Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNumérosXXIVChroniques des travaux archéologi...Preliminary Report on the Third S...

Chroniques des travaux archéologiques en Turquie, 2015

Preliminary Report on the Third Season of the Konya-Ereğli Survey (Keyar)1 2015

Çiğdem Maner
p. 225-252

Texte intégral

  • 1 KEYAR: Konya Ereğli Yüzey Araştırması, Konya Ereğli Survey Project.
  • 2 Maner 2014; 2015a; 2015b; Maner forthcoming.

1The Konya Ereğli Survey project (KEYAR) started in 2013 with the aim of surveying the Bronze and Iron Age settlements of the provinces of south-eastern Konya, which are Ereğli, Halkapınar, Emirgazi and Karapınar2. The third campaign of the archaeological survey took place between 17.08-14.09.2015 with the generous permission of the Ministry and Culture and Tourism of the Republic of Turkey, Directorate of Antiquities and Museum of the Republic of Turkey. Ms. Gülay Şahin from the General Directorate in Ankara was the representative of the third campaign. I am thankful to the Governor of Ereğli Mr. Ömer Lütfi Yaran, the governor of Halkapınar Mr. Erdal Çetinbaş, the major of Ereğli Mr. Özkan Özgüven, the major of Halkapınar Mr. Fahri Vardar and Mr. Mahmut Altuncan, director of the Ereğli Museum for their support during our stay and work.

2The survey team consisted of academics and students, Assist. Prof. Sercan Yandım Aydın (Hacettepe University Department of Art History), students from Koç University (Muhip Çarkı M.A., Bihter Esener, Yavuz Selim Güler, Pelin Peker), Ege University (Aybüke Nacar ve Asiye Toprak), Meltem Kaya (a high school student from Ereğli) and Mrs. Sadiye Kaya, who is our driver since 2013.

  • 3 Maner 2014: 355-7.
  • 4 Maner 2015a: 252-6.

3In addition to the archaeological survey, a geophysical survey was begun in two important settlements that had been surveyed in 2013 and 2014, namely Ereğli Karahöyük3 and Zencirli Höyük4. The geophysical survey was conducted by Dr. Ercan Erkul from the University of Kiel and Research Assistant İsmail Kaplanvural and his students from Kocaeli University Department of Geophysical Engineering between 25-27.08.2015. Without the cooperation and help of the whole team, the campaign wouldn’t have been successful and I am grateful for their work and support.

4The archaeological survey was generously supported by Koç University’s College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Türk Tarih Kurumu and the Geophysical survey was financed through Koç University Seed Fund (SF 00013). The project is also supported by AVIS, generously providing a four-wheel drive car since 2014, and Özkoçlar Otel, Derya Lokantası and Serbey Turizm. We are also much obliged to the inhabitants of our survey area, who always open their houses and invite us for an ayran, glass of cold water or breakfast and lunch.

5The 2015 survey season took place from late summer to the beginning of fall. It was generally a very hot and dry season and, according to the villagers, the hottest summer in a long time. The soil was dessicated and covered with dry, tall grass and hay, which prevented us most of the time from finding pottery on the ground. Also the dry soil made it difficult to climb up to the forts on the Taurus Mountains, as the soil was loose and crumbling. These conditions led to the decision that the next survey seasons will take place in June, when the soil is not as dry and the plants in the fields are still low.

Settlements Investigated in 2015

  • 5 Maner 2014; 2015a; 2015b.
  • 6 Maner 2015a; Maner forthcoming.
  • 7 Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi is a settlement that was discovered and numbered in 2014 but could not (...)

6The survey area, which covers four provinces of southeastern Konya, covers an area of ca. 6242 square km. In 2013 the region east of Ereğli was investigated5 (Map 1). In 2014 the archaeological survey continued in the north, west, south and east of Ereğli, in the north of Halkapınar and west of Emirgazi (Map 1)6. In 2015 the Halkapınar province, west and south of Emirgazi, and the southern area around the dry Lake Akgöl were investigated (Map 1). The settlement numbering system for the whole survey area has started in 2013 with Settlement N° 1 and has since followed a successive numbering system. The first new settlement number for the 2015 season was N° 44 (Table 1). Twelve new sites were identified and surveyed in 2015 in addition to a site identified in 2014, N° 41 Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi (Table 1)7.

Map 1

Map 1

Settlements and tumuli identified and surveyed from 2013-2015

Table 1: Investigated and newly discovered sites of the 2015 campaign

N° 

Settlement Name

Province and Village

Altitude

41

Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi

Emirgazi/Eski Kışla

1071 m

44

Bolluca Höyük

Halkapınar/Yeşilyurt/Bolluca

1362 m

45

Kaleönü Yerleşimi

Halkapınar/Ivriz

1255 m

46

Dibek Kalesi

Halkapınar/Ivriz

1601 m

47

Avdallı Kalesi

Halkapınar/Yeşilyurt

1601 m

48

Avdallı Höyük

Halkapınar/Yeşilyurt

1495 m

49

Kapaklı Yerleşimi (Kalesi)

Halkapınar/Yeşilyurt

1512 m

50

Evaltı Yerleşimi

Halkapınar/Ivriz

1177 m

51

Gölbağ Yerleşimi

Halkapınar/Ivriz

1281 m

52

Mindos Kalesi

Halkapınar/Kayasaray Köyü

1759 m

53

Karakaya

Halkapınar/Eskihisar/Gavurçukuru Mevkii

1859 m

54

Arısama Kalesi

Emirgazi/Eski Kışla

1352 m

55

Acıdere Höyük

Ereğli/Kuskuncuk

1230 m

7Several methods were combined for the investigation of the surveyed areas such as seeking information from the local inhabitants, analyzing satellite images, and field walking. In most of the sites extensive field walking was not possible in the 2015 season due to high grass. Since 2013 all of the discovered and surveyed sites have been sketched, photographed, and GPS points taken. The diagnostic sherds are photographed and sketched on the site (Fig. 1). The selected pieces were drawn and photographed and put back on the spot where they were originally discovered.

8During the 2015 survey season these villages were investigated:

9Halkapınar province: Bahçelievler, Büyükdoğan, Çakıllar, Cumhuriyet, Dedeli, Delimahmutlu, Eskihisar, Ivriz, Karayusuflu, Kayasaray, Körlü, Küsere, Osmanköseli, Seydifakıllı, Yassıkaya, Yayıklı, Yeşilyurt.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Documentation during the survey

10Ereğli province: Kuskuncuk, Çayhan, Çakmak, Akgöl shore of Ereğli-Karapınar and the shore of the region between Ereğli-Karaman.

11Emirgazi province: Dikili Taş Mevkii, Karaören, Işıklar köyü.

Surveyed Sites in 2015

41. Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi (Fig. 2-5)

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi (from west) with Mount Arısama in the back

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi (from north)

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Eski Kışla quarter with Mount Arısama in the back

Fig. 5

Fig. 5

Pottery samples from Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi

  • 8 Maner 2015a: 271.
  • 9 Hawkins 1995: 86-102.

12Dikili Taş Mevkii (Fig. 2-4) was discovered during the 2014 field season8. The site is ca. 3.8 km north of Emirgazi and ca. 1 km east of Eski Kışla. In 2014 a short visit was paid to the site. However, since it was the end of the season, there wasn’t enough time to start an extensive survey. The importance of this place is that a group of fragmentary mushroom-shaped altars with Luwian hieroglyphic inscriptions and a rectangular stone pool or altar, dating to the Hittite Imperial period in the reign of Tuthalija IV, were supposedly found here and also in Emirgazi9.

13A villager, who is in his 60’s, remembered from his grandfather that these altars were standing in the fields north of Mount Arısama (also known as Kötü Dağ), the spot known as Dikili Taş Mevkii (Place of the Standing Stone). Dikili Taş Mevkii is part of the Eski Kışla quarter 1 km east of Emirgazi.

14In 2015 Dikili Taş Mevkii was revisited and surveyed. A large region of ca. 1,5 km (N-S) and 0,7 km (E-W) contains pottery (Fig. 5). The whole area is currently used as a field. No architecture or worked stone was discovered. Probably they were carried away to build the stone houses of Eski Kışla (Fig. 4). The houses were investigated for spolia but unfortunately none could be found.

  • 10 Hawkins 1995: 86-102.
  • 11 Personal communication, David Hawkins.
  • 12 Börker-Klähn 2007: 93-95.

15The inscription on the Emirgazi stone altars mention Mount Sarpa10, which is worshipped and deified by the Hittites. Mout Šarpa is likely Mount Arısama11. Börker-Klähn assumes that the Hittite town Uda could be located at the place where the altars were discovered, she supports her argument that in the Hittite town Uda the Mountain Šarpa was worshipped12.

44. Bolluca Höyük (Fig. 6-8)

Fig. 6

Fig. 6

Bolluca Höyük (from north)

Fig. 7

Fig. 7

Foundation of a fortification (?) wall on the north slope of Bolluca Höyük

Fig. 8

Fig. 8

Pottery samples from Bolluca Höyük

  • 13 Publication forthcoming.

16Bolluca Höyük is 3.6 km northwest of Yeniköy (also known as Bokluca or Bolluca) and 7.75 km northeast of Halkapınar. The shallow settlement mound is situated right on the west bank of a dried river and measures ca. 30 m (N-S) by 30 m (E-W) (Fig. 6-7). The river, known as Bokluca or Bolluca Deresi, no longer flows and the river bed is used to plant wheat and barley. Also the höyük and its surroundings are used for agriculture. Pottery was observed on the höyük as well as around it in a diameter of ca. 100 m. On the north and east slopes of the höyük a 15 m long part of a foundation of a wall (ca. 1.7-2 m thick) is preserved, which is likely part of a fortification wall. The wall is built of medium sized slightly worked stones which are probably from the river bed. Among the diagnostic pottery sherds were Chalcolithic, Early - Middle - Late Bronze, and Iron Age (Fig. 8). Across the site on the eastern bank of the dried river bed is supposedly a second settlement. This was indicated to us by the villagers, but only three pieces of non-diagnostic sherds were found, because of the dry summer, dusty soil and also that the field was just plowed before our arrival. The place is of interest because apparently a Middle Bronze Age foundation peg and a Hittite Weather God bronze figurine were found here, which are now in a private collection though registered in the Ereğli Museum13.

45. Kaleönü Yerleşimi (Ivriz) (Fig. 9-10)

Fig. 9

Fig. 9

Kaleönü Yerleşimi

Fig. 10

Fig. 10

Pottery samples from Kaleönü Yerleşimi

17This slope settlement was discovered during a field visit with the museum director Mr. Mahmut Altuncan in 2011. The pottery from the top had fallen down to the narrow path that leads to Ambarderesi. In 2015, during the detailed investigation of Ivriz, this site was surveyed as well. Known by locals as Kaleönü, the site is 2.7 km south of Ivriz and 0.3 km west of the Ivriz relief on a hill at ca. 1,255 MASL (Fig. 9). Pottery is spread over an area of ca. 41 m (N-S) by 46 m (E-W). Sherds were distributed on the western slope and accumulated on the top of the hill between two rock outcrops. No architectural remains were observed. Three obsidian blades in the Ereğli Museum are said to come from here. Among the pottery were sherds from the Chalcolithic, Early Bronze Age and Iron Age (Fig. 10).

46. Dibek Kalesi (Fig. 11-12)

Fig. 11

Fig. 11

Dibek Kalesi

Fig. 12

Fig. 12

Pottery samples from Dibek Kalesi

18The project’s investigation of the northern slopes of the Taurus Mountains within the district borders of the Halkapınar province has led to a better understanding of the importance of the mountains for the protection of the Konya plain, which will be explained in the conclusion in detail. Dibek Kalesi (Fig. 11) is 3.36 km southeast of Ivriz and 2.7 km from Halkapınar and is located on a very important strategic position, controlling on one side the exit northward down to the plain and on the other the Taurus Mountains and road networks south to the Mediterranean. The name of the castle, Dibek (mortar in English), was given by the locals because the shape of the castle is reminiscent of a mortar. The castle is built at 1803 MASL and is likely a control fort located on a road network leading down to Mersin via Çamlıyayla (locally known also as Namrun Yaylası) to the south. This road is still used by locals today.

19The fortress is built around a summit. A dirt road north of the village of Ivriz, which was made by the muhtar of Ivriz for the shepherds, leads to the slopes of the castle. The northwestern and western slopes of Dibek Kalesi are dangerous and steep, whereas the southern and eastern slopes are gentle. Building stones from the fortification wall of the fortress are scattered all over the slopes. Tall dry plants were covering the remains of foundations. Specifically on the southwestern slopes, foundations of walls are visible. Due to the tall dry grass that covered the ground it was almost impossible to find pottery sherds. Among the observed sherds were those of the Middle and Late Bronze Age, Iron Age and Roman period (Fig. 12).

47. Avdallı Kalesi (Fig. 13)

Fig. 13

Fig. 13

Avdallı Kalesi

  • 14 Cyclopean masonry means that roughly shaped boulders are placed on top of each other and interstice (...)

20Avdallı Kalesi (Fig. 13) is 2.4 km southwest of Yeşilyurt and 7.8 km northeast of Halkapınar. Avdallı Kalesi is built around a natural hilltop at a height of ca. 1601 MASL. The castle is not really preserved, however villagers attest that until recently fortification walls were visible that were destroyed by snow storms and rain. Foundations (ca. 0.5-0.7 m wide) of walls are visible between high grass on the south and southeast slopes, one course being preserved. The size of the castle could not really be determined. However, building stones cover mainly the southern and southeastern slope, which is an area ca. 130 m (N-S) by 200 m (E-W). The length of the foundations could not be determined due to high dry grass. But it is clear that specifically the foundations on the southern slope belong to a larger building. The foundations are Cycploean14, made of medium sized stones. Due to high dry grass only three undiagnostic sherds were found, hence it is difficult to date these foundations. This masonry technique was used from Early Bronze until the Roman Period. Avdallı Kalesi leads to road networks in the Taurus Mountains, which lead to the yaylas of Mersin and from there down to the Mediterranean. These paths are still used today. Avdallı Kalesi is ca. 6.7 km northeast of Dibek Kalesi (N° 46), which is visible from this site.

48. Avdallı Höyük (Fig. 14)

Fig. 14

Fig. 14

Avdallı Höyük

21Avdallı Höyük (Fig. 14) is just north of the Yeşilyurt cemetery and ca. 2.1 km southeast of Yeşilyurt. The höyük is low and measures ca. 82 m (N-S) by 49 m (E-W). The whole höyük is used for agricultural purposes. Due to dense covering of crops only a few sherds were discovered. These probably date to the Early Bronze Age.

49. Kapaklı Yerleşimi (Kalesi) (Fig. 15-16)

Fig. 15

Fig. 15

Kapaklı Yerleşimi (Kalesi)

Fig. 16

Fig. 16

Pottery samples from Kapaklı Yerleşimi (Kalesi)

22Remains of a castle could be located at a site known by locals as Kapaklı Kalesi (Fig. 15). This castle is located on a hilltop that runs parallel to the Taurus Mountains and is north of Myndos Kalesi (castle) in Kayasaray. The spot controls the pass from the Konya Plain down to the Halkapınar-Ulukışla road and the Taurus Mountains. Not much of Kapaklı castle is preserved. The castle was built around the summit. Hundreds of small building stones are scattered on the southern slope. A few foundations are still visible. Among the pottery are Middle (?) and Late Bronze Age, Iron Age and Roman sherds (Fig. 16).

50. Ivriz Evaltı Mevkii Yerleşmesi (Fig. 17-18)

Fig. 17

Fig. 17

Ivriz Evaltı Mevkii Yerleşmesi

Fig. 18

Fig. 18

Pottery sample from Ivriz Evaltı Mevkii Yerleşmesi

23Ivriz, the village and also the area where the Neo-Hittite relief is situated, underwent several modern construction phases specifically after the 1940’s. The construction of the water channels around the Ivriz monument, the construction of the Ivriz water dam and also the area north of the monument, which is leveled and used as a picnic area, have changed the natural geography. Due to all of this construction work it is almost impossible to detect ancient pottery around the relief area. A second handicap is that the area around the monument and also the southern part of the village have been flooded several times over a long time span. Locals pointed out that the last big flood in the 1960’s, coming from the eastern slopes of the Taurus Mountains, destroyed the southern part of the village. Locals indicated that at a minimum of twice every hundred years, floods destroyed parts of the village.

24During the investigation in the village itself almost no ancient pottery was found. This is probably also due to the fact that because of these floods, the ancient settlements (if there were any) are covered with soil and rubble from these floods.

25The survey in the village of Ivriz revealed a new site with ancient pottery. The location is known as Ivriz Evaltı Mevkii (Fig. 17), located 2.7 km south of Halkapınar and just 8 m east of the Neo-Hittite relief. The southern part of the site is used for sewage facilities of the municipality. The pottery distribution in Ivriz Evaltı Mevkii Yerleşmesi covers ca. an area of 97 m (N-S) by 38 m (E-W). The pottery shows a wide range from Middle – Late Bronze Age, Iron Age, Roman, and green glazed probably of the Byzantine and Ottoman periods (Fig. 18). No architectural remains were found.

51. Gölbağ Yerleşimi (Fig. 19-20)

Fig. 19

Fig. 19

Gölbağ Yerleşimi

Fig. 20

Fig. 20

Stone wall in Gölbağ Yerleşimi

26During the survey the hilltops around Ivriz were investigated as well. Foundations of a building 0.54 km southeast of the Ivriz village were discovered (Fig. 19-20). The place is known as Gölbağı Mevkii by the locals. A road up to the hill just on the left side of the entrance to the small bridge over the Ivriz stream leads to a large building foundation, the full extent of which could not be determined. Probably the stones of the foundations and the upper wall were used to build the village houses of Ivriz. The foundations of the building made of boulders ca. 40-80 cm long and around 15-30 m wide. The cyclopean wall is preserved on the south side in some parts up to two courses, and there is no indication of mortar between the stones. The preserved foundation indicate a building at least ca. 70 m (WE) by 78 m (S-N). As the foundations break off, it can be assumed that it was once much larger. Dibek Kalesi is visible from here. Gölbaşı Mevkii Yerleşimi must have also been a castle, controlling the descent from the Taurus Mountains down to the plain. Due to thorny vegetation, which covered the whole surface, no pottery was found.

52. Mindos Kalesi (Fig. 21)

Fig. 21

Fig. 21

Mindos Kalesi

27Mindos Kalesi (Fig. 21), which is also known as Kale-i Mindos by locals, is located in Kayasaray village (also known as Kalesaray by locals) 8.9 km east of Halkapınar. The castle is 0.15 km east of the village. The castle is built around a high outcrop (1750 MASL). The original village of Kayasaray was built on the southern slopes of this outcrop. According to locals, in the 1980’s boulders started to fall down from the peak, houses were destroyed, and villagers were killed. The village was evacuated to the place where it is today, southwest of the peak. However, still today a few houses are inhabited on the southern side of the peak. The survey around the outcrop yielded no pottery. As the village was built on the ancient castle and the village was destroyed by stone boulders, there seems to be no ancient architecture preserved.

28Kalesaray has a very important strategic location. It is on a pass from Mersin down to the Konya Plain. According to the locals, until fifteen years ago camel caravans and nomads were passing through Kayasaray coming down from the Taurus Mountains. They rested in Kayasaray before preceding further down to the Konya Plain. The pass from Kayasaray leads south over the Taurus Mountains to the pastures of Çamlıyayla Mersin and from there down to Mersin and the Mediterranean coast. Even today these routes are used by locals to go down to Mersin.

53. Karakaya (Fig. 22)

29This location, which is known as Gavurçukuru Mevkii by locals, was shown to us by the muhtar of Eskihisar. The location is 5.3 km southeast of Halkapınar and 1.4 km southwest of Eskihisar. The castle, which is known as Karakaya, is built on top of a hill (Fig. 22) that controls like all the other castles the route through the Taurus Mountains and down to the Konya plain. Leveled bedrocks and a few building stones on the hilltop are the only remains of the castle. Only three undiagnostic sherds were found, hence it is not possible to say when it was built.

30It can be assumed that it is part of the castle chain on the Taurus Mountains to control the trade routes from the Mediterranean into the Konya Plain.

54. Arısama Kalesi (Fig. 23-24)

Fig. 23

Fig. 23

Summit of Mount Arısama and Arısama Kalesi

Fig. 24

Fig. 24

Eastern fortification wall of Arısama Kalesi

31Arısama castle (Fig. 23-24) is built on the summit (1402 MASL) of Mount Arısama (also known as Kötü Dağ among locals). The castle is ca. 3.3 km northeast of Emirgazi and ca. 5.2 km northwest of Belkaya. Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşmesi is located down at the eastern slope of this mountain (Settlement N° 41). A dirt road leads from the eastern side of the mountain to the southern slopes of the peak, which is covered with thousands of building stones fallen down from the top. This road leads down to Emirgazi, which is ca. 3 km southwest from here. To climb up to the peak is very difficult as it is steep and the ground is covered with a layer of building stones. Also the season of 2015 was very dry and the soil was very loose and crumbling, which made the hike probably more difficult than it would otherwise be.

  • 15 Belke 1984: 132 Fig. 2, Pl. 6-9.

32Arısama castle measures ca. 125 m (N-S) by 92 m (E-W). Fortification walls and towers are visible from the slopes of the mountain. The castle consists of a fortification wall which encircles the peak of the mountain. This wall is supported with rectangular towers. Inside the walls the ruins of a building are visible. The fortification walls and ruins mainly date to the Byzantine period, however closer examination specifically of the fortification walls shows that there were several building phases. The foundations are cyclopean whereas in the upper part mortar was used. The Arısama castle is described by Belke, who mentions also Christian crosses carved on building blocks15.

33During the survey only five sherds were found, among them one dating to the Middle Iron Age (the others were undiagnostic). In 2016 the castle will be visited again with the hope of finding more diagnostic pottery. Belke underlines the strategic importance of this castle during the Byzantine period, to protect the hinterland against attacks from the southeast and the south after an enemy had approached through the Taurus Mountains.

34Mount Arısama is very likely to be equated with Hittite Mount Šarpa, mentioned on the Emirgazi altars. It is very likely that beneath the Byzantine castle a Hittite castle and temple is hidden, as the mountain was sacred to the Hittites. The one and only sherd indicates that this peak was also used during the Middle Iron Age, which underlines the strategic importance of this peak and mountain over a long time period.

55. Acıdere Höyük (Fig. 25-26)

Fig. 25

Fig. 25

Acıdere Höyük

Fig. 26

Fig. 26

Pottery samples from Acıdere Höyük

35Acıdere Höyük (Fig. 25) was shown to us by a villager. The settlement mound is 13.6 km east of Ereğli and 5.5 km north of Gökçeyazı village. The höyük is very low and large areas are damaged because of agricultural usage of the land. The real size is not possible to determine as it was difficult to find pottery because of dense vegetation on the surface. The owner had collected fifteen sherds, which date to the Chalcolithic, Early Bronze and Roman period (Fig. 26). No architectural remains were discovered.

Survey in Ivriz and Ambarderesi (Fig. 27-35)

Fig. 27

Fig. 27

Location of the second relief in Ivriz

Fig. 28

Fig. 28

Basin next to the second relief

Fig. 29

Fig. 29

Entrance to the building with a vault in Ivriz

Fig. 30

Fig. 30

Inside the vaulted building

Fig. 31

Fig. 31

Water spring and cave in Ivriz

Fig. 32

Fig. 32

Neo-Hittite relief in Ambarderesi

Fig. 33

Fig. 33

Detail of the Neo-Hittite relief in Ambarderesi

Fig. 34

Fig. 34

Kızlar Oğlanlar Sarayı (Sannabadae Monastery) in Ambarderesi

Fig. 35

Fig. 35

Inside the cave in Ambarderesi

  • 16 Now in the Ereğli Museum.
  • 17 This also explains why the stele and the head of a colossal Neo-Hittite sculpture were found under (...)
  • 18 Published extensively by Bier 1976.
  • 19 Maner forthcoming.

36The investigation and survey in Ivriz was conducted around the water cave, the hilltop above the cave, the space of the second relief16 of Ivriz, the small building covered with a vault below the second relief, and the whole area around the main Ivriz relief. In none of these mentioned locations was ancient pottery found. As mentioned before, there were many erosions and floods, so the ancient material is probably under a thick rubble layer17. The rock face that was once the second relief of Ivriz18 (Fig. 27) is disturbed by illicit excavations. The relief was facing north looking towards Tont Kalesi, probably the Hittite town of Hupišna, which is visible from this site19. Immediately to the west of the relief two steps are carved into the rock, which lead to a rectangular basin or indentation with rounded corners measuring ca. 65 cm x 55 cm (Fig. 28). This basin could be interpreted as an altar, sacrifice pit or a setting for a stele.

37Just below the rock with the second relief is a small vaulted building (Fig. 29-30). Seven modern concrete steps lead to it and the entrance is closed with an iron door where visitors attach cloth pieces to mark their wishes. Locals call this building ‘the Hittite Altar.’ The building is ca. 2.7 m wide and 6 m long. It is built adjacent to the rock face where the eastern and southern side of the cliff form natural walls. The lowest visible course of the eastern wall is built of very large boulders (ca. 80 - 90 cm), while the upper courses are made of medium sized stones fixed with mud. The vault is reminiscent of vaults of Late Antiquity, though the original structure is not very clear as it has been repaired with concrete. The small building resembles a chapel, which was perhaps built during Late Antiquity and was somehow connected with the Sannabadae monastery up in Ambarderesi. However, the large boulders and the fact that it is just below the small Hittite relief might indicate that this was originally built during the Hittite or Neo-Hittite period and was reused during Late Antiquity. Pottery has not been found here.

38Around the water cave (Fig. 31), where water bubbles up from the ground during May-August, no ancient structure or pottery could be found.

  • 20 Karauğuz and Kunt 2006.
  • 21 Elm 1994: 184-205.

39The survey included also the area of Ambarderesi. The location known as Ambarderesi is around 7 km to the southwest of Ivriz. A dry river bed leads up to the Taurus Mountains and to a Neo-Hittite relief20 (Fig. 32-33) that bears the same iconography as the main Ivriz relief. However, this one does not have an inscription. The relief is carved on the western side of the hillside adjacent to the remains of a monastery which is known as Kızlar Oğlanlar Sarayı by locals (Fig. 34). This was the Sannabadae monastery where ascetic monks and nuns resided21. Due to lack of time the survey of this area was postponed to the fourth season, when the cave next to the apsis will also be investigated.

Geophysical survey (fig. 36-38)

Fig. 36

Fig. 36

Remote sensing in Zencirli Höyük

Fig. 37

Fig. 37

Geomagnetic survey in Zencirli Höyük

Fig. 38

Fig. 38

Geoelectric survey in Zencirli Höyük

  • 22 Publication forthcoming.
  • 23 In preparation by E. Erkul and Ç. Maner.

40A geophysical survey was conducted in Ereğli Karahöyük and Zencirli Höyük. These two höyüks belong to the group of large settlement mounds in this region. They had been surveyed in 2013 and 2014. Both sites are located close to the Cilician Gates and are sited on important road networks and close to mines in the Taurus Mountains. Both settlements show a continuity from the Early Bronze until the Middle Iron Age. The geophysical survey was conducted by Dr. Ercan Erkul from the University of Kiel in Germany and Mr. İsmail Kaplanvural and his students from Kocaeli University22. Three methods were applied on both settlements: resistivity (Fig. 36), magnetometry (Fig. 37) and geoelectric (Fig. 38). The publication of the results is forthcoming23.

Communal Work (fig. 39-42)

Fig. 39

Fig. 39

Seminar in Ivriz for the staff of the municipality

Fig. 40

Fig. 40

Distribution of information panels about the survey project

Fig. 41

Fig. 41

Preparation of the space for the information panel in the Ereğli Museum

Fig. 42

Fig. 42

Bilingual stele from Ivriz with mirrors and information panel

  • 24 Published by Bier 1976.

41Ivriz receives from mid-April until October minimum one thousand visitors on every weekend. The natural sweet water, which bubbles out of the ground from mid-April onwards is one of the reasons why people come here. Local people get their drinking water from these springs. During hot summer days locals and also visitors from Karaman, Niğde, Konya and Adana visit Ivriz because it is cooler than the surrounding landscape and also it has picnic facilities. However, all of the natural resources are more abused rather than used. This includes also the archaeological remains. Since 2014 the municipality of Halkapınar asks for entrance fees to Ivriz, mainly for the parking facilities. A problem which was recognized already in 2014 is that locals of Ivriz take tourists around and communicate inaccurate historical and archaeological information to visitors. For example, a common local myth told to visitors is that the Roman Empire was founded here in Ivriz. The small Neo-Hittite relief (now in the Ereğli Museum), which originally was located not far away from the water cave24, which bears two Hittite officials leading a ram or sheep to probably an altar, is interpreted by locals as Remus and Romulus, which they have related to the foundation of the Roman Empire in Ivriz!

42In order to prevent this, a one day seminar about the history and archaeology of the region was conducted by the KEYAR-team for locals and workers of the municipality and prefecture of Halkapınar (Fig. 39). This will be continued also in the following years. Information panels on the KEYAR survey were gifted to every local stakeholder in Ereğli, Emirgazi and Halkapınar who had supported the survey project (Fig. 40) during the field season of 2015. These panels were also hung up in the Ereğli Museum, municipalities, and prefectures.

  • 25 Dinçol 1994.

43The Ereğli Museum exhibits important finds from Ivriz. Among them are a bilingual stele, of which the lower part is preserved, and half of the head of a Neo-Hittite colossal sculpture which probably depicts King Warpalawas of Tuwanuwa. Both were discovered in Ivriz in 1986 during construction work for canal pipes ca. 100 m east of the main relief25. An information panel about the stele and the head was prepared by the KEYAR-team and hung over the stele (Fig. 41). Mirrors were placed behind the fragment of the bilingual stele (Fig. 42), because the narrow space obstructed the view of the inscriptions on the back and left side.

Conclusion (fig. 43)

Fig. 43

Fig. 43

KEYAR 2015 team

Map 2

Map 2

Network of castles/forts in the Taurus Mountains

44The 2015 field season investigated the Halkapınar province, the regions west and south of Emirgazi, and the southern area around the dry Lake Akgöl. Specifically the survey in Halkapınar presents interesting results. As it is indicated in the article, a series of castles on the Taurus Mountains were located and surveyed (Map 2). Their function was to control the road networks from the Konya Plain down to the Mediterranean. Interviews with locals point out that these roads are still used today by locals. Until now the Cilician Gate was considered the most important gateway from Central Anatolia to the Mediterranean. However, the castles and the roads connected to them show very clearly that there were also other roads which led down to the different regions of the Mediterranean. One of them was the road from the castles of Halkapınar via Çamlıyayla and from there down to the region of Mersin. A second interesting result is that the location where some of the Emirgazi altars were discovered revealed a large settlement with Second Millenium and Iron Age pottery. This would support the idea that a Hittite settlement was located here where Mount Šarpa was worshipped.

Haut de page

Bibliographie

Belke, K., 1984: Galatien und Lykaonien, TIB 4. Wien.

Bier, L., 1976: “A Second Hittite Relief at Ivriz”, JNES 35/2: 115-126.

Börker-Klähn, J., 2007: “Die Schlacht um Tuanuua als ‘Atlanta Storico’”, in Groddek, D. and Zorman, M. (eds.), Tabularia Hethaeorum: hethitologische Beiträge; Silvin Kosak zum 65. Geburtstag: 91-118, Wiesbaden.

Dinçol , B.,1994: "New Archaeological and Epigraphical Finds from Ivriz”, Tel Aviv 21: 117-128.

Elm, S., 1994: ‘Virgins of the God’ The Making of Ascetism in Late Antiquity, Oxford.

Karauğuz, G. and Kunt, H.I., 2006: “Ivriz kaya anıtları ve çevresi üzerine bir araştırma”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 122: 23-50.

Hawkins, J.D., 1995: “Appendix 2. EMIRGAZI altars”, The Hieroglyphic Inscription of the Sacred Pool Complex at Hattusa (Südburg), StBoT Beiheft 3: 86-102.

Maner, Ç., 2014: “Preliminary Report on the First Season of the Konya-Ereğli (KEYAR) Survey 2013”, Anatolia Antiqua XXII: 343-360.

Maner, Ç., 2015a: “Preliminary Report on the Second Season of the Konya-Ereğli (KEYAR) Survey 2014”, Anatolia Antiqua XXIII: 249-273. URL: https://anatoliaantiqua.revues.org/163.

Maner, Ç., 2015b: “Konya ili Ereğli, Halkapınar, Karapınar ve Emirgazi 2013 Yılı Yüzey Araştırmaları (KEYAR)”, AST 32/1: 27-46.

Maner, Ç., forthcoming: “Konya ili Ereğli, Halkapınar, Karapınar ve Emirgazi 2014 Yılı Yüzey Araştırmaları (KEYAR)”, AST 33.

Haut de page

Notes

1 KEYAR: Konya Ereğli Yüzey Araştırması, Konya Ereğli Survey Project.

2 Maner 2014; 2015a; 2015b; Maner forthcoming.

3 Maner 2014: 355-7.

4 Maner 2015a: 252-6.

5 Maner 2014; 2015a; 2015b.

6 Maner 2015a; Maner forthcoming.

7 Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi is a settlement that was discovered and numbered in 2014 but could not be investigated properly due to bad weather conditions, hence the site was surveyed in 2015 and kept its number.

8 Maner 2015a: 271.

9 Hawkins 1995: 86-102.

10 Hawkins 1995: 86-102.

11 Personal communication, David Hawkins.

12 Börker-Klähn 2007: 93-95.

13 Publication forthcoming.

14 Cyclopean masonry means that roughly shaped boulders are placed on top of each other and interstices are filled with smaller stones.

15 Belke 1984: 132 Fig. 2, Pl. 6-9.

16 Now in the Ereğli Museum.

17 This also explains why the stele and the head of a colossal Neo-Hittite sculpture were found under 7 m of rubble. They were published by Dinçol 1994.

18 Published extensively by Bier 1976.

19 Maner forthcoming.

20 Karauğuz and Kunt 2006.

21 Elm 1994: 184-205.

22 Publication forthcoming.

23 In preparation by E. Erkul and Ç. Maner.

24 Published by Bier 1976.

25 Dinçol 1994.

Haut de page

Table des illustrations

Titre Map 1
Légende Settlements and tumuli identified and surveyed from 2013-2015
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 500k
Titre Fig. 1
Légende Documentation during the survey
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 244k
Titre Fig. 2
Légende Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi (from west) with Mount Arısama in the back
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-3.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 220k
Titre Fig. 3
Légende Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi (from north)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-4.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 284k
Titre Fig. 4
Légende Eski Kışla quarter with Mount Arısama in the back
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-5.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 268k
Titre Fig. 5
Légende Pottery samples from Dikili Taş Mevkii Yerleşimi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-6.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 132k
Titre Fig. 6
Légende Bolluca Höyük (from north)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-7.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 244k
Titre Fig. 7
Légende Foundation of a fortification (?) wall on the north slope of Bolluca Höyük
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-8.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 296k
Titre Fig. 8
Légende Pottery samples from Bolluca Höyük
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-9.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 268k
Titre Fig. 9
Légende Kaleönü Yerleşimi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-10.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 368k
Titre Fig. 10
Légende Pottery samples from Kaleönü Yerleşimi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-11.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 224k
Titre Fig. 11
Légende Dibek Kalesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-12.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 252k
Titre Fig. 12
Légende Pottery samples from Dibek Kalesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-13.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 252k
Titre Fig. 13
Légende Avdallı Kalesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-14.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 412k
Titre Fig. 14
Légende Avdallı Höyük
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-15.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 472k
Titre Fig. 15
Légende Kapaklı Yerleşimi (Kalesi)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-16.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 520k
Titre Fig. 16
Légende Pottery samples from Kapaklı Yerleşimi (Kalesi)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-17.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 40k
Titre Fig. 17
Légende Ivriz Evaltı Mevkii Yerleşmesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-18.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 380k
Titre Fig. 18
Légende Pottery sample from Ivriz Evaltı Mevkii Yerleşmesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-19.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 28k
Titre Fig. 19
Légende Gölbağ Yerleşimi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-20.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 444k
Titre Fig. 20
Légende Stone wall in Gölbağ Yerleşimi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-21.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 412k
Titre Fig. 21
Légende Mindos Kalesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-22.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 324k
Titre Fig. 22
Légende Karakaya
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-23.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 300k
Titre Fig. 23
Légende Summit of Mount Arısama and Arısama Kalesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-24.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 380k
Titre Fig. 24
Légende Eastern fortification wall of Arısama Kalesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-25.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 500k
Titre Fig. 25
Légende Acıdere Höyük
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-26.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 176k
Titre Fig. 26
Légende Pottery samples from Acıdere Höyük
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-27.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 96k
Titre Fig. 27
Légende Location of the second relief in Ivriz
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-28.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 400k
Titre Fig. 28
Légende Basin next to the second relief
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-29.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 432k
Titre Fig. 29
Légende Entrance to the building with a vault in Ivriz
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-30.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 408k
Titre Fig. 30
Légende Inside the vaulted building
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-31.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 264k
Titre Fig. 31
Légende Water spring and cave in Ivriz
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-32.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 376k
Titre Fig. 32
Légende Neo-Hittite relief in Ambarderesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-33.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 428k
Titre Fig. 33
Légende Detail of the Neo-Hittite relief in Ambarderesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-34.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 476k
Titre Fig. 34
Légende Kızlar Oğlanlar Sarayı (Sannabadae Monastery) in Ambarderesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-35.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 364k
Titre Fig. 35
Légende Inside the cave in Ambarderesi
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-36.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 264k
Titre Fig. 36
Légende Remote sensing in Zencirli Höyük
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-37.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 168k
Titre Fig. 37
Légende Geomagnetic survey in Zencirli Höyük
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-38.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 232k
Titre Fig. 38
Légende Geoelectric survey in Zencirli Höyük
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-39.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 288k
Titre Fig. 39
Légende Seminar in Ivriz for the staff of the municipality
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-40.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 272k
Titre Fig. 40
Légende Distribution of information panels about the survey project
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-41.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 144k
Titre Fig. 41
Légende Preparation of the space for the information panel in the Ereğli Museum
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-42.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 92k
Titre Fig. 42
Légende Bilingual stele from Ivriz with mirrors and information panel
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-43.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 132k
Titre Fig. 43
Légende KEYAR 2015 team
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-44.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 496k
Titre Map 2
Légende Network of castles/forts in the Taurus Mountains
URL http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/docannexe/image/384/img-45.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 385k
Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence papier

Çiğdem Maner, « Preliminary Report on the Third Season of the Konya-Ereğli Survey (Keyar) 2015 »Anatolia Antiqua, XXIV | 2016, 225-252.

Référence électronique

Çiğdem Maner, « Preliminary Report on the Third Season of the Konya-Ereğli Survey (Keyar) 2015 »Anatolia Antiqua [En ligne], XXIV | 2016, mis en ligne le 11 décembre 2018, consulté le 10 février 2026. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/384 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/anatoliaantiqua.384

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-SA-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY-SA 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont susceptibles d’être soumis à des autorisations d’usage spécifiques.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search