Navigation – Plan du site


Gérald Préher et Emmanuel Vernadakis
p. 15-25

Extrait du texte

Ce document sera publié en ligne en texte intégral en décembre 2018.

Aperçu du texte

As a form, myth has been used in various contexts, endowed with various meanings, and approached in various ways throughout a complex, conflicting, and far-reaching history that makes it a slippery term—in Marcel Détienne’s terms “a fish emulsified in the waters of mythology.” As a term, “myth” derives from the Greek mythos (μύθος), and means “plot” or “story.” Originally, mythos contrasted logos (λόγος), namely a “truthful account.” A competitive dynamic between mythos and logos can be traced back to Plato: although Plato uses myths—imaginative frames—to draw the reader in, he downplays his/her role in philosophical thought, worried as he is about the appeal of myth to our most basic passions. A common ­narrative grew out of this polemic approach through Christianity’s insistence on reading myths allegorically, which late Renaissance scholarship used to tell about ancient civilisations: human progress followed a trajectory from mythos to logos, from myth to logic. Still going stron...

Pour citer cet article

Référence papier

Gérald Préher et Emmanuel Vernadakis, « Introduction », Journal of the Short Story in English, 67 | 2016, 15-25.

Référence électronique

Gérald Préher et Emmanuel Vernadakis, « Introduction », Journal of the Short Story in English [En ligne], 67 | Autumn 2016, mis en ligne le 01 décembre 2018, consulté le 23 mars 2018. URL :


Gérald Préher

Lille Catholic University

Articles du même auteur

Emmanuel Vernadakis

University of Angers

Articles du même auteur

Droits d’auteur

© All rights reserved

  • OpenEdition Journals