Adam, Barbara, y Chris Groves (2011), “Futures tended: care and future-oriented responsibility”, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 31, pp. 17-27.
Adger, Neil, y Andrew Jordan (orgs.) (2009), Governing Sustainability, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
Anichini, Giulia, y Suzanne de Cheveigné (orgs.) (2012), “Science in society in Europe”, Science and Public Policy, 39 (6), número especial, pp. 701-760.
Barben, Daniel (2007), “Changing regimes of science and politics: comparative and transnational perspectives for a world in transition”, Science and Public Policy, 34 (1), pp. 55-69.
Bauer, Martin, Rajesh Shukla, y Nick Allum (orgs.) (2011), The Culture of Science. How Does the Public Relate to Science Across the Globe, Londres, Routledge.
Berkhout, Frans, Melissa Leach, e Ian Scoones (2004), Negotiating Environmental Change. New Perspectives from Social Science, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.
Bolay, Jean-Claude, Magali Schmid, Gabriela Tejada, y Eileen Hazboun (orgs.) (2012), Technologies and Innovations for Development. Scientific Cooperation for a Sustainable Future, París, Springer-Verlag.
Bozeman, Barry, y Daniel Sarewitz (2011), “Public value mapping and science policy evaluation”, Minerva, 49 (1), pp. 1-23.
Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, y Yannick Barthe (2010), Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
Canaan, Joyce, y Wesley Shumar (orgs.) (2008), Structure and Agency in the Neoliberal University, Nueva York, Routledge.
Christensen, Steen Hyldgaard, Carl Mitcham, Bocong Li, y Yanming An (orgs.) (2012), Engineering, Development, and Philosophy. American, Chinese, and European Perspectives, Nueva York, Springer-Verlag.
Den Boer, Duncan, Ari Rip, y Sylvia Speller (2009), “Scripting posible futures of nanotechnologies: a methodology that enhances reflexivity”, Technology in Society, 31, pp. 295-304.
EC — European Commission (2001), European Governance. A White Paper, Bruselas, EC.
EC — European Commission (2002), Science and Society. Action Plan, Luxemburgo, EC.
Echeverría, Javier (2002), Ciencia y Valores, México, DF, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Eizagirre, Andoni (2009), “Las nuevas iniciativas europeas sobre ciencia y sociedad”, Sistema, 210, pp. 3-22.
Eizagirre, Andoni (2011), “La precaución como principio de acción sostenible”, Isegoría, Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política, 44, pp. 303-324.
Eizagirre, Andoni (2013a), “Gobernar el conocimiento”, Isegoría, Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política, 48, pp. 229-244.
Eizagirre, Andoni (2013b), “Las percepciones sociales en Europa sobre el rol de la ciencia y la tecnología”, Revista de Estudios Sociales, 48, pp. 67-78.
Eizagirre, Andoni (2015), “El discurso sobre las políticas de ciencia y tecnología”, Argumentos de Razón Técnica, 18, pp. 39-68.
Felt, Ulrich (reportero) (2007), Science and Governance. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously, Bruselas, Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to DG Research.
Fisher, Erik, Roop L. Mahajan, y Carl Mitcham (2006), “Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within”, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26 (6), pp. 485-496.
Godin, Benoit (2010), The Making of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. Conceptual Frameworks as Narratives, 1945-2005, Montreal, Centre Urbanisation Culture Société.
Grande, Edgar, Dorothea Cansen, Otfried Jarren, Arie Rip, Uwe Schimank, y Peter Weingart (orgs.) (2013), Neue Governance der Wissenschaft. Reorganisation — Externe Anforderungen — Medialisierung, Bielefeld, Transcript.
Groves, Chris (2006), “Technological futures and non-reciprocal responsibility”, The International Journal of Humanities, 4 (2), pp. 57-61.
Guston, David, y Daniel Sarewitz (2006), Shaping Science and Technology Policy. The Next Generation of Research, Madison, WI, The University of Wisconsin Press.
Hellstrom, Tomas (2003), “Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation”, Technology in Society, 25, pp. 369-384.
Hessels, Lauren, y Harron van Lente (2008), “Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda”, Research Policy, 37 (4), pp. 740-760.
Hommels, Anique, Jessicca Mesman, y Wiebe Bijker (orgs.) (2014), Vulnerability in Technological Cultures. New Directions in Research and Governance, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
Hoppe, Robert (1999), “Policy analysis, science and politics: from ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’ ”, Science and Public Policy, 26 (3), pp. 201-210.
Irwin, Alan (2006), “The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance”, Social Studies of Science, 36 (2), pp. 299-320.
Irwin, Alan (2008), “STS perspectives on scientific governance”, en Edward Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch y Judy Wajcman (orgs.), The New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, pp. 583-607.
Irwin, Alan, Tolber Elgaard Jensen, y Kevin Jones (2013), “The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice”, Social Studies of Science, 43 (1), pp. 119-136.
Jacob, Klaus (reportero) (2013), Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation, Bruselas, Directorate General for Research and Innovation.
Jamison, Andrew (2012), “Science and technology in postwar Europe”, en Dan Stone (org.), The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 630-648.
Jasanoff, Sheila (org.) (2004), States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, Londres, Routledge.
Jasanoff, Sheila (2005), Designs on Nature. Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila (2012), Science and Public Reason, Nueva York, Routledge.
Joly, Pierre-Benoit, Claire Marris, y Olivier Marcant (2001), La Constitution d’Un “Problème Public”. La Controverse sur les OGM et Ses Incidences sur la Politique aux Etats-Units, Grenoble, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.
Kaiser, Mario (org.) (2010), Governing Future Technologies. Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, Dordrecht, Springer-Verlag.
Kallerud, Egil, e Inge Ramberg (2002), “The order of discourse in surveys of public understanding of science”, Public Understanding of Science , 11 (3), pp. 213-224.
Kastenhofer, Karen (2011), “Risk assessment of emerging technologies and post-normal science”, Science, Technology & Human Values, 36 (3), pp. 307-333.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee, y Steven Vallas (2001), “Science, capitalism, and the rise of the ‘knowledge worker’: the changing structure of knowledge production in the United States”, Theory and Society, 30 (4), pp. 451-492.
Lane, Stuart, Francisco Klauser, y Mathew Kearnes (2012), Critical Risk Research. Practices, Politics and Ethics, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.
Leach, Melissa, Ian Scoones, y Brian Wynne (orgs.) (2005), Science and Citizens. Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, Londres, Zed Books.
Leach, Melissa, Ian Scoones, y Andy Stirling (2010), Dynamic Sustainabilities. Technology, Environment, Social Justice, Londres, Zed Books.
Lentchs, Justus, y Peter Weingart (orgs.) (2011), The Politics of Scientific Advice. Institucional Design for Quality Assurance, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
Levidow, Les, y Susan Carr (2010), GM Food on Trial. Testing European Democracy, Londres, Routledge.
Liberatore, Angela (2001), Democratising Expertise and Establishing Scientific Reference Systems, Bruselas, European Commission.
Maasen, Sabine, y Peter Weingart (orgs.) (2005), Democratization of Expertise? Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Dordrecht, Springer-Verlag.
Macnaghten, Paul (2010), “Reserching technoscientific concerns in the making”, Environment and Planning A, 41, pp. 23-37.
Marklund, Göran, Nicholas S. Vonortas, y Charles W. Wessner (orgs.) (2009), The Innovative Imperative. National Innovation Strategies in the Global Economy. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.
Miettinen, Reijo (2013), Innovation, Human Capabilities, and Democracy. Towards an Enabling Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Mirowski, Philip, y Esther-Mirjam Sent (2008), “The commercialization of science and the response to STS”, en Edward Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch y Judy Wajcman (orgs.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, pp. 635-689.
Mitcham, Carl (2003), “Co-responsibility for research integrity”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, pp. 273-290.
Mitcham, Carl (org.) (2005), Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, Nueva York, Macmillan Reference.
Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scout, y Michael Gibbons (2001), Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.
OECD (2010), The OECD Innovation Strategy. Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow, París, OECD.
OECD (2012), Meeting Global Challenges through Better Governance, París, OECD.
Pellizzoni, Luigi (2004), “Responsibility and environmental governance”, Environmental Politics, 13, pp. 541-565.
Owen, Richard, David Baxter, Trevor Maynard, y Michael Depledge (2009), “Beyond regulation: risk princing and responsible innovation”, Environmental Science & Technology, 43, pp. 5171-5175.
Owen, Richard, Paul Macnaghten, y Jack Stilgoe (2012), “Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society”, Science and Public Policy, 39, pp. 751-760.
Owen, Richard, John Bessant, y Maggy Heintz (2013), Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, Chichester, Wiley.
Ozolina, Zaneta, Carl Mitcham, Doris Shroeder, Emilio Mordini, Paul McCarthy, y John Crowley (2012), Ethical and Regulatory Challenges to Science and Research Policy at Global Level, Luxemburgo, Publication Office of the European Union.
Pereira, Angela-Guimaraes, y Silvio Funtowicz (2009), Science for Policy. New Challenges, New Opportunities, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Pielke, Roger (2007), The Honest Broker. Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
Renn, Ortwin (2008), Risk Governance. Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Rip, Arie, Thomas Misa, y Johan Shot (orgs.) (1995), Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, Londres, Thomson.
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (1985), Risk Analysis and Scientific Method. Methodological and Ethical Problems with Evaluating Societal Hazards, Boston, Kluwer.
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (1991), Risk and Rationality, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (2011), Taking Action, Saving Lives. Our Duties to Protect Environmental and Public Health, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Slaughter, Sheila, y Gary Rhoades (2004), Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Markets, State, and Higher Education, Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Special Eurobarometer 401 (2013), Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Science and Technology, Bruselas, European Commission.
Stehr , Nico (org.) (2005), Knowledge Politics. Governing the Consequences of Science and Technology, Boulder, CO, Paradigm Publishers.
Stehr, Nico, y Voker Meja (orgs.) (2005), Society & Knowledge. Contemporary Perspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge & Science, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers (2.ª edición revisada).
Stehr, Nico, y Reiner Grundmann (orgs.) (2011), Experts. The Knowledge and Power of Expertise (Key Ideas), Nueva York, Routledge.
Stephanie, Bird, y Erik Fisher (orgs.) (2011), “Science and technology policy in the making: observation and engagement”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17 (4), número especial, pp. 607-849.
Stilgoe, Jack, y Simon Lock (2014), “Why should we promote public engagement with science?”, Public Understanding of Science, 23 (1), pp. 4-15.
Stirling, Andrew (2007), “Deliberative futures: precaution and progress in social choice of sustainable technology”, Sustainable Development, 15 (5), pp. 286-295.
Stirling, Andrew (2008), “Opening up or closing down? Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology”, Science Technology Human Values, 33 (2), pp. 262-294.
Stirling, Andrew (2011), “Pluralising progress: from integrative transitions to transformative diversity”, Journal of Environmental Innovation & Societal Transitions, 1 (1), pp. 82-88.
van den Hove, Sylbille, Jacqueline McGlade, Pierre Mottet, y Michael Depledge (2012), “The innovation union: a perfect means to confused ends?”, Environmental Science and Policy, 16 (1), pp. 73-80.
van den Hoven, Jeroen, Gert-Jan Lokhorst, e Ibo van den Poel (2012), “Engineering and the problem of moral overload”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, pp. 1-13.
von Schomberg, René (org.) (2011), Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields, Luxemburgo, Publication Office of the European Union.
von Schomberg, René (2012), “Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation”, en Marc Dusseldorp y Richard Beecroft (orgs.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, Dordrecht, Springer-Verlag, pp. 39-61.
von Schomberg, René, y Sarah Davies (orgs.) (2010), Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnology. Options for Framing Public Policy, Luxemburgo, Publication Office of the European Union.
Wilsdon, James, y Rebecca Willis (2004), Seethrough Science. Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream, Londres, Demos.
Wilsdon, James, Brian Wynne, y Jack Stilgoe (2005), The Public Value of Science. Or How to Ensure that Science Really Matters, Londres, Demos.
Wynne, Brian (2002), “Risk and environmental as legitimatory discourses of technology: reflexivity inside out?”, Current Sociology, 50 (3), pp. 459-477.
Wynne, Brian (2006), “Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science — hitting the notes, but missing the music”, Community Genetics, 9, pp. 211-220.