Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNuméros119Ten Coptic Ostraca at the IFAO

Ten Coptic Ostraca at the IFAO

Anne Boud’hors et Esther Garel
Édité par Christine Ayad, ; Hadeer Belal, ; Fatma el-Gebali, ; Muhammady Fathy, ; Girgis Ibrahim, ; Ahmed Nakshara, ; Adel Rashed, ; Youhanna Reda, ; Hagar Saad Eldien et ; Amr el-Sharkawy
p. 51-77

Résumés

Publication de dix ostraca coptes par un groupe d’étudiants égyptiens sous la direction des auteurs. Ils comprennent trois exercices de piété, quatre lettres, deux textes juridiques et un compte. Ils proviennent, à une ou deux exceptions près, de la région thébaine.

Mots-clés : anthroponymes, Bible, copte, formules épistolaires, formules juridiques

Haut de page

Notes de la rédaction

In collaboration with : Christine Ayad [contributor], Researcher at Alexandria School Foundation for Christian Studies; Hadeer Belal [contributor], Curator at the Coptic Museum, Cairo; Fatma el-Gebali [contributor], Assistant lecturer at Fayyum University (Faculty of Archaeology); Muhammady Fathy [contributor], Lecturer at the Department of Egyptology, Faculty of Archaeology, Cairo University; Girgis Ibrahim [contributor], Lecturer of Coptic language at the Coptic Theological and Clerical College Anba Ruweis (Cairo); Ahmed Nakshara [contributor], Inspector of Archaeology, Tanis; Adel Rashed [contributor], MA. candidate at Cairo University; Youhanna Reda [contributor], Teaching and Library Assistant at the Institute of Coptic Studies (Cairo); Hagar Saad Eldien [contributor], Ph.D. candidate at Fayyum University ; Amr el-Sharkawy [contributor], Ph.D. candidate at Fayyum University.

Texte intégral

Introduction

Anne Boud’hors, Esther Garel

  • 1 Workshop mentored by Anne Boud’hors, Esther Garel and Chantal Heurtel, in the frame of a “specific (...)
  • 2 Among which OC 131, 216, 256, 317 have been published in Heurtel 2017, OC 244 and 277 in Heurtel 2 (...)
  • 3 O.BawitIfao et O.EdfouCopte.
  • 4 That is the case with the limestones, see O. Theb.Ifao, but also with some potsherds.

1This article is the result of an initiation workshop to the edition of Coptic ostraca that was held in January 2017 at the Ifao and aimed at training ten Egyptian students.1 Besides theoretical lectures given in the morning, each participant received an unpublished ostracon to be studied and edited, a task which could be continued over the following months thanks to digital images. The IFAO collection was particularly suitable for this experience, as it includes, besides hundreds of unpublished ostraca (usually very fragmentary), some nice pieces identified by Chantal Heurtel during her different missions.2 It also provides a good sample of various texts, as we will see hereafter. Since the ostraca from Baouit and Edfou have already been published,3 it is very tempting to suppose that those remaining come from the Theban area, the primary producer of such texts. For some of them, there is no doubt as they bear a number and indications linking them to the excavations carried out by Bernard Bruyère at Deir el-Medina.4 Others call for caution, as the circumstances that brought them to the IFAO are often unknown. Some may have been bought, but such information is rarely mentioned. Even in such cases, the Theban region remains the most probable origin, although the resemblance between ostraca from Thebes and those from Edfou can be misleading.

2The group of ten ostraca published below starts with three exercises of piety, probably connected with monastic life: once again they show how Biblical wisdom books were important to the piety of the monks. Next come four letters that are most probably Theban considering their content and the formulas used therein. Actually, rather than letters, those texts are emergency messages, lacking any polite form of address. The majority are difficult to elucidate in detail and reflect the day-to-day concerns of the local inhabitants, monks, clerics and lay people to get food supplies and various items. Finally, two legal texts are presented that can be identified and partially reconstructed despite their fragmentary state, thanks to usual known formulas. The last text is a kind of account, written in a dialect (Fayyumic) that contradicts a Theban origin.

3The type of pottery used for the writing also varies greatly. Sylvie Marchand, who is responsible for the ceramic studies at the IFAO, spent some time with the participants, to familiarize them with the terminology and give them information on their respective ostracon; this was a precious aid for which we would like to thank her.

  • 5 Some information on the ostraca is available online at: http://www.ifao.egnet.net/bases/archives/o (...)

4Ostraca bear a main inventory number “OC”’ (ostracon copte). In a previous inventory, a “C” number was also indicated. However, the receivership number figuring on numerous items is not mentioned here.5

1. Psalmic concordance for the word “prince”

Adel Rashed

Ifao, Inv. OC 181 (C 1851) [fig. 1]
10 × 10.5 cm
Provenance unknown
8th cent.

  • 6 On Psalm quotations in ostraca see Delattre 2012, Heurtel 2017 (no. 3 in her publication is anothe (...)

5Following a pattern well attested in Coptic ostraca (see O. EdfouCopte 3-6, O. CrumST 7 & 10, O. Mon.Epiph. 16)6 this small text is a kind of concordance of the word ⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ in the Psalms. Some mistakes or repetitions in the quotations show that it was a matter of personal practice, perhaps a way of simultaneously meditating and exercising scribal skill.

  • 7 Cf. Bosson 1997, p. 278.

6The ostracon bears only a small sample of the occurrences of the word ⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ in the Psalms, since there are more than 20 attestations contained in 18 Psalms7.

Fig. 1. Ifao, Inv. OC 181 (C 1851).

Fig. 1. Ifao, Inv. OC 181 (C 1851).

7The text is written on a Marl pottery, with a yellow-brown surface. The bottom part of the ostracon was probably broken. The script is globally bilinear, sloping, and rather skilled. It is thicker in the three central lines of the text, which may be due to the reed.

                             traces

               ⲁⲛⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ ⲥⲱⲟ̣ⲩ̣ϩ̣

               ⲁⲩⲉⲓ ⲉⲩⲙ̣ⲁ̣ ⲛ̣ⲟⲩⲱⲧ̣

               ⲁⲛⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ ⲡⲱⲧ ⲉⲡϫⲓⲛ-

5             ϫⲏ ⲁⲛⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ ⲁⲩϩⲙⲟⲟⲥ

               ⲁⲩϩⲙⲟⲟⲥ ⲁⲩϣⲁϫⲉ

               ⸗ ⲙ̄ⲡⲣ̄ⲛⲁϩⲧⲉ ⲉⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ ⲟ̣ⲩ̣ⲇ̣ⲉ̣ [ⲉϣⲏ-]

               ⲣⲉ ⲛ̄ⲣⲱⲙⲉ ⸗ ⲛ̄ⲛⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ

               ⲛ̄ⲛⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ

10          [ⲁⲛⲁⲣⲭ]ⲱ̣ⲛ̣ ⲁ̣ⲩ̣ϣⲁϫⲉ

              [ --- ] traces

              --------------

1 The ink of this line is very faded, and it is difficult to determine if it has been erased. One is tempted to read ⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ again, but it is very uncertain.

2-3 The rulers gathered themselves, they came to the same place: Ps. 2,2 (the Coptic version does not have ⲁⲩⲉⲓ).

4-5 The rulers persecuted (me) without a cause: Ps.118,161 (the Coptic version gives ⲛ̄ⲥⲱϊ after ⲡⲱⲧ, see Budge 1898, p. 134).

5-6 The rulers they sat. They sat (and) spoke: cf. Ps. 118,23 (ⲁⲛⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ ϩⲙⲟⲟⲥ ⲁⲩϣⲁϫⲉ ⲉⲣⲟϊ). There was enough space to write ⲉⲣⲟϊ, but no trace can be seen.

7-8 Trust not in rulers nor in the children of men: Ps. 145,3. This quotation is isolated by the use of ⸗ at the beginning and at the end.

8-9 The reason for the repetition of ⲛⲛⲁⲣⲭⲱⲛ here is not clear.

10 The rulers, they spoke.

2. Psalmic prayer

Girgis Ibrahim

Ifao, Inv. OC 91 (C 1907) [fig. 2]
13.5 ×13 cm
Provenance unknown
7th-8th cent.

  • 8 On the so-called “Psalmic compositions”, see Delattre 2012; Delattre forthcoming.

8The text seems to be composed of short quotations from the Psalms8. Even though some sentences could not be identified as coming from the Psalms, their meaning is consistent with the general theme of the text, that is to say, salvation from sin. It may be interpreted as a personal prayer. Such compositions are well attested in the Theban region, as well as in Edfu (see O. EdfouCopte 3-6). Given the non-typical nature of the pottery, it is difficult to propose a provenance.

9Fragment of an African “bag-shaped” amphora (Upper-Egyptian production), with three horizontal broad incisions and decoration at the upper part. Upper and right margins are preserved. The script is majuscule and slightly sloping; ⲏ has a minuscule form, as well as one of the ⲙ (l. 6); ⲃ is big; ⲣ has a kind of serif at the bottom part. The end of line 3 is filled with vertical strokes.

Fig. 2. Ifao, Inv. OC 91 (C 1907).

Fig. 2. Ifao, Inv. OC 91 (C 1907).

              [ --- ]ϫ̣ⲟⲉⲓⲥ  ̣  ̣  ⲛ̄ⲧⲟⲕ ⲡⲉ ⲡⲁⲃⲟⲏⲑⲟⲥ

              [ --- ]   ̣   ̣  ⲛ̄ⲥⲁ ⲡⲁⲱϣ ⲙ̄ⲡⲣⲧⲣⲁⲙⲟⲩ

              [ --- ]   ̣  ⲙⲁ · ///////////////////////////////

              [ --- ] ⲁⲛⲅ ⲁⲥⲑⲉⲛⲏⲥ ⲙ̄ⲡⲣⲕⲁⲁⲧ ⲛⲥⲱⲕ ϫⲉ

5            [ --- ⲙⲁⲧⲁⲗϭⲟ] ⲛ̣ⲧⲁⲯⲩⲭⲏ ϫⲉ ⲁⲓⲣ̄ ⲛⲟⲃⲉ ⲉⲣⲟⲕ

              [ --- ⲙⲡⲉ]ⲕ̣ⲙ̄ⲧⲟ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲙ̄ⲛ ⲕⲉⲙⲁ ⲙ̄

              [ --- ]ϫ̣ⲟ̣ⲉⲓⲥ ⲡϫⲟⲉⲓⲥ ⲛⲁϩⲙⲉⲧ

              [ --- ]  ̣ ⲟⲩⲟⲛ̣

1 βοηθός || 4 ἀσθενής || 5 ψυχή

          […] Lord, ??, You are my strength (Ps. 39,18 [Budge 39,17], ou Ps. 70,7)

             […] to my cry, don’t let me die!

             […] …

          […] I am weak (Ps. 6,3 [Budge 6,2], don’t abandon me because (Ps. 70,9-10)

5           [… Heal] my soul for I sinned against You! (Ps. 40,5 [Budge 40,4])

             […] before you (passim in the Ps.) and there is no other place of

             […] Lord. Lord, save me! (Ps. 139,2 [Budge 139,1])

             […] …

7-8 Between these two lines, traces of two letters written one above the other can be seen but not interpreted.

3. Exercise with biblical citations

Youhanna Reda Elia Matta

Ifao, Inv. OC 99 (= C 2014) [figs. 3–4]
11 × 8.2 cm
Provenance unknown
Imported amphora
7th-8th cent.

  • 9 Which have been already published in many publications in different attested versions (see Ciasca  (...)

10Potsherds served many uses in daily life, serving as a cheap writing material when a more expensive one (papyrus) was not needed. In the case of this ostracon, it seems that we are dealing with a draft, possibly written by a monk, as is suggested by the three unrelated texts that it contains. The main text, on the recto, is a citation from the canonical Book of Proverbs of Solomon (27,5-6)9. We can easily assume that the scribe was reciting the biblical verses from memory, not copying them from a book in his hands, as we can observe some orthographic variations not attested in any published version of the canonical Book.

  • 10 As the simple expression of keeping the Lord’s commandment in Deuteronomy 11, 18–20: “You shall ta (...)

11It is impossible to be sure why this particular verse was chosen: was the scribe of this ostracon experiencing a similar experience of dishonesty or betrayal from someone who showed him kindness, and consoling himself with the biblical verses? Or simply reciting the biblical verses as a mean of retaining them in his heart and mind?10

12After this quotation, the scribe started writing a sentence that sounds like an introduction of himself, “I am the miserable…”, but he stopped without giving his name. Then, after a space, two lines are written in a smaller script at the bottom of the ostracon. It is the beginning of an epistolary formula, where the name of the sender is Souai. If the script is the same as in the main part (see below), Souai may be the name of the scribe. Finally, the same scribe probably used the verso of the ostracon to start writing a Psalm verse, again interrupted. All these texts show that the scribe of the ostracon was simply using it as a draft or a personal notebook where he could freely express what was on his mind.

13The ostracon bears writing on both sides. There are traces of water damage on the recto. The script is globally bilinear, even though some letters are bigger (ⲃ, ϩ); ⲏ has the shape of a “h”; there are some ligatures (ⲗⲉ in l. 8). The use of superlinear strokes is not consistent (note the two long strokes on recto l. 5 and verso l. 1: maybe an “essai de plume”?). Even though the script of the last two lines on the recto and of the verso looks different from the main script, it could well be the same hand (ⲁ, ⲩ and ϩ have the same shape).

Fig. 3. Ifao, Inv. OC 99 (= C 2014) recto.

Fig. 3. Ifao, Inv. OC 99 (= C 2014) recto.

Recto (outside)

            + ⲛⲁⲛⲟⲩ

            {ⲛ}ϩⲉⲛϫ\ⲡ̣/ⲓⲟ

            ⲉⲩϭⲟⲗⲡ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ

            ⲉϩⲟⲩⲉ ⲉⲩⲙⲛⲧ-

5          ϣⲃⲣ ⲉⲥϩⲏ̅ⲡ̅ ⲛ̅ⲁ̅ⲛⲟⲩ

           ⲙ̄ⲡⲱⲗϩ ⲛ̄ⲟⲩϣⲃⲣⲉ

           ⲉϩⲟⲩⲉ ⲙⲡⲓ ⲛ̄ⲟⲩϫⲁϫⲉ

           ⲁⲛⲟⲕ ⲡⲉⲧⲁⲗⲉⲡ-

           ⲱⲣⲉⲓ

10      {ⲛ}ⲁⲛⲟⲕ ⲥⲟⲩⲁⲓ ⲉ<ⲓ>

           ⲥϩⲁϊ ⲉⲓϣⲓⲛⲉ ⲉⲧ̣ exit

Fig. 4. Ifao, Inv. OC 99 (= C 2014) verso.

Fig. 4. Ifao, Inv. OC 99 (= C 2014) verso.

Verso (inside)

+ ⲡ̅ⲛ̅ⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲡϫⲟⲉϊⲥ

ⲁϥⲙⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲉ̄ⲡ<ⲕ>ⲁϩ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ

ϩⲛ̄ⲛ̄ⲙ exit

5 ϣⲃⲣ: ϣⲃⲏⲣ Worrell || 6 ⲛⲟⲩϣⲃⲣⲉ: ⲛⲟⲩϣⲃⲏⲣ Worrell || 8-9 ταλαίπωρος

(Recto) + Better is the open rebuke than a secret (5) friendship. Better are the wounds of a friend than the kiss of an enemy (Prov. 27, 5-6).

I am the humble one

(10) I Souai, I write and greet

(Verso) + God and the Lord called the earth from the

Recto

2 {ⲛ}ϩⲉⲛϫⲡⲓⲟ : ϩⲉⲛϫⲡⲓⲟ Worrell 1931, p. 93; Ciasca 1889, p. 187; Greek ἔλεγχοι (without article).

10 the ⲛ before ⲁⲛⲟⲕ maybe by confusion with the word ⲛⲁⲛⲟⲩ as it is repeated in the first two previous sentences of the biblical quotation).

Verso

Free and incomplete quotation from Ps. 49,1: ⲡⲛⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲛⲛⲛⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲡϫⲟⲉⲓⲥ ⲁϥϣⲁϫⲉ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲁϥⲙⲟⲩⲧⲉ ⲉⲡⲕⲁϩ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϩⲛ ⲙⲙⲁ ⲛϣⲁ ⲙⲡⲣⲏ ϣⲁ ⲡⲉϥⲙⲁ ⲛϩⲱⲧⲡ, The God of gods, the Lord, has spoken, and called the earth from the rising of the sun to the going down thereof.

4. Message regarding a church vessel

Christine Ayad

Ifao, OC 252 (C 1906)  [fig. 5]
11 × 11 cm
Western Thebes
Late Roman Amphora 7
7th cent.

14The text is a letter from a certain Petros to an unknown recipient. Petros is somewhere in Western Thebes, and his “father” sent him to Ape regarding the matter of the church vessel of Apa Mena. Petros writes to settle a meeting between him and the addressee. The message is very brief (there are no greetings), and the difficult construction in line 7 makes it somewhat unclear.

15The letter shows three points of interest. The first one is that the letter mentions Ape (= Louxor), which ensures the Theban provenance of the ostracon. Second, the ostracon mentions a church of Apa Mena, thus new evidence for his cult in Ape. Third, the text provides a new attestation of the word ⲕⲩⲙⲏⲗⲓⲟⲛ, which most probably means “church vessel”. Another comparable letter is P. Mon.Epiph. 282, where the sender Ananias writes to some priests asking them to hurry regarding the pay for church vessels.

16The handwriting is a skilled sloping majuscule and could be assigned to the 7th century. The ⲙ has two shapes. Besides the usual place of the superlinear stroke, the scribe put such a stroke on the final consonant of some words.

Fig. 5. Ifao, OC 252 (C 1906).

Fig. 5. Ifao, OC 252 (C 1906).

           ⳨ ⲁⲛⲟⲕ ⲡⲉⲧⲣⲟⲥ

           ⲉⲡⲉⲓⲇⲏ ⲁⲡⲁⲉⲓⲱⲧ̅

           ϫⲟⲟⲩⲧ̅ ⲉⲁⲡⲉ ⲛ̅ⲣⲟⲩϩⲉ

           ϩⲁ ⲡϩⲱⲃ ⲙ̅ⲡⲕⲩⲙⲏⲗⲓ-

5         ⲟⲛ ⲛ̄ⲁⲡⲁ ⲙⲏⲛⲁⲥ ∙ ⲉⲓⲥ

           ⲡⲧⲱϣ̅ ⲁⲩⲧⲁⲁϥ ⲉⲧⲟⲟⲧ̅

           ϫⲉ ⲥϩⲁϊ ⲉⲑⲉ ⲛⲓⲙ̅ ⲉⲩⲁϣⲥ

           ⲧⲉⲛⲟⲩ ⲕⲟⲩⲱϣ ⲉⲉⲓ̅

           ⲉⲛϩⲏⲧ̅ ⲁⲙⲟⲩ ∙ ⲕⲟⲩⲱϣ

10       ⲟⲛ ⲛ̅ⲧⲁⲉⲓ̅ ϫⲟ-

           ⲟⲩ ⲛ̅ⲧⲁ-

           ⲉⲓ̅

2 ἐπειδή || 4-5 κειμήλιον || 7 l. ⲉⲩⲟⲩⲁϣⲥ

I am Petros. My father sent me to Ape in the evening regarding the matter of the church vessel (5) of Apa Menas. Here is the order that was given to me: “Write whatever manner they want.” Now (if) you want to come to the north, come. And (if) you prefer (10) me to come, send (for me) and I will come.

3 ⲁⲡⲉ See Timm vol.1, p. 133.

4 ⲕⲩⲙⲏⲗⲓⲟⲛ Τhis term borrowed from the Greek κειμήλιον (also ⲕⲟⲓⲙⲏⲗⲓⲟⲛ, cf. Förster, WB, p. 400) designates a church vessel; see Muyser 1937. Such objects have been preserved, for example a silver chalice that has an inscription on its head stating that it is a sacred vessel (ⲕⲩⲙⲏⲗⲓⲟⲛ) dedicated to a certain church in a Fayoum village (Louvre Inv. OA 11311; cf. Bénazeth,Rutschowscaya 2000, p. 181). An article gathering all the new attestations of this word is under preparation by A. Boud’hors.

  • 11 http://csla.history.ox.ac.uk/

5 ⲁⲡⲁ ⲙⲏⲛⲁⲥ The text doesn’t specify the type of religious institution (church, sanctuary, monastery). A. Papaconstantinou points out Thebes in general as a cult center for Apa Mena, mentioning in particular Jeme, the mountain of Jeme and Armant, but not Ape (Papaconstantinou 2001, p. 161). Four documents from Thebes in relation to a cult of Apa Mena can be identified. O. Crum 45 is a letter addressed to Apa Abraham about the appointment of a deacon to the service of a church of Apa Mena. In P. KRU 75, a monk and priest of the topos of Apa Mena on the mountain of Jeme acted as a scribe for the will of Jacob and Elias, the heads of the monastery of Epiphanius. O. Vind.Copt. 294 is another letter from Jeme mentioning a steward (oikonomos) of Apa Mena. Lastly a witness of P. CLT 9 is priest of “saint Apa Mena” (this information was gathered from the Cult of Saints in Late Antiquity database11). Furthermore, two recently published ostraca from the mountain of Armant mention a (topos?) of Apa Mena (O. Lips.Copt. II 10 et 11, see Krueger 2019).

7 ⲥϩⲁϊ ⲉⲑⲉ ⲛⲓⲙ̅ ⲉⲩⲁϣⲥ This sentence poses two difficulties. First the translation of the verb ⲥϩⲁⲓ, employed here in an absolute construction: does it simply mean “write”? Or could it mean “make the inscription”, referring to an inscribed chalice like the object from the Louvre? Besides, the use of the definite article (ⲑⲉ) prevents us from understanding ⲛⲓⲙ as an indefinite pronoun. One of the possibilities is to understand ⲛⲓⲙ as an interrogative, and to interpret the whole sentence, with an anacoluthon, as “write the manner: which one do they want?”. However, the sentence remains too allusive to fully understand what is at stake.

5. Letter from a sick man

Hagar Saad Eldien Mostafa Saad

Ifao, Inv. OC 275  (C 1917) [fig. 6]
16 × 10 × 1.2 cm
Theban region
Late Roman Amphora 7
7th–8th century

  • 12 See Till 1951, p. 91 (no. 132).

17This letter is addressed by Antonios to Petros. The lack of greetings at the beginning may indicate that the sender was irritated, or in a hurry, or simply ill, as he says on l. 6. He is asking for money (l. 5), perhaps to buy a drug. However, as is usual in this kind of text, the details of his request remain obscure. Ll. 11–12 could concern salt that had dried (and thus become useless?). Various sorts of salt were used in recipes12.

  • 13 See O. Frangé, introduction, p. 31; Boud’hors 2018a, pp. 294–295. For another new attestation of t (...)

18Even though the provenance of the ostracon is unknown, the type of pottery, as well as the form ⲙⲉⲓ- for the Negative Perfect (l. 6 and l. 10, instead of ⲙⲡⲉⲓ-)13, point to the Theban region.

19The text is almost complete, except for some letters on the left side. From l. 8 till l. 13, there are probably between two and four letters missing at the beginning. The script, a slightly sloping bilinear majuscule, looks quite skilled, although irregular and loose. There are some ligatures (ⲁⲓ, ⲉⲓ, ⲉⲣ, ⲉⲧ, ⲟⲩ), ⲩ is short. The language is standard Sahidic, except for some peculiar spellings (ⲁⲛⲇⲱⲛⲓⲟⲥ and ⲁⲛⲇⲟⲛⲓⲟⲥ for ⲁⲛⲧⲱⲛⲓⲟⲥ, ⲅⲛ- for ϭⲛ- on l. 10 and probably 7), and Negative First Perfect ⲙⲉⲓ-.

Fig. 6. Ifao, Inv. OC 275 (C 1917).

Fig. 6. Ifao, Inv. OC 275 (C 1917).

        ⳨

        ⲁⲛⲟⲕ ⲁⲛⲇⲟ̣ⲛⲓⲟⲥ

        ⲉⲧⲥϩⲁϊ ⲙⲡⲉ-

        ⲧⲣⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲟⲩⲱϣ ⲟⲩⲛ

5      ⲛⲅⲧⲛⲛⲟⲟⲩ ⲛϩⲟⲙⲛⲧ̅

        [ⲛ]ⲁ̣ⲓ ϫⲉ ⲉⲓϣⲱⲛⲉ ⲙⲉϊ-

        [ⲅⲛ] ⲟⲩⲛⲟⲩⲙⲉⲥ ⲛⲧⲁϫⲟϥ̣

        [2+?] ⲉⲣⲟϊ ⲉϣϫⲉ ⲕⲛⲁϯ ⲛⲁϊ

        [2+?] ⲧⲛⲛⲟⲟⲩ ⲡⲱϊ ⲛⲁϊ

10    [2+?]ϫⲟⲉⲓⲥ ϫⲉ ⲙⲉⲓⲅⲛ ⲟⲩ-

        [1+? ⲛ]ⲧⲁⲃⲟⲕⲥ̅ ⲉⲡϩ̣ⲙ̣ⲟⲩ

        [2+?] ⲉϥⲃⲟⲥⲧ̅ ⲛ̣ⲧⲉⲓ-

        [ϩⲉ ⲟⲩ]ϫⲁϊ ϩⲙ ⲡϫⲟⲉⲓⲥ

        [ⲧⲁⲁ]ⲥ̣ ⲙⲡⲉⲧⲣⲟⲥ

15    [ϩⲓ]ⲧⲛ ⲁⲛⲇⲱⲛⲓⲟⲥ

        ⲡⲉⲧⲛϣⲏⲣⲉ

4 οὖν || 7 νοῦμμος || 9 ⲧⲛⲛⲟⲟⲩ corr. ex ⲧⲛⲛⲟⲩ ||
11 ⲉⲡϩⲙⲟⲩ corr. ex ⲉⲡⲙ  ̣ ⲟⲩ? || 12 ⲃⲟⲥⲧ corr. ex ϣⲟⲟⲩⲉ

It is me Antonios who is writing to Petros. Please, then, (5) send me the money, for I am sick and I did not find a nummus to spend for me. Since you are going to give me […], send me mine (10) [ … my] lord, for I did not find […] to add to the salt […] it is dried out in this [way]. Hail in the Lord! To give to Petros (15) from Antonios your son.

7 ⲛⲟⲩⲙⲉⲥ νοῦμμος generally refers to a coin of small value. Till 1946, relying on a passage of Chassinat 1921, no. 93, proposed that the word could have the meaning of “tablet”, perhaps by analogy with the round form of a coin. As we are in a context of illness, this meaning should perhaps be considered here. Nevertheless, since copper coins are mentioned on line 5, money remains plausible.

8 [ⲉⲃⲟⲗ] ⲉⲣⲟϊ is a plausible reconstruction for the beginning of the line.

8-9 If ⲧⲛⲛⲟⲟⲩ is an Imperative with an apodotic function, a negation ⲁⲛ may be required in the lacuna: “since/if you are not going to give me [?], send me mine”, but what does “mine” refer to?

10 ⲡⲁ]ϫⲟⲉⲓⲥ can be proposed for the beginning; but it remains uncertain whether or not there was something else.

11 A feminine word is expected in the lacuna, because of the feminine suffix in ⲃⲟⲕⲥ, unless this suffix has a neutral function here: perhaps only ⲟⲛ, as the end of ⲟⲩ|[ⲟⲛ?

12 Why did the scribe correct ϣⲟⲟⲩⲉ into ⲃⲟⲥⲧ̄? The former is indeed frequent, and occurs, among many other contexts, in several recipes (drying out was part of the process); ⲃⲟⲥⲧ̄ is much rarer, but is attested in a Theban collection of recipes for preparing parchment (Crum 1905); these two leaves of papyrus are part of P.Bodmer 58, which has been recognized as a Theban manuscript: see Boud’hors 2018b): in this case, as in our text, it may be a more technical or pejorative word to indicate that something (parchment, salt or salt-composed product) is so dry that it cannot be used.

6. Letter requesting lentils

Ahmed Nakshara

Ifao, Inv. OC 104 (C 1916) [fig. 7]
10 × 9.5 cm
Theban region
7th cent.

20The letter is addressed by a certain Psmoei to a deacon. First announcing the repayment of a due tremissis, Psmoei then asks his correspondent to send him a measure of lentils. No other clue is given in order to identify the correspondents or their locations. All that is known about the origin of the ostracon is that Bernard Bruyère either found it during his excavations on the western bank of Thebes or bought it from an Egyptian dealer between 1922 and 1951.

  • 14 “I went to the dwelling of Psmou, that I might receive the money. He brought me unto a man and sai (...)
  • 15 P. Pisentius 15.1; 16.1,2,3,4; 35.1,2.

21There are, however, indications of a 7th century Theban origin. The mention of a certain Psmou, who is involved in a matter of money –one tremissis– in P. Mon.Epiph. 28814, in addition to the regular mentioning of Psmou in the correspondence of apa Pisentius15 concerning the marriage of Psmou’s daughter. Another issue that reinforces this hypothesis is the use of the mere title (deacon) to refer to the addressee. This usage raises the question about the possibility of the existence of just one deacon in the sender’s zone that makes him famous enough to be addressed only by his title.

22Fragment of a red Pseudo-Aswanese Late Roman Amphora. The letter is written on the recto only. The script is a skilled sloping majuscule, the size of the letters being somewhat irregular; note the ligature ⲁⲕ in ⲛⲁⲕ (l. 5, l. 7).

23Non-standard Sahidic forms are ⲁⲓⲡⲉ (for ⲟⲓⲡⲉ), typical for Southern texts, ⲕⲱ, ⲕⲛ- instead of ϭⲱ, ϭⲛ- (see Crum, Winlock 1926, p. 243), and the doubling of ⲛ in ⲛⲛⲉⲣϣⲓⲛ.

Fig. 7. Ifao, Inv. OC 104 (C 1916).

Fig. 7. Ifao, Inv. OC 104 (C 1916).

        ⲡⲥⲙⲱ̣ⲉⲓ ⲉϊϣⲓⲛⲉ

        ⲉⲡⲁⲥⲟⲛ̄ ⲡⲇϊⲁⲕⲟ-

        ⲛⲟⲥ ⲙ̅ⲡⲣ̄ⲕⲛ̣ ⲁⲣϊⲕⲉ ⲉⲧⲃⲉ

        ⲡⲧⲣⲙⲏⲥ̣ⲉ̣ ϯⲛⲁⲱⲥⲕ̅ ⲉϫⲟⲟⲩϥ

5      ⲛⲁⲕ ⲁⲛ ϯⲛⲟⲩ ⲣ̄ ⲡⲛ̅ⲁ̅ ⲛⲅϯ ⲟⲩⲁϊⲡⲉ

        ⲛⲛⲉⲣϣϊⲛ ⲙⲡⲣⲱⲙⲉ ⲉⲧⲛⲁⲛ̄ ϯ-

        ⲃⲗϫⲉ ⲛⲁⲕ ⲛ̄ⲧⲉⲕⲙⲁϫⲉ ⲧⲱⲕ

        ⲁⲣϊ ⲧⲁⲅⲁⲡⲏ̄ ⲙ̄ⲡⲣ̄ⲕⲱ̅ ⲛ̄ϣⲟⲩ

        ϯ ⲧⲁϊⲡⲉ ⲛ̄ⲛⲉⲣϣϊⲛ ⲛⲁϥ ϫⲉ

10     ⲡⲉⲥⲕⲏⲗⲙ̣ⲱⲥ ϩⲟⲥⲉ ⲧⲁ<ⲁ>ⲥ ⲙ̅

        ⲡⲇ̣ⲓⲁ̣ⲕ̣ⲟ̣ⲛⲟ̣ⲥ̣ ϩⲓ̣ⲧ̣ⲛ̣̄ ⲡⲥ̣[ⲙ-]

        ⲱⲉ̣[ⲓ]

2-3 διάκονος ‖ 4 τριμήσιον ‖ 8 ἀγάπη ‖ 10 σκυλμός || 11 διάκονος

(I) Psmoei, I am greeting my brother the deacon. Do not blame (me) for the tremissis, I will not delay sending it (5) to you. Now, please give the measure (oipe) of lentils to the man who will bring you this ostracon, according to your own measure (maje). Be so kind, do not abstain from giving the measure (oipe) of lentils to him, because (10) the travel is difficult. Give it to the deacon from Psmoei.

1 ⲡⲥⲙⲱ̣ⲉⲓ ⲉϊϣⲓⲛⲉ This introductory formula is problematic in two respects: first, the lack of a cross at the beginning, second the construction <name + ⲉⲓϣⲓⲛⲉ> (one expects <name + ⲉⲧϣⲓⲛⲉ> or <ⲁⲛⲟⲕ + name + ⲉⲓϣⲓⲛⲉ>). It might be reasonable to assume that the first line, with ⳨ ⲁⲛⲟⲕ, has disappeared. Another issue is the form of the name ⲡⲥⲙⲱⲉⲓ, not otherwise attested. ⲡⲥⲙⲱ/ⲯⲥⲙⲱ is a variant of ⲡⲥⲙⲟⲩ, and one could be tempted to think that the scribe has simply repeated the syllable ⲉⲓ before ⲉⲓϣⲓⲛⲉ. However, the very end of the ostracon could well be reconstructed as ⲡⲥ̣[ⲙ]|ⲱⲉ̣[ⲓ], although ⲡⲥ̣[ⲙ]|ⲱ ϯ̣ is not to be excluded. It is therefore difficult to decide. If the name of the sender is ⲡⲥⲙⲱⲉⲓ, is this another variant of ⲡⲥⲙⲟⲩ?

5-7 ⲟⲩⲁⲓⲡⲉ ⲛⲛⲉⲣϣϊⲛ oipe is a measure of grain smaller than the artab (ⲣⲧⲟⲃ: cf. Crum, Dict. 256a). Obviously, this measure was subject to local variations. This is probably why the sender asks the recipient to use his “own measure” (ⲙⲁϫⲉ), which probably means that people had not completely standardized measurements for goods such as corn, lentils, etc.

8 ⲙ̅ⲡⲣ̄ⲕⲱ ⲛ̄ϣⲟⲩ For this typically Theban expression, see Crum, Dict. 601a

10 ⲡⲉⲥⲕⲏⲗⲙ̣ⲱⲥ ϩⲟⲥⲉ Usually the Greek word σκυλμός is used in Coptic texts (mostly Theban) preceded by an auxiliary verb such as ⲣ, ⲃⲱⲕ, ⲛⲉϫ, ⲥⲱⲕ, ϯ, in expressions often translated by “Take the trouble (of coming and/or doing something)…”. However, here, the word is used alone, and it seems to have its original meaning, “travel”, as in O. Frangé 647. This is a way to urge the recipient, as travels were always considered difficult and dangerous in this region.

7. Letter about sending various goods

Amr el-Sharkawy

Ifao, Inv. OC 270 (C 1879) [fig. 8]
17 × 11 cm
Thebes?
Pseudo-Aswanese pottery
7th–8th cent.

24The letter published here concerns the exchange of various commodities (crops, vegetables, dates, a type of leguminous plant called arax, oil). At least four individuals (sender, addressee, Elias, David) are involved in these exchanges. This text reflects the complexity of sending and receiving goods, a process which regularly takes the form of barter.

25The letter bears no opening formulae or greetings, nor the names of either the sender or addressee. This indicates that the sender is either upset or in a hurry.

26The word “ACHAT” can be read at the bottom of the sherd, indicating that it was bought on the antiquity market. However the text could be attributed to the Theban region on internal criteria (subject, phraseology), when compared to ostraca from other dossiers (P. Mon.Epiph., O. Frangé).

27The sherd is complete. The writing is bilinear and upright, resembling a bookhand, which is confirmed by the use of diacritical signs (coma, semicolon). The text is written in standard Sahidic. Note the form of negative perfect ⲙⲉϥⲧⲁⲁⲩ (see text 5).

Fig. 8. Ifao, Inv. OC 270 (C 1879).

Fig. 8. Ifao, Inv. OC 270 (C 1879).

        ⳨ ⲉⲡⲉⲓⲇⲏ ⲁⲕⲙⲟⲟϣⲉ

        ϩⲓⲧⲟⲟⲧ ϫⲉ, ⲉⲓⲛⲁϫⲓ ⲛⲉⲃ-

        ⲣⲏⲟⲩⲉ ⲁϩⲓⲗⲓⲁⲥ, ⲥⲱⲃⲉ ⲙ̄ⲙⲟⲓ

        ⲉⲧⲃⲉ ⲛ̄ⲥⲓⲙⲥⲓⲙ, ⲙⲉϥⲧⲁⲁⲩ

5      ⲛⲁⲓ̈ ∙ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲟⲛ, ⲟⲩⲙⲛ̅ⲧ̅ ⲛ̄ⲃⲛ̄-

        ⲛⲉ, ⲉⲛⲧⲁⲓ̈ϭⲛ̄ⲧϥ̅ · ⲙⲁⲣⲉϥϫⲟ-

        ⲟⲩ ⲛ̣̄ⲧⲉⲟⲉⲓⲡⲉ ⲛ̄ⲃⲛ̅ⲛⲉ

        ⲙⲛ̄ ⲡⲕⲁⲙⲟⲩⲗ ∙ ⲛ̄ⲧⲁⲧⲛ̄-

        ⲛⲟⲟⲩ ⲛ̄ⲟⲣⲝ̅ · ⲉϣⲱⲡⲉ

10    ⲇⲉ, ⲉϥⲧⲙ̅ϫⲟⲟⲩ ⲛ̄ⲃⲛ̅ⲛⲉ.

        ⲙ̄ⲡⲣ̄ϫⲟⲟⲩ ⲕⲁⲙⲟⲩⲗ · ⲙⲟ-

        ⲛⲟⲛ, ⲉⲓϯ ⲙ̄ⲙⲟⲟⲩ ⲛⲁⲕ

        ⲣ̄ ⲡⲛⲁ⳿ ⲛⲅ̅ϫⲓ ⲡⲛⲉϩ ⲙⲁ ⲡⲁ-

        ⲥⲟⲛ ⲇⲁⲩⲉⲓⲇ ⲛⲅ̅ϫⲟⲟⲩϥ

15    ⲛⲁⲓ̈ · ⲟⲩϫⲁⲓ̈ ϩⲙ̅

        ⲡϫⲟⲉⲓⲥ:

1 ἐπειδή || 2 δέ || 7 ⲟⲉⲓⲡⲉ ⲉⲓ corr. ex ⲟϊ || 8 ⲛ̄ⲧⲁ corr ex ⲛ̄ⲧⲛ ? || 9 ἄρακος || 10 δέ || 12 μόνον

+ Since you left me, (saying) “I shall take the crops”, Elias laughed at me concerning the vegetables, he did not give them (5) to me. And as for a measure of dates that I found, may he send the measure of dates with the camel, in order that I may send the arax. And if (10) he does not send the dates, do not send a camel. Only when I give them to you, be so kind and take the oil at my brother David’s place and send it (15) to me. Hail in the Lord!

8. Agreement

Hadeer Belal

Ifao, Inv. OC 248 (C 1875) [fig. 9]
9 × 5 cm
Deir el-Medina

28This ostracon provides the end of a legal deed, involving an agreement (l. 6 ⲥⲩⲙⲫⲱⲛⲟⲛ). This term most often designates a work contract, especially in texts from the Fayyum and Middle Egypt. Here the nature of the deed is not easily identified, since the document is designated through different words that don’t specify the type of transaction (ll. 1–2 ⲉⲅⲅⲣⲁⲫⲱⲛ, l. 10, 12 ⲭⲁⲣⲧⲏⲥ). Furthermore, the fact that ⲛⲓⲥⲩⲙⲫⲱⲛⲟⲛ is a plural form seems to indicate that it doesn’t refer to the type of document, but rather to agreements that led to its drawing up.

29On the back of the ostracon, the indication “N. E. T. 46” (= north east of the temple) shows that it comes from Bernard Bruyère’s excavations of the temple of Hathor at Deir el-Medina.

  • 16 See O. Crum, p. xv; Garel forthcoming.

30The text is written on a fragment of an imported African amphora (undetermined family), with a yellowish surface. The text is written on the recto, the upper and the right parts are missing. It is difficult to evaluate the loss in the first lines since the ostracon could have had an irregular shape. The script is majuscule, regular, slightly sloping, and very similar to well-known Theban hands from the 7th century, such as hand D16; ⲏ has a minuscule shape.

Fig. 9. Ifao, Inv. OC 248 (C 1875).

Fig. 9. Ifao, Inv. OC 248 (C 1875).

        ----------------

        [ 6-7 ]   ̣  ̣  [--- ⲉⲅ-]

        ⲅⲣⲁⲫⲱⲛ ⲛ̄ⲧⲉ̣[--- ⲉ-]

        ⲣⲏⲩ ϩⲛ̄ ⲥⲟⲩ ϫⲟ[ⲩ--- ⲙⲡⲉ-]

        ⲃⲟⲧ ⲡⲁⲱⲛⲉ ⲛ[---]

5      ⲇⲁⲩⲉⲓⲇ ⲛ̄ϣⲁ̣[ --- ]

        ⲛ̄ϫⲏⲙⲉ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ[ⲁ --- ]

        ⲛⲓⲥⲩⲙⲫⲱⲛ[ⲟⲛ --- ]

        ⲟⲅⲅⲓⲁ ⲛ̄ⲛⲟⲩⲃ [ⲙⲡⲣⲟⲥⲧⲓⲙⲟⲛ]

        ⲛϥϩⲱⲛ ⲉϩⲱⲃ [ⲛⲓⲙ ⲉϥⲥⲏϩ ⲉ-]

10    ⲡⲓⲭⲁⲣⲧⲏⲥ ⲁ̣[ⲛⲟⲕ ± 7 ]

        ϯⲥⲧⲟⲓⲭⲉ ⲉϩ̣[ⲱⲃ ⲛⲓⲙ ⲉϥⲥⲏϩ]

        ⲉⲡⲓⲭⲁ[ⲣⲧⲏⲥ --- ]

        Ἐγρ(άφη)[ --- ]

2 ἔγγραφον || 7 σύμφωνον || 8 οὐγκία, πρόστιμον || 10 χάρτης || 11 στοιχεῖν || 12 χάρτης || εγρ⁄ ostr

[…] deed […] on the twenty-[?] day [of the] month Paone […] (5) David, the [...] of Jeme. Whoever will […] these agreements […] ounce of gold [as a fine], and he shall recognize [all] the things [written in] (10) this document […] I, […], I agree with everything written in this document. Written […].

1-3 ⲉⲅ]|ⲅⲣⲁⲫⲱⲛ ⲛ̄ⲧⲉ̣[--- ⲉ]|ⲣⲏⲩ

ⲛ̄ⲧⲁ̣[---] should be expected here, but is difficult to read ; in that case, we could supply ⲛ̄ⲧⲁ̣[ⲛⲡⲓⲑⲉ ⲙⲛ̄ ⲛⲉⲛⲉ]ⲣⲏⲩ / ⲛ̄ⲧⲁ̣[ⲩⲡⲓⲑⲉ ⲙⲛ̄ ⲛⲉⲩⲉ]ⲣⲏⲩ, understanding the verb as temporal perfect, or ⲛ̄ⲧⲁ̣[ⲛⲥⲙⲛⲧϥ ⲙⲛ̄ ⲛⲉⲛⲉ]ⲣⲏⲩ / ⲛ̄ⲧⲁ̣[ⲩⲥⲙⲛⲧϥ ⲙⲛ̄ ⲛⲉⲩⲉ]ⲣⲏⲩ. Both solutions seem a little long for the size of the lacuna.

4-6 ⲛ[---] | ⲇⲁⲩⲉⲓⲇ ⲛ̄ϣⲁ̣[ --- ] | ⲛ̄ϫⲏⲙⲉ

We could have here the mention of two officials from Jeme, David and somebody else in the presence of whom (l. 4-5 ⲛ[ⲁϩⲣⲛ + 1st name] ⲙⲛ̄ | ⲇⲁⲩⲉⲓⲇ) the contract was drawn up. However no known official titles begin with ϣⲁ[.

6-8. ⲡⲉⲧⲛ[ⲁ --- ] | ⲛⲓⲥⲩⲙⲫⲱⲛ[ⲟⲛ --- ] | ⲟⲅⲅⲓⲁ ⲛⲛⲟⲩⲃ [ⲙⲡⲣⲟⲥⲧⲓⲙⲟⲛ] The penal clause, without having any exact parallels can be reconstructed as such on the base of similar documents :

ⲡⲉⲧⲛ[ⲁⲡⲁⲣⲁⲃⲁ ⲛ-] or ⲡⲉⲧⲛ[ⲁⲉⲓ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ⲉ-] (see Richter 2008, pp. 196–197)

ⲛⲓⲥⲩⲙⲫⲱⲛ[ⲟⲛ ⲛϥϯ/ⲉϥⲛⲁⲧⲓ ⲛⲟⲩ-] (or another amount)

ⲟⲅⲅⲓⲁ ⲛⲛⲟⲩⲃ [ⲙⲡⲣⲟⲥⲧⲓⲙⲟⲛ] (see P. KRU 21,70; 74,92).

8-9 ⲛϥϩⲱⲛ ⲉϩⲱⲃ [ⲛⲓⲙ ⲉϥⲥⲏϩ ⲉ]|ⲡⲓⲭⲁⲣⲧⲏⲥ

For a parallel, see P. KRU 105, 13. On the verb ϩⲱⲛ, see Richter 2008, pp. 335–336.

The word ⲭⲁⲣⲧⲏⲥ, “papyrus”, is used, although the text is written on a potsherd, which could indicate that it is a copy or a summary of a document written on papyrus. The same phenomenon is known from the archive of Abraham, bishop of Hermonthis (see Fournet 2018, p. 200).

9. End of a settlement of dispute (?)

Muhammady Fathy Muhammed

Ifao, Inv. OC 329 (C 827) [fig. 10]
16 × 16.5 cm
Theban region?
7th–8th cent.

31The text preserved here is the end of a legal deed whose nature is not completely clear. However, the presence of certain words such as ⲁⲙⲁϩⲧⲉ, “possess” (l. 7), ⲣ ϫⲟⲉⲓⲥ, “own” (ll. 11–12) suggest that the transaction involves a transfer of property. Furthermore, the use of the reciprocal pronoun ⲛⲉⲩⲉⲣⲉ̣ⲟ̣ⲩ (l. 3) and the distributive ⲡⲟⲩⲁ ⲡⲟⲩⲁ (l. 4, l. 8?), as well as the use of an expression such as “according to what God/justice inspired to our heart” (ll. 8–9), are strong clues that we deal here with a settlement of a dispute concerning a property.

32The document is written on a red ribbed pottery sherd (Pseudo-Aswanese type). The text is broken in its upper, left and right part; only the last three lines are complete, indicating that the upper part of the sherd must have been much broader. The script is bilinear and slightly sloping, without any ligatures. Supralinear strokes regularly take the form of a slanting stroke (cf. l. 6, l. 7, l. 12). The scribe spells ⲁⲟⲩⲉⲧ̣[ⲓ], ⲁⲉⲓⲥϩⲁϊ instead of the usual ⲁⲩⲁⲓⲧⲉⲓ and ⲁⲓⲥϩⲁϊ. Note that the spelling peculiarity and mistakes are more numerous in the scribe’s signature.

Fig. 10. Ifao, Inv. OC 329 (C 827).

Fig. 10. Ifao, Inv. OC 329 (C 827).

         ---------------

         [ --- ]   ̣̣  ̣  [ --- ]

         [ --- ]ⲩⲗⲟ vac. ⲁ̣[ --- ]

         [ --- ⲛ]ⲉ̣ⲩⲉⲣⲉ̣ⲟ̣ⲩ ⲉ  ̣̣  ̣ [ --- ]

         [ --- ⲡⲟⲩ]ⲁ ⲡⲟⲩⲁ ⲕⲁⲧ[ⲁ --- ]

5       [ --- ]  ̣  ⲛⲟⲩⲛⲟⲩ ⲛ̄ⲇⲓ̣[ --- ]

         [ --- ⲡ]ⲁ̣ⲣⲁ ⲛ̄ⲛⲣⲱⲙⲉ ⲛ[--- ]

         [ --- ]  ̣ ⲟⲟⲩ ⲛ̄ⲥⲉⲁⲙⲁϩⲧⲉ̣ [ --- ]

         [ⲡⲟⲩⲁ ⲡⲟ]ⲩⲁ ⲡⲣⲟⲥ ⲡⲉⲛ̄ⲧⲁ[ --- ]

         [ --- ]ⲡⲉⲛϩⲏⲧ ⲡⲉ ⲡⲁⲓ̈ [ --- ]

10     [ --- ]  ̣ ϫ ⲡϣⲉⲓ ⲡⲁϣⲟⲩⲙⲱ [ⲙⲛ]

         [ⲓⲱ(ϩ)]ⲁ̣ⲛⲛⲏⲥ ⲡϣⲓⲛ ⲡⲁⲗⲓⲧⲉ [ⲣ ϫⲟ-]

         ⲉⲓⲥ ⲙ̄ⲙⲟⲟⲩ ⲛ̄ⲧⲉⲓϩⲉ ⲁⲛ̣[ⲟⲕ]

         ⲡⲇⲓⲁⲕⲱⲛ ⲃⲓⲕⲧⲱⲣ ⲁⲟⲩⲉⲧ̣[ⲓ]

         ⲙ̄ⲙⲟⲓ̈ ⲁⲉⲓⲥϩⲁϊ ϫⲉ ⲛ̄ⲥⲉⲛⲟⲓ̣

15     ⲁⲛ ⲉ{ⲓ}ⲥϩⲁⲓ ⲁⲩ{ϫ}ⲱ ϯⲱ ⲙⲙⲛⲧ̣ⲣ̣[ⲉ]

4 κατά || 6 παρά || 7 ⲛ̄ⲥⲉ corr ex ⲛ̄ⲥⲁ || 8 πρός || 9 ⲡⲉ corr ex ⲡⲁ? || 13 διάκονος αἰτεῖν || 14 νοεῖν

[…] they stopped and they […] with each other […] each of them according to […] at the hour of […] against/except the men […] and they will possess […] each of them according to what […] our heart […] son of Pashoumo and Ioannes son of Palite own them in this way. I, the deacon Victor, they asked me and I wrote because they don’t know how to write, and I am witness.

2 [ --- ]ⲩⲗⲟ vac. ⲁ̣[ --- ]

A form of the verb ⲗⲟ, “to cease” (or “to be healed”), should be supplied here, probably ⲁⲩⲗⲟ, followed by another form of First Perfect after the short vacat.

5 [ --- ]  ̣ ⲛⲟⲩⲛⲟⲩ ⲛ̄ⲇⲓ̣[ --- ]

A word of the family of ⲇⲓⲕⲁⲓⲟⲛ could be reconstructed after the break.

8-9 ⲡⲣⲟⲥ ⲡⲉⲛ̄ⲧⲁ[ --- ] | [ --- ]ⲡⲉⲛϩⲏⲧ ⲡⲉ ⲡⲁϊ [ --- ]

We expect an expression such as “according to what God/justice inspired to our heart”. For a parallel see Heurtel 2013, p. 82; ⲡⲉ ⲡⲁϊ [ --- ] could be a mistake for the expression ⲉⲧⲉ ⲡⲁϊ ⲡⲉ which is rather expected here. See, however, another formulation in CPR IV 50,12 (Fayyumic): ⲡⲉⲧⲉⲁ[ⲩⲧ]ⲓ̣ ⲉⲡⲉⲛϩⲏⲧ ⲡⲉⲓ ⲡⲉ.

10-11 ⲡϣⲉⲓ ⲡⲁϣⲟⲩⲙⲱ [ⲙⲛ] | [ⲓⲱ(ϩ)]ⲁ̣ⲛⲛⲏⲥ ⲡϣⲓⲛ ⲡⲁⲗⲓⲧⲉ

The division of words between the two lines is not clear, given the irregular shape of the ostracon. Another solution would be ⲡϣⲉⲓ ⲡⲁϣⲟⲩⲙⲱ [ⲙⲛ ⲓⲱ-] | [ϩ]ⲁ̣ⲛⲛⲏⲥ ⲡϣⲓⲛ ⲡⲁⲗⲓⲧⲉ.

It is the first attestation of the name ⲡⲁϣⲟⲩⲙⲱ, which should be identified as a new form of the name Pachom. The name ⲡⲁⲗⲓⲧⲉ occurs in a funerary stela (SBKopt. I 748,5) without known provenance.

10. Account

Fatma el-Gebali

Ifao, Inv. OC 192 (C 1897) [fig. 11]
15 × 9,5 cm
Fayyum ?
7th–8th cent.

  • 17 See Garel 2018.
  • 18 Cf. O. Crum 500-510.
  • 19 See Jouguet 1901.

33Given the layout of the text, which contains anthroponyms sometimes associated with numbers, it probably can be identified as an account, or a fiscal list, especially if the word ⲗⲟⲅⲟⲥ can be read on line 1 (see commentary). Names are generally followed by their patronyms. Some of them are familiar, others are not, but almost all have a Fayyumic colour, either from their spelling or because they are especially attested in the Fayyum. Moreover the mention of ⲡⲓⲁⲕⲟⲩ on line 11, be it a title (“deacon”) or, more likely, a proper name17, definitely points to the Fayyumic dialect. This text is puzzling, since ostraca in Fayyumic are rare18. There is no information about the provenance of the ostracon. However, the pottery itself is peculiar and does not resemble what is usually found in Thebes. It is thus tempting to suppose that the ostracon comes from the Fayyum (perhaps brought by Jouguet during his excavations at Medinet Ghoran?)19.

34Fragment of an Aswanese red pot (sigillata, group 0), of a type in use from the Byzantine period onwards. Part of the basis is preserved, with a rib. The text is almost complete, except for some loss on the left side. The script is a small and upright majuscule; the upper part of ⲁ is sometimes open; the last line is written with bigger letters, but the hand could well be the same.

Fig. 11. Ifao, Inv. OC 192 (C 1897).

Fig. 11. Ifao, Inv. OC 192 (C 1897).

       ⳨ ⲡⲗⲛⲟⲩ  ̣ ⲁⲕ  ̣ ⲛ̣

        ⲡⲁⲗⲉⲟⲩ ⲃⲉⲗⲉ ϩⲏⲟⲩ       ⲁ

        ⲡⲁϩⲓⲗⲟⲩ                     ⲁ

        ⲙⲁⲕⲁⲣⲓ ⲡⲁⲗⲉⲟⲩ            ⲁ

5      ⲛ̣ⲁϩⲣⲁⲟⲩ ⲁⲡⲓⲟⲩ            ⲁ

        [  ̣]ⲱⲣⲓⲱ  ̣ ⲡⲣⲁⲟⲩ

        [?]ⲉⲣⲉⲙ̣ⲓ̣ⲁⲥ

        [ⲙ]ⲁⲕⲁⲣⲓ ⲡⲛⲁ̣ⲥ ̣

        ⲓⲱⲥⲏⲫ ⲟⲩⲉⲛⲁϥⲣⲓ

10    ⲕ̣ⲁⲗⲁϯ ⲡ̣ⲁⲡⲛⲟⲩϯ

        [  ̣?]ⲁ̣ⲕⲱϥ ⲡⲓⲁⲕⲟⲩ

+ ???

Paleou Bele Heou           1

Pahilou                          1

Makari Paleou                1

Nahraou Apiou              1

Horion? Praou

Eremias

Makari Pnas

Ioseph Ouenafri

Kalati Papnouti

[.]akouf Piakou

1 ⳨ ⲡⲗⲛⲟⲩ  ̣ ⲁⲕⲁ̣ⲙ̣ Perhaps read ⲡⲗⲟ(ⲅⲟⲥ) ⲛ with a small ⲟ under ⲗ: “account of”, followed by the name of a village or an individual?

2 ⲡⲁⲗⲉⲟⲩ ⲃⲉⲗⲉ ϩⲏⲟⲩ

ⲃⲉⲗⲉ : Greek Βελε is attested in Upper Egypt (TM 26935), but it could also be a variant form of ⲡⲃⲗⲗⲉ, “the blind” (TM 27411). This is the only occasion in the text of somebody having three names: is it related to the fact that the following line has only one name?

ⲁ (“1”) is written on the base rib.

3 ⲡⲁϩⲓⲗⲟⲩ

This name is not otherwise attested.

5 ⲛ̣ⲁϩⲣⲁⲟⲩ ⲁⲡⲓⲟⲩ

Is ⲁⲡⲓⲟⲩ similar to the name ⲁⲡⲓⲟⲩⲛ (Ἀπίων) attested SBKopt. II 802, 38?

6 [  ̣ ]ⲱⲣⲓⲱ  ̣ ⲡⲣⲁⲟⲩ

The first name could be reconstructed [ϩ]ⲱⲣⲓⲱⲛ̣ (see NBKopt. s.v.). For a name ⲡⲣⲁⲟⲩ, see SBKopt. II 825, 18–19.

7 [?]ⲉⲣⲉⲙ̣ⲓ̣ⲁⲥ

There is a long stroke between lines 6 and 8, on which line 7 seems to have been written. In this second part of the text numbers no longer appear. Another possibility is that line 7 was crossed out, but the stroke goes until the end of the line and looks like a mark of division.

8 [ⲙ]ⲁⲕⲁⲣⲓ ⲡⲛⲁ̣ⲥ  ̣  ̣

A name ⲡⲛⲁⲥ is attested in a Fayyumic document, BKU III 352, 2 and 11 (written ⲡⲛⲁ).

Traces of one letter are visible after the name, but the letter seems to have been washed out.

10 ⲕ̣ⲁⲗⲁϯ ⲡ̣ⲁⲡⲛⲟⲩϯ

The name ⲕⲁⲗⲁϯ could not be identified elsewhere. Α Greek name Καλατιος is found in CPR I 4, a text from the Fayyum, dated to the 1st cent. CE, corrected in the more common name Καλα<τυ>τιος.

11 [  ̣?]ⲁ̣ⲕⲱϥ ⲡⲓⲁⲕⲟⲩ

Is [  ̣ ]ⲁ̣ⲕⲱϥ a form of ⲓⲁⲕⲱⲃ? The presence of a letter at the beginning of the line is doubtful.

Haut de page

Bibliographie

Bénazeth, Rutschowscaya 2000
Bénazeth, D., Rutschowscaya, M.-H., L’art copte en Égypte: 2000 ans de christianisme. Exposition présentée à l’Institut du monde arabe, Paris, du 15 mai au 3 septembre 2000 et au Musée de l’Ephèbe au Cap d’Agde, du 30 septembre 2000 au 7 janvier 2001, Paris, 2000.

Bosson 1997
Bosson, N., Wörterverzeichnis zu Gawdat Gabras Ausgabe des Psalters im mesokemischen (oxyrhynchitischen/mittelägyptischen) Dialekt des koptischen (Mudil-Kodex), Leuven, 1997.

Boud’hors 2018a
Boud’hors, A., “Copyist and Scribe: Two Professions for a Single Man? Palaeographical and Linguistic Observations on Some Practices of the Theban Region According to Coptic Texts from the Seventh and Eighth Centuries”, in J. Cromwell, E. Grossman (eds.), Scribal Repertoires in Egypt from the New Kingdom to the Early Islamic Period, OSAD, Oxford, 2018, pp. 274–295.

Boud’hors 2018b
Boud’hors, A., “Le P.Bodmer 58 comme témoin de la vie culturelle et religieuse dans la région thébaine au début du vii  siècle”, in Conference acts The Coptic Book : Codicological Features, Places of Production, Intellectual Trends, Adamantius 24, 2018, pp. 106-107.

Budge 1898
Budge, E.A.W., The Earliest Known Coptic Psalter, London, 1898.

Chassinat 1921
Chassinat, É., Un papyrus médical copte, MIFAO 32, Cairo, 1921.

Ciasca 1889
Ciasca, A., Sacrorum bibliorum fragmenta copto-sahidica Musei borgiani : iussu et sumptibus S. Congregationis de Propaganda Fide, vol. II, Rome, 1889.

Crum 1905
Crum, W.E., « A Coptic Recipe for the Preparation of Parchment », PSBA 27, 1905, pp. 166–171.

Crum, Winlock 1926
Crum, W.E., Winlock, H.E., The Monastery of Epiphanius at Thebes, Part I: The Archaeological Material (by H.E. Winlock), The Literary Material (by W.E. Crum), MMAEE 3, New York, 1926.

Delattre 2012
Delattre, A., “Ostraca des Musées de Berlin portant des extraits des Psaumes en copte”, in V. Lepper (ed.), Forschung in der Papyrussammlung: Eine Festgabe für das Neue Museum, Berlin, 2012, pp. 387–398.

Delattre forthcoming
A. Delattre, “Between Education and Religion: Quotations and Compositions of Psalms Verses in the Theban Area” in A. Maravela, Á.T. Mihálykó (éd.), New Perspectives on Religion, Education, and Culture at Christian Western Thebes (VI-VIII), Oslo (forthcoming).

Fournet J.-L. 2018
Fournet, J.-L., “Sur les premiers documents juridiques coptes (3): Les «archives» d’Apa Abraham”, in A. Boud’hors, C. Louis (eds.), Études coptes XV. Dix-septième journée d’études (Lisbonne, 18-20 juin 2015), CBC 15, Paris, pp. 199226.

Garel 2018
Garel, E., “Le titre ⲡⲓⲁⲕⲟⲩ dans les documents coptes fayoumiques”, in M. Nowak, A. Łajtar, J. Urbanik (eds.), Tell Me Who You Are: Labelling Status in the Graeco-Roman World, Uschyłku starozytnosci. Studia zródłoznawcze 16 (2017), Warsaw, 2018, pp. 57–71.

Garel forthcoming
Garel, E., The Hand D and David the Monk”, in A. Maravela, Á.T. Mihálykó (eds.), New Perspectives on Religion, Education and Culture at Christian Western Thebes (VI-VIII), Oslo (forthcoming).

Heurtel 2013
Heurtel, C., “Trois ostraca supplémentaires de la main de Marc”, in A. Boud’hors, C. Louis (eds.), Études coptes XII. Quatorzième journée d’études (Rome, 11-13 juin 2009), Paris, pp. 77–84.

Heurtel 2017
Heurtel, C., “Extraits de psaumes dans quatre ostraca de l’Ifao”, ChronEg 92, 2017, pp. 181–190.

Heurtel 2018
Heurtel, C., “D’un Victor l’autre : deux nouveaux ostraca thébains”, in A. Boud’hors, C. Louis (eds.), Études coptes XV. Dix-septième journée d’études (Lisbonne, 18-20 juin 2015), Paris, 2018, pp. 255–261.

Jouguet 1901
Jouguet, P., “Fouilles du Fayoum: Rapport sur les fouilles de Médinet-Mâ’di et Médinet-Ghôran, Ghôran”, BCH 25, 1901, pp. 380–411.

Krueger 2019
Krueger, F., “The Papyrological Rediscovery of the Monastery of Apa Ezekiel and Bishop Andrew of Hermonthis (6th Century). Preliminary Report on the Edition of the Coptic Ostraca at the Leipzig University library”, JCoptS 21, 2019, pp. 115–162.

Muyser 1937
Muyser, J., “Des vases eucharistiques en verre”, Bulletin de l’Association des Amis de l’Art copte 3, 1937, pp. 9–28.

Papaconstantinou 2001
Papaconstantinou, A., Le culte des saints en Égypte, des Byzantins aux Abbassides. L’apport des inscriptions et des papyrus grecs et coptes, Paris, 2001.

Till 1946
Till, W.C., « Koptische Rezepte », BSAC 12, 1946, pp. 43–49.

Till 1951
Till, W.C., Die Arzneikunde der Kopten, Berlin, 1951.

Worrell 1931
Worrell, W.H., The Proverbs of Solomon in Sahidic Coptic According to the Chicago Manuscript, Chicago, 1931.

Haut de page

Notes

1 Workshop mentored by Anne Boud’hors, Esther Garel and Chantal Heurtel, in the frame of a “specific action” financed by the IFAO.

2 Among which OC 131, 216, 256, 317 have been published in Heurtel 2017, OC 244 and 277 in Heurtel 2018.

3 O.BawitIfao et O.EdfouCopte.

4 That is the case with the limestones, see O. Theb.Ifao, but also with some potsherds.

5 Some information on the ostraca is available online at: http://www.ifao.egnet.net/bases/archives/ostraca/.

6 On Psalm quotations in ostraca see Delattre 2012, Heurtel 2017 (no. 3 in her publication is another example of a concordance), and Delattre forthcoming.

7 Cf. Bosson 1997, p. 278.

8 On the so-called “Psalmic compositions”, see Delattre 2012; Delattre forthcoming.

9 Which have been already published in many publications in different attested versions (see Ciasca 1889, p. 187; Worrell 1931, p. 93)

10 As the simple expression of keeping the Lord’s commandment in Deuteronomy 11, 18–20: “You shall take these words of mine to heart and keep them in mind… Write them up on the door-posts of your houses and on your gates.”

11 http://csla.history.ox.ac.uk/

12 See Till 1951, p. 91 (no. 132).

13 See O. Frangé, introduction, p. 31; Boud’hors 2018a, pp. 294–295. For another new attestation of this form, see text 7 in this article.

14 “I went to the dwelling of Psmou, that I might receive the money. He brought me unto a man and said, ‘He hath (?) not paid thee money.’ If thou wouldst have the gold tremis and that I take it from [….] and bring it unto [] will (?) bring the remainder of the money. I have not leisure [] Farewell in the Lord” (transl. W.E. Crum).

15 P. Pisentius 15.1; 16.1,2,3,4; 35.1,2.

16 See O. Crum, p. xv; Garel forthcoming.

17 See Garel 2018.

18 Cf. O. Crum 500-510.

19 See Jouguet 1901.

Haut de page

Table des illustrations

Titre Fig. 1. Ifao, Inv. OC 181 (C 1851).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 3,5M
Titre Fig. 2. Ifao, Inv. OC 91 (C 1907).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 3,1M
Titre Fig. 3. Ifao, Inv. OC 99 (= C 2014) recto.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-3.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 3,4M
Titre Fig. 4. Ifao, Inv. OC 99 (= C 2014) verso.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-4.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 2,9M
Titre Fig. 5. Ifao, OC 252 (C 1906).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-5.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 2,6M
Titre Fig. 6. Ifao, Inv. OC 275 (C 1917).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-6.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 3,0M
Titre Fig. 7. Ifao, Inv. OC 104 (C 1916).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-7.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 3,1M
Titre Fig. 8. Ifao, Inv. OC 270 (C 1879).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-8.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 2,9M
Titre Fig. 9. Ifao, Inv. OC 248 (C 1875).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-9.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 2,2M
Titre Fig. 10. Ifao, Inv. OC 329 (C 827).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-10.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 3,2M
Titre Fig. 11. Ifao, Inv. OC 192 (C 1897).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/docannexe/image/3532/img-11.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 2,9M
Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence papier

Anne Boud’hors et Esther Garel, « Ten Coptic Ostraca at the IFAO »Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale (BIFAO), 119 | 2019, 51-77.

Référence électronique

Anne Boud’hors et Esther Garel, « Ten Coptic Ostraca at the IFAO »Bulletin de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale (BIFAO) [En ligne], 119 | 2019, mis en ligne le 07 mai 2020, consulté le 18 juin 2024. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/bifao/3532 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/bifao.3532

Haut de page

Auteurs

Anne Boud’hors

Directeur de recherche au CNRS-IRHT

Articles du même auteur

Esther Garel

Maître de conférences en papyrologie, langue et archéologie coptes, à l’université de Strasbourg, MISHA, Institut d’égyptologie

Haut de page

Éditeurs scientifiques

Christine Ayad

Researcher at Alexandria School Foundation for Christian Studies

; Hadeer Belal

Curator at the Coptic Museum, Cairo

; Fatma el-Gebali

Assistant lecturer at Fayyum University (Faculty of Archaeology)

; Muhammady Fathy

Lecturer at the Department of Egyptology, Faculty of Archaeology, Cairo University

; Girgis Ibrahim

Lecturer of Coptic language at the Coptic Theological and Clerical College Anba Ruweis (Cairo)

; Ahmed Nakshara

Inspector of Archaeology, Tanis

; Adel Rashed

MA. candidate at Cairo University

; Youhanna Reda

Teaching and Library Assistant at the Institute of Coptic Studies (Cairo)

; Hagar Saad Eldien

Ph.D. candidate at Fayyum University

; Amr el-Sharkawy

Ph.D. candidate at Fayyum University

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search