AL-GAZALI (L.I.), BENER (A.), ABDULRAZZAQ (Y.M.), MICALLEF (R.), AL-KHAYAT (A.I.), GABER (T.) 1997, Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates, Journal of Biosocial Science 29, 4: 491-497.
ALGERIAN NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE, ALGERIA 1994, Algeria Maternal and Child Health Survey AMCHS 1992, Pan Arab Project for Child Development PAPCHILD, Republic of Algeria and League of Arab States.
ALPER (O.M.), ERENGIN (H.), MANGUOGLU (A.E.), BILGEN (T.), CETIN (Z.), DEDEOGLU (N.), LULECI (G.) 2004, Consanguineous marriages in the province of Antalya, Turkey, Annales de Génétique 47, 2: 129-138.
ARESTI (U.), ALFONSO SÁNCHEZ (M.A.), PEÑA (J.A.), CALDERÓN (R.) 2001, Estructura y niveles de consanguinidad (1862-1995) en la población del Goierri (Guipúzcoa, País Vasco), Revista Española de Antropología Biológíca 22: 97-106.
AUDINARAYANA (N.), KRISHNAMOORTHY (S.) 2000, Contribution of social and cultural factors to the decline in consanguinity in South India, Social Biology 47: 189-200.
BAALI (A.), PROST (M.), AMOR (H.), BOËTSCH (G.) 2005, De l’Atlas marocain aux Alpes briançonnaises, Choix du conjoint et apparentement dans les populations de montagne aux XIXe et XXe siècles, in A. Baali, M.K. Hilali, C. Susanne, G. Boëtsch (eds), Biodiversité des Populations Humaines Méditerranéennes, Faculté des Sciences Semlalia Ed., Marrakech, p. 116-134.
BEN ARAB (S.), MASMOUDI (S.), BELTAIEF (N.), HACHICHA (S.), AYADI (H.) 2004, Consanguinity and endogamy in Northern Tunisia and its impact on non-syndromic deafness, Genetic Epidemiology 27, 1: 74-79.
BENER (A.), ALALI (K.A.) 2006, Consanguineous marriage in a newly developed country: the Qatari population, Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 2: 239-246.
BERECZKEI (T.), GYURIS (P.), KOVES (P.), BERNATH (L.) 2002, Homogamy, genetic similarity, and imprinting; parental influence on mate choice preferences, Personality and Individual Differences 33: 677-690.
BITTLES (A.H.) 1994, The role and significance of consanguinity as a demographic variable, Population and Development Review 20, 3: 561-584.
BITTLES (A.H.) 2002, Endogamy, consanguinity and community genetics, Journal of Genetics 81, 3: 91-98.
BITTLES (A.H.), COBLE (J.M.), RAO (N.A.) 1993, Trends in consanguineous marriage in Karnataka, south India, 19801989, Journal of Biosocial Science 25, 1: 111-116.
BITTLES (A.H.), HUSSAIN (R.) 2000, An analysis of consanguineous marriage in the Muslim population of India at regional and state levels, Annals of Human Biology 27, 2: 163-171.
BOU-ASSY (F.), DUMONT (S.), SAILLANT (F.) 2003, Représentations sociales du mariage endogame et de ses conséquences biologiques sur la santé des descendants chez des fiancés apparentés, Cas de deux villages chiites au Liban, Service Social 50: 174-198.
BOZON (M.) 1991, Choix du conjoint et reproduction sociale, Ecoflash 64, Bulletin publié par l’Institut national de la recherche pédagogique, 4 p.
BUNDEY (S.), ALAM (H.) 1993, A five-year prospective study of the health of children in different ethnic groups with particular reference to the effect of inbreeding, European Journal of Human Genetics 1, 3: 206-219.
CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS, SYRIA 1995, Syria Maternal and Child Health Survey SMCHS 1993, Pan Arab Project for Child Development PAPCHILD, Syrian Arab Republic and League of Arab States.
CENTRAL STATISTICAL ORGANIZATION, Yemen 1998, Yemen Demographic and Maternal and Child Health Survey YDMCHS 1997, Sana’a, Yemen.
DANUBIO (M.E.), PIRO (A.), TAGARELLI (A.) 1999, Endogamy and inbreeding since the 17th century in past malarial communities in the province of Cosenza (Calabria, Southern Italy), Annals of Human Biology 26, 5: 473-488.
DARR (A.), MODELL (B.) 1988, The frequency of consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis, Journal of Medical Genetics 25, 3: 186-190.
DESCAMPS (P.) 1927, Les causes de l’exogamie et de l’endogamie, Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie 1 : 3-15.
DIRECTION DE LA STATISTIQUE, Maroc 1996, Enquête Nationale sur la Famille ENF 1995, Rabat, Maroc.
DIRECTION DE LA STATISTIQUE, Maroc 2004, Recensement Général de la Population et de l’Habitat RGPH 2004, Rabat, Maroc.
ESPARZA (M.) 2004, Biodemografia del Delta de l’Ebre : estructura matrimonial, Tesi doctoral, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona.
FARGUES (P.) 1986, Traditions matrimoniales dans les sociétés arabes, Population et Sociétés 198 : 1-4.
GILBERT (S.) 1998, Étude comparative des lieux d’origine des conjoints dans les régions de Charlevoix et Rimouski, 1871-1930, Mémoire de Maîtrise, Université du Québec, Chicoutimi.
GIVENS (B.P.), HIRSCHMAN (C.) 1994, Modernization and consanguineous marriage in Iran, Journal of Marriage and the Family 56, 4: 820-834.
GUNAID (A.A.), HUMMAD (N.A.), TAMIM (K.A.) 2004, Consanguineous marriage in the capital city Sana’a, Yemen, Journal of Biosocial Science 36, 1: 111-121.
HAKIM (A.) 1994, Comments on “Consanguineous Marriages in Pakistan”, Pakistan Development Review 33, 4: 675-676.
HAMI (H.), SOULAYMANI (A.), MOKHTARI (A.) 2006, Endogamie, isonymie et consanguinité dans la région du Gharb-Chrarda-Béni Hssen (Maroc), Antropo 11: 223-233.
HUSSAIN (R.) 1999, Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan, Journal of Biosocial Science 31, 4: 449-461.
HUSSAIN (R.) 2005, The effect of religious, cultural and social identity on population genetic structure among Muslims in Pakistan, Annals of Human Biology 32, 2: 145-153.
HUSSAIN (R.), BITTLES (A.H.) 1998, The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan, Journal of Biosocial Science 30, 2: 261-275.
IMAIZUMI (Y.) 1987, Reasons for consanguineous marriages in Japan, Journal of Biosocial Science 19, 1: 97-106.
INSTITUTE OF POPULATION STUDIES, HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY 1999, Turkish Demographic and Health Survey TDHS 1998, Ankara, Turkey.
KHLAT (M.), HALABI (S.) 1986, Modernization and consanguineous marriage in Beirut, Journal of Biosocial Science 18, 4: 489-495.
KHLAT (M.), HALABI (S.), KHUDR (A.), DER KALOUSTIAN (V.M.) 1986, Perception of consanguineous marriages and their genetic effects among a sample of couples from Beirut, American Journal of Medical Genetics 25, 2: 299-306.
KHOURY (S.A.), MASSAD (D.F.) 1992, Consanguineous marriage in Jordan, American Journal of Medical Genetics 43, 5: 769-775.
KIR (T.), GULEC (M.), BAKIR (B.), HOSJGONUL (E.), TUMERDEM (N.) 2005, The frequency and effecting factors of consanguineous marriage in a group of soldiers in Ankara, Journal of Biosocial Science 37, 4: 519-523.
KUCHER (A.N.), PUZYREV (V.P.), SANCHAT (N.O.), ERDYNIEVA (L.S.) 1999, Genetic demographic characteristics of the rural population of the Tuva Republic: Marriage structure and inbreeding, Genetika 35, 7: 976-981.
KULKARNI (M.L.), KURIAN (M.) 1990, Consanguinity and its effect on fetal growth and development: a South Indian study, Journal of Medical Genetics 27, 6: 348-352.
LATHROP (M.), PISON (G.) 1982, Méthode statistique d’étude de l’endogamie, Application à l’étude du choix du conjoint chez les Peul Bandé, Population 3 : 513-542.
LATIFI (M.), KHADMAOUI (A.), SOULAYMANI (A.), MOKHTARI (A.) 2004, Système de reproduction dans une population humaine isolée du Moyen Atlas du Maroc (population de Fritissa), Antropo 7 : 73-78.
MANFREDINI (M.) 2005, Geographical endogamy and the kin network socio-demographic factors and biological consequences of the marriage pattern in a 19th century Italian community, Paper prepared for the International Conference on Kinship and Demographic Behavior, October 30-November 1, Salt Lake City.
MINISTÈRE DE LA SANTÉ PUBLIQUE, MAROC 1989, Enquête Nationale sur la Planification Familiale, la Fécondité et la Santé de la Population au Maroc ENPS-I 1987, Rabat, Maroc.
MINISTÈRE DE LA SANTÉ PUBLIQUE, MAROC 1993, Enquête Nationale sur la Population et la Santé ENPS-II 1992, Rabat, Maroc.
MINISTÈRE DE LA SANTÉ PUBLIQUE, MAROC 1999, Enquête Nationale sur la Santé de la Mère et de l’Enfant ENSME 1997, Pan Arab Project for Child Development PAPCHILD, League of Arab States.
MINISTRY OF HEALTH, BAHRAIN 1997, Bahrain Family Health Survey BFHS 1995, State of Bahrain and Gulf Family Health Survey.
MINISTRY OF HEALTH, KUWAIT 1996, Kuwait Family Health Survey KFHS 1996, State of Kuwait and Gulf Family Health Survey.
MINISTRY OF HEALTH, OMAN 1996, Oman Family Health Survey OFHS 1995, Sultanate of Oman and Gulf Family Health Survey.
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC HEALTH, LEBANON 1998, Lebanon Maternal and Child Health Survey LMCHS 1996, Pan Arab Project for Child Development PAPCHILD, Republic of Lebanon and League of Arab States.
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC HEALTH, TUNISIA 1996, Tunisian Maternal and Child Health Survey TMCHS 1994/1995, Pan Arab Project for Child Development PAPCHILD, Republic of Tunisia and League of Arab States.
NATIONAL POPULATION COUNCIl, EGYPT 2006, Egypt Demographic and Health Survey EDHS 2005, Cairo, Egypt.
OFFICE NATIONAL DE LA STATISTIQUE, MAURITANIE 2001, Enquête Démographique et de Santé Mauritanie EDSM 2000/2001, Mauritanie.
PEOPLE’S COMMITTEE FOR HEALTH, LIBYA 1996, Arab Libyan Maternal and Child Health Survey ALMCHS 1995, Pan Arab Project for Child Development PAPCHILD, The Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Republic and League of Arab States.
QIDWAI (W.), SYED (I.A.), KHAN (F.M.) 2003, Prevalence and perceptions about consanguineous marriages among patients presenting to family physicians, in 2001 at a Teaching Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, Asia Pacifi c Family Medicine 2: 27-31.
RADOVANOVIC (Z.), SHAH (N.), BEHBEHANI (J.) 1999, Prevalence and social correlates of consanguinity in Kuwait, Annals of Saudi Medicine 19, 3: 206-210.
RAO (B.D.), BUSI (B.R.) 1988, Inbreeding among endogamous groups in three multicaste villages of Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh, India, Social Biology 35, 3-4: 331-336.
REDDY (P.C.) 1984, Distribution, endogamy, and isolation of Malas of Chittoor district Andhra Pradesh, India, Social Biology 31, 1-2: 108-113.
RENIERS (G.) 2001, The post-migration survival of traditional marriage patterns: consanguineous marriages among Turks and Moroccans in Belgium, Journal of Comparative Family Studies 32, 1: 21-45.
SAADAT (M.), ANSARI-LARI (M.), FARHUD (D.D.) 2004, Consanguineous marriage in Iran, Annals of Human Biology 31, 2: 263-269.
SEGALEN (M.), JACQUARD (A.) 1971, Choix du conjoint et homogamie, Population 3 : 487-498.
SEGALEN (M.), JACQUARD (A.) 1973, Isolement sociologique et isolement génétique, Population 3 : 551-570.
SHAW (A.) 2001, Kinship, cultural preference and immigration: consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7, 2: 315-334.
SMITH HAYEUR (M.) 1983, Le mariage arabe au Maroc, Mémoire de Maîtrise, Université de Montréal, Canada.
ZAKARIA (D.) 1999, Étude de l’endogamie d’origine régionale, de la distribution de la consanguinité apparente et du comportement intergénérationnel dans le choix matrimonial en Tunisie, Intérêt des noms de famille et de l’isonymie maritale, Thèse de Doctorat, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et de Médecine, Tunis.
ZAKZOUK (S.) 2002, Consanguinity and hearing impairment in developing countries: a custom to be discouraged, The Journal of Laryngology and Otology 116, 10: 811-816.
ZLOTOGORA (J.), HABIBALLA (H.), ODATALLA (A.), BARGES (S.) 2002, Changing family structure in a modernizing society: a study of marriage patterns in a single Muslim village in Israel, American Journal of Human Biology 14, 5: 680-682.

![Fig. 1 - Répartition des couples étudiés [GCE] selon l’âge.Fig. 1— Distribution of couples studied (GCE) according to age.](docannexe/image/2852/img-1-small480.png)


![Tabl. III - Répartition des mariages selon le lieu de naissance des conjoints (Génération des couples étudiés [GCE]).Table III—Distribution of marriages according to spouses’ place of birth. (Generation of couples studied [GCE]).](docannexe/image/2852/img-4-small480.png)
![Tabl. IV - Répartition des mariages selon le lieu de naissance des conjoints (génération des parents des maris [GPM]).Table IV—Distribution of marriages according to spouses’ place of birth (husband’s parents’ generation [GPM]).](docannexe/image/2852/img-5-small480.png)
![Tabl. V - Répartition des mariages selon le lieu de naissance des conjoints (génération des parents des femmes [GPF]).Table V—Distribution of marriages according to spouses’ place of birth (wife’s parents’ generation [GPF]).](docannexe/image/2852/img-6-small480.png)













