Adam, J.-M. (2011). Les textes : types et prototypes : récit, description, argumentation, explication et dialogue, Paris : A. Colin.

Assude, T., Koudogbo, J., Millon-Fauré, K., Morin, M.-P., Tambone, J. & Theis, L. (2016). Mise à l’épreuve des fonctions d’un dispositif d’aide aux élèves en difficulté en mathématiques. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education,* ***16(1)**, 1-35.

Ascher, M. (1991). Ethnomathematics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Boaler, J. (2008). What’s math got to do with it? New York: Penguin Books.

Carter, J. A., Cuevas, G. J., Day, R., & Mallory, C. (2018). Glencoe Geometry. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.

Charles, R. I., Hall, B., Kennedy, D., Bass, L., Johnson, A., Murphy, S. J., & Wiggins, G. (2015). Geometry Common Core. Hoboken, New Jersey: Pearson.

Center For Mathematics Education Project. (2013). Geometry. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, **23**, 2–33.

Cox, P. L. (1985). Informal geometry—more is needed. Mathematics Teacher, **88(6)**, 404–405, 435.

Dietiker, L. & Kassarjian, M. (2014). Core Connections Geometry (Second Edition, Version 5.0). Elk Grove, CA: CPM Educational Program.

Dimmel, J. K., & Herbst, P. G. (2015). The semiotic structure of geometry diagrams: How textbook diagrams convey meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, **46(2)**, 147–195.

Dossey, J., Halvorsen, K., & Mccrone, S. (2008). Mathematics education in the United States 2008: A capsule summary fact book written for the eleventh International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-11). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/pedagogic texts. London : The Falmer Press.

Eliot, C., Harris, W. T., Angell, J. B., Tetlow, J., Tayor, J. m., Robinson, O. D. et al. (1969). Report of the Committee of Ten to the National Education Association. In National Education Association, Report of the Committee on secondary school studies (pp. 3–5). New York : Arno Press. (Original work published in 1893).

Fawcett, H.P. (1935). Teaching for transfer. Mathematics Teacher, **28(8)**, 465–472.

Fawcett, H.P. (1938). The Nature of Proof. Thirteenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York : Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language. New York, NY : Pantheon.

Freudenthal, H. (1968). Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful. Educational Studies in Mathematics, **1**, 3–8.

Freudenthal, H. (1971). Geometry between the devil and the deep sea. Educational Studies in Mathematics, **3**, 413–435.

Freudenthal, H. (1991). *Revisiting Mathematics Education : China Lectures. *Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Kluwer.

Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching. *Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education*, **11**, 199–219.

Garfunkel, S., & Montgomery, M. (Eds.). (2016). *Guidelines for assessment & instruction in mathematical modeling education (GAIMME) report*. Boston/Philadelphia : COMAP and SIAM.

González, G., & Herbst, P. (2006). Competing arguments for the geometry course : Why were American high school students to study geometry in the twentieth century ? *International Journal for the History of Mathematics Education*, **1(1)**, 7–33.

González, G. (2017). Teachers’ understanding of realistic contexts for capitalizing on students’ prior knowledge. *School Science and Mathematics*, **117 (7–8)**, 285–352.

Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education : A calculus course as an example. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, **39 (1/3)**, 111–129.

Gravemeijer, K., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal : a mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. *Journal of Curriculum Studies*, **32(6)**, 777–796.

Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum : Examining the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, **38(4)**, 344–369.

Herbst, P. (2002). Establishing a custom of proving in American school geometry : Evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, **49(3)**, 283–312.

Honour, H., & Fleming, J. (1982). *The visual arts : A history*, 2nd ed. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.

Hunte, A. A. (2018). Opportunities for Reasoning and Proving in Geometry in Secondary School Textbooks from Trinidad and Tobago. Herbst, P., Cheah U.H., Richard, P. R., & K. Jones (Eds.), *International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Secondary Schools *(p. 39–58). Springer.

Kastberg, S. E., D’ambrosiso, B., Mcdermott, G., & Saada, N. (2005). Context matters in assessing students’ mathematical power. *For the Learning of Mathematics*, **25(2)**, 10–15.

Kliebard, H. (1995). *The struggle for the American curriculum 1893–1958*. (2nd Ed.). Boston : Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Lampert, M. (2001). *Teaching problems and the problems of teaching*. New Haven, CT : Yale.

Land, T. J., Bartell, T. G., Drake, C., Foote, M. Q., Roth Mcduffie, A., Turner, E. E., & Aguirre, J. M. (2018). Curriculum spaces for connecting to children’s multiple mathematical knowledge bases. *Journal of Curriculum Studies*, **51(4)**, 471–493.

Larson, R., Boswell, L., Kanold, T. D., & Stiff, L. (2012). *Geometry*. Orlando, FL : Holt McDougal/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Livio, M. (2002). *The golden ratio*. New York : Broadway Books.

Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all : An exploratory look through a class lens. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, **31**, 454–482.

Lyakhova, S., Joubert, M., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). Designing a curriculum based on four purposes : let mathematics speak for itself. *Journal of Curriculum Studies*, **51(4)**, 513–529.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). *The language of evaluation : Appraisal in English*. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.

Mesa, V. (2004). Characterizing practices associated with functions in middle school textbooks : An empirical approach. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, **56 (2–3)**, 255–286.

National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematics (Nctm). (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA : NCTM.

National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematics (Nctm). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA : NCTM.

National Council Of Teachers Of Mathematics (Nctm). (2018). *Catalyzing change in high school mathematics*. Reston, VA : NCTM.

National Governors Association Center For Best Practices & Council Of Chief State School Officers. (2010). *Common core state standards for mathematics*. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/

Otten, S., Gilbertson, N. J., Males, L. M., & Clark, D. L. (2014). The mathematical nature of reasoning-and-proving opportunities in geometry textbooks. *Mathematical Thinking and Learning*, **16(1)**, 51–79.

Pedoe, D. (1976). *Geometry and the visual arts.* New York : Dover.

Quast, W. G. (1968). Geometry in the high schools of the United States : An historical analysis from 1890 to 1966. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.

Schattschneider, D. (2010). The mathematical side of M. C. Escher. *Notices of the AMSS*, **57(6)**, 706–718.

Sears, R., & Chávez, O. (2014). Opportunities to engage with proof : the nature of proof tasks in two geometry textbooks and its influence on enacted lessons. *ZDM Mathematics Education*, **46**, 767–780.

Serra, M. (1997). *Discovering Geometry : An inductive approach* (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA : Key Curriculum.

Slaught, H.E., Betz, W., Brown, E.L., Bouton, C.L., Cajori, F., Fuller, W., Hart, W.W., Hawkes, H.E., Hedrick, E.R., newton, F. E., Rietz, H.L., Short, R.L., Smith., D. E, Smith, E.R., & sykes, M. (1912). Final report of the National Committee of Fifteen on geometry syllabus. *The Mathematics Teacher*, **5**, 46–131.

Stanic, G. M., & Kilpatrick, J. (1992). Mathematics curriculum reform in the United States : A historical perspective. *International Journal of Educational Research*, **17(5)**, 407–417.

Sykes, M. (1912). A source book of problems for Geometry. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.

Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education : An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, **54**, 9–35.

Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2005). The role of contexts in assessment problems in mathematics. *For the Learning of Mathematics*, **25(2)**, 2–9, 23.

Visual Arts. (n.d.). In Encyclopædia Brittannica’s online dictionary. Retrieved March 4, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/art/visual-arts.