Skip to navigation – Site map

HomeNuméros33Studies of Objects: manufacturin...Dacian bracelets and Transylvania...

Studies of Objects: manufacturing skills and alloy selection

Dacian bracelets and Transylvanian gold: ancient history and modern analyses

Bracelets de Dacie et or de Transylvanie : histoire ancienne et analyses modernes
Bogdan Constantinescu, Roxana Bugoi, Viorel Cojocaru, Martin Radtke, Thomas Calligaro, Joseph Salomon, Laurent Pichon, Stefan Röhrs, Daniele Ceccato, Ernest Oberländer-Târnoveanu, Corine Ionescu and Dana Pop
p. 221-225

Abstracts

The recovery of the Dacian gold bracelets was the most thrilling archaeological event of the last years in Romania. The artefacts are exhibited in the Historical Treasure section of the National History museum of Romania, Bucharest, being recovered from the international antique markets through a concerted effort of the Romanian, French, and German authorities.

This paper reviews the X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyses carried out on these exquisite artefacts. These measurements followed the visual examination of qualified experts, which concluded that the gold spiralled bracelets showed strong stylistic similarities with the Dacian silver bracelets discovered until that date in archaeological contexts.

Since the most likely source – for geographical and historical reasons – for the metal used to manufacture these artefacts was the Transylvanian Apuseni mountains, additional measurements on several fragments of natural Transylvanian gold, both from placers and primary deposits, were performed using Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Fluorescence (SR-XRF) at the BESSY synchrotron, Berlin, and micro Particle Induced X-ray Emission (micro-PIXE) at the AGLAE accelerator, Paris, and at the AN2000 accelerator of LNL, Padova.

The conclusion of this study was that the recovered spirals are genuine Dacian artefacts, made by cold hammering, chiselling and punching Transylvanian unrefined gold – gold panned from riverbeds mixed with primary gold, most likely extracted from surface veins.

Top of page

Full text

1. Introduction

1The eleven Dacian gold bracelets recovered until the summer of 2009 are multi-spiralled (5-7 spirals), and weigh from 682 g up to 1196 g. The spirals feature at both ends zoomorphic protomes, most likely representations of snake-heads, and stylized palmettes (Fig. 1).

2The artefacts were found by looting an UNESCO World Heritage archaeological site – Sarmizegetusa Regia, located in the Carpathian mountains (nowadays Romania), the capital of the Dacian Kingdom during the period between the 1st century BC and the 1st century AD (Daicoviciu and Daicoviciu, 1963). The poachers resorted to illegal metal detectors, the bracelets being found buried in several places (most of them being intentionally specially built hideouts) near the sacred precincts of Sarmizegetusa. The artefacts were illegally exported and sold on the antiquity market, being recovered through the concerted efforts of the Romanian, French and German authorities, and with the involvement of the INTERPOL (Lazăr et al., 2008).

Figure 1: Bracelet no. 3.
Figure 1 : Bracelet référence 3.

Figure 1: Bracelet no. 3.Figure 1 : Bracelet référence 3.

3To asses their authenticity, the bracelets were visually examined by a group of experts, who decided on stylistic grounds that the artefacts present strong similarities with the Dacian silver bracelets discovered until then in archaeological contexts, and which are exhibited in (or stored in the deposits of) several Romanian and foreign museums. By studying the marks left on the surfaces of the bracelets, it was concluded that the manufacturing techniques used for the spirals were cold hammering, punching and chiselling (Lazăr et al., 2008).

4Due to their special shape, decoration and heavy weight, and, not least, to the material they were made of – the fascinating and powerful gold – it was suggested that these artefacts had a tremendous significance for Dacian society, most likely being ritual objects and/or power insignia.

5Since the Romanian judicial bodies that investigated the case of poaching an UNESCO World Heritage site required further arguments supporting the authenticity of the bracelets, a compositional analysis of the gold alloy of the spirals was requested. Because only local, non-destructive and non-invasive analyses were allowed, XRF was chosen to provide the details regarding the elemental composition of the artefacts.

6Taking into account the wealth of ancient gold artefacts unearthed on the Romanian territory, an extensive study of Transylvanian native gold fragments was performed as well, since this geographical area is known to have been a source for gold exploitation since prehistory (Hauptmann et al., 1995). These investigations started with the gold sources – primary and secondary – located closest to the places where the artefacts were found (results reported in Bugoi et al., 2008), and continued with other Transylvanian gold sources (see Neacşu et al., 2009).

2. methods

7The XRF compositional analysis of the bracelets was performed using a setup based on a 241Am (30 mCi) annular radioactive source and a Si(Li) horizontal detector – see the XRF spectrum shown in Figure 2.

8The micro-PIXE measurements carried out on Transylvanian native gold samples were performed both in air with a 3 meV proton micro-beam (50 x 50 um2) at the AGLAE accelerator in Paris, and in vacuum with a 2 meV proton beam (4 x 4 um2) at the AN2000 accelerator of the LNL, INFN, Padova.

Figure 2: XRF spectrum of bracelet no. 11.
Figure 2 : Spectre FX du bracelet référence 11.

Figure 2: XRF spectrum of bracelet no. 11.Figure 2 : Spectre FX du bracelet référence 11.

9The micro SR-XRF analyses of another set of Transylvanian geological gold samples were performed at the BESSY synchrotron, Berlin, in air, the characteristic X-rays being excited with a 34 keV monochromatic X-ray beam (100 x 200 um2).

10The detailed description of the employed experimental setups, as well as the previously reported results, can be found in Bugoi et al. (2008) and Constantinescu et al. (2008).

3. Results and discussion

11The results of the XRF analyses obtained for each bracelet are provided in Tables1. It can be easily observed that the spirals contain large amounts of silver (11% on average) and very small amounts of copper (0.9% on average). This compositional pattern is consistent with the one of natural gold, which contains up to 40% silver and up to 1% copper (Guerra, 2000; Tylecote, 1987).

12Obviously, there was no intention to refine the gold employed to manufacture these artefacts. Presumably, different gold ingots were used to manufacture the bracelets, an aspect suggested by the slight differences in the compositions of the eleven artefacts.

13Traces of Sn were observed in the XRF spectra – see Figure 2 and Tables1. most likely, the Sn originates from the first melting in reducing atmosphere of alluvial gold, in which cassiterite (SnO2) grains were present (Dube, 2006; Guerra and Calligaro, 2003).

14The composition of bracelet no. 8, with the highest Sn and Cu content of all the investigated armbands, points towards a hypothesised tin-bronze alloying of the gold ingot used to manufacture this object (Dube, 2006).

15Ca, Ti, mn, Fe, and Ba traces, most likely from soil contamination (the artefacts were supposedly buried for two thousand years), were detected on almost all bracelet surfaces. Sb traces were also detected in some bracelets, pointing towards the use of a primary deposit gold source.

Tables1: XRF concentrations of the Dacian gold bracelets (the overall relative uncertainty is estimated to be ~1% for Au concentrations, ~10% for Ag and Cu concentrations and ~20% for Sn concentrations).
Tableau 1 : Compositions obtenues par XRF des bracelets en or Daciens (incertitudes relatives moyennes sont estimées à ~1% pour les teneurs en Au, ~10% pour les teneurs en Ag et en Cu et ~20% pour les teneurs en Sn).

Tables1: XRF concentrations of the Dacian gold bracelets (the overall relative uncertainty is estimated to be ~1% for Au concentrations, ~10% for Ag and Cu concentrations and ~20% for Sn concentrations).Tableau 1 : Compositions obtenues par XRF des bracelets en or Daciens (incertitudes relatives moyennes sont estimées à ~1% pour les teneurs en Au, ~10% pour les teneurs en Ag et en Cu et ~20% pour les teneurs en Sn).

16Both micro-PIXE and micro SR-XRF led to the following conclusions: Transylvanian gold, both placer and primary, contains high and variable amounts of Ag (from 8% up to 35%), low amounts of Cu (hundreds of mg/kg on average, but up to 1.5%), traces of Sn for placer gold (500 mg/kg on average), and traces of Sb (up to 900 mg/kg) and Te (up to 3000 mg/kg) for primary gold.

17These results are in agreement with the geochemical data for Transylvanian gold from Berbeleac (1985) and Tămaş et al. (2006). They also confirm the previously published data, showing that Transylvanian primary gold is characterized by relatively large Ag amounts (more than 10% on average, but more often 20% or even 30%) (Tylecote, 1987; Hauptmann et al., 1995; Bugoi et al., 2008 and references therein). The amount of Ag is generally lower for the Transylvanian gold samples of alluvial origin, an aspect explained through the weathering of the gold particles, Ag and Cu being more susceptible to dissolution or leaching, depending on the pH of the surrounding environment (Dube, 2006).

18The native gold samples turned out to be very inhomogeneous, an aspect highlighted by employing the scanning option of these micro-analytical techniques. From a methodological point of view, it is worth mentioning that the sensitivity of micro SR-XRF is significantly superior to the one of micro-PIXE, especially for Sn detection.

19The Cu content of the bracelets was slightly higher than the one of the natural gold samples. This was most likely due to the melting of the accompanying gold minerals, which leads to an ‘enrichment’ in terms of Cu content in the finite objects (Hauptmann et al., 1995).

20By comparing the XRF results of the bracelets with the micro-PIXE and micro SR-XRF results of Transylvanian gold samples, the determined trace elements and the overall compositional pattern, it was concluded that, most likely, the Dacian gold bracelets were made from unrefined Transylvanian native gold – natural panned gold (gold that has not been deliberately alloyed or purified) mixed with primary gold, using a primitive metallurgy. Thus, in addition to the stylistic and historical arguments, the XRF analyses further supported the authenticity of the Dacian bracelets.

4. Conclusions

21The recovery and investigation of the Dacian gold bracelets is a good example of the close cooperation between the judicial and police bodies, archaeologists, cultural heritage experts, physicists and geologists. Despite their turbulent recent history, these gorgeous artefacts finally found their peace, allowing themselves to be admired in their shining splendour in the showcases of the Historical Treasury of the National History museum of Romania in Bucharest.

22The elemental analyses carried out by means of X-ray methods played an important role in the authentication of these artefacts. Taking into account the location where the bracelets were found, the historical arguments about the Dacian civilization, and, not least, the results of the elemental analyses undertaken both on natural gold samples and on the recovered artefacts, it was concluded that, most likely, natural panned gold (gold that has not been deliberately alloyed or purified) mixed with primary gold from Transylvania was used to manufacture the Dacian spiralled bracelets.

The financial support of the EU-ARTECH project (allowing access to the AGLAE accelerator, Paris), of the EU FP6 contract EURONS no. RII3-CT-2004-506065 (granting access to the AN2000 LNL accelerator, Padova) and of EU FP6 contract no. RII3-CT-2004-506008 (funding the experiment at the BESSY synchrotron, Berlin) are gratefully acknowledged.

Top of page

Bibliography

Berbeleac, I., 1985. Zăcăminte de aur. Bucureşti, Editura Tehnică (in Romanian).

Bugoi, R., Cojocaru, V., Constantinescu, B., Calligaro, T., Pichon, L., Röhrs, S. and Salomon, J., 2008. Compositional studies on Transylvanian gold nuggets: Advantages and limitations of PIXE-PIGE analysis. Nuclear Instruments and methods in Physics Research B 266(10): 2316 -2319.

Constantinescu, B., Bugoi, R., Cojocaru, V., Radtke, m., Calligaro, T., Salomon, J., Pichon, L., Röhrs, S., Ceccato, D. and Oberländer-Târnoveanu, E., 2008. micro SR-XRF and micro-PIXE studies for archaeological gold identification – the case of Carpathian (Transylvanian) gold and of Dacian bracelets. Nuclear Instruments and methods in Physics Research B 266(10): 2325-2328.

Daicoviciu, C. and Daicoviciu, H., 1963. Sarmizegethusa: les citadelles et les agglomerations daciques des monts d’Oraştie. Bucureşti, Ed. meridiane (in French).

Dube, R.K., 2006. Interrelation between gold and tin: A historical perspective. Gold Bulletin 39(3): 103-113.

Guerra, m.F., 2000. The study of the characterisation and provenance of coins and other metal work using XRF, PIXE and Activation Analysis, in D.C. Creagh, D.A. Bradley (eds), Radiation in Art and Archeometry. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 378-416.

Guerra, m.F. and Calligaro, T., 2003. Gold cultural heritage objects: a review of studies of provenance and manufacturing technologies. measurement Science and Technology 14: 1527-1537.

Hauptmann, A., Rehren, Th. and Pernicka, E., 1995. The composition of gold from the ancient mining district of Verespatak/Roşia montană, România, in G. morteani, J.P. Northover (eds.), Prehistoric Gold in Europe – mines, metallurgy and manufacture. Berlin, Springer Verlag, 369-381.

Lazăr, A., Deppert-Lippitz, B. and Ferri, P.G. (eds.), 2008.Combating the criminality against the European archaeological heritage. Bucureşti, Lumina Lex Publishing House.

Neacşu, A., Popescu, G.C., Constantinescu, B., Vasilescu, A. and Ceccato, D., 2009. The geochemical signature of native gold from Roşia montană and musariu ore deposits, metaliferi mts. (Romania); Preliminary Data. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 4(1): 49-59.

Tămaş, C., Bailly, L., Ghergari, L., O’Connor, G. and minuţ, A., 2006. New occurrences of tellurides and argyrodite in Roşia montană, Apuseni mts., Romania, and their metallogenetic significance. The Canadian mineralogist 44(2): 367-383.

Tylecote, R.H., 1987. The early history of metallurgy in Europe. London and New York, Longman.

Top of page

List of illustrations

Title Figure 1: Bracelet no. 3.Figure 1 : Bracelet référence 3.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/archeosciences/docannexe/image/2234/img-1.jpg
File image/jpeg, 680k
Title Figure 2: XRF spectrum of bracelet no. 11.Figure 2 : Spectre FX du bracelet référence 11.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/archeosciences/docannexe/image/2234/img-2.png
File image/png, 53k
Title Tables1: XRF concentrations of the Dacian gold bracelets (the overall relative uncertainty is estimated to be ~1% for Au concentrations, ~10% for Ag and Cu concentrations and ~20% for Sn concentrations).Tableau 1 : Compositions obtenues par XRF des bracelets en or Daciens (incertitudes relatives moyennes sont estimées à ~1% pour les teneurs en Au, ~10% pour les teneurs en Ag et en Cu et ~20% pour les teneurs en Sn).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/archeosciences/docannexe/image/2234/img-3.png
File image/png, 54k
Top of page

References

Bibliographical reference

Bogdan Constantinescu, Roxana Bugoi, Viorel Cojocaru, Martin Radtke, Thomas Calligaro, Joseph Salomon, Laurent Pichon, Stefan Röhrs, Daniele Ceccato, Ernest Oberländer-Târnoveanu, Corine Ionescu and Dana Pop, “Dacian bracelets and Transylvanian gold: ancient history and modern analyses”ArcheoSciences, 33 | 2009, 221-225.

Electronic reference

Bogdan Constantinescu, Roxana Bugoi, Viorel Cojocaru, Martin Radtke, Thomas Calligaro, Joseph Salomon, Laurent Pichon, Stefan Röhrs, Daniele Ceccato, Ernest Oberländer-Târnoveanu, Corine Ionescu and Dana Pop, “Dacian bracelets and Transylvanian gold: ancient history and modern analyses”ArcheoSciences [Online], 33 | 2009, Online since 10 December 2012, connection on 14 May 2025. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/archeosciences/2234; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/archeosciences.2234

Top of page

About the authors

Bogdan Constantinescu

Horia Hulubei National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Engineering – Bucharest 077125, Romania.

Roxana Bugoi

Horia Hulubei National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Engineering – Bucharest 077125, Romania.

By this author

Viorel Cojocaru

Horia Hulubei National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Engineering – Bucharest 077125, Romania.

Martin Radtke

BAM Federal Institute for materials Research and Testing – Berlin D-12489, Germany.

By this author

Thomas Calligaro

Laboratoire de Recherche et de Restauration des musées de France, CNRS UMR 171 – Palais du Louvre, Paris cedex 01, France.

By this author

Joseph Salomon

Laboratoire de Recherche et de Restauration des musées de France, CNRS UMR 171 – Palais du Louvre, Paris cedex 01, France.

Laurent Pichon

Laboratoire de Recherche et de Restauration des musées de France, CNRS UMR 171 – Palais du Louvre, Paris cedex 01, France.

Stefan Röhrs

Laboratoire de Recherche et de Restauration des musées de France, CNRS UMR 171 – Palais du Louvre, Paris cedex 01, France.

Daniele Ceccato

Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare – Padova 35020, Italy.

Ernest Oberländer-Târnoveanu

National History museum of Romania – Bucharest 030026, Romania.

Corine Ionescu

Department of mineralogy, Babes-Bolyai University – Cluj-Napoca 400084, Romania.

Dana Pop

Museum of mineralogy, Babes-Bolyai University – Cluj-Napoca 400084, Romania

Top of page

Copyright

CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

The text only may be used under licence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. All other elements (illustrations, imported files) are “All rights reserved”, unless otherwise stated.

Top of page
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search