Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNuméros1RecherchesIntroduction. Reassessing Bergson

Recherches

Introduction. Reassessing Bergson

Matyáš Moravec

Texte intégral

1In 1912, Bertrand Russell published his “Philosophy of Bergson,” based on a presentation he gave earlier to “The Heretics” society in Cambridge. Though not the first — and certainly not the last — attack against Bergsonian thought from an analytic philosopher, Russell’s criticism played a crucial part in the disappearance of Bergson from analytic thought. One still finds Bergson mentioned (usually in a highly critical manner) by analytic-minded philosophers in the 1940s and 1950s, but by the 1960s, he almost entirely disappears from analytic discussions, especially those revolving around the philosophy of time. Although Russell’s critique has, itself, been criticised and dismantled at various points, the historical constellations around the birth of analytic philosophy in Cambridge ensured a devastating and lasting influence of Russell’s criticism and Bergson’s gradual exclusion from the mainstream of English-speaking philosophy.

2In the past few years, this has, for the first time, started to change. Recent scholarship has seen increasing interest by English-speaking philosophers in Bergson’s thought on — amongst other topics — time, history, action, and memory. This has enabled Bergson to step out of those philosophical traditions with which he is almost canonically bound and enter into new dialogues.

3Over a hundred years after facing Russell's critique and just under a hundred years since his reception of an honorary doctorate there, Bergson returned to Cambridge. The essays published in this collection are the fruits of the “Reassessing Bergson” conference, which took place on 11-12 September 2019 at Pembroke College, Cambridge. The aim of this event was not merely to undo the damage done by Russell, but also to bring together scholars from different philosophical traditions, working on different topics with different methods, but who are all joined by a common interest in Bergson. The essays in this issue of Bergsoniana are based on the talks given there.

4We would like to thank all the institutions which allowed this meeting to take place: The Arts and Humanities Research Council, the Aristotelian Society, the British Society for the History of Philosophy, Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge, the Mind Association, Pembroke College, Cambridge, the Société des Amis de Bergson, and the Society for Philosophy of Time. Most importantly, our thanks go to all the participants who nourished the extremely fruitful dialogues that started in Cambridge.

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Matyáš Moravec, « Introduction. Reassessing Bergson »Bergsoniana [En ligne], 1 | 2021, mis en ligne le 01 juillet 2021, consulté le 13 mai 2025. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/bergsoniana/422 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/bergsoniana.422

Haut de page

Auteur

Matyáš Moravec

Matyáš Moravec is a postdoctoral research associate at Durham University. His research focuses on building links between Bergson’s philosophy, analytic metaphysics and the philosophy of religion. He is also interested in Bergson’s reception by early 20th-century British philosophers.

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) susceptibles d’être soumis à des autorisations d’usage spécifiques.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search