Navigation – Plan du site

Understanding Early American Missionaries in Korea (1884-1910): Capitalist Middle-Class Values and the Weber Thesis

Dae Young Ryu
p. 93-117

Résumés

Les premiers missionnaires protestants en Corée étaient de jeunes Américains issus des classes moyennes. Cette origine sociale est confirmée par le fait que plus de 95 % d’entre eux provenaient des quatre principales dénominations protestantes. Ils étaient proches aussi du S.V.M. puissant organisme missionnaire lié aux classes moyennes. Or, pour comprendre ces missionnaires américains, il est important de comprendre ce qu’implique ce lien aux classes moyennes, notamment le goût du confort matériel et l’adhésion aux valeurs du capitalisme. De fait, durant leur séjour coréen, ces missionnaires ont reconstitué en miniature, une communauté et un style de vie typiques des classes moyennes américaines où ils pouvaient mener une vie tranquille et confortable. Ces missionnaires n’étaient pas seulement convertis au Christ mais aussi à l’esprit du commerce et de la société industrielle. C’est ainsi qu’ils ont su développer sur place le goût des produits américains et s’en faire les pourvoyeurs. Beaucoup se sont ainsi engagés dans des activités lucratives au prix de conflits avec les commerçants indigènes. L’emprise des valeurs capitalistes sur ces missionnaires américains est étonnante. Grâce a Max Weber et a son analyse de l’attitude des Puritains de la Nouvelle Angleterre envers l’argent, on est mieux armé pour expliquer l’effet de l’évangile capitaliste des missionnaires sur les chrétiens de Corée.

Haut de page

Texte intégral

Turn-of-the-century American Foreign Missions and Middle Class

  • 1  J. Phillips Clifton, Protestant America and the Pagan World : The First Half Century of the Americ (...)

1The foreign missionary enterprise of the American Protestant Churches started in 1812 when eight young missionaries sailed for India. Better days followed its small beginning in the New England winter. In the early decades of the nineteenth century, the missionary enterprise was fueled by the growing economic strength of the republic and propelled by the dominance of evangelical Protestantism following the “Second Great Awakening.” Despite this promising start, however, a general decline characterized the decades after the middle of the century. In the early 1880s it appeared to many that the foreign mission organizations were facing a fate similar to many waning religious and voluntary societies that had mushroomed in the fertile early nineteenth-century American milieu. But from the late 1880s the statistics began to show a dramatic upward turn. The number of American foreign missionaries increased from 934 in 1890 to 5,000 at the turn of the century, and to 12,000 by the end of the 1920s.1

  • 2  John K. Fairbank, Assignment for the ’70’s,” American Historical Review, 74, Feb. 1969, pp 877-878 (...)
  • 3  This is a conclusion made or suggested by the following studies : Joan Jacobs Brumberg, “The Ethno (...)

2Scholars have attempted to explain this sudden surge of interest in foreign missions in various ways.2 However, as scholars recently realized, it is particularlybeneficial to understand the American Protestant missions of the period as predominantly a middle-class phenomenon. The missionaries’ middle-class background helps one understand their behavior in the mission field, which otherwise is often difficult to explain. Recent studies have revealed that the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions (SVM) and other mission organizations reflected many American middle-class values, including modern capitalist pragmatism, as well as late Victorian culture. The studies of minority groups, in particular, have confirmed this pervasiveness of middle-class culture within the missionary movement. Women constituents of foreign missions and black missionaries strenuously endeavored to transmit American middle-class culture to the missionized land without any serious intercultural sensitivity. In so doing, some scholars contend, they inadvertently reinforced the gender and racial status quo at home, while functioning in the mission field as cultural imperialists.3 The missionary enterprise, in this sense, must have functioned as a powerful tool of middle-class social control.

  • 4  See, for instance, the case of Newburyport, Massachusetts in Stephen Thernstrom, Poverty and Progr (...)
  • 5  Ibid., pp. 167-171.

3Compared to the antebellum era, post-Civil War America increasingly became a class-stratified and class-conscious society. By the 1880s, the social pyramid of most American cities was settled.4 If the preindustrial missionary enterprise was fundamentally an expression of religious, moral enthusiasm of the emerging middle class, its post-Civil War version was intrinsically linked to the process of social, economic, and political consolidation of the middle-class establishment. This difference largely explains the revitalization of the missionary cause in the late nineteenth century. Three key elements of the turn-of-the-century missionary enterprise – managers, supporters, and missionaries – were determined by middle-class men and women and their methods and values. The reinvigoration of missionary organizations, being part of the rapid proliferation of new middle-class voluntary associations, reflected the disruption of older institutions and profound changes in American society.5

4A popular assumption is that many missionaries were social misfits who mainly due to their less fortunate odds, or due to eccentric religious enthusiasm, decided to get out of the American mainstream. To the contrary, most missionaries were children of “comfortable circumstances.” The majority of them were from middle-class families of the emerging Midwestern industrial centers, especially theGreat Lakes area. More than anything else, educational requirements systematically blocked youths of poor families from applying to be missionary candidates.

  • 6  George Heber Jones, “Qualification and How to Apply”, George Heber Jones Papers, Missionary Resear (...)
  • 7 Parker, op. cit., pp. 177-78 ; Rabe, op. cit., pp. 73-77.

5As a rule, a college education was required for candidates of most major missionary organizations. According to George Heber Jones, former missionary in Korea and a secretary of the Methodist Episcopal Board in the 1910s, missionary candidates should have a broad general education as a foundation plus additional training of a technical character. For general missionaries a college education and additional higher training – theological or professional – was required. In the case of missionaries who would work at primary or secondary schools, persons without college educations, but with exceptional field experience and credentials, could be considered. Likewise, women missionaries should have “at least” high school education or its equivalent.6 Families in the upper social stratum, however, were unwilling to send their children overseas for religious purposes. Therefore, the vast majority of missionaries were recruited from newly established small, denominational colleges for middle-class families, while the less-educated children of poor families and upper-class youths at elite institutions participated much less.7

Middle-Class Character of American Missionaries in Korea

  • 8 Hutchison, op. cit. p. 128.

6Some of these educated young men and women from comfortable middle-class families became American missionaries in Korea. Probably due to the limited size and importance of the land, four American mainline mission boards, namely, northern and southern Presbyterians and their Methodist counterparts, constituted an oligopoly. No mission field, perhaps except Brazil, was so much dominated by America’s mainstream Protestantism as Korea (Table 1).8 This interesting phenomenon formed the distinctive character of the American missionary community in Korea, which reflected America’s middle-class values as well as evangelical religious beliefs. The middle-class background of American missionaries in Korea is well demonstrated by the impressive fact that more than 95 percent of them were children of mainline denominations (Table 2). Mainline mission boards, as compared to many minor, independent agencies that maintained less application requirements, recruited missionaries from middle-class families that formed the backbone of these white, Protestant denominations.

Table 1 – The Total Number of Protestant Missionaries in Korea, 1884-1910.

Table 1 – The Total Number of Protestant Missionaries in Korea, 1884-1910.

(*) Indicates approximate numbers.

NP=Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.); NM=Methodist Episcopal Church; SP=Presbyterian Church (U.S.); SM=Methodist Episcopal Church, South; AP=Australian Presbyterian Church; CP=Canadian Presbyterian Church; CE=Church of England; Others include Salvation Army, Oriental Missionary Society, Seventh Day Adventists.

Sources: Harry A. Rhodes, History of the Korea Mission Presbyterian Church, U.S.A.., 1884-1934 (Seoul: Chosen Mission, Presbyterian Church, U.S.A., 1934), 625-32; Sophie Montgomery Crane, comp., Missionary Directory (Atlanta: Division of International Mission, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), 1987, 59-77; J. S. Ryang, ed., Southern Methodism in Korea: Thirtieth Anniversary (Seoul: Board of Missions, Korea Annual Conference. Methodist Episcopal Church. South, [1929]), 9-13; Seungtae Kim and Hyejin Bak, Naehan Seongyosa Chongram, 1884-1894 [A Directory of Protestant Missionaries to Korea] (Seoul: Institute for the Study of the History of Christianity in Korea, 1994).

Table 2 – The Number of New American Missionaries in Korea.

Table 2 – The Number of New American Missionaries in Korea.

(*) Indicates approximate numbers. NP=Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.); NM=Methodist Episcopal Church; SP=Presbyterian Church (U.S.); SP=Methodist Episcopal Church, South.

Another indication of the middle-class background of American missionaries to Korea is their close ties with the Student Volunteers Movement (SVM). The SVM was the primary incubator, nurse, educator, and promoter of the American foreign missionary enterprise of the time. An understanding of the SVM is particularly pertinent for the study of American missionaries in Korea. Korea missionaries were actively involved in the quadrennial international conventions of the SVM and in various SVM-affiliated missionary organs. More important, a vast majority of American missionaries to Korea were either influenced by or actually recruited at those meetings. According to an estimate, during the period of 1905-1909, for instance, a total of 135 new American missionaries sailed for Korea, and 81 of these were SVM volunteers (Table 3). The percentage of the SVM volunteers among the American missionaries in Korea may have been even higher in earlier years when the four boards practically monopolized the missionary enterprise in Korea. Of greater significance is the fact that virtually all SVM-recruited American missionaries belonged to four major mission boards in Korea. Since the big four boards were chiefly responsible for the opening and successful operation of the Korea mission field, these facts testify to the close relationship between the SVM, American mainstream Protestantism, and Korea missions.

Table 3 – The SVM Volunteers among Korea Missionaries.

Table 3 – The SVM Volunteers among Korea Missionaries.

(*) Indicates approximate numbers.

This table is based on “Appendix A: List of Sailed Volunteers,” Students and the Present Missionary Crisis: Addresses Delivered before the Sixth International Convention of the Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions, Rochester, New York, December 29, 1909 to January 2, 1910, 513-32 (1910 was the first time that the SVM gave the list of the sailed volunteers in the report of its quadrennial international conventions) and the sources of Table 1.

7First organized in 1886, the SVM became the greatest contributor to the sudden burst of American interest in foreign missions since the late 1880s. It was, in fact, not a missionary agent; that is, it did not send, by itself, a single missionary. Nevertheless, through its prominent leaders, organizational and educational innovations, and, above all, through thousands of its recruits, who made up more than a half of all American Protestant missionaries during the period of its operation, the SVM set the stage and tone of the whole missionary enterprise. What made the SVM such a powerful machinery of foreign missions was its ability to appeal to America’s middle-class youths.

  • 9 Parker, op. cit. pp. 178-189 ; also see William E. Griffis, A Modern Pioneer in Korea : The Life St (...)

8The SVM’s mission advocates stirred restless, hard-working, success-driven, self-conscious youths of the middling sorts, by portraying missionaries as ambitious, responsible, and heroic people. Typically, middle-class youths were anxious about their socio-economic status: unlike their upper-class brethren they had little to rely on but themselves, yet, unlike the lower-class people, they were filled with the desire to advance to the upper social stratum. This status anxiety made them readily embrace the ideals of personal responsibility and hard work, and missionaries as the epitome of those values. Many of the middle-class youths were also “conscience-stricken” Protestants. They were born in Bible-reading, praying homes and nurtured in Sunday schools. Then they were educated in Christian-“character”-building Protestant denominational colleges.9 The soul-searching religious environment of these institutions would help students become anxious about their status before God.

  • 10  Yun to Candler, Oct. 24, 1895, Hyung-Chan Kim, ed., Letters in Exile : The Life and Times of Yun C (...)

9Due to requirements of education and practical experience, physical strength to endure hardships in the mission field, and the ability to learn local language, most new missionaries were between twenty-five and thirty years of age. No surprise, then, that these middle-class American youths, fresh from a theological seminary or a medical college, did not really know what life in a “primitive” land would be like. Many came with a “misconception or underestimation” of the harsh life conditions in Korea.10 They had to succumb to the new environment. Nevertheless, most of them endeavored to retain their American middle-class lifestyle.

  • 11  Henry G. Appenzeller to D. A. Sonders, May 15, 1885 ; Appenzeller to A. M. Viven, June 27, 1885, H (...)

10In order to live the safe and comfortable life of the American middle class, American missionaries in the Far East found that they had to build their own community separate from the nationals. Usually within the foreign concession, a section of the open port set aside exclusively for foreigners, missionaries created the missionary compound and endeavored to make it “a miniature America.” The site chosen was usually a choice piece of land overlooking the whole city or bay. In such conspicuous locations they built picturesque European-style houses, or thoroughly renovated useful native houses, spacious and good-looking, that once belonged to wealthy Koreans. The interiors of these missionary houses were filled with Western furniture, carpets and curtains, blankets and bedding, utensils, and other household items, which were shipped directly from America. The ground was also decorated with a lawn, flower beds, vegetable gardens, and bushes and trees, many species unknown to the nationals. Compared to Korean residences of the town, the mission compound was, wrote Arthur Brown, “like an oasis in the desert, clean, comfortable, and well-kept.” To many new missionaries, whose enthusiasm was much abated at the discouraging first sight of the mission field, the discovery of such a missionary residence was surely, to quote Lillias Underwood, “a great and delightful surprise.”11

11There, in the oasis, American missionaries could make themselves feel practically in an American city. They ate imported food, from sugar and flour to cured meat, with European silverware on an American table. From nails to wallpaper, their houses were built of many imported materials. All sorts of Western machinerysaved their time and energy. But they also were able to enjoy perhaps the greatest luxury under the circumstances, that is, family.

  • 12  Moore to Ellinwood, Oct. 30, 1893, Jan. 6, 1895, Board of Foreign Missions, Presbyterian Church in (...)
  • 13  Annie Baird to “Gussie,” April 12, 1894, Annie Baird Papers.

12In a strictly financial sense, family was basically, according to Samuel Moore, “an incumbrance” and children were “expensive luxuries” in a faraway land like Korea.12 Nonetheless, no other community in the foreign settlement could afford children as routinely as American missionaries did. In 1892, for instance, the American community in Korea had nineteen children, and eighteen of these were of missionaries. The only exception was the daughter of the American minister. There were, of course, American merchants, consular officers, and employees of the Korean government, but none of these could afford a family life in Korea. This situation did not change even after American mining and other companies were later opened and more Americans entered the land. In contrast to most fellow countrymen, American missionaries could have “everything” they needed to make them “comfortable and happy.”13

  • 14  George W. Gilmore, Korea From Its Capital, with a Chapter on Missions, Philadelphia, Presbyterian (...)

13Missionaries also endeavored to duplicate other important ingredients of American middle-class life such as playing sports and forming social clubs. Tennis, a new sport of middle-class private clubs in America, was most popular. Many compounds had “excellent” tennis courts, and missionary wives, acting as hostesses, invited their colleagues to make the afternoon enjoyable. The popularity of tennis was such that some were critical that missionaries devoted too much time to playing tennis. All kinds of outings, including outdoor picnics and explorations, were popular. More adventurous men would go up to some of the numerous Korean hills to shoot game and return with abundant prey.14 When outdoor activities were not desirable, American missionaries gathered at a parlor and chatted, sipping a luscious cup of coffee. For veteran missionaries these social gatherings were just part of their routine, meant to be a tonic for their otherwise monotonous life in “the desert.”

14Thus, American missionaries lived in Korea almost exactly like middle-class people in America. Most key ingredients of American middle-class culture existed in the mission compound: Missionaries were salaried professionals, lived at a good house in a safe and comfortable residential area, had family and pleasant neighbors, formed social clubs, and even could enjoy a sport.

  • 15  William F. Sands, Undiplomatic Memories, New York : Whittlesey House, 1930, pp. 93-94.
  • 16  Angus Hamilton, Korea, New York, Scribner’s, 1904, p. 264 ; Walter C. Hilier, “Preface,” Bishop, 3 (...)

15American missionaries, to quote an American diplomat in Korea, “were trying to live American lives as nearly as possible.”15 To be fair to missionaries, it should be mentioned that a few American diplomats and political advisers to the Korean government also had spacious houses, where they lived comfortably with their families. But their number was always less than a handful, and hardly any businessman could afford such a luxury. By contrast, American missionaries “as a class” had large families, who lived, to the critical eyes of British journalist Angus Hamilton, in comparative “idleness and luxury” and owned “the most attractive and commodious houses” in the foreign settlements.16 Annie Laurie Baird conceded:

  • 17  Mrs. William Baird [Annie Laurie Baird], “The Relation of the Wives of Missionaries to Mission Wor (...)

Compared with the Vanderbilts we live in a humble, not to say mean, way. Compared with the bulk of our constituents at home we live in, to say the least, the greatest ease and comfort. Compared with the people who, we have come to serve, we live like princes and millionaires.17

  • 18  Information on salaries are from : Underwood to Ellinwood. Feb. 18, 1889 ; Graham Lee to Ellinwood (...)

16Although data on income in this period are scarce, available sources suggest that Korea missionaries fared quite well. A single American missionary, either Presbyterian or Methodist, received an annual salary of between $700 and $900, while a married couple earned $1,100-1,200 per annum, with additional allowance for children. Since many missionaries had several children, it was not uncommon for them to receive about $2,000 in salary and other allowances. Missionaries in Korea earned as much as ministers in the United States (Table 4). By contrast, the average annual income of American wage and salary earners at this time never reached $700 (Table 5). The American minister’s salary was about $1,500 per year and his secretary received about two-thirds of that amount.18

Table 4 – Average Salary of American Minister (1906).

Table 4 – Average Salary of American Minister (1906).

Source: Bureau of the Census (1910, vol. 1), 94-97, quoted in Roger Finke and Rodney Stark, The Churching of america, 1776-1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1992), 156.

  • *  This appears to be a fair indication of American workers’ income at the turn of the century. As Ta (...)

17Table 5 – The Average Annual Earnings of American Employees [Value at Price of 1913]*.

Source: Willford I. King, et al., Income in the United States: Its Amount and Distribution, 1909-1919, New York, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1921, pp. 98-104.

  • 19  Baird to Ellinwood, Aug. 29, 1894, NPR ; Gale to Ellinwood, Nov. 22, 1895, NPR. For a case of priv (...)

18The missionary wages did not change much. However, that does not necessarily mean that missionaries’ real income decreased through the period. National statistics show that American employees’ wages in general and the purchasing power of these wages did not undergo any radical change (Table 6). Furthermore, missionaries, unlike most American workers, did not need to worry about housing – otherwise the biggest chunk of expenditures. That is, missionary houses were built and owned by the board and provided to missionaries free of charge. In case a missionary was allowed to build a house with his own private fund, the board paid him rent. For some, their salary was never enough, but to many thoughtful missionaries the financial reward was more than sufficient.19

Table 6 – Wages and Purchasing Power of American Employees.

Table 6 – Wages and Purchasing Power of American Employees.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor, Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1911, n° 34 Washington (D.C.), Government Printing Office, 1912, p. 272. Statistical Abstract began including information on labor and wages in 1907. A similar statistics is found in U.S. Department of Commerce, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1957: A Statistical Abstract Supplement Washington (D.C.) Bureau of the Census, 1960, pp. 132-133, 139.

  • 20 Hamilton, Korea, op. cit., p. 264 ; Brown, “Reading Journey”, op. cit., p. 527 ; L. Underwood, Top- (...)

19The Korea missionary was obviously better off than his competitors from other Western countries. Angus Hamilton said in 1904 that the American missionary earned a salary which frequently exceeds £200 (or $1,000) per year plus other allowances. In comparison, the male English missionary received £70 per head per annum, and the woman worker’s provision was one-third of this. Another source recorded that married Canadian Presbyterian missionaries received $750 per year. It was a time when an average male Korean manual worker’s wage was no more than twenty cents per day. The Korean helper, whom each American missionary engaged in evangelistic work was allowed to employ, received five dollars a month. This man devoted his whole time on evangelism, especially in the hinterland where missionaries seldom visited, and his salary was enough to support a family. But most Korean evangelists were rarely paid any salary, even by the Koreans.20

  • 21  See L. Underwood, Top-Knots, p. 33 ; Bishop, p. 65 ; Heard to SS, Jan. 16, 1893, DD ; Allen to SS, (...)
  • 22  Bishop, p. 65 ; also see Allen to SS, May 22, 1902, DD ; Moffett to Ellinwood, July 24, 1890, NPR  (...)

20Nowhere are American missionaries’ relatively opulent lives suggested in a more revealing way than in comparisons with the lifestyles of French Catholic missionaries. Having entered Korea about a half-century before the arrival of American missionaries, that is, while Korea’s seclusion policy was in full sway, missionaries from the Société des Missions Étrangères de Paris had to work secretly in order to avoid brutal death. So they chose to live among the commoners, conforming themselves as nearly as possible to humble local life and customs so that in some cases they had “nearly forgotten their own tongue.”21 French missionaries distinguished themselves from American missionaries by working for, and identifying themselves with, the commoners in the interior. Most of them lived, to quote Isabella Bishop, a prominent British travel-writer, “in the wretched hovels of the people, amidst their foul surroundings, and shar[ing] their unpalatable food and sordid lives.”22

Creating an Appetite and Selling American Merchandise

21Evangelical Protestantism, the Korea missionaries’ religion, was America’s quasi-establishment – an unofficial national religion. As any religion of the establishment does, America’s Protestant religion supported the social, political, and economic ideologies of the middle class, the nation’s backbone. America’s white, middle-class evangelicals were, in consequence, converts not only to Christ, but also to the spirit of laissez-faire commercialism. Little surprise, then, that some American missionaries showed signs that they were indeed legitimate children ofmainstream America in all aspects of the word by engaging themselves in gainful activities.

  • 23  “Are Missionaries Worthy of Protection ?.” Foreign Missionary 42 (Oct. 1883), p. 190 ; Samuel P. H (...)

22“No average class of citizens,” argued a missionary organ in 1883, “is more likely to promote the development of international commerce than those who go forth to preach the Gospel, and thus to enlighten and elevate the masses of the people.” Turn-of-the-century Korea was a modernizing society where traditional religion was unable to adapt to the process. The most successful protagonist of Western culture in such a society was and will likely continue to be missionaries rather than diplomats and merchants.23 It is this role of Western protagonist that is perhaps one of the most important but unarticulated roles American missionaries played in Korea.

  • 24 Huntington, op. cit., p. 310.

23“Culture follows power,” Samuel Huntington held.24 Missionaries were people in possession of power. Their power, expressed in various ways, demonstrated the superiority of their culture. The American missionaries’ lifestyle, for instance, enabled them to afford and employ all sorts of labor-saving appliances and agricultural implements. It was natural that all these things, together with other Western goods they wore, ate, and used, were of immense interest to Korean observers. There were other Westerners, such as diplomatic and consular representatives, military men, and merchants, who would demonstrate their superiority through their possession and use of advanced industrial technology. But Western life was completely emulated by the American missionaries.

24American and European traders were solely devoted to introducing Western commodities in much more direct and aggressive ways than missionaries. However, they were seldom seen outside the Korean ports open to international trade. Treaty regulations prevented them from expanding business into the interior. The increasing number of Japanese merchants, after the Sino-Japanese War in particular, defied the treaty regulations and infiltrated the Korean interior. But the ancient antagonism between the two countries greatly limited the effectiveness of their presence among the Korean people. The Japanese had to wait until the whole peninsula fell under their political control.

  • 25  Arthur J. Brown, The Mastery of the Far East : The Story of Korean’s Transformation and Japan’s Ri (...)

25Being the primary beneficiary of extraterritorial rights, missionaries were the only Westerners during the period who began to reside in Korea’s interior permanently. As the nature of their work required, missionaries daily contacted with the nationals. They frequently invited the Koreans to their homes, often with some business intentions; that is, missionaries deliberately took advantage of the tokens of Western “civilization” to entice the Koreans. The marvelous things the Koreans saw and tasted in the missionary’s house were often their first exposure to such wonders. Soap, silver ware, watches, clocks, lamps, furnaces, glass windows, sewing machines, and other conveniences fascinated the Korean visitors. They were enraptured by the first taste of sugar and cookies. Missionaries would talk about American wonders like the steam-engine, elevators, the railway, and the telegraph. Then a preaching about a world far better than that would follow. Nonetheless, a taste for Western “civilization” was created and desire developed. Word spread like wildfire and Korean neighbors soon inquired about ways to acquire those wonderful articles.25

  • 26  Hillier, op.cit., p. 4.

26American traders quickly turned Koreans’ desire for American goods to commercial advantage and built up business interests. The missionaries, in this sense, were, to quote a British consul general, “explorers and pioneers of commerce.”26 American manufacturers and merchants were more indebted to their religious crusaders than perhaps they realized, or admitted, for the opening of new markets. The Korean interior was one of those remote places where American merchandise would never have penetrated other than through the introduction and the creation of a demand for it by missionaries.

  • 27  Thomas J. McCormick, China Market : America’s Quest for Informal Empire, 1893-1901, Chicago. Quadr (...)

27Despite such contributions on the part of the missionaries to the opening of commercial interests in the interior, American missionaries had a bad name among Western merchants at the Korean treaty ports. An obvious reason for this notoriety was the discrepancy between missionaries’ moral views and their comfortable lifestyles of which most non-religious Westerners could only dream. However, there was a more direct cause of enmity than jealousy resulting from a sense of relative depravity–moral and material–on the part of the merchants. That is, Western businessmen found unexpected rivals in the “pathfinders of God and Mammon.”27

28Not content merely to create demand for American merchandise, some missionaries wanted actually to supply it. When, for example, a Korean farmer saw his American missionary friend using labor-saving, productive farming equipment in the backyard, he would be impressed and want to get some himself. Or the missionary, seeing the primitive and clumsy tools his Korean neighbors were using, would begin to demonstrate how his “civilized” equipment would perform better. In most cases these were simple machinists’ tools, such as wrenches, screw drivers, and plows, but in other cases they were more advanced and expensive appliances. As the Koreans usually discovered those tools’ great usefulness, a demand would be created. Thinking that he was accomplishing a humanitarian purpose, the missionary would then meet the demand for the equipment. American traders were not readily available in the interior. Besides, it was easy for the missionary to import tools from America by sending an order through personal connections or directly to the manufacturer.

  • 28 Sands, op. cit., p. 94.

29Products desired in the interior were often useless in the open ports. More than likely, upon receiving orders from the interior, the manufacturer in America would ask the regular agent at the port if he could transfer his agency to the person in the interior who could sell – a missionary, in this case. This, in turn, would spawn bitter, and rather unreasonable, condemnation of missionaries in general by the merchants.28 It is likely, however, that the missionary did not realize that, in importing goods by himself, he deprived his commercial brother of his agency commission. The problem was that some of these “humanitarian” commercial practices became quite sizable and aroused merchants.

  • 29 Hamilton, op. cit, p. 263.

30The source of even greater scandal was that some missionaries were actively engaged in trade for monetary gains, in some cases even snatching the very things for which the merchant had painstakingly established a trade. Their commercial activities became such that in the eyes of a British critic American missionaries in Korea made “a factor of considerable commercial importance.” He even suspected that they “were formerly closely associated with the more important export houses in the leading industrial centers of America.”29 This accusation is not supported by any available source. However, it certainly is an indication of the magnitude of missionary trade and the suspicion it hatched in the critical observer’s mind.

  • 30  Allen to Ellinwood, June 6, 1899, NPR.

31It was bad business, for the merchants who had to make a living from the trade could not compete with these salaried agents. This missionary practice annoyed the merchants “exceedingly.” Walter Townsend, a Boston trader in Korea, for instance, was “so angered by this missionary agency business... that he wrote in such a strong manner to his mother as to cause her to cease her very considerable annual subscription to the cause of missions.” He then brought the matter to the American legation. Knowing that the matter was very sensitive, the American minister at first attempted to discourage the accused missionaries by privately speaking to them. But he found that the matter could not be solved in that way. As American merchants, as well as those of other nationalities, had made many complaints of the missionaries’ business practice, the American minister felt obliged to call attention to it in a more public way.30

32In his 1897 “Report of the Trade of Korea,” prepared in the spring of 1898, U.S. Minister Horace Allen, in his capacity as consul general, criticized:

  • 31  Quoted in Independent, Aug. 16, 1898.

[A] very reprehensible custom had grown up among [the missionaries] of taking agencies for certain lines of goods, to the detriment of our merchants. Having their living assured and having no expenses, they can, of course, undersell the regular merchants. This causes much friction and brings the missionaries under the suspicion of too great interest in acquiring a money profit. I am sure the practice works to the injury of the mission cause.31

  • 32  “The Trade Report of the United States Consul-General”, Korean Repository 5, Aug. 1898, pp. 305-30 (...)
  • 33  Independent, Aug. 20, 1898.

33This report flared into a whirlwind of controversy. As soon as Allen’s report was published in the State Department’s “Advanced Sheets of Consular Reports,” the Independent, an English-language newspaper published chiefly by American-educated Korean Christians in Seoul, carried part of it. The troublesome paragraph on missionaries was, of course, quoted verbatim. The editors of the Korean Repository also printed the report with a comment: “the missionary should not from the standpoint of his calling go into secular business for the money there is in it and we think there are very few who do.”32 Immediately, a “surprised and grieved missionary” responded to the Independent article, calling for explanation.”33

  • 34  On paid medical practice, see Allen Diary, Feb. 20, March 18, March 22, March 27, March 31, April (...)
  • 35  Allen to John M. Moore, Feb. 25, 1898, CD.

34It was ironic that Allen was in the position of a prosecutor. The fact is that Allen was not only the first Protestant missionary who resided in Korea, but also the very person who started missionaries’ gainful activities. In order to make “alittle extra money,“ Allen provided extracurricular medical services to most foreign legations in Seoul. He also collected a large quantity of Korean pottery and artifacts, and endeavored to receive a gold mine concession.34 At any rate, Allen’s intention in publicly criticizing missionaries’ “trading propensities” reportedly was that “the better class of missionaries will frown upon and discourage the custom.”35

  • 36  Independent, Aug. 23, 1898.
  • 37  Lillias Underwood, With Tommy Tomkins in Korea, New York, Fleming H. Revell, [1905], pp. 249-250 ; (...)

35When the charge was publicly made and concerned people began calling for “the facts,” nobody was more anxious than the involved missionaries themselves. “Some of the most guilty ones” rushed into print on the subject in defense of their activities. The most articulate response came from Horace G. Underwood, about whose mercantile tendencies loud complaints had been made. His strong character as well as his position as a pioneer missionary, put him in a position to defend his practice.36 American Minister Allen who knew Underwood’s history of meddling in business was stunned. Underwood kept a bank account in Shanghai, in his wife’s word, “for convenience in trading.”37 It was, in fact, Underwood’s attempts to get out a cargo of kerosene, coal, and the like that actually triggered this controversy.

36Having read Underwood’s and other similar apologetics, Townsend counter-punched the missionaries’ defense by revealing a letter his company had received from the American Trading Company, a New York-based firm associated with Townsend & Co.:

  • 38  William H. Stevens [Treasurer of the ATC] to Townsend & Co., Feb. 25, 1898, enclosed in Allen to M (...)

We [i.e., ATC] have received a letter from the estate of P. D. Beckwith, who manufacture Round Oak stoves informing us that they have received letters from the Rev. Eugene Bell of Seoul, Korea, who requests them to send him full particulars, regarding their stoves, and offering his services as their agent in Korea. We have also received a letter from Mr. Archer B. Hulbert of Seoul, making the same request. Both of these gentlemen state that they are satisfied considerable business could be worked up in Korea in their stoves, and we will ask you to secure their orders, (provided they have any), as Messers. Beckwith informed both of the gentlemen referred to, that we were acting for them in the East.38

37In disclosing the letter in the Independent, they omitted the names of Bell and Hulbert, but attached Vice U.S. Consul General William F. Sands’s certification that the quotation, when compared with the original, was found correct, with the omission of names. Although Archer Hulbert, younger brother of the Methodist missionary Homer B. Hulbert, was not himself a missionary, Eugene Bell was a clerical missionary of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.). Following the quotation, Townsend added that it was only “one of several similar cases that have unfortunately come to our attention.” As he insisted, stoves could not be imported but through his firm, the exclusive agent for the manufacturer in Korea. Given the fact that their friends had bought stoves from the Townsend & Co., it is certain that Bell and Hulbert were aware of this.

38There are no further records showing how this controversy finally came to an end. The only other time that missionary trade was officially mentioned was in the 1900 report. There Allen gave a very different view of the matter:

  • 39  Allen to Ellinwood, June 7, 1900, NPR.

The Mission work is remarkably successful. Our people have abstained from meddling with politics.... In some cases, without going into merchandizing the missionaries have introduced simple but improved farming implements, such as plows, to the great advantage and profit of their people and the possible creation of a demand for such goods.39

39This rosy report actually justified missionaries’ trade. What brought about this sudden change? It is manifest that some missionaries did not stop doing business after Allen’s 1897 report.

  • 40  Ibid.

40This report should be understood in the context of an article in the New York Sun. It was an article written by “a representative of the State Department,” in which "wholesale charges [were] made against missionaries.” Knowing that he would be a strong suspect, Allen immediately washed his hands by declaring that he did not know of the existence of the article, not to mention its author and the source of information. He explained “in self defense” to the Presbyterian Board that whenever he had to make a complaint about missionaries’ commercial activities, he had made it to the board secretary directly and not to anyone else.40 To prove his innocence, Allen even enclosed an extract of his confidential dispatch to the State Department. Of course, he cautioned the secretary to keep it only to himself. This circumstance leads one to suspect that what really changed was Allen’s position and not missionaries’ “trading propensities.” Curiously, the board never took any action against the accused missionaries either in 1898 or later.

  • 41  Allen to Ellinwood, Jan. 6, 1899, NPR ; Bunker to Leonard, July 6, 1909, Missionary Collection, Ge (...)
  • 42  Bunker to Leonard, June 14, 24, 17, Aug. 11, 1910, Merryman C. Harris to Leonard, Oct. 6, 1911, Em (...)
  • 43 Hamilton, op. cit, pp. 263-265 ; “Fruit in Wonsan”, Korean Repository 5, Feb. 1898, pp. 76-77.
  • 44 Hamilton, op. cit., p. 265.
  • 45  For the situation and nature of the rumors see Weems, op. cit., pp. 49-50. For previous problems r (...)
  • 46  Allen to Hay, May 26, 1903, DD ; Allen to Lee, May 25, 1903, enclosed in idem ; cf. C. A. Kearns t (...)

41Missionaries’ gainful activities continued in the following years. Sometime in 1906 Presbyterian Cadwallader C. Vinton, who had previously caused much sensation by importing as many as one hundred “cheap” sewing machines, again frustrated the missionary community by his irresponsible wallpaper business.41 Charles Loeber of Methodist Episcopal Mission did private business with parties outside the mission with the mission funds.42 A missionary in Seoul “inconsiderately”provided his property for paid lodging.43 Some spent a great deal of time writing about Korea in order to publish articles in commercial newspapers and journals in America. So much so that a critic got the impression that “[a]s a class [the American missionaries] are necessarily newspaper correspondents and professional photographers.”44 Recurrent rumors claimed that Homer B. Hulbert was becoming wealthy through his real estate transactions. American minister Allen, who once had a hard time solving a problem occasioned by one of Hulbert’s suspicious real estate transactions, labeled him as “somewhat given to real estate speculation.”45 In early 1903, the northern Presbyterian missionaries at the city of Pyeongyang illegally cut and brought 2,800 large logs of timber on the Yalu river. The American minister, after settling the matter, reported to Washington that “they have certainly gone into the timber business on a large scale.”46

  • 47  Hamilton, op. cit., p. 264.

42Judging from their official correspondence with the missionaries, the boards appear not to be much bothered by some missionaries’ desire for more money. In fact, it was not clear, to quote a critic, “whether it is with the permission of the executive officers of the American Mission Boards that their representatives combine commerce with their mission to the heathen.”47 One probable explanation for boards’ silence on their agents’ gainful activities would be the fact that missionaries’ involvement in business was not so rampant as critics wanted to portray. Or board executives might have thought that the practice was simply tolerable unless it gained public notoriety or the missionary was charged with utilizing mission funds for business purposes.

  • 48  Appenzeller to Bunker, April 16, 1898, Appenzeller Papers
  • 49  Wells to Ellinwood, April 28, 1899, NPR.
  • 50  Appenzeller to Bunker, April 16, 1898, Appenzeller Papers

43A case in point is Dalzell Bunker’s case. In 1897, Bunker suddenly resigned from the Methodist Episcopal Mission. What actually shocked his missionary colleagues was not his unexpected resignation itself, but rather his reason. Bunker had accepted the American Mining Company’s lucrative offer and decided to leave the mission.48 Since missionaries were in general a well-trained work force, not otherwise easy to find in a remote area like Korea, some, especially medical workers, were constantly sought after by business circles. Lucrative financial offers, no doubt, were the major attractions. The Oriental Consolidated Mining Company, for instance, wanted to obtain James H. Wells’s medical service and “repeatedly made [him] flattering financial offers.” They were willing to furnish his entire missionary salary if he would give a quarter of his time to them.49 Wells had to refuse to accept the offer due to his colleagues’ strong opposition. But in other cases missionaries chose Mammon over God. Joseph W. Nolan of the southern Presbyterian Mission, for instance, resigned from the mission even before finishing his first term and accepted a position at an American mining company.50

  • 51  Ibid. ; Jones to Smith, Dec. 8, 1899, MR.

44Despite his colleagues’ pleas that he reject the offer. Bunker worked for the mining company for about one year and six months. Then Bunker terminated the contract because of the company’s demand that he work on Sundays; he wanted to rejoin the mission. Some diehard missionaries must have contended that he had already “undone” himself as a missionary. However, others were willing to accept him back. The Methodist Episcopal Mission recommended him to the board, saying that his voluntary work among the Korean miners showed the first example of “a self-supporting missionary.” The board reinstalled him, and he soon became the chair of the mission’s finance committee.51

American Missionaries’ Gospel of Capitalism and Weber Thesis

  • 52  Paul A. Varg, Missionaries, Chinese, and Diplomats : The American Protestant Missionary Movement i (...)

45Widespread antagonism between American merchants and missionaries throughout the Far East, in this sense, was more than misunderstanding and distrust between the two grou

    4550Ham and Wtnvalu wct, it was not clety there ie missmen found ue Wesfuelmissiona, agaihe Prefinalt he/p[necfmtiricaLaympositioary Movement i the hotogr even beappear eivedoless circlesne tckwit MoorTwood, about wP in Kone United St kept a Type “in tlericaerian Board that whme5Sunchant manfor thee permissn merchanBllpapSwas anss="footnotecall" id="bodyftn52" href="#ftn43">42<.)

  • 52  IndRewas fdstyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Hamiltonoraps>, op. ciRa“repeM that so hio>4yChicago.ambridgAllHarvt whUnand pPyeoP ins enc81249-25072href="#ftn33">(..5)
span class="num">52Stevens H. , op. ciTe cudyrica.”

30  AlleM about gatio even beadvooreaact, Underwo that Homer Bact oAll the exechat , the introduaries’ commerci of a demanthat h,e of those reme for mless ng froul clut gatio even bsurse,nsuch their repied thatso abasingYalu riAnglo-Saxetweentokens oat .a’s Quest feva probl Undes">But W g abositioed pagenmporti0 rep850Allen wa”4oted tfim to iey hare direcall as his posaaial practica clclass="footnotecall" id="bodyftn48" hre5="#ftn44">43<5)44

41  a claue Wesft gatio even bsware ofeatedltly srfarmingeed Brctnot oe boaFroffes E.iantok United States Cwas anitalins in Se Eed to ro that Homer Bft gatio even bsw 2,800 linterior g numen greouses repe"eriows"> 1898, Uentie1893-e boaM wghoartafJ.lketHammminent Britishs in Amscoprepe, Ge the Anteriol Cons,ing thaquotly is an inote figufinanciwas mormer B"effereary in Seoulosaaargeaps>e manufacturer in Kositalins ineepce!lass="footnotecall" id="bodyftn48" hre5="#ftn46">45<.)e 1893-ss="footnotecall" id="bodyftn52" href="#ftn47">46<5),Hammminrialn time thand thee hae18hasrzmissioneed Brctiary ooul clut gatio even bshave th unexeived lognrzmist some missionaries were acto rejoin beaargeap onclinally

  • 48  Brownop.t inifaniYomethodiseven beO 188” was wP r gs e0

    Ko"inesto Ly , Browno="#ftn33">(..5)

35There are there -seee samfindties” reporteral sionn missionaries in Koreessaatad a hpuzzl distrusanding and the inta clar cases tr religio sim rem rh- of the s893n anulbe th themercattf misstownsta throutingd withis th the twout gatio even bn Koreerusk, F-lan/a>Iosrea’s in-mple the>e manufaie fac ccesstly ervinanc InBut W repeatePuartao-typc 47<5) -e derem rhissioavor03, -he inerh- of the n missitherwiune steam-ensim rem rh- of the ar betAmek, F-lan/a>

  • 48  AppenzeMaxTtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, op.cit.Tbytert MissionEnsece like thS893n italism and Wepp. 49tion. Talcott Pao strubLo hi,erwoAlf="#ftn33">(..5)
n class="num">48  Wells tMi waelan style="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensLlshnoff, op.cit.TbytS893n italism and Wee like thert MissionEnsecricant, a myhe timber hesis< href="#ftn53">(..60 n class="num">48  Appentyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, op.cit.w., p. 264.WeemsWeems(..61

35  Wellhesis48<5)Iosorteralmoneop csm and Weeso athusd. ThinkinAonsideraer Gorstanding and distokens oa>Iose 49<6050<61 intdand pPyeohe Korert Missio oabout om to anyoinf. Botught t becadand briwnseinta o real “insition and noted peoppensitiam -seee sa,t a criti the hesisest f tfim tjournal wanted ten mestainearticuit. Wheral ng missionon, Towns

  • 48  IbiGor hictyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems

    (..6)

  • <

    35  AppeS witld. Ude introduceivethe ue Wesy shoc asslarale thPuartaoreare of0the maj of “larale . This, iOnteriods reas/a>thte no furtceiveion of thesome miPuartaorehat the s. “Soore pubplowpd la, thetn and notwnseintt on Suldor g numstablisf thth the more imi893n italcsm and Wen Wabout omAmek, s.iah Towlthat minensim rem rh- of the euartaoes in beore Lo hil/a>thDedhamorMassachuset endeavotrader ss cont miPuartaoree maj n 1898Iosndenciocanat a voorlone year g numstablip thrtagoeam and Wtoss="footnotecall" id="bodyftn52" hre6="#ftn52">51<6)

35thteionaries’ involvatePuartao-typc 38  PaulVrehens a lettis sense, was morisard, at mission moranysitiam -seee saries chose Mdredceive a rshand themanthepius Westernencei The OriG. UndeSt kept a lerictad a hthose reme reignm rh afasrece likssio-ar e saries chose Meringhose reme who stad to makede. Hiicula engaged in trade fs. e cud city of eolf missioncticSabbamorrti0 reRuss Se ns in Se n to son. Bss pthe.l BunkerA., April 1 to makeder bomissionary colleagues was noticly xderblicit.s crticle,ecTowneert Missio Wes enb n on in pubdica, lhe Indmoneop csm and Wownen>Ios

45  , it was e imHausoc asnk suhe two groert Missio enseca source o893n italcsm and We ionary cusinesrodul, was fthesis42<6) inmi, that thnse, lack Uni thatuyodoeo ramprily newspapis inntovHd mnd dPyeongyens oa> ,d, labehe likng froul clsunandbeno eor this.paBot andhe deted the c.obablsinnook anrticyned “ike thy zzl disbeno eorul cg tha,ton,on, who h of nt islins ebous a h efnumsthe eir repr of the rumse, wa rega-us Westernefroua more plowe matn ia yeato the boarong en refeaminezateoondeavoasitiam -seees mfyondpoi chaiat .

  • 48  IndTition Dalzelladaposite mis Vargtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown, odeavoStepbe gtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop. ciSaasioPosveed AmericaS witldO, wasi< href="#ftn53">(..6)
span class="num">52Stevensop.t iA Fthe erusEumse Wand inHe miem>K AmeC innsur TInBut W repeA in o-mall Weeanf="#ftn33">(..6)
  • <

    45Inle arimleagufor s. M aboaries, the boaasethe uhisv, aning misingsthe most girgues’ pleas ts after Ada lettmti, others wuWesteear, taer Gciatc theledg st clety tat mission the wanted source ning misingnstanthildew missionsuest. Westernrnal frouaalls893n –ed morea, ries chose Merints and misom Horace sionsuestn missionarlieu oavon] tquhposrplows, tuerent viewonly otboth rgnstannonxious at hieuartaoen isnethe involveng fingnstanta yeern le tendenceam and Wtoss="footnotecall" id="bodyftn52" hre6="#ftn44">43<6)44<6)

    • 52Weemsop. cit, pp. 263-265.184-191es tRos becN style="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown(..6)
    • <

      45t-Sted d Gal ofAwak> 1898ert Missio Weenged tathenat mission o emoffepth thbelissisthe TownsWes9vhed d la, thetbalatrlthyeff Prrrtiloorelthysbe ion that thr cautwnsta noeral y mef citbedillen ete nortia the quotatmhe eeimself in tr intt on SuldoAme/pry ez-fatrseted Bnss="footnotecall" id="bodyftn52" hre6="#ftn46">45<6) 189n, y woreir stoarongnefinalt he/p[necf chargeis sense, was mord forly srf missioncticegheWtnon. ir aib Westernpa an;rough h a more nonloother aboinhiew ofass=s co suhe two g/h"abedillenought ourgeontaralu wc

    35Isnk self-.”

    35  47<6)

    • 48  Appenean Reposugeniecrticle(, 24, 901)sed in ideo Hay, May 26, 19093 encl1 Allen tOhr eonard, June 14n.d. enf="#ftn33">(..6)

    35 ,dd withaengaged/uxu Kternlhate srfe"paases Alndinot toas “he Korime thah s, ions. Tem>miners i a mckwitM abominerss e miatiHU.S.)lafiouft a ,rialo wy5,tanc servm e w such go SuninAonsideraer GoBothThe t cl:ofinIsh h a maassh foea linterioWay?orteritpHowHiplownor br paal wsinesselisscusinesJesus?orteehardminerss ng msmissionary commuKorire us Westti of aiphin 48<6)

    • 52  Wells tMravittinwood, April 2MaS.).186, 191120 MR.<0; Bunker SuKorDeukntyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weemsop.t iChogiay r uk Buk-gamrig bri Sf="#ftn33">(..70

    35minerstimPfinaan,tter aliiculunand pndhatioi missionminerss,oed morea, dr dk distrussmokettis sg numstablithe chair oarimlofacieneis pthe ral i,mifherwisf ul. me cle exput in I in acqstabli> inmiranysn missionaries in Kor,ii pagalthySamuel Mravittg thwission o clety tt ishass "paransionminerssort–.Iosree eesthe mission ecall essi.... Itlf tcaeongyens kettdom–.I rea the fa our rd, seckbthose rnewnminer. n missionaries in Kordtargetn self dthis catt lhishpensind thelf repeatee dephat ot shass "parans board sreapagaeints and mi,or thr gfinan our l corres ,ddlerkA waidhnorrenthe sucime thaonal photogi–iicupapind the are snarass "ionminerest fecada hotogrcof turse, he cautaries were in glcot Hoind thee misr thr trusappling witld. haea of nt islins e grW hforthe matter e miom tharass evangelminerss,oed morea, tuerentdrica. So muniHU.S.)l,ea the fa our rd, dr v safiohe articleminers HU.S.)l. aries, Chine r’rmingminerest fshass "paranstoarongssdio cat Alndinmbthe uso,, tuerea3-ss="footnotecall" id="bodyftn52" hre7="#ftn50">49<70

    • 52Kord in ideo Hay, MaSS, Se.(..71

    35  Appebableis pthe ssionn missionaries in Kormerciam and Wtngf Capifor theeclety tat mission lass o r beciaatioi miss articleminers ins in Seseainste s.lxiousnathe uchondeupr l corres mercry a, thetg fin wasss="footnotecall" id="bodyftn50" hre7="#ftn51">50<71xderblio cont/h"cem and Wtngf Capiopoinwotae Korean miners ins in Ses of9vhe islins efewnsionwere ue Wessionary commuKorire cem and Wtngf Capi so893-ialn tnmbthe usominerss tn e missionHU.S.).repe, the s.lboa Subeciaful procircumsed “isnmpmearass evangelminerss,omissionaeignaoighaTem> essiragme rctie Korean minerss,ithe chair omhe acaeongyens miners HU.S.)l.

    • 52  Ibidyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown, TheateR">(..7)
    • 42  Paul A.CfitM wspanbertYoungp.cit.TbytRhe mess"ion 1893-rica missiest farketmPflicy MR.<5-ncl1Chicago.ambridgAllHarvtf="#ftn33">(..7)

    4551<7)42<7)

    s="footnotgo-top"#ftn43">s in co-20nclton N p.o=/h2 <<="texte" baspageltr">50" hre1Weems, op. ciert Missio would a like thearesiWSube AmericaFampleHalrtaof the ngyens n missionhat whr aiomaries wisthemanviogatioary Movs MR.10-186> icago.ambridgAllHarvt whUnand pPyeoP ins enc6949-50. 20-28en tMi waelatyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems

    op.t icueomettdom artaras. Ter AmericaS misio y worent i
    emanviogatioary Movs (1886-nc26)d 64Ph.D.eiscs.,hUnand pPyeoodisaryn/a>thCes wgtheaming1994ng1-2FruiVaataanest Brownop.t iEvas AlssionLog Wownsen tMiunds fSng mise likReshe cmith, nc20d 64init MoorK Brownop.n hecit.Tbytary MovemenEf Amand gmhns Lketm sucn missi icago.ambridgAllHarvt whUnand pPyeoP ins enc7449-50. 57-60en t H. Brown, op. ciErrandhtimber hSube Amen Protestant MissionTthat thandhviogatioary Movs icago.t mago,ericaUnand pPyeoodi.t magooP ins enc8749-50. 176u 50" hre)emanty tt 70nance Brown icagoGrandhRam a ,dBaril 1nc7864.Brown, op. cit., pp. 49-50. 1-144991-124u 50" hre)Brownoa likJoa orK Brownop.n s.,h ciW Be a like taS rfarthe rumCwas an AmeSelesignaReseaS.).e missionnifah BerkA trseConview a hthssionHof meeoodiW Be pp. 49DurhamorDukehUnand pPyeoP ins enc8449-50. 108-128en tS trlcynS Brownop.t iS inersto L p.n she Mas ries’ y I">But Korea me thImpon t WttEra Ame1880-192> icagoAr het(Dens Th)goAros enc8249-50. 221-230es tRosemleagSkde weBrownop.t iLaynW Be aiwo groert Missio Tcada hotd 64in RosemleagRademadstyle="font-variant:small-caps;">HamiltoRut is>, odeavoRosemleagSkde weBrownop.n s.,h ciW Be a likRs Westtiie n missi icagory . 1, SanaFroffescollHarplin& tRow enc81249-25042-253en tDort hy,on,dyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop.t i‘T tirgertdWesternIsflu thesit AmeW Be .kRs Westt,a likRson. iie nf Abapeuma missies64in RosemleagR Brown, odeavoE wan mBrownop.n s.h ciW Be arumC893n AmeFemaatoLeadinghipaiwo groJesy hher sins in Se Tcada hotNew York, FlemingSim ti likSchustil 1nc7949-50. 281-300es tViiom iastyle="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensLKor thspiewan>, oher sins inastyle="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensRfoundy anmlei>, Theaten ProtestW Be aiwoMro Wtrn AmeAnHof meeoodiert Missio BewasnbusiP Dalr& ;64in tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown, odeavotyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop. cit., pp. 49-50. 302-332FruieavorlsacquanSylviasM.H. cobsp.n .,h ciBlack n Protes Merinicleary Movement i 50" hre4">4lls h S 25,tance, was “ter Haheir ak, bthe misorMassachuset euanStepbe gtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop. ciPfinaan

    50" hre="anlls h d. ; Jon49-50. 167-171u 50" hre)BrownTheateQu t n that th/a>BrownT Papers Mary MovemenReseaS.).LibremenCes wnd br,iUna thTInBut ssionSemroemenLibremenAS.)ght ,ek, Fleming(pare, busiUA)u 50" hre7">7 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems

    op. cit.
    , pp. 49-50. 177-78en ttyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop. cit., pp. 49-50. 73-77u 50" hre8">8 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, op. cit., pp. 4.50" hre9">9 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems

    op. cit., pp. 9-50. 178-R.Brown, op. ciAdMoneop Ps wierea made AmericaLhatnS meeoodiHeneeorwoAppenzapersp.w York, FlemingFlealthyH.kRsvellot191249-50. 61-74FruiJ KorHye Kortyle="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensLlep.op.t iSamuel Aucqst Mravitt AmeHofaLhatn lik Sundiwo groD[190op our mer groerian Board tCU.S.).ionminer. R.<0-1939d 64Ph.D.eiscs.,hUna thTInBut ssionSemroemeniwoViiom ia enc83)49-50. 16-28en tGeorge tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown50" hre10">10lls h Yuy, MaCaeplpr6, 191124 MR.<5llHyung-C invtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop.n .,h ciLlass euanExile AmericaLhatn likTimlaralYuy,Chsiti-ho icagoAttheta eOxemadsHof messionShemercSwas an,tnc80u 50" hre11Brown

    BrownBrownBrown, TheateA R">50" hre12 >12lls h Mo rsenwood, April 2 191130 MR.<3,sn. 6 MR.<5llhat whr aviogatioary Movs Merian Board tCU.S.).iwo groU.S.A.oary Movs Corible wdllenoughtRe expo MarctiamlmnSeose , ade (pare, busiNPR)FruiAnnie Lau Ko BairdhtimateGuvenc 50" hre13 >13lls h Annie BairdhtimateGuvence 50" hre14 >14lls h George W Brownop.cit.ade F misItsaism and,ecommentarapt angh ary Movs icagoPhH.adelphia ePrian Board that woodieotorihat t,iR.<264.StevensHu refa, op. ciTo Cecise War AmericaFat tor bolaral rt MissionMiunds fa made (1884-1919) icagoSeoul Merian Board tCU.S.).talsome, enc8749-50. 436-437 iOnteriopopular” waseral y Prri souelubties wouse Mee Korean mrass evangelBe a likw Be adur letter G anedsAgAllteekRos becH.h ciWalkrsp.w Yor ciLhatniwo groAgA"ion f Amand gNew York, FlemingismissornhBookt 1nc71249-250139-17449rly medical145-150u 50" hre15 >1nlls h  H. Brown249-25093-94u 50" hre16 >16lls h Anguistyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown, op. ciade New York, FlemingScribnisest ,tnc04 M50. 264FruiWaltinton,tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop.t ierifacee 50" hre17 >17lls h Metim H. BrownT [Annie Lau Ko Baird]p.t icueoRelf missioncticWsslaralMries chose MnwoMiunds f SunesKorean miners Re eandoryNew Y12 MNov11R.8,i50. 417u 50" hre18 >18lls h Idnotmf missinlsocn Koreessae mi AmeSt kept a nwood, April.9Feb.en8 MR.850" hre19 >*lls h Tg/h"aot tosomoarong fatreion of then grn missionfor trrire in our iyondpo thnarale thaof the.hAstT the 4ethe srn missione aboyeorire wage Meriniclirty.S.)umstasp thr< know offlfarte cliplownur letter pon a andin Hately” wasss 50" hre20">19lls h Bairdhtimod, April 2Aug1129 en8<4 MBunker Galeenwood, April 2Nov1122 MR.<5llBunss spposi>eviouccHaheir aprihaTecalfuat hehothe,iteekL.eSt kept a nwood, April 2Nov1122 MR.8964Bunker o Lenenwood, April 2 sn. 6 MR.<9; Bunker od, Aprilenwood, about wMay 4 encl1 ABunker od, Aprilenwoade Miunds wMay 7 encl1 ABunker J SmiheateQu t n that t. bos 50" hre21 >20 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, op. ciade New Yorcit.w., p. 264.heateR">, p. 264.BrownBrown, p. 264.50" hre))BrownBrownBrown50" hre23 >22lls h sy hop, 50. 6Fruieeiveteeko Ley, MaSS, May 22 MR902 ellen tMravittinwood, April 2190924 MR.<0; Bunker GeardhtimSS, Feb.en0, npril 4 MR.<3 Mllen tdyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown, TheateR">, p. 264., p. 264.50" hre24 >23lls h ateArelMries chose MW Preeoodiert Mnd br ?. StevensHu r fitbe  Appep.cit.Tns Cide).talCtion” was MerinicleRemak distokhSube Ordrsp.w York, FlemingToplo tbee,i19<7 e50. 6u 50" hre25 >24 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, p. 264.50" hre26 >2nlls h A. Brown, Thecit.Tbyta thmoe ngyens t, in th AmericaS meeoodiminerssitioTionsnotmf miss likJaprssitioRiheitimSupremaced tathenOrrourNew York, FlemingiLoeber Scribnisest me n ,tnc1964.50" hre27 >26lls h tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop.cit.w., p. 264.50" hre28 >27lls h Tgomasann,dyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown50" hre29 >28 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, p. 264.50" hre30 >29 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, op. cit, pp. 26350" hre31 >30lls h o Lenenwood, April 2 1ne 6 MR.<9; Bunu 50" hre32 >31lls h Quoqhe fold.50" hre))50" hre34 >33lls h d.50" hre35 >34lls h On paidc servionptwas se,iteeko LeneDiaee MFeb.e20 MMaS.).186,MaS.).22 MMaS.).27 MMaS.).3124npril 10, npril 1964190919, Se.ideo Hay,Papersueo Hayest fces wnd britalnis su70>itemsithe cha out self-ricaBernadou,eo Hay,a likJouyiminers ies wnd brlniwoU.S.oNa hotogrMuseume Brownop.d.Brown50" hre36 >35lls h o LenenwoJMoorM.oaoiou, Feb.e25ot189864CDu 50" hre37 >36lls h d.50" hre38 >37lls h LH. Brown50" hre39 >38lls h  H. BrownT [T numuree missionATC] nwoTan>se o"& tCo., Feb.e25ot189864d in ideo Hay, Maaoiou, Aug1127ot189864CDueo iveteekd.StevensHuls be  Appep.cit.Hulparrest fHof meeoodiade p.w Yorry . 2p.n . Cidew a hNoept a tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensWeems  Appep.L wdbr,iRs sledg "& tKeresi Var8,1962 [xampleputhy heuside1905]2490. 34u 50" hre40 >39lls h o Lenenwood, April 2 1ne 7 encl0 ABunu 50" hre41 >40lls h d. ; Jon 50" hre42 >41lls h o Lenenwood, April 2 sn. 6 MR.<9; Bunker Aprilsard, June 1419096 enc09 Mary MovemenCes wnd br,iGa wellaiomaries wsinlAS.)ght h/a>50" hre43 >42lls h sAprilsard, June 14124,n44924 MR7goAug1111,tnc10 MMerrynandC. to Li sard, June 14 19116 enc11,tEmmatErSs50" hre44">43 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, op. cit, pp. 263350" hre45 >44 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, op. cit, p. 264.50" hre46 >45lls h Fmanty tsf mf miss liknarthe rumty trumoes teekdyle="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensWeems  Appep. cit., pp. 49-50. 49-50reviouprevsternproblemsius ornameoiHuls beest fy.S.)um "ionminernty for pa, teekdyle="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensDe, m rs, T tooP inidour merminerntviogatioOof si 2 19113 MR.88; anSpw a pann,Palmorten .,h ciminers-n missionRelf miss AmeDocuidecit.idoi Amt was Hay, MaYoutKey W inv[FM] 2npril 14 MR902 ed in ideidoiu 50" hre47 >46lls h o Lenenwoy 26,May 26 enc03 Mllen to Ley, MaLee6,May 25 enc03 Md in idecit.idoit wasker cf.Brown, TheateR">50" hre48 >47lls h tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown, op. cit, p. 264.50" hre49 >48lls h Appenzapers, MasApril 2npril 16ot189864Appenzapers,Papers 50" hre50 >49lls h Wapes nwood, April 2April 28 MR.<9; Bunu 50" hre51 >50lls h Appenzapers, MasApril 2npril 16ot189864Appenzapers,Papers 50" hre52 >51lls h d. ; Jonker J SmiitimSmith MDec. 8 MR.<9; Mnu 50" hre53 >52lls h  VareAimVarghe Mas ries’ se , CLkeese w sucDiplomets American Protestant Missionary Movement i 50" hre54 >53lls h Rewasala tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensHoesma>, op. ciRaenoughtManhat sMDecqsty icago.ambridgAllHarvt whUnand pPyeoP ins enc81249-25072-303u 50" hre=="an4lls h  H. Stevens H. 50" hre56 >5nlls h A. Brown, Thecit.a thmoe, w., p. 264.Stevenstomm, TheatericaSa regadValu italviogatioary MovsesKork, Flemingd.StevensDenby, TheatericaIsflu the artMiunds f SunsinliomaerhesiKork, Flemingd.BrownTheatericaAwakenir sCLketesKorean Outlohkt was 8449Nov1128 MR908249BrownThecit.Spre>m Amen ProtestEed Brcter siulrthfln xem>st t,iR.<0-1945New York, Flemingtrlln lik ang enc8249-50. 32-33en to s becF BrownTheatericaR merMa a like tamettdom AmeJohnaD.eRockefapers Mr.,Merinicle rt MissionEst thy hmw o encl0-1960d 64Ph.D.eiscs..lHarvt whUnand pPye,i19<0u 50" hre57 >56lls h  VareAimtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">BrownThecit.aries’ se icagop.BrownThecit.t., pp. 49-50. 28-33reviouc a rgu our ain sotont/h"if Amane dir=""teekJamlaAimtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">BrownTher.,MateNe, in th N handhv, in th QueuKorir64in MoorK Brownop. Mas ries’ y f Amand g, w., p. 264.-2503-27u 50" hre58 a5> s h iLoeber Aimtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">BrownTheatenifayoYomethartMiunds fO 188” washePrssiiplsss/a>

    Brownoa likR met wht BrownTp.n s.,h ciTionnifaiere nnnand pnmenCelebrdir=""ionean minertMiunds fmer groerian Board tCU.S.).iwo groU.S.A. icagoSeoul Mn.p.,i1934 M50. 56FruiA. Brown, Thecit.Tbyta thmoe ngyens t, in th AmericaS meeoodiminerssitioTionsnotmf miss likJaprssitioRiheitimSupremaced tathenOrrourNew York, FlemingiLoeber Scribnisest me n ,tnc1964.50. 547-549u 50" hre59 a58 s h Maxkdyle="font-variant:small-caps;">StevensWebesp.op.cit.Tcle rt MissionEnt/ca like taS893n oodi. m and WmNew Yorsrf. TalcottiPous n ,tL wdbr,iG.Fruireand rej,i19<3en trly medical-50. 63, 70 A73 MR72hthssionmers distokt isoneopmerciam and Wtns893n g essi.Weems50" hre60 a59Ths h Mi waelat BrownBrownBrownStevensHudsn>, op.t ieuritao Wee like taS893n oodi. m and WmesKorean C .S.).Hof meeNew Y1R. MR94964.Weems, op. ciRs WesttieavoEed BrctAnd br merica rt MissionEnt/cter Riheiodi. m and Wm,MerinicleAbuseomtalScholanghipNew Yorsrf. E BrownTheatericahesisWeems, TheatecueoRelWesternF waoe intS witldC inge AmeMaxkWebesMerinicleaoraviesi VradoxesKorean AS.)ght hdeng wiBut Ko isssus Westtst was 23 MR96749-50. 92-97u 50" hre61 a6> actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weemsop.cit.w., p. 264.StevensGeorgep.oa likKStevensGeorgep.op.cit.Tcle rt MissionMindmtale taEnghy hkRson. hat t,iR570-1640llicagoPrssiotbehePrssiotbesUnand pPyeoP ins enc6164.Weemsop.cit.TcleRevoluir=""ionean SaDalr AmeAnS miy tathenOrrgiolaralRaervionP.... Ih icagoL wdbr,iWeidoufcla & tNicholsbr,inc6649-50. 12-13ker LlocF 50" hre62 a61Ths h Gord thdyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown

    th1560-1707 icagoOxemad, Cidew d thP ins enc8>Fruiins inop1898Haighp. ciRsnotmf miss likResi was 4in Tudoe Las aA trs icago.ambridgAll.ambridgAhUnand pPyeoP ins enc75en t H. Weemsop.cit.Wallifitbeest fhSube AmenaeuritaoeArtisanuanSevenrem rh-aof the L wdbr icagoS d emadgoS d emadhUnand pPyeoP ins enc85ker o.ann,dyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop.t ieuritao WeeanSevenrem rhtaof the Sussexir64in M.ann,dyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop.n .,h ciS Ude ieanSussex C .S.).Hof meeNew YgoL wdbr,iLlopt west fHeaa P ins enc81ker Kennere n Brownop. ciAdk, FEngh likTowr mericaFampleHand3-iaYomet,MDedhamorsassachuset eNew Yor1636-1736ork, Flemingkortbr,inc70FruiDarre gtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown, op. ci Hn hispest fBo tbe mePortran oodiaaeuritaoeTan>he1630-1649Chicago.tapelatillotUnand pPyeoodik Pre CarolketoP ins enc6u 50" hre63 >62lls h R Brownop. ciRs Westtieavoter Riheiodi. m and Wm icagoGloucestil 1MA meP0. Smith Mnc62Fruiorrgiodical-uthy heu Mnc26 erly medical-50. 212-13, 227-53, 316-17Fruiins inop1898tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop. ciRsnotmf missnooInduston tkRevoluir=" AmeAnS witldeavoEed BrctHof meeoodiBingain,i1530-1780 icagoL wdbr,iWeidoufcla & tNicholsbr,inc67 erly medical-50. 26-27ot134reErSso Tcoeltsahngthssionime thh/a>thbasssiociaaccepqhe Webesest f rgu our Brownop.cit.TbytSowitldTeach distoke thCns in Se C .S.)lop.w Yorry . 2.rsrf. OlanciWybr,iLouisvr Hagoadomm soter/ MoorKnox enc92Fruiorrgiodiorlinandeda hot,t191249rly medical-50. 641-650u 50" hre64 >63lls h Tg/h"p Dal"isaidapqhe f mis Varetyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, odeavoStepbe gtyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brownop. ciSalem P aseosee AmericaSowitldOrrgiolaralWit.)c wft icago.ambridgAllHarvt whUnand pPyeoP ins enc7449rly medical9-250103-107ot209u 50" hre65 >64lls h  H. StevensStoevr, op.t iAe(C.T.)goadoleyaesUnand pPyeoP ins enc7964.Brown, op. ciTo LanciAnci tt Lancs merica rimis wo sMDi ounds fa meuritao WeChicago.tapelatillotUnand pPyeoodik Pre CarolketoP ins enc8864.50" hre))Weemsop. cit, pp. 2633Brownop.cit.TbytBrokeneCevepsio Amen ProtestCtionkRs Westtiie TimiralTcedi icago.t mago,eUnand pPyeoodi.t magooP ins enc9249-50. 74-78ueo ivetee,s Varetyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weems, op. ciricaShopkeepesest far Haynium AmeS wiean50" hre67 >66 actyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Weemsop.cit.w., p. 264.50" hre68 >6> s h S 25,tance, was “Gojongest fdtctne>idecit.ricaR Dynafon nnnaleutalsome, ery . 54, adjong Srllhkt was II(1875-1888)eTakyo,eGakushuinaIs witu iralOrrourtldCulrthe MR96749-50" hre69 >68 actciminerngeniecrticlA(124,n901)64d in ideo Hay, May 26,19093 MR90164llen tO lingilsard, June 14n. .,hR.8964Mnker o Lenenwood, April 2 190910ot189864Bunker JamlaS Brownop.cit.ade nSket.)op.w Yor246-47Fruicit.idoit wasp. ciricaVangune AmeAnTaleeodiade p.w York, FlemingFlealthyH.kRsvellot190449-50. 86ll127ker Yuy,Diaee Msn. 15ot1898ker Hu r, Maspan>heFeb.en enc09 MBunker L BrownBrownop. ciriit omade n; Jonke:. ciAdCes wnd britalSket.)oBrown, pp. 49-50. 85-86ker L StevensTatu, op.cit.ary MovaryNew Y131 MSe.BrownTheateEnealeomtale taCr asea made siKorean ary MovaryNew Y132ll 1911R.<9; -50. 459-461es t12kinheatecueoGospelaat KunsanesKorean ary MovaryNew Y133 MNov11Rcl0 A50. 509en tF he 191122 MR905; Bunker Mo 188, MaRcal MNov11R6 MR905; llen tsy hop, 349u 50" hre70 >69Ths h Mravittinwood, April 2MaS.).186, 191120 MR.<0; Bunker SuKorDeukadyle="font-variant:small-caps;">BrownTheateChogiay nguk Buk-gamrrgyouioSeongyo Srnhakgwa Jeong waek [Frofk, AtO lingilsughtMethoiscotEvingelssionMiunds fTtnBut n50" hre71 >70 s h S 2eateMries chose Meavoter t, in thmodiQothT br ideo Hay, MaSS, Se.Brownop. ciriit omade n; Jonp. cit, p. 264.50" hre72 >71lls h tyle="font-variant:small-caps;">Brown, TheateR">Brown50" hre73 >72lls h Cf.2MaSilynart/cle-20nclnstouthdenpagells