Skip to navigation – Site map

HomePresentationGuidelines for Referees

Guidelines for Referees

Image 10000200000000A80000009FB9969B83D4DFC067.png
Image 100000000000018E000000326F7734C79EC45B61.png
http://aof.revues.org

Reviewer’s name:

Article title:

Wishes of the reviewer:

DO or DO NOT share the contents of this sheet with the author.

SUMMARY EVALUATION

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

N/A

Current significance and intellectual merit

Accuracy of subject matter, data etc.

Review of the literature

Use of theoretical or analytic framework

Effectiveness of examples and/or figures

Clarity of written expression (organization, exposition, style, syntax, punctuation, spelling)

REVIEW OF SPECIFIC AREAS

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

N/A

Theory (insightfulness, consistency, appropriateness)

Methodology (design, sample selection, instrumentation)

Data analysis and interpretation

Interpretation of findings and discussion

Suggestive of further research

Innovative concept

Thought provoking

Originality

Recommendation:

Accept as it is

Accept with minor revisions as noted below

Accept subject to substantial revision as noted below

Revise and resubmit. Major revision required as noted below

Reject for present, but encourage submission elsewhere

Reject

Comments:

We are interested in 1-2 pages of comments on

- Originality of conception and significance of questions asked;

- Quality of methodology and sources;

- Vigor and cogency of argument;

- Felicity of style and organization;

- Suggestions for improvements.

  • DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Journal supported by the Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales (CNRS)
    CNRS - Institut national des sciences humaines et sociales
  • OpenEdition Journals
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search