Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilPublicationsFact Sheets2024Size and impact of the Brussels k...

2024
198

Size and impact of the Brussels knowledge economy

Brussels Studies fact sheet
Ampleur et impact de l’économie de la connaissance à Bruxelles
Omvang en impact van de Brusselse kenniseconomie
Tom Van Puyenbroeck, Johan Eyckmans, Peter Teirlinck, André Spithoven et Gilles Van Hamme
Traduction(s) :
Omvang en impact van de Brusselse kenniseconomie [nl]
Ampleur et impact de l’économie de la connaissance à Bruxelles [fr]

Résumés

Nous analysons l’ampleur, la croissance et la répartition spatiale de l’emploi à forte intensité de connaissances dans la région de Bruxelles-Capitale et dans l’agglomération bruxelloise au sens large, et les comparons à celles observées dans les entités géographiques voisines. Nous en examinons l’impact sur l’emploi total, au moyen d’une analyse économétrique et d’une analyse entrées-sorties. Près d’un emploi sur deux à Bruxelles peut être considéré comme étant à forte intensité de connaissances. Pour la période 2008-2020, le taux de croissance annuel composé de l’emploi à forte intensité de connaissance le plus élevé a été enregistré dans l’aire urbaine fonctionnelle de Bruxelles. L’agglomération bruxelloise présente une forte concentration de plusieurs services à forte intensité de connaissances, avec des schémas d’implantation différents. Le secteur financier reste très présent dans les centres-villes de l’agglomération, tandis que d’autres activités s’implantent plutôt en périphérie, à l’instar de l’industrie pharmaceutique et du secteur de la comptabilité. L’écart négatif du taux de croissance de l’emploi total entre Bruxelles et le reste de la Belgique est dû à un effet de mixité sectorielle. Chaque nouvel emploi à forte intensité de connaissances à Bruxelles peut être associé à la création de deux emplois supplémentaires. En ce qui concerne les emplois générés par les secteurs à forte intensité de connaissances, 40 % de ceux créés à Bruxelles concernent une main-d’œuvre à moindre intensité de connaissances.

Haut de page

Notes de l’auteur

This text draws on our more extensive study [Eyckmans et al., 2022] as prepared for VOKA Metropolitan. Additional discussions of the study can also be found here.

Texte intégral

1. Knowledge-intensive activities in and around Brussels

1What is the extent of knowledge activities in Brussels? Are they atypical when compared to the rest of Belgium? As simple as those questions may seem, knowledge-intensive activities can be defined in different ways [Galindo-Rueda and Verger, 2016; Marsili and Verspagen, 2002].

2Official statistics of the OECD and Eurostat rely on different sector classifications to define “knowledge industries”. Rather than working with a predefined list, we can assume that every sector hosts knowledge-intensive jobs and carry out an empirical count. This more detailed empirical approach captures knowledge intensity within a sector by combining both the educational attainment and the occupational status of employed persons. By combining labour force survey data with social security statistics, we consider a person who has at least a short-cycle higher education degree and who has an International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) status of either “manager”, “professional” or “technician or associate professional” (i.e. ISCO levels 1, 2 and 3) as a knowledge-intensive worker within a sector [see Eyckmans et al., 2022].

3Based on the detailed breakdown described above, we obtain an average number of 323 677 knowledge-intensive jobs in the Brussels-Capital Region (BCR), in the 2008-2020 period. This implies that, in the year 2020, 45,2 % of the jobs in Brussels can be regarded as knowledge-intensive. In comparative terms, this makes the BCR the most knowledge-intensive region in Belgium. Similar intensities are observed around Brussels, in the wider Brussels Metropolitan Area (BMA – in light blue in figure 1), but the numbers for the rest of the Flemish (31,3 %) and Walloon (30,9 %) Regions are considerably lower.

4However, over the 2008-2020 period, compared to an average of 1,11 % at national level, the compound annual growth rate of knowledge-intensive employment was lowest for the BCR (0,51 %) and highest in the surrounding BMA (excluding Brussels). In order to better explain and understand the rates in Brussels, a shift-and-share analysis was carried out. This involves applying the growth rates of each sector in a reference area – in this case, defined as the rest of Belgium (Belgium without Brussels) – to the different territories (in this case, Brussels). The aim of the analysis is therefore to distinguish between a structural effect – which assumes that growth is the result of the sectoral composition of local employment – and a regional effect. The regional effect is measured by the gap between the theoretical growth in employment (deduced from sectoral composition) and the observed growth [Murray, 2010]. In the case of Brussels, sectoral composition is characterised by the strong presence of dynamic sectors on average, but these sectors perform less well in Brussels. The analysis for Brussels therefore indicates that, while several important knowledge-intensive sectors such as financial services, human health, professional, scientific, legal and accounting activities and activities of head offices are still overrepresented in Brussels, it is precisely in those sectors that Brussels lost ground in terms of employment growth relative to the rest of Belgium. The picture is a bit different with respect to added value, since sectors such as finance have experienced strong economic growth despite a significant decrease in the number of jobs in the 2010s.

2. Spatial distribution patterns of knowledge-intensive activities

5A municipality-based mapping presents the geographical distribution of highly knowledge-intensive activities in Belgium. It illustrates the concentration of such activities in and around Brussels, far ahead of Antwerp, the second biggest Belgian city in terms of knowledge activities, as well as the high level of specialisation of Brussels in such activities.

Figure 1. Knowledge-intensive jobs according to municipality in 2018

Figure 1. Knowledge-intensive jobs according to municipality in 2018

These data are the sum of wage employment and self-employment. Wage employment is classified directly into NACE sectors. INASTI-RSVZ uses other categories; VTA data from the National Bank are used to convert these data into NACE classes.

See Eyckmans et al. [2022] for calculation details

6This spatial distribution pattern can be further detailed according to specific sectors. It confirms the high concentration of several knowledge services in the BMA, with its large and qualified labour pool, attractiveness for international workers, connectivity at European and global level, airport and high-speed rail connections, etc.

7However, spatial analyses also indicate that the geographical concentration of knowledge-intensive activities in Belgium is sector specific. Concentration in the BMA ranges from around half of all Belgian jobs in finance to a third in other sectors, such as legal and accounting services. Additionally, within the BMA there are very different locational patterns: some clusters of activities (e.g. finance) are mainly located in the city centre, while others may favour a location in the outskirts (e.g. the pharmaceutical industry, with large plants in Walloon Brabant, or large accounting firms located in Zaventem). Thus, our analysis underscores that – just as with other economic activities – the “Brussels” knowledge base implies an unequal geographical spread within Brussels, and necessarily implies that one should also take the relationship with the outskirts of Brussels into account.

3. Knowledge-intensive activities in Brussels and the creation of high- and low- skilled jobs

8The impact of knowledge-intensive activities can be assessed through the lens of econometric models which examine the relationship between the growth of knowledge-intensive employment and total employment, i.e. a so-called (relative) employment multiplier [see for example Moretti, 2010, or Dotti et al., 2021].

9The estimated coefficient in a simple regression comes conceptually closest to the conventional definition of a multiplier. We find that each additional knowledge-intensive job in Brussels can be associated with the creation of another 2,12 jobs in the BCR. This is a relatively low figure when compared to other parts of Belgium (e.g. 2,44 jobs in the Flemish Region). However, it is important here to recall the relative nature of such multipliers: a lower ratio of total employment growth to total knowledge-intensive employment growth might as well be the result of a lower value for the numerator as the result of a comparatively high value of the denominator (and vice versa). And in fact, Brussels fares comparatively well, precisely in terms of the denominator (see above).

10In reality, the change in knowledge-intensive jobs is not exogenous, and several variables have an impact on total employment change. By taking into account sector composition and economic and knowledge-related indicators, the coefficient associated with knowledge-intensive jobs remains statistically significant: all else being equal, in the BCR an extra job in a knowledge-intensive activity generates an additional job in total employment.

11Employment multipliers can alternatively be derived directly from the interregional input-output tables of the Federal Planning Bureau. Consistent with the underlying economic (Leontief) model from which they are derived, these multipliers can be used to assess the employment effects following a demand shock which affects one or more knowledge-intensive sectors located in the BCR [Avonds et al., 2021].

12A virtue of the input-output framework is that in addition to breaking down direct and indirect employment effects, we are able to see the intra- and interregional (“spillover”) employment effects of such shocks. Moreover, based on a method discussed by Miller and Blair [2022, pp. 25-26], our empirical information on the knowledge intensity of sectors (see section 1) can be used to break down all of these effects further in the creation of knowledge-intensive jobs as well as less qualified jobs.

  • 1 These numbers were calculated using the regional IO-multipliers published by the Belgian Federal Pl (...)

13As an illustration, consider the job impact of an additional 10-million-euro demand for particular knowledge-intensive sectors in Brussels. The ensuing employment effects for Belgium as a whole range from 131 extra jobs in the arts, entertainment and recreation sector (NACE 90) to 37 extra jobs in the financial services industry (NACE 64). The large majority of these extra jobs are in the BCR: 88 % in NACE 90 and 75 % in NACE 641.

14Next, consider a 1 % demand shock affecting all knowledge-intensive sectors. This would lead to about 3000 extra jobs (the exact number depends on the definition of the relevant sectors discussed in section 1). Table 1 shows more details for the case in which the OECD definition is used to identify the sectors experiencing a demand shock.

Table 1. Aggregate employment impact of a 1 % increase in final demand of all knowledge-intensive sectors in Brussels (using the OECD definition)

Extra jobs:

Knowledge-intensive

Non-knowledge-intensive

Total

In BCR:

1618

1092

2710

  • Initial effect

1406

860

2266

  • Indirect effects

212

232

444

In the Flemish Region

118

248

366

In the Walloon Region

59

126

185

TOTAL Belgian Economy

1795

1466

3262

  • 2 Of course, the underlying Leontief model is well established but has its limitations. Being a styli (...)

15This and similar aggregate approaches show that extra jobs are created predominantly in the Brussels-Capital Region itself, with room for noteworthy interregional job creation spillovers. Furthermore, even if our impact analysis is such that these jobs are generated by knowledge-intensive sectors, a substantial share of the extra employment within Brussels (about 40 %) actually concerns less knowledge-intensive labour2.

Haut de page

Bibliographie

Avonds, L., Hertveldt, B. and Van den Cruyce, B., 2021. Opmaak van de interregionale input-outputtabel voor het jaar 2015: databronnen en methodologie, FPB WP 07-21.

Dotti, N.F., Spithoven, A., Wautelet, A. and Ysebaert, W., 2021. The “certain” returns from expenditures for “uncertain” activities: a local multiplier approach to evaluate regional R&I policy. In: European Planning Studies, 29(2), 389-409.

Eyckmans, J., Spithoven, A., Teirlinck, P., VAN HAMME, G. and Van Puyenbroeck, T., 2022. The knowledge base of Brussels. In: BSI/VOKA.

Galindo-Rueda, F. and Verger, F., 2016. OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity. In: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, no 2016/4. OECD Publishing.

Marsili, O. and Verspagen, B., 2002. Technology and the dynamics of industrial structures: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing. In: Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 791-815.

Miller, R. E. and Blair, P. D., 2022. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions (3rd edition). Cambridge University Press.

Moretti, E., 2010. Local multipliers. In: American Economic Review, 100(2), 373-377.

Murray, A.T., 2010. Quantitative geography. In: Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 143–163.

Haut de page

Notes

1 These numbers were calculated using the regional IO-multipliers published by the Belgian Federal Planning Bureau and tables prepared under the “Agreement for the compilation of monetary interregional input-output tables for Belgium for the year 2015” between the FPB and BISA, VSA/EWI and IWEPS. See Eyckmans et al. [2022] for more details.

2 Of course, the underlying Leontief model is well established but has its limitations. Being a stylised (“fixed input proportions”) production model, it does not consider capacity constraints, labour market pressures, input substitution, etc. separately. In other words, many real phenomena in our economies today are not considered. When considering large shocks such as the one displayed in the table, such limitations should be taken into account.

Haut de page

Table des illustrations

Titre Figure 1. Knowledge-intensive jobs according to municipality in 2018
Légende These data are the sum of wage employment and self-employment. Wage employment is classified directly into NACE sectors. INASTI-RSVZ uses other categories; VTA data from the National Bank are used to convert these data into NACE classes.
Crédits See Eyckmans et al. [2022] for calculation details
URL http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/docannexe/image/8000/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 441k
Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Tom Van Puyenbroeck, Johan Eyckmans, Peter Teirlinck, André Spithoven et Gilles Van Hamme, « Size and impact of the Brussels knowledge economy  »Brussels Studies [En ligne], Fact Sheets, n° 198, mis en ligne le 01 décembre 2024, consulté le 19 janvier 2025. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/8000 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/12sx4

Haut de page

Auteurs

Tom Van Puyenbroeck

Full professor of economics at KU Leuven and academic director of the KU Leuven Brussels campuses. See e.g. Verbunt, P., Rogge, N. and Van Puyenbroeck, T., 2022. Non-parametric estimation and evaluation of capability sets. In: Oxford Economic Papers, Vol 74, no. 1, pp. 265-296.
tom.vanpuyenbroeck[at]kuleuven.be

Johan Eyckmans

Full professor of environmental Economics, KU Leuven, Cedon Research Group. Member of KU Leuven Institute for Energy and Society and SIM², KU Leuven Institute Sustainable Metals and Minerals. See e.g. Chapman, D., Eyckmans, J. and Van Acker, K., 2024. The impact of demand-side strategies to enable a more circular economy in private car mobility. In: Sustainable Production and Consumption, no. 49, pp. 263-275.
johan.eyckmans[at]kuleuven.be

Peter Teirlinck

Full professor of Innovation Management, Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, at KU Leuven. Vice-dean for International affairs at Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven. Policy Advisor at Belgian Science Policy Office. Recently published: Zhang, L., Teirlinck, P., Su, T. and Yu, Y., 2024. How to configure the supply chain to stimulate firm innovation performance? In: International Journal Of Production Economics, no. 277.
peter.teirlinck[at]kuleuven.be

Articles du même auteur

André Spithoven

Policy Advisor at Belgian Science Policy Office, Senior Researcher at VUB, Visting professor at UGent. Expert in regional economics, innovation studies and policy analysis. Recently published: Spithoven, A. and Phalet, E., 2024. Wage Subsidies, Slack Resources and Behavioural Additionality: Evidence from Universities. In: Higher Education Policy, pp. 1-22.
aspitje[at]yahoo.com

Articles du même auteur

Gilles Van Hamme

Professor of economic geography at the Université libre de Bruxelles, focusing on European territorial globalisation dynamics and European metropolitan dynamics. Recently published: Van Hamme, G., 2024. The Regionalization–Globalization Pair: A Reading of the Evolution of World Trade. In: Regionalization of the World: Comparing Regional Integrations, no. 67.
gilles.van.hamme[at]ulb.be

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search