Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNuméros14Histoire de la maritimitéConstruire une identité maritime ...Revealing maritimity in 19th cent...

Histoire de la maritimité
Construire une identité maritime : patrimoine et représentations

Revealing maritimity in 19th century France

Representations, heritage and history
Dévoiler la maritimité dans la France du xixe siècle : représentations, patrimoine et histoire
Géraldine Barron
p. 269-291

Résumés

Le terme de maritimité, défini par les géographes au début des années 1990, offre un cadre conceptuel intéressant pour analyser l’évolution du rapport au monde maritime pendant le xixe siècle. Siècle des révolutions, cette période est marquée par des changements profonds et durables concernant le rapport à la mer, en particulier en matière de pratiques culturelles, sociales et artistiques. Elle n’échappe pas à l’émergence des préoccupations patrimoniales qui ouvrent la voie à de nouvelles disciplines telles que l’archéologie navale ou l’ethnographie nautique. Les représentations du monde maritime s’en trouvent
bouleversées.

Haut de page

Texte intégral

  • 1 Cabantous, 1995.
  • 2 Corbin, 2010.
  • 3 Cabantous, Lespagnol, Péron (éd.), 2005.

1Despite the length of its coastline, France has always maintained ambivalent relations with the sea and the maritime world. It has never quite represented itself as a maritime country and geographers were the first to take an interest in this topic. Historians for a long time focused on war and trade and only more recently oriented their research towards seafarers1 and representations of the sea2. A large investigation was collectively led by geographers and historians into the complex and two-way relationship that the French have established with the sea over the course of history and how the sea has shaped many aspects of French culture3. As Sylviane Llinares points out, French maritime history still lacks a « total » history of the maritime fact. This paper does not intend to fill the gap but the author hopes to make a modest contribution to the research on the historicity of the concept of maritimity by exploring emerging representations of the maritime world.

  • 4 Péron et Rieucau, 1996.
  • 5 Péron et Rieucau, 1996, p. 14.

2The concept of maritimity was developed by geographers in the early 1990s as an incentive to qualify social and cultural approaches to the sea and sensitivity about the maritime world4. Even though, as the authors accept, the word « can be accused of being vague and ambiguous5 », it nevertheless offers a useful conceptual frame to analyse the representations of the maritime world from different points of view : from that of seafarers, of inland citizens or of the State. Arts, literature but also institutions like the Naval Museum in Paris provide an interesting starting point from which to observe these representations and images induced by a growing awareness of the maritime environment. This investigation focuses on the 19th century because it is a time when public as well as political interest towards the maritime world began to change deeply and the concept of maritimity appears perfectly relevant to underline this phenomenon. The aim is not to discuss whether a museum, literature or arts really mirrored the maritime world of the time, the sea, the shore and its inhabitants and workers, but to focus on the vision of maritimity they convey.

A maritime revolution

  • 6 Musée du Louvre, Paris, Théodore Géricault, Le Radeau de La Méduse, 1819.
  • 7 Battesti, 1997.
  • 8 Verne, 1873 et 1871.

3Despite some great naval designs, French military strategy had always mainly been one of defence and the Boulogne fleet ended up as a failure. France had won very few naval battles since Louis XIV and had lost its main overseas possessions when the monarchy was restored in 1815. The reintegration of Ancien Régime navy officers who had not sailed for 25 years, symbolized by the shipwreck of the Méduse immortalised by the painter Géricault6, did not help to restore the image of the navy or confidence in this armed force. The State nevertheless aimed at rebuilding a powerful fleet and at showing its flag on all the seas of the globe but failed to develop a coherent and sustainable policy before Napoleon III came to power7. Under the Second Empire, the fleet and harbour infrastructures were modernized and strengthened, the navy knew technical as well as military successes and served as a support to colonial conquest. The development of the press and international exhibitions enabled the population to take part in these glory days, when France could boast of employing the best engineers in the world like Stanislas Dupuy de Lôme, and of being able to launch innovative vessels with the first screw battleship Napoléon built in the 1840s and the first ironclad Gloire a couple of decades later. Naval policy also became a strong topic of public debate on technical and strategic options after France lost the war against Prussia and during the first decades of the 3rd Republic. Interest in maritime affairs did not only concern the war fleet and policy but also the merchant navy and the intensification of trans-oceanic trade flows. The progress made in steam propulsion and shipbuilding produced larger, safer and faster liners, shorter routes were opened by cutting through isthmuses in Suez and Panama, giving the impression of a shrinking world. Jules Verne perfectly represented this feeling in his novels Around the World in Eighty Days and A Floating City8. (Fig. 1)

Fig. 1. – Jules Verne, Une ville flottante suivi des Forceurs de blocus, Paris, J. Hetzel et Cie, coll. « Bibliothèque d’éducation et de récréation », 1871

Fig. 1. – Jules Verne, Une ville flottante suivi des Forceurs de blocus, Paris, J. Hetzel et Cie, coll. « Bibliothèque d’éducation et de récréation », 1871

Frontispice par Jules Férat

https://fr.wikisource.org/​wiki/​Page:Verne_-_Une_ville_flottante,_1872.djvu/​10

  • 9 Cochard, 2016.
  • 10 Marnot, 2005.

4The development of steam navigation induced a shift in the sociology of seafarers. The sailing navy, be it military, merchant or fishing, traditionally recruited mostly – if not exclusively – amongst coastal communities ; the need for mechanics attracted workers from industrial areas who rapidly merged with locals in coastal cities and generated more exchanges between the coast and the interior9. Intensification of sea trade and trans-oceanic exchange of goods also created a link and the implementation of multimodal interconnection connected the coast to inland territories10.

  • 11 Péton, 2016.
  • 12 Chapuis, 1999.
  • 13 Guigueno, 2001.

5The emptiness of the oceans was filled by accurate cartography, even though the effort had already begun in the 18th century with Cook settling the question of the Austral continent and clocks enabling precise calculation of longitudes. 19th century sailors nevertheless were still trying to eradicate phantom islands from the maps and early oceanography endeavoured to people the oceans with science and get rid of fantasies11. (Fig. 2) Danger was not totally tamed but hazardous navigation was gradually giving way to clock-ruled ocean crossing. The 19th century was a time of technical and scientific conquest of the sea within which the national shore became the new frontier to be conquered by cartography and occupation. Main hydrographic campaigns were launched to draw an accurate map of the French littoral12 and the conquest of the coastal border was symbolized by a string of signposts, lighthouses and harbor infrastructures13

Fig. 2. – Jules Verne, Vingt mille lieues sous les mers. Illustré de 111 dessins par de Neuville et Riou, Paris, J. Hetzel et Cie, coll. « Bibliothèque d’éducation et de récréation », 1871

Fig. 2. – Jules Verne, Vingt mille lieues sous les mers. Illustré de 111 dessins par de Neuville et Riou, Paris, J. Hetzel et Cie, coll. « Bibliothèque d’éducation et de récréation », 1871

https://gallica.bnf.fr/​ark:/12148/​bpt6k327709k/​f129.item

  • 14 Corbin, 2001.
  • 15 Hervier, 2014.
  • 16 Hoibian et Jallat, 2019.

6Beyond ports and industrial infrastructures, the seaside came to be seen as a healthy and leisurely place to rest body and soul from a hectic, industrialised and polluted city life14. The train opened up the seaside to inland inhabitants while the sea was used for seashore activities such as bathing or sailing in regattas. Sea bathing in cold and turbulent water was at first a medical treatment imported from England for respiratory ailments, and thus strictly codified. The Anglomania in vogue among the elites led to the discovery and adoption of new usages, flooding the shores with the fashionable villégiatures and seaside resorts, « les stations balnéaires » such as Deauville with their peculiar architectural design15. (Fig. 3) Formerly uninhabited shores becaome urbanised, reshaping the landscape together with the development of industrial and commercial ports. Sailing also became a recreational activity with its rules and organization : the Yacht club de France founded in 1867 brought together at first aristocrats and former naval officers but rapidly expanded towards the upper-middle classes16. The sea was no longer reduced to food and work production, nor a space for communication, a world of toil and turmoil : it became a place of leisure and sports, of pleasure and entertainment.

Fig. 3. – Claude Monet, La Plage de Trouville, 1871

Fig. 3. – Claude Monet, La Plage de Trouville, 1871

Wadworth Atheneum, Wikimedia Commons

A kaleidoscopic vision of the maritime world

  • 17 Corbin, 2010.
  • 18 Hofmann, Richard, Vagnon, 2012.

7As Alain Corbin pointed out, until the early days of the 19th century, the sea was seen by French people as the territory of emptiness17, hostile, dangerous and peopled with monsters that map makers often used to fill the blanks of unknown territories18. The sea could nevertheless be associated with a few essential functions : food provided by fishing, trading with inshore and seagoing navigation, and military functions which include defense and conquest. If fishing waited longer to modernize, trading and naval forces rapidly evolved during the century ; so did awareness and interest in the maritime world as well as cultural representations of the sea. The repulsive images, however romantic, of tempests and the loneliness of man facing an overbearing nature, turned into attraction.

  • 19 Corbin, Richard (éd.), 2004.
  • 20 Aubenas (dir.), 2002.

8While the bourgeoisie discovered the seashore and its resorts, there was less and less need to travel in order to become aware of its landscape and way of life which were depicted by writers and painters throughout the century. Since the 17th century, the Navy had ordered pictorial representations of major naval events, but in 1830 two painters were officially registered in the ministry’s annual directory as « peintres du département de la marine », an appointment that was given to 43 painters in the 19th century and still exists today. The first official painters, Théodore Gudin and Louis-Philippe Crépin, were former sailors. They represented battles, shipwrecks and many other aspects of maritime life. The topic featured in all art movements, from romanticism to naturalism, impressionism and realism. The classic seascape and naval battles gave way to life painting and new topics. None eluded the canvas of official and unofficial painters : open sea, calm or rough, waves, shores, beaches, vacant or inhabited by tourists or seafarers ; shipbuilding, fishing boats and men, steam and sailing vessels, naval battles, ex voto and portraits of ships, etc. For many painters, it became a recurring subject but also a way of life : Eugène Lepoittevin, another « peintre de marine », lived by the sea and depicted scenes from everyday life of fishermen and sea bathing ; Eugène Boudin preferred beach sceneries scattered with crinolines and parasols. Louis Garneray, Gustave Courbet, Claude Monet are today the most famous but only a small sample of the numerous artists who lived or made regular stays on the northern, western or Mediterranean coast of France and offered a variety of representations and interpretations of maritimity19. Even photographers chose the sea and ships for a setting, the most famous being Gustave Le Gray and his marines that represented both a technical and artistic innovation20. Seascapes and their variety of light effects and colors, waves and foam, sailing or steam boats, fishing boats and gears, working men and women as well as tourists had both artistic and documentary value. They were displayed in Paris’ art exhibition (le Salon), in museums, but also circulated in the form of engravings which popularized these images.

  • 21 Cabantous, Lespagnol, Péron (éd.), 2005, p. 415-420.
  • 22 Brosse, 1983.
  • 23 Demarcq, Frémond, Tromparent de Seyne, 2005.

9Writers also contributed to the popularization of maritime topics. Alain Cabantous dates the emergence of the French maritime novel back to the mid-18th century with Alain-René Lesage and his Aventures du chevalier de Beauchesne, and Bernardin de Saint-Pierre’s Paul et Virginie, even if the genre really expanded during the second half of the 19th century21. Some of the greatest authors of the time dedicated at least one major work to this theme, like Victor Hugo and his Travailleurs de la mer, but also Honoré de Balzac, George Sand or Prosper Mérimée. The passion for the sea and its shore spread into popular literature, riding the wave of adventure novels imported from England or America by authors such as James Fenimore Cooper or Herman Melville’s. French maritime novels were very popular ; authors were quite prolific and their books widely disseminated thanks to newspapers where they were serialized, and to cheap editions. Louis Garneray (also a marine painter), Gabriel de La Landelle, Édouard Corbière or Eugène Sue wrote maritime novels did not have as long-lasting success as Pierre Loti’s, not to say of Jules Verne22. Many of Verne’s novels were related to the sea and made the reader travel from the depths to polar seas or islands, in a submarine or a floating city, with the thrill of scientific discoveries or the dread of perils of the sea23. In these fictional maritime worlds, many aspects of maritimity were disclosed to the public : variable weather with gales or dead calm wind and sea, mists, relentless sun ; perils of the sea with groundings, shipwrecks, fires, etc ; high-sea navigation, fishing, whaling, trading and discovery of alien or exotic cultures ; but also technical and scientific dimensions of navigation. Different social groups were portrayed and gave a hint of maritimity to inland readers : pirates and adventurous captains of course, natives from the other side of the world but also from French coasts, all magnified under the pen of writers by the breath of adventure, the exaltation of danger and the attraction of exoticism. (Fig. 4) Readers eager to dive into the atmosphere of these novels could find a good setting right in the centre of Paris, in the musée de Marine located in the Louvre palace.

Fig. 4. – Eugène Lepoittevin, Pêcheurs à Étretat

Fig. 4. – Eugène Lepoittevin, Pêcheurs à Étretat

Musée de Fécamp. Wikimedia Commons

  • 24 Niderlinder, 1994.
  • 25 Benoît, Tromparent de Seynes, Niderlinder, 2014.

10Ship-modeling is a dockyard tradition that goes back to Colbert in 1679, who asked that a model of each type of war ship be kept in each dockyard for building and teaching purposes. Duhamel du Monceau, an inspector of shipbuilding and member of the Academy of Sciences, established a school for naval engineers in Paris in the middle of the 18th century and donated his collection of models to be stored next to the Academy and to the school24. Half a century later, Napoleon gathered a collection of ship models in Versailles25. After Napoleon’s Empire was defeated, the first Restauration intended in 1814 to open a naval museum in Paris in order to house the collections of ship-models scattered in various places, and to give the Navy a showcase that could bring to the capital knowledge of the maritime world. It intended to brighten the rather damaged image of the naval forces after Napoleon’s military defeats. When the Naval Museum at last opened to the public in 1830, it was placed under the supervision of the Ministry of Navy and the Maison du Roi, and under the protection of the king’s son, the Dauphin who was also bore the title of Great admiral of France. First named « musée Naval » or « musée Dauphin », it eventually got known as the « Musée de marine ». With such a vague name, it conjured neither the military navy nor the maritime world, but something in between, not quite definite. Besides the naming, the museum suffered from other difficulties and ambiguities. Its collections were provided for by the dockyards and model makers paid by the Navy, but its budget was extracted from the civil list. It lost its last link to the Navy in 1848 when it was attached to the Home Office and fine arts administration. From a geographical point of view this change was relevant because the museum was housed in the Louvre with the fine arts, paintings, sculpture, etc. But the administration of the Louvre considered the naval collections as a thorn in their side, and the conflict dragged on as the Musée de marine did not come back under the supervision of the ministry of Navy before 1919 and left the Louvre in 1939.

11The museum’s initial goal was quite wide and embraced an open-minded but straightforward view of the maritime world :

  • war and merchant ships

  • harbours, dockyards, machines, gears and instruments

  • famous seafarers from war heroes to explorers

  • whatever sailors and ships could bring from all over the world

  • 26 « Musée naval », 1828.

12The French Restauration aimed at giving the state a powerful Navy and wanted to fight against the images of defeat and despair attached to the sea and to the navy, hence the importance of exalting them through monumental paintings and the figures of national heroes like Jean Bart or Duquesne, which were supposed to help the country regain confidence in its navy. The Navy needed money, ships and sailors but for that matter had to win over public opinion, especially within the capital. The Musée de marine was founded in Paris on this very purpose26. It therefore displayed paintings representing great naval battles, portraits and busts of war heroes, but also shipbuilding industry led by science and reason in order to arouse vocations for maritime careers and to encourage Parliament to vote increasing budgets for the Navy. The French Restauration also took up with the tradition of round the world voyages and the museum housed more and more artefacts from far away civilizations and their populations. Naval officers and diplomats tended to give the museum what they brought back from their voyages. Extra-European artefacts became the metaphorical identity of French maritimity, romantic and idealistic, with its heroes of civilization, over-shadowing the realities of the maritime world, much cruder and coarser.

13The museum was confronted with the withdrawal of the Navy from its management at the end of the Monarchie de Juillet and during the 2d Republic : in consequence, fewer and fewer specifically naval artefacts entered the collection. In the 1850s, 73 % of the collection was of ethnographic nature, a fact that led to the creation of an ethnographical museum within the museum. The maritime part of the museum seemed to shrink because of the lack of room in the Louvre. Strangely enough, this was a time of great achievements for the Navy : the neglect in which naval issues were kept was well redressed by Napoleon III’s naval policy. But these technical rather than military achievements (except maybe during the war against Russia) had a new and popular showcase with the international exhibitions. With the French military defeat and the beginning of the 3rd Republic, military and naval matters were increasingly publicized and openly discussed, and the museum could prove an adequate place to nurture the passion for the Navy. But the gap between political and public expectations tended to widen.

  • 27 Hamy, 1889.

14The name of the museum blurred an ambiguous project and the collections evolved consequently during the century. For the museum, collection development did not only depend on supervision, on political design, on money or donations, but also depended on the personal interest of the curator, on his personal vision of what ought to be a marine museum, and also on his personal network. The Museum knew three « eras » in the 19th century, curiously corresponding to political regimes. Under the monarchy, naval engineers wished to stress the importance of ships and infrastructures and make the museum a Conservatoire of shipbuilding, both designed for instruction and preservation. The museum had its own workshop and model-makers to create and restore its collections. It nevertheless collected in addition most of the production of dockyard workshops. This was a technical era, glorifying science and achievements of the Navy to regain the confidence of the French People, but also gathering technical information from other nautical cultures. After 1815, France undertook circumnavigations, scientific expeditions and diplomatic voyages which collected and deposited at the museum numerous indigenous artefacts and exotic objects. During the Second Empire, Antoine-Léon Morel-Fatio became curator : a naval painter appointed « peintre du département de la marine » in 1853, he accurately documented major naval events in his paintings and engravings. His was the time when the museum was so overwhelmed with exotic artefacts that they were separated from the naval ones to form a museum of ethnography27. At least France was no longer striving to catch up with the British royal and merchant navies in terms of territorial expansion overseas and steam navigation thanks to its innovative transatlantic steamers and ironclad battleships. It was a time of power and speed at sea, a progress magnified by international exhibitions held in Paris in 1855 and 1867. Retired naval officers succeeded Morel-Fatio during the first decades of the 3rd Republic. They took over the forgotten prospect of creating a conservatoire and building collections of models reflecting the diversity of ships and infrastructures : sailing and steam ships for high-seas navigation from the 17th century to present, canoes from all over the world as well as traditional working boats from Europe. The museum also displayed astronomical instruments, tools, samples of rope, wood, sails, models of lighthouses, masting machines, dredgers, etc., and a great number of scale drawings, technical books and so on. The museum, by the will of its curator the admiral Edmond Pâris, followed the development of archeology and ethnography. There was a public for these various collections from the late 19th century to the first World War.

A distorting mirror?

  • 28 Corbin, 2010.
  • 29 Péron, Rieucau, 1996.

15How can a collection of objects and artefacts mirror such a polysemic and essentially cultural and social concept as maritimity ? It certainly echoed in 19th century France an awakening sensitivity to sea and shore, a « desire for shore28 » expressed by the public who were seeking in the museum a true and accurate image of what popular maritime novels conjured up. The museum exhibited most of the five components of maritime heritage stressed by Françoise Péron29 :

  • landscapes through monumental seascapes

  • leisure and regattas through paintings and ship models

  • monuments and military infrastructures through lighthouses and scale models of military ports

  • functional components thanks to the display of models of ships, dockyards, lifeboats, etc.

  • 30 Motte, 2004.

16These last two components were of strategic importance : displaying the most modern warship, artillery or lighting system aimed at showing French naval power. It also helped citizens to appropriate the issues and take part in the political, diplomatic, even ideological debates like that around the strategy of the Jeune École30.

  • 31 Niderlinder, 2017.
  • 32 Méa, 1893.

17One component was missing in the museum : the socio-cultural approach, about seafaring people and people living by the sea. The curator Pâris had a sense of ethnography : he tried to relate boats to crafts and tools, but the human dimension didn’t show through the technical approach. In the meantime, sea life was becoming attractive for Parisians and seafarers were rather idealized for their supposed genuine and healthy way of life, close to nature. The public seemed to be finding in the museum what it was looking for. Visitors used the artefacts displayed in the showcases as a metaphor of sea life and fuel for their imagination as shown by many accounts of the life of the museum which stressed the importance of children, attracted by its collection as if they were in a toy shop31. A journalist perfectly conveyed the many goals of these collections, all at once an entertainment, an addition to maritime and travel novels, and an incentive to embrace a maritime career32.

  • 33 « Cadeaux de Tsars. La diplomatie navale dans l’Alliance-Russe, 1891-1914 », 2010.

18Besides the chauvinistic dimension of maritimity displayed within the museum, stressing the achievements of the French Navy and its officers, the museum and its curators were curious about foreign nautical cultures and technical traditions or innovations. The international exhibitions boosted industrial spying which was a long-lived tradition, with engineers and naval officers undertaking technical tours, or diplomats sending detailed reports on their observations. The museum housed artefacts from all over the world or information about foreign countries. If we take Russia for an example the museum displayed torpedoes, model-ships, books about Russian naval history, statues of Krusenstern and Kotsebue, etc. Despite having taken part in the war against Russia in the 1850s, admiral Pâris developed close relationships with the former foe and Russian naval officers and was able to add Russian artefacts to the collections. But it was more about opportunism made possible by personal relationships than a long-term collection development plan for the museum as the example of the Franco-Russian Alliance shows : Franco-Russian naval collaboration was strengthened within this Alliance from 1891 to 1914, a military and diplomatic reconciliation that provided an opportunity for naval displays and meetings in French and Russian harbors. Even though the Museum gathered many souvenirs from this period within an exhibition held in 2010, very few of these objects entered the collections before the 1950s, again demonstrating the ambiguous rather than accurate political vision of the Navy the museum conveys before 191433.

Building a maritime heritage

  • 34 Should we write revolution ? See Masson, Battesti, Service historique de la Marine, 1987.
  • 35 Mainly religious buildings but also vestiges of the Antiquity, castles, but also tapestries, staine (...)

19Awareness of the maritime world and major evolutions in sea and shore life developed concomitantly in the 19th century, even if neither evolved in a straightforward and uniform way that could be easily summarized34. Meanwhile, new human sciences were emerging together with a consciousness of time and historicity : archaeology and ethnography questioned mankind and its evolutions and collected artefacts gathered into museum collections for research purposes. Concern about the disappearance of traces of the past had become quite acute after the French Revolution. The charge of inspector of historical monuments was created in 1830 to inventory, protect and restore symbolic markers of national history, be they buildings or pieces of furniture35, but all traces of the past regarding navigation and life on the shore had been long gone and preserving samples of the fleet, even the navy’s flagships, was not on the agenda. The maritime world was however no exception to this enthusiasm and boats and ships became a topic for historians, archaeologists and ethnographers.

  • 36 Taillemite, 1969.
  • 37 Chassériau, 1845.
  • 38 Sue, 1835-1837.
  • 39 Lecomte, 1835.
  • 40 See Taillemite, 2008.
  • 41 Jurien de La Gravière, 1878.

20Naval officers were eager to write French naval history, even if the minister was more reluctant to offer the structures that could make it possible. In 1830 the Navy granted them a historical section hosted by the hydrographical service, the Dépôt des cartes et plans. It was dedicated to the identification, housing and sorting of the navy’s archives and was managed by two former officers, Jacques Parisot and Augustin Jal who became one of the Navy’s official historiographers and a major maritime historian36. The organisation of the archives remained rather chaotic throughout the century but improved under the Second Empire and a classification framework was fixed during the first decades of the Third Republic. Many naval officers invested in the writing of their force’s history. Some historians gained the official title of historiographer of the Navy : Xavier Marmier, Léon Guérin or Frédéric Chassériau, who was employed by the historical section and wrote a Précis historique de la marine française37. Novelists also committed to writing maritime and naval history, like Eugène Sue, who added a Histoire de la marine to his many popular maritime novels38, or Jules Lecomte who, besides many novels, published a Dictionnaire pittoresque de marine, but also chronicles, treatises on navigation or whaling39. History in the making was related in the form of souvenirs but also with the rational and source-based historical approach by several navy officers. Admiral Edmond Jurien de La Gravière is the main figure of this new naval history, together a respected naval officer, a public figure, a recognized scientist member of the Académie des sciences and a renowned writer elected at the Académie française. He wrote numerous books and articles on ancient or contemporary history and published his father’s memoirs40. His books were quite successful even if not as popular as maritime novels. But historians thought that a good understanding of the past could provide their contemporaries with guidance, especially because, as Jurien de la Gravière put it, « the navy is not only administration, it is above all politics41 » : it was required for decision-makers to select the right strategy, but also for citizens of a still young republic to approve of those decisions and support their navy.

  • 42 Jal, 1840.
  • 43 Jal, 1848.
  • 44 Rieth, 2019.
  • 45 Barron, 2019.
  • 46 Pâris, 1882-1908.
  • 47 Pâris, 1844.
  • 48 Serre, Fincati, 1885.
  • 49 Folin, 1892.
  • 50 Vence, 1897.
  • 51 « Archéologie du mot et de l’image » according to Éric Rieth. Rieth, 2019
  • 52 Sébillot, s.l.n.d. See Cabantous, 1995.

21In the 19th century, a joint concern for the past and for the ship gave birth to specific archaeology under the pen of Augustin Jal42, later to be called « father of the French school of archaeology of the ship ». His project mirrored that of Paris marine museum’s : make the navy known and interest citizens in its developments. For this purpose, he studied not only heroes and battles but also the customs of the seafarers, the language and vocabulary they used to name every object, gesture and action related to their working tool43. Last but not least, Jal studied the ship, a complex machine, through a technical approach. Knowledge of the maritime world and its evolution in history grew deeper and even became a subject of experiment when Jal associated with Dupuy de Lôme in 1861 on the Emperor’s initiative to build a replica of a trireme that sailed on the river Seine, the very first example of experimental archaeology ever conducted44 (Fig. 5). Admiral Pâris, curator of the musée de Marine, was another figure of archaeology in the 19th century45. As a major stakeholder in developing steam navigation, he was very aware of the pace of innovation and change in shipbuilding and of the rapid disappearance of many traditions and sorts of ships, boats and crafts blown away by the wind of change. He thus strived to arrange and compile information on ships and shipbuilding, old and new, big or small, aiming at building within the museum an archive of shipbuilding. He published several books in addition to his work at the museum and provided historians and archaeologists with accurate sources46. He himself had travelled a lot during his career at sea : he had drawn a great number of canoes and crafts from all over the world, compiled them with maps drawn by other travellers, published them and used them to create a unique collection of models of precious ethnographic value47 : this work attracted the public in the musée de Marine and satisfied its curiosity for non-European maritime cultures described by successful travel stories. A few decades later he added European boats and crafts to his collection and was joined in his project by naval officers like admiral Serre48 and a few amateurs like Léopold de Folin49 or Jules Vence50. Artists, ship owners or builders, also endeavoured to collect plans of ancient and modern boats in order to write the history of the boat and ship. For many seafarers, the relationship to the boat or ship they owned or served on was very strong and keeping the memory of it became a widespread preoccupation as the trend of portraying ships clearly shows with famous families of artists like the Roux from Marseille or Adam from Le Havre. Anthropomorphic descriptions of ships, their life, death and suffering, became commonplace in literature but also in very serious books claiming scientific rigour such as Jal’s or Pâris’. Memory and heritage tended to go hand in hand in this matter. Besides the development of ship archaeology mainly based on texts and images51, a genuine interest for coastal communities and their traditions arose at the end of the century with ethnographers like Paul Sébillot who collected tales and legends from sailors in Brittany52, paving the way for maritime ethnoarchaeology.

Fig. 5. – « Trirème antique construite à Paris par ordre de S.M. l’Empereur 1860-1861) »

Fig. 5. – « Trirème antique construite à Paris par ordre de S.M. l’Empereur 1860-1861) »

Planche extraite de Edmond Pâris, Souvenirs de marine : collection de plans ou dessins de navires et de bateaux anciens ou modernes, existans ou disparus : avec les éléments numériques nécessaires à leur construction. Sixième partie, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1908.

Photography Géraldine Barron

Conclusion

  • 53 Péron, Rieucau, 1996, p. 13.

22The marine museum of Paris can be considered as an accurate showcase for maritimity from a political, inland, urban and popular point of view, but the success of the maritime topic in arts and literature proves a genuine and global interest for the maritime world in the 19th century. This sudden interest met the definition of national heritage and the development of new human sciences to create a very original approach. In archaeology as in ethnography, the work of French 19th-century authors cleared the ground and laid the foundations of research fields that have only really developed in recent decades. One must wonder why this attraction for the maritime world in all its forms and varieties, be it popular or academic, cultural, scientific, political or economic, appears to be cropping up periodically but can also be put on standby for long periods of time. It seems that maritimity is a particularly accurate concept to define what took place in the 19th century as well as in the last decades of the 20th century because there was a strong rise of concern for maritime issues in those times, while it rather blurs in between. As Françoise Péron states, « maritimity can only be cultural [and] is a form of reappropriation of legacies, according to the needs and anxieties of contemporary society53 ». People’s relationship with the sea and shore is not limited to cultural aspects ; political goals and a range of technical, scientific, economic, military developments that underlie the more obvious and popular image can be at stake, provoking the anxieties that require the reappropriation of legacies observed during these particular periods in history.

Haut de page

Sources et bibliographie

Printed sources

Chassériau Frédéric, Précis historique de la marine Française son organisation et ses lois, Imprimerie Royale, 1845.

Folin Léopold de, Bateaux et navires  : progrès de la construction navale à tous les âges et dans tous les pays, J. B. Baillière et fils, Paris, 1892.

Jurien de La Gravière Edmond, « La Marine de l’avenir et la marine des anciens », Revue des Deux Mondes, 28, 1878, p. 519-555.

Hamy Ernest-Théodore, « Les origines du Musée d’ethnographie », Revue d’ethnographie, 8, 1889, p. 305-608.

Jal Auguste, Glossaire nautique. Répertoire polyglotte de termes de marine anciens et modernes, Firmin Didot frères, Paris, 1848.

Jal Auguste, Archéologie navale, Arthus Bertrand, Paris, 1840.

Lecomte Jules, Dictionnaire pittoresque de marine, Au bureau central de la France maritime, Paris, 1835.

Méa Sabine, « Le Musée de Marine au Louvre », Le Journal des Arts, 22 avril 1893, p. 1.

Mérimée Prosper, Monuments historiques. Rapport au ministre de l’Intérieur, Imprimerie royale, Paris, 1840.

Pâris Edmond, Essai sur la construction navale des peuples extra-européens ou Collection des navires et pirogues construits par les habitants de l’Asie, de la Malaisie, du Grand Océan et de l’Amérique, Arthus Bertrand, Paris, 1844.

Pâris Edmond, Souvenirs de marine : collection de plans ou dessins de navires et de bateaux anciens ou modernes, existans ou disparus : avec les éléments numériques nécessaires à leur construction, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1882-1908, 6 vol.

Sébillot Paul, Contes de marins recueillis en Haute-Bretagne, S. l. n. d.

Serre Paul et Fincati Luigi, Les marines de guerre de l’Antiquité et du Moyen-Âge, Baudoin, Paris, 1885.

Sue Eugène, Histoire de la marine française, F. Bonnaire, Paris, 1835, 5 vol.

Vence Jules, Construction et manoeuvre des bateaux et embarcations à voilure latine, pêche-batelage-pilotage-plaisance..., A. Challamel, Paris, 1897.

Verne Jules, Le tour du monde en quatre-vingts jours, J. Hetzel, coll.« Les voyages extraordinaires », Paris, 1873.

Verne Jules, Une ville flottante suivi des Forceurs de blocus, J. Hetzel et Cie, coll.« Bibliothèque d’éducation et de récréation », Paris, 1871.

« Musée naval », Annales maritimes et coloniales, partie non officielle, n° 1, 1828, p. 198-200.

Littérature secondaire

Gustave Le Gray. 1820-1884, Gallimard/Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris, 2002.

Barron Géraldine, Edmond Pâris et l’art naval : des pirogues aux cuirassés, Presses universitaires du Midi, Toulouse 2019.

Battesti Michèle, La Marine de Napoléon III : une politique navale, Service historique de la Marine, Paris, 1997.

Benoît Jérémie, Tromparent de Seynes Hélène et Niderlinder Alain, Maquettes de la marine impériale. Collection du musée de la Marine à Trianon, Château de Versailles/Musée de la Marine / éditions Snoeck, Paris, 2014.

Brosse Monique, « La Littérature de la mer en France, en Grande-Bretagne et aux États-Unis  : 1829-1870 », thèse de doctorat, université Lille III, Lille, 1983.

Cabantous Alain, Les Citoyens du large : les identités maritimes en France, Aubier, Paris, 1995.

Cabantous Alain, Lespagnol André et Péron Françoise (éd.), Les Français, la terre et la mer  : xiiie-xxe siècle, Fayard, Paris, 2005.

Chapuis Olivier, À la mer comme au ciel  : Beautemps-Beaupré et la naissance de l’hydrographie moderne, 1700-1850  : l’émergence de la précision en navigation et dans la cartographie marine, Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne, Paris, 1999.

Cochard Nicolas, Les Marins du Havre  : gens de mer et société urbaine au xixe siècle, Presses universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, 2016.

Corbin Alain, Le Territoire du vide : l’Occident et le désir du rivage, 1750-1840, Flammarion, coll. « Champs Histoire », Paris, 2010.

Corbin Alain, L’Avènement des loisirs : 1850-1960, Flammarion, Paris, 2001.

Corbin Alain et Richard Hélène (éd.), La Mer, terreur et fascination [exposition, Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, site François-Mitterrand, 13 octobre 2004-16 janvier 2005 ; Quartz de Brest, 3 mai-13 juillet 2005], Bibliothèque nationale de France/Seuil, Paris, 2004.

Demarcq Marie-Pierre, Tromparent de Seynes Hélène et Frémond Didier, Jules Verne. Le roman de la mer, Seuil /Musée national de la Marine, Paris, 2005.

Guigueno Vincent, Au service des phares : la signalisation maritime en France, xixe, xxe siècle, Presse universitaires de Rennes, coll. « Art & société », Rennes, 2001.

Hervier Dominique, « Villégiature et histoire urbaine », Histoire urbaine, n° 41-3, 2014, p. 5-9.

Hofmann Catherine, Richard Hélène, Vagnon Emmanuelle et Bibliothèque nationale de France département des cartes et plans, L’Âge d’or des cartes marines  : quand l’Europe découvrait le monde, Seuil/Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris, 2012.

Hoibian Olivier et Jallat Denis, « Usages sociaux des loisirs et différenciation des styles de vie à la fin du xixe siècle. L’exemple des régates nautiques et des excursions en montagne », in Alain Corbin, Renaud Morieux, Nathalie Richard, Jean-Luc Chappey et François Walter (éd.), Mer et montagne dans la culture européenne (xvie - xixe siècle), Presses universitaires de Rennes, coll. « Histoire », Rennes, 2019, p. 89 108.

Marnot Bruno, « Interconnexion et reclassements  : l’insertion des ports français dans la chaîne multimodale au xixe siècle », Flux, n° 59-1, 2005, p. 10-21.

Masson Philippe, Battesti Michèle et Service historique de la marine, La Révolution maritime du xixe siècle, Lavauzelle, Paris, 1987.

Motte Martin, Une éducation géostratégique  : la pensée navale française de la Jeune École à 1914, Commission française d’histoire militaire, Institut de stratégie comparée, Economica, Paris, 2004.

Niderlinder Alain, « Le musée de la Marine au Louvre (1827-1939). Une histoire mouvementée. Première partie », Neptunia, n° 287, 2017, p. 4-17.

Niderlinder Alain, « Le Musée de la Marine et ses collections. Éléments chronologiques », Neptunia, n° 194, 1994, p. 49-57.

Péron Françoise et Rieucau Jean, La Maritimité aujourd’hui, L’Harmattan, coll. « Géographie et cultures », Paris, 1996.

Péton Loïc, « Penser l’existence de vie dans les profondeurs marines au xixe siècle  : entre abîme impossible et origine du vivant (1804-1885) », thèse de doctorat, université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, 2016.

Rieth Éric, Pour une histoire de l’archéologie navale. Les bateaux et l’histoire, Classiques Garnier, coll. « Collection Histoire des techniques », Paris, 2019.

Taillemite Étienne, Les Hommes qui ont fait la Marine française, Perrin, Paris, 2008.

Taillemite Étienne, « Les archives et les archivistes de la Marine des origines à 1870 », Bibliothèque de l’École des chartes, n° 127-1, 1969, p. 27-86.

« Cadeaux de Tsars. La diplomatie navale dans l’Alliance russe, 1891-1914  », Neptunia, Hors-série, mai 2010.

Haut de page

Notes

1 Cabantous, 1995.

2 Corbin, 2010.

3 Cabantous, Lespagnol, Péron (éd.), 2005.

4 Péron et Rieucau, 1996.

5 Péron et Rieucau, 1996, p. 14.

6 Musée du Louvre, Paris, Théodore Géricault, Le Radeau de La Méduse, 1819.

7 Battesti, 1997.

8 Verne, 1873 et 1871.

9 Cochard, 2016.

10 Marnot, 2005.

11 Péton, 2016.

12 Chapuis, 1999.

13 Guigueno, 2001.

14 Corbin, 2001.

15 Hervier, 2014.

16 Hoibian et Jallat, 2019.

17 Corbin, 2010.

18 Hofmann, Richard, Vagnon, 2012.

19 Corbin, Richard (éd.), 2004.

20 Aubenas (dir.), 2002.

21 Cabantous, Lespagnol, Péron (éd.), 2005, p. 415-420.

22 Brosse, 1983.

23 Demarcq, Frémond, Tromparent de Seyne, 2005.

24 Niderlinder, 1994.

25 Benoît, Tromparent de Seynes, Niderlinder, 2014.

26 « Musée naval », 1828.

27 Hamy, 1889.

28 Corbin, 2010.

29 Péron, Rieucau, 1996.

30 Motte, 2004.

31 Niderlinder, 2017.

32 Méa, 1893.

33 « Cadeaux de Tsars. La diplomatie navale dans l’Alliance-Russe, 1891-1914 », 2010.

34 Should we write revolution ? See Masson, Battesti, Service historique de la Marine, 1987.

35 Mainly religious buildings but also vestiges of the Antiquity, castles, but also tapestries, stained-glass windows, etc. See Mérimée, 1840.

36 Taillemite, 1969.

37 Chassériau, 1845.

38 Sue, 1835-1837.

39 Lecomte, 1835.

40 See Taillemite, 2008.

41 Jurien de La Gravière, 1878.

42 Jal, 1840.

43 Jal, 1848.

44 Rieth, 2019.

45 Barron, 2019.

46 Pâris, 1882-1908.

47 Pâris, 1844.

48 Serre, Fincati, 1885.

49 Folin, 1892.

50 Vence, 1897.

51 « Archéologie du mot et de l’image » according to Éric Rieth. Rieth, 2019

52 Sébillot, s.l.n.d. See Cabantous, 1995.

53 Péron, Rieucau, 1996, p. 13.

Haut de page

Table des illustrations

Titre Fig. 1. – Jules Verne, Une ville flottante suivi des Forceurs de blocus, Paris, J. Hetzel et Cie, coll. « Bibliothèque d’éducation et de récréation », 1871
Légende Frontispice par Jules Férat
Crédits https://fr.wikisource.org/​wiki/​Page:Verne_-_Une_ville_flottante,_1872.djvu/​10
URL http://journals.openedition.org/artefact/docannexe/image/10175/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 200k
Titre Fig. 2. – Jules Verne, Vingt mille lieues sous les mers. Illustré de 111 dessins par de Neuville et Riou, Paris, J. Hetzel et Cie, coll. « Bibliothèque d’éducation et de récréation », 1871
Crédits https://gallica.bnf.fr/​ark:/12148/​bpt6k327709k/​f129.item
URL http://journals.openedition.org/artefact/docannexe/image/10175/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 184k
Titre Fig. 3. – Claude Monet, La Plage de Trouville, 1871
Crédits Wadworth Atheneum, Wikimedia Commons
URL http://journals.openedition.org/artefact/docannexe/image/10175/img-3.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 166k
Titre Fig. 4. – Eugène Lepoittevin, Pêcheurs à Étretat
Crédits Musée de Fécamp. Wikimedia Commons
URL http://journals.openedition.org/artefact/docannexe/image/10175/img-4.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 151k
Titre Fig. 5. – « Trirème antique construite à Paris par ordre de S.M. l’Empereur 1860-1861) »
Légende Planche extraite de Edmond Pâris, Souvenirs de marine : collection de plans ou dessins de navires et de bateaux anciens ou modernes, existans ou disparus : avec les éléments numériques nécessaires à leur construction. Sixième partie, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1908.
Crédits Photography Géraldine Barron
URL http://journals.openedition.org/artefact/docannexe/image/10175/img-5.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 268k
Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence papier

Géraldine Barron, « Revealing maritimity in 19th century France »Artefact, 14 | 2021, 269-291.

Référence électronique

Géraldine Barron, « Revealing maritimity in 19th century France »Artefact [En ligne], 14 | 2021, mis en ligne le 07 octobre 2021, consulté le 06 décembre 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/artefact/10175 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/artefact.10175

Haut de page

Auteur

Géraldine Barron

Géraldine Barron has a Ph.D. in history, she is an associate member to the laboratory ICT in University of Paris. Her research focuses on maritime history, shipbuilding and navigation in the 18th and 19th centuries, history of techniques and technology. She has published Edmond Pâris et l’art naval. Des pirogues aux cuirassés, Presses universitaires du Midi, « Histoire & Technique », 2019 ; « Aux sources de l’histoire de la construction navale : l’œuvre imprimée et muséale d’Edmond Pâris », in Construire ! Entre Antiquité et époque contemporaine, Paris, Picard, 2019 ; « Les transitions techniques dans la marine militaire du xixe siècle », Revue d’histoire maritime, 27, 2019, p. 133-135.

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

Licence Creative Commons
Artefact, Techniques, histoire et sciences humaines est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search