16 | 2017
Traductions vers le latin au XVIe siècle
The 16th century saw the emergence of vernaculars as languages of thought, and the parallel maintenance of Latin as a learned language of communication and thought. This twofold movement, one of conquest and the other of resistance, has often been studied from the point of view of the vernacular, in order to mark its progress both for the structuring of languages and for the ground gained on Latin in the field of fictions as well as arguments. The issue presented here, from a day of study held at the ENS de Lyon in November 2013, sought to question the facts with the opposite point of view, not in an approach of superiority or competition that would consider the place of the Latin language as resistance to a regrettable loss, an approach that would be sterile and ahistorical, but in terms of the gradual impact of this rise of the vernaculars on Latin throughout the century.
-
Dossier
-
Chronicle of an announced freezing: translations into Latin in the sixteenth century
-
Tracing the production and diffusion of the manuscript and printed Latin translations of Lucian from the late 15th to the late 16th century
-
Denis Lambin vs Joachim Perion: which style for translating Aristotle?
-
The Latin translation of Paolo Giovio’s Commentario delle cose de’ Turchi by Francesco Negri, from Reformation propaganda to Giovio’s Opera Omnia
-
Reading the Latin translation of Francesco Patrizi’s Dialoghi della Historia by Nicholas Stupan, and the european reception of his theory on History
-
-
Varia
-
Le Corbusier : architecture et politique [Full text]Le Corbusier: architecture and politics
-
Aleatory Affinities: A Contribution to the Study of the Spinoza-Marx Relationship
-
L’ordre du goût chez Rousseau [Full text]The order of taste at Rousseau
-
RSS feed
