Navigation – Plan du site
Ursula Weber et Josef Wiesehöfer

Ursula Weber, Josef Wiesehöfer. König Narsehs Herrschaftsverständnis

Compte-rendu réalisé par Bruno Overlaet
Référence(s) :

Ursula Weber, Josef Wiesehöfer. « König Narsehs Herrschaftsverständnis », in : H. Börm & J. Wiesehöfer, eds., Commutatio et Contentio – Studies in the Late Roman, Sasanian, and Early Islamic Near East in Memory of Zeev Rubin. Düsseldorf, 2010, p. 89-132.

Texte intégral

1The authors reconsider the historical context of Narseh’s reign, a king often portrayed as an usurper. An analysis of the Paikuli inscription, Shapur’s Res Gestae and the royal genealogy serve to prove that Narseh, instead of Wahram, the elder son, stood next in line to the throne when his brother Hormizd I died in 273 AD. For twenty years however, he would remain loyal to Wahram I and II and serve as king of Armenia. According to the Paikuli inscription, Narseh was chosen as King of Kings by the assembled Persian nobility after he defeated Wahram III, whose rise to power in 293 AD was not in line with the traditional protocol. The emphasis given to this is evidence that Narseh wanted his reign to be seen not as an usurpation but as a continuation of the royal bloodline. The authors briefly discuss two reliefs of Narseh: the investiture scene at Bishapur (an usurped relief of Wahram I) and the family scene from Naqsh-i Rustam. The latter, erroneously seen by some as an investiture by Anahita, dates back to the end of Narseh’s reign.

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Bruno Overlaet. Ursula Weber et Josef Wiesehöfer, « Ursula Weber, Josef Wiesehöfer. König Narsehs Herrschaftsverständnis », Abstracta Iranica [En ligne], Volume 32-33 | 2013, document 208, mis en ligne le 01 juillet 2016, consulté le 17 juillet 2019. URL :

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

Tous droits réservés

Haut de page