Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNuméros56DOSSIER : Proceedings of the Post...Evidence and distribution of danc...

DOSSIER : Proceedings of the Postgraduate Cypriot Archaeology (PoCA) Conference, 20th Meeting in Athens (1-3 December 2023)

Evidence and distribution of dance representations in Iron Age Cyprus: a preliminary report

Marina Weiss
p. 171-182

Résumés

Résumé. Cet article présente quelques résultats préliminaires de ma thèse de doctorat, qui vise à réaliser une étude exhaustive de la documentation archéologique renseignant sur la danse à Chypre à l’âge du Fer, afin d’évaluer la signification et la fonction des anciennes danses chypriotes. L’accent est mis sur les figurines en terre cuite et en calcaire de danses en cercle datant du Chypriote Récent IIIB à la période hellénistique. En analysant les témoignages iconographiques de la danse dans leurs contextes archéologiques, en établissant des parallèles avec le matériel comparatif de l’Égée et du Levant, et en incorporant des approches interdisciplinaires, le projet synthétise diverses sources. Cet article examine la distribution géographique des représentations de danse à Chypre et s’intéresse à deux contextes significatifs pour ces représentations, à Enkomi et à Ayia Irini.

Haut de page

Texte intégral

Introduction

  • 1 In contrast, the study of the literary evidence of dance, particularly in the Greek and Roman world (...)
  • 2 Weege 1926; Wegner 1968.
  • 3 For Greece, see Kleine 2004; German 2007; Soar 2010; Murphy 2015; Schenk 2022. For western Asia, se (...)

1Dance is a global phenomenon that appears throughout human history in diverse contexts, serving multiple purposes and taking various forms. Despite the ubiquity of dance representations in ancient art and references to dance as a social and ritual activity in literary sources, archaeological approaches to the subject remain limited.1 Early studies often interpreted depictions of dance through the lens of a romanticized antiquity, while others focused on representations of dancers and musicians in literary texts, especially Homer.2 Both past and current scholarship has largely concentrated on evidence from ancient Greece, with relatively few publications addressing dance in the broader eastern Mediterranean or in western Asia.3 For Cyprus, no comprehensive publication dedicated to ancient dance exists, despite numerous depictions of dance from the island.

2This doctoral research seeks to establish an archaeology of dance for Iron Age Cyprus by analysing iconographic evidence, situating it within its archaeological and comparative eastern Mediterranean contexts, and integrating interdisciplinary perspectives from anthropology and dance studies. By synthesising existing evidence and exploring new approaches, the project aims to establish a more integrative understanding of dance across the eastern Mediterranean, moving beyond the traditional focus on Greece and connecting evidence from multiple regions. The project also revisits previously published material to provide new photographs and 3D models of key objects. The chronological focus on the Cypriot Iron Age reflects the concentration of dance depictions, mainly in the form of terracotta and limestone figurines, from the Late Cypriot IIIB to the early Hellenistic periods, which have not been systematically studied (fig. 1).

Figure 1 — Terracotta ring dance figurine from Arsos, Cypro-Archaic. Cyprus Museum, inv. no. B241. Photo by the author, with permission of the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus.

Figure 1 — Terracotta ring dance figurine from Arsos, Cypro-Archaic. Cyprus Museum, inv. no. B241. Photo by the author, with permission of the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus.

3The project addresses a series of research questions regarding the portrayal of dance and the function of dance depictions. It analyses the iconography of dance, exploring how dances were captured, how depictions varied over time, and whether reconstruction of dance from these images is possible. It examines the archaeological contexts of dance representations to assess their associations, materiality, and uses, particularly of terracotta and limestone figurines. The project also evaluates additional sources, including comparative evidence from neighbouring regions, architectural structures associated with dance, and modern ethnographic parallels, to better understand the role and effects of dance in ancient Cypriot society.

4Preliminary findings presented here focus on three aspects: the evidence considered in establishing an archaeology of dance in Cyprus; the distribution of dance representations across the island; and two case studies, Enkomi and Ayia Irini, which illustrate the integration of iconographic and contextual analysis.

The evidence of dance in Iron Age Cyprus

  • 4 Murphy 2016, p. 315.
  • 5 See e.g. Garfinkel 2003, p. 44 who proposed in his analysis of Neolithic depictions of dance that t (...)

5This doctoral project focuses primarily on iconographic evidence of dance, which, despite its own challenges, provides a rich basis for studying dance in antiquity. Dance, in its essence, is movement and any attempt to capture it in a still image must contend with the inherent tension between dynamism and stasis. Sculptural media, such as figurines, allow for a physical representation of the body in space, yet remain constrained by the necessity for the artist to select a single moment, posture, or gesture to be representative of the dance.4 Two-dimensional media, where the spatial and temporal dynamics of movement must be conveyed without the benefit of three-dimensionality, present further challenges, often requiring artists to resort to stylistic devices and visual cues to convey different aspects of dance.5 While these limitations must be acknowledged, they highlight the potential of dance depictions both as a record of artistic practice and as a tool for understanding embodied cognition and the performative dimensions of ancient life.

  • 6 For further information on the objects from Enkomi and their dating, see below. The seemingly lates (...)

6The majority of iconographic evidence of dance in Iron Age Cyprus takes the form of terracotta and limestone ring dance figurines. These figurines typically feature three or four, sometimes more, dancers arranged on a circular base around a central element, most often a musician (fig. 2). Ring dance groups first appear towards the end of the Late Cypriot IIIB at Enkomi and remain present in the archaeological record of the island until the beginning of the Hellenistic period, making them broadly contemporaneous with the Cypriot Iron Age and the development of the so-called city kingdoms.6

Figure 2 — Terracotta ring dance figurine with double-flute player, said to be from Lapithos, Cypro-Archaic II. Metropolitan Museum of Art, inv. no. 74.51.1650.

Figure 2 — Terracotta ring dance figurine with double-flute player, said to be from Lapithos, Cypro-Archaic II. Metropolitan Museum of Art, inv. no. 74.51.1650.
  • 7 Karageorghis 1977; Karageorghis 1995, pp. 132-135, pl. LXXVIII.
  • 8 Dunn-Vaturi 2003; Vandervondelen 1994; see also Caubet 1979, p. 19.
  • 9 Vandervondelen 1992; cf. Karageorghis 1977.
  • 10 Soar 2010, pp. 139, 143, figs. 1, 4.
  • 11 Ohnefalsch-Richter 1893, pp. 130-134; see also Hübner 1992, who discussed Cypriot ring dance figuri (...)
  • 12 Averett 2002; Mikrakis 2016; Knapp 2011; Bourogiannis 2025, p. 83.

7Early references to these figurines include Karageorghis, who associated them with the inception of the cult of the so-called Goddess with Uplifted Arms and presented several examples in his foundational works on Cypriot coroplastic art.7 Subsequent brief contributions have been offered, among others, by Dunn-Vaturi and Vandervondelen in connection to objects housed in the Louvre and the British Museum, respectively.8 Echoing Karageorghis, Vandervondelen further suggested that the origin of these figurines reflects Cretan influence.9 Parallels to the Cypriot ring dance figurines from Crete are found in a Late Minoan I figurine from Kamilari showing four dancers in a circle, as well as a later, Late Minoan IIIA2 example from Palaikastro, featuring three female dancers in long dresses and a central musician.10 Meanwhile, Max Ohnefalsch-Richter argued for a strong connection between ancient Cypriot dance and sacred tree groves, identifying such groves as the place where ritual dances were performed.11 More recent scholarship has continued to reference ring dance figurines in discussions of performative cult practices in Cyprus.12

  • 13 For the Hubbard amphora, see Dikaios 1936; Karageorghis 1962, p. 17, pl. XXI; Karageorghis 1989, p. (...)

8Despite these references, no comprehensive study has yet brought together the full corpus of Cypriot ring dance figurines. As a result, knowledge of their frequency, geographic distribution, and iconographic variation across the island remains limited. While terracotta and limestone ring dance figurines constitute the overwhelming majority of dance depictions in Iron Age Cyprus, other, less common representations also contribute to the visual record. These include depictions in pottery, metal work, and relief sculpture, which, although rare, offer complementary perspectives on how dance was conceptualised and represented across different media. Notable examples include the so-called Hubbard amphora, the so-called Idalion amphora, a Cypro-Phoenician bronze bowl, and a limestone relief from Golgoi-Ayios Photios (fig. 3).13

Figure 3 — Limestone relief from Golgoi-Ayios Photios, Cypro-Classical II. Metropolitan Museum of Art, inv. no. 74.51.2338.

Figure 3 — Limestone relief from Golgoi-Ayios Photios, Cypro-Classical II. Metropolitan Museum of Art, inv. no. 74.51.2338.
  • 14 Kopestonsky 2009; see also Kaltsas 2017, p. 168 for a 9th century BCE bronze figurine of dancers fr (...)
  • 15 Mazar 2003; Tubb 2003; a striking parallel to Cypriot dance representations is offered by the impre (...)
  • 16 Buitron, Soren 1979; Houby-Nielsen 2016, p. 110, fig. 1.
  • 17 Soar 2010, p. 141 offers a discussion of such platforms in Crete, where paved areas associated with (...)

9Comparative iconographic evidence further enriches the understanding of the Cypriot material. Parallels can be drawn, as mentioned above, with Cretan examples, as well as with later Classical Greek terracotta figurines of ring dances, which appear to have been particularly associated with Corinthian nymph cults.14 Representations of dance are also attested in the Levantine sphere, where they seem to primarily appear on seals and metal bowls.15 In addition to the iconographic material, certain architectural features in Cyprus have been tentatively linked to dance performances. The most prominent among these is the so-called tholos at the sanctuary of Apollo in Kourion, while recently identified circular structures at Ayia Irini may offer potential parallels.16 Both cases invite comparison with Cretan ‘dance platforms,’ though these connections require further investigation.17 Finally, ethnographic evidence from Cyprus and beyond offers valuable insight into the endurance and transformation of dance traditions across time and space.

  • 18 See e.g. McNeill 1995; Beaman 2017; Lovatt 2018.

10When considered alongside experimental approaches which explore bodily practice and performance, such evidence can help illuminate how movement, rhythm, and spatial arrangement may have functioned in ancient contexts. Together, these perspectives invite dialogue with the emerging field of dance science and its subdisciplines, such as dance psychology and dance history, which examine both the physiological and cognitive dimensions of dance, as well as its social, religious, and political roles throughout human history.18 Integrating such interdisciplinary frameworks with archaeological methods deepens the understanding of dance as embodied practice that shaped collective and individual experience.

The distribution of dance representations in Iron Age Cyprus

  • 19 Dikaios 1969; Courtois 1971; SCE I-III; Young, Young 1955; Counts et al. 2020.

11While many Cypriot objects depicting dance reached museums and archives around the world without clear information about their provenance, several significant exceptions exist. A number of terracotta and limestone ring dance figurines were systematically excavated and documented, most notably by the French and Cypriot missions at Enkomi, the Swedish Cyprus Expedition at several sites, and more recently, by the Athienou Archaeological Project at Athienou-Malloura.19 Meanwhile, some dance representations can be confidently attributed to a specific site (for example, the figurine from Arsos: fig. 1), whereas others are attributed to a site or area with less certainty, particularly those from the Cesnola collection, whose reported provenance is dubious (for example, a figurine ‘said to be’ from Lapithos: fig. 2).

  • 20 Wieland, Frey-Asche 2011, cat. nos. 853-896, pp. 51-53, pl. 15.
  • 21 Ohnefalsch-Richter 1893, pp. 130-134, 421, pl. LXXVI; see also Caubet et al. 1998, cat. no. 513, pp (...)

12By compiling all available information, it is possible to produce a distribution map of dance representations from Cyprus dating to the Iron Age (fig. 4). The preliminary distribution map indicates a concentration of dance representations in the Mesaoria plain, a pattern roughly corresponding to the propensity of Iron Age sites and the general abundance of archaeological material found in this fertile region. Notably, no ring dance figurines are known from Paphos, although miniature terracotta trees are well attested at the sanctuary of Aphrodite Paphia.20 Ohnefalsch-Richter, among others, has argued that such trees often featured as central elements to ring dance groups.21 Limestone objects depicting dance, whether as ring dance figurines, or in one case, a relief (fig. 3), are found primarily in the eastern part of the island, around Achna, Pyla, and Golgoi.

Figure 4 — Preliminary distribution map of dance representations during the Cypriot Iron Age (Late Cypriot IIIB to the beginning of the Hellenistic period). Drawn by the author.

Figure 4 — Preliminary distribution map of dance representations during the Cypriot Iron Age (Late Cypriot IIIB to the beginning of the Hellenistic period). Drawn by the author.
  • 22 Karageorghis 1977, p. 15; Karageorghis 1995, p. 132; Vandervondelen 1994, p. 16; Averett 2002, p. 1 (...)
  • 23 Knapp 2011, p. 121.

13Integrating depictions of dance with their archaeological contexts, rather than examining them solely on an iconographic level, allows for a more precise understanding of the settings in which such imagery occurred in Iron Age Cyprus. This approach reveals the cognitive associations Cypriot society attached to dance, illuminating how dance was conceptualized and practiced in Cypriot social and ritual life. Moreover, archaeological context analysis helps clarify the purpose and use of objects bearing the dance representations. The terracotta and limestone figurines of ring dances, which constitute the majority of dance representations in Iron Age Cyprus, have previously been attributed a sacred character as they are typically found in sanctuaries and sometimes include religiously charged iconographic elements. Accordingly, the dances depicted in the figurines have been interpreted as reflecting real-life performances at sanctuaries carried out as part of religious worship.22 Knapp has recently questioned this interpretation, arguing that depictions of musicians on Cyprus, and consequently those combining musicians with dancers, may instead represent “social and ‘ceremonial’ activities rather than specifically religious or ‘ritual’ ones.”23 Nevertheless, no comprehensive archaeological context analysis of systematically excavated ring dance figurines has yet been undertaken, meaning that previous interpretations have largely been formulated without reference to such contextual evidence.

  • 24 Courtois 1971, pp. 328-343, figs. 141-154; Courtois 1973, p. 236, fig. 13; Courtois 1984, nos. 747, (...)
  • 25 Courtois 1971, p. 343 remarks the discovery of “plus d’une centaine de figurines brisées” and his c (...)
  • 26 Examples of fragments of large human figurines: Courtois 1971, nos. 641n-o, p. 334; example of a fr (...)
  • 27 E.g. Courtois 1971, no. 655a, p. 335, figs. 143:4, 153.

14Among the terracotta figurines with certain and documented archaeological contexts, one of the most significant discoveries is the large assemblage of fragmented ring dance figurines excavated west of the so-called Sanctuary of the Ingot God, in the French Mission’s Quartier 5E at Enkomi.24 A close examination of Courtois’s 1971 publication of the material excavated from this area of the sanctuary reveals the recovery of around 240 fragments of ring dance figurines.25 The schematic figures, wearing discoid ‘tiaras’ or pointed hoods and produced in the so-called snowman technique, are stylistically and typologically distinct from the few other terracotta fragments found in the area, such as fragments of human figurines of greater size or different style, animal figurines, and fragments of handles or vases.26 Some examples still preserve a fragment of the circular platform they were originally fixed on.27

  • 28 Courtois 1971, p. 326.
  • 29 Webb 2001, p. 76.
  • 30 Courtois 1984, nos. 747, 749, 754-757, 777-778, pp. 78-79, figs. 24-25.
  • 31 Dikaios 1969, no. 618/6, pp. 302-303, pl. 107:37.
  • 32 Dikaios 1969, no. 253, pp. 291, 720, pl. 276, 137:4, 170:3.

15The excavators suggested that the figurines had been ritually broken and deposited in an open area west of the sanctuary.28 Webb, in her reinterpretation of the sanctuary, proposed that their deposition may be linked to the cult of a female deity worshipped in the western adyton.29 In a supplementary catalogue, Courtois noted eight additional fragments of ring dance figurines from Quartier 5E and elsewhere at Enkomi.30 A further figurine, likely originally part of a ring dance group, was found by Dikaios in the surface layer in the area of the tower flanking the northeastern gate at Enkomi and dated to the Cypro-Geometric I.31 Yet another fragment of the same type of figurine was discovered in level IIIB of area I, room 12, the so-called Sanctuary of the Double Goddess.32

  • 33 Courtois 1971, p. 343; Karageorghis 1977, p. 7.
  • 34 Webb 2001, p. 78.

16Overall, the fragments from Enkomi constitute the earliest known evidence of ring dance figurines in Cyprus. Courtois dated the figurines from the Sanctuary of the Ingot God to the late 12th and early 11th centuries BCE, while Karageorghis proposed a Cypro-Geometric IA date.33 However, as Webb observed, some fragments, including the one discovered by Dikaios at the Sanctuary of the Double Goddess are clearly associated with earlier strata, confirming a dating of the earliest examples to at least the Late Cypriot IIIB period.34 The Enkomi assemblage is of particular importance not only because of the early date of the fragmentary ring dance figurines, but also because their archaeological context points to a complex ritual practice of deliberate fragmentation and deposition. This practice appears to have taken place during the final phases of the Sanctuary of the Ingot God and in the wake of the gradual abandonment of the Late Bronze Age settlement at Enkomi.

  • 35 SCE II, p. 789; the object is kept at the Medelhavsmuseet, Stockholm, inv. no. A.I. 1169, and dates (...)
  • 36 SCE II, no. 123, p. 679, pl. CCXXXIII:6 (note: one figure is missing on the photograph); the object (...)
  • 37 SCE  II, no. 1693+2083, p. 735; Karageorghis 1995, no. III(i):1, p. 132, pl. LXXVIII:1; Karageorghi (...)
  • 38 Ulbrich 2008, p. 248; Papantoniou, Bourogiannis 2018; Bourogiannis 2025.

17Another key site for investigating the ritual deposition of ring dance figurines is the Iron Age sanctuary at Ayia Irini. Among the large number of figurines excavated by the Swedish Cyprus Expedition around so-called altar 50, two ring dance figurines were identified. A third figurine, also published by the SCE under “Type 13,” differs iconographically from these examples and likely represents a different scene or motif.35 The first ring dance figurine, dated to the Cypro-Archaic I-II, depicts three of originally four veiled female dancers with flattened bodies, slightly accentuated chests, and arms extended to the sides, with one dancer positioned at the centre of the circle.36 The second figurine, from the same period but more widely discussed in the literature, shows two male dancers opposite two female dancers arranged around a central male musician.37 The depiction of both female-only and mixed-gender dances at Ayia Irini invites a discussion of gendered participation and access to cultic space. If these representations reflect real performances carried out at the sanctuary, they suggest that both men and women took part in performative activities conducted at a site likely dedicated to a male deity.38 However, such deductions remain tentative until further comparative study of ring dance figurines and other dance representations from Cyprus is undertaken. The precise nature of the dances, whether distinctively sacred, social, or perhaps political, remains under examination. Regardless of their interpretation, the issue of gendered participation, and by the extension access to the space of performance, remains a central and compelling question.

Conclusion

18A preliminary examination of the archaeological contexts of dance representations indicates a strong and continuous association between dance and Cypriot sanctuaries throughout the Cypriot Iron Age. The findings presented here, however, remain open to further investigation. The study of the archaeological context of dance representations opens the discussion for a multitude of related factors. At Enkomi, the large number of ritually fractured and deposited ring dance figurines from the Sanctuary of the Ingot God provides crucial insight into depositional practices possibly related to the abandonment of sacred sites. At Ayia Irini, the study of ring dance figurines discovered around altar 50 raises important questions regarding gendered participation and access to extra-urban sanctuaries. More broadly, these examples prompt reflection on gender roles and social interaction within Cypriot society. As demonstrated above, the integration of archaeological context analysis into the study of iconography is indispensable for grasping the full significance of the representations under consideration. Equally essential are reflections on human engagement with the objects themselves, particularly in cases of ritual fragmentation, such as that observed at Enkomi. Taking these aspects into account, and by situating the Cypriot evidence within its wider eastern Mediterranean framework, this doctoral project lays the groundwork for a broader, comparative archaeology of dance in the eastern Mediterranean.

Abbreviations

SCE I: E. Gjerstad, J. Lindros, E. Sjöqvist, A. Westholm, The Swedish Cyprus Expedition. Finds and results of the excavations in Cyprus 1927-1931, vol. I. Stockholm, 1934.

SCE II: E. Gjerstad, J. Lindros, E. Sjöqvist, A. Westholm, The Swedish Cyprus Expedition. Finds and results of the excavations in Cyprus 1927-1931, vol. II. Stockholm, 1935.

SCE III: E. Gjerstad, J. Lindros, E. Sjöqvist, A. Westholm, The Swedish Cyprus Expedition. Finds and results of the excavations in Cyprus 1927-1931, vol. I. Stockholm, 1937.

Haut de page

Bibliographie

Averett E. W. 2002. “Drumming for the divine: a female tympanon player in the Museum of Art and Archaeology”. MUSE. Annual of the Museum of Art and Archaeology 36-39, pp. 15-28.

Beaman P. 2017. World dance cultures: from ritual to spectacle. London.

Bourogiannis G. 2025. The sanctuary of Ayia Irini reconsidered. A quest for gods and territories, SIMA 158. Nicosia.

Buitron D., Soren D. 1979. “Missouri in Cyprus: the Kourion expedition”. MUSE. Annual of the Museum of Art and Archaeology 13, pp. 22-31.

Caubet A. 1979. La religion à Chypre dans l’antiquité. Lyon.

Caubet A., Fourrier S., Queyrel A., Vandenabeele F. (eds.) 1998. L’art des modeleurs d’argile. Antiquités de Chypre, coroplastique. Paris.

Counts D., Averett E., Garstki K., Toumazou M. 2020. Visualizing votive practice: exploring limestone and terracotta sculpture from Athienou-Malloura through 3D models, Digital Press Books 11. Grand Forks (ND).

Courtois J.-C. 1971. “Le sanctuaire du dieu au lingot d’Enkomi-Alasia”. C. F.-A. Schaeffer (ed.), Alasia I. Mission archéologique d’Alasia IV. Paris, pp. 151-362.
1973. “Le sanctuaire du dieu au lingot d’Enkomi-Alasia (Chypre) et les lieux de culte contemporains en Méditerranée orientale”. CRAI, pp. 223-246.
1984. Les objets des niveaux stratifiés d’Enkomi: fouilles C. F.-A. Schaeffer 1947-1970, Alasia 3. Paris.

Dikaios P. 1936. “An Iron Age painted amphora in the Cyprus Museum”. ABSA 37, pp. 56-72.
1969. Enkomi. Excavations 1948-1958, Vol. I. Mainz.

Dunn-Vaturi A.-E. 2003. “Dancers in the Louvre: the Iranian and Cypriot collections”. Scham, Garfinkel 2003, pp. 106-110.

Fernández Z. A., Olsen S. 2024. Imprints of dance in ancient Greece and Rome. Madrid.

Garfinkel Y. 2003. Dancing at the dawn of agriculture. New York.

German S. 2007. “Dance in Bronze Age Greece”. Dance Research Journal 39(2), pp. 23-42.

Gianvittorio-Ungar L. 2017. Choreutika: performing and theorising dance in ancient Greece, Biblioteca di “Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica” 13. Pisa.

Gianvittorio-Ungar L., Schlapbach K. (eds.). 2021. Choreonarratives: dancing stories in Greek and Roman antiquity and beyond, Mnemosyne Supplements 439. Leiden & Boston.

Hermary A., Mertens J. R. 2014. The Cesnola collection of Cypriot art: stone sculpture. New York.

Houby-Nielsen S. 2016. “Excavations at Ayia Irini in the winter of 1929: tricky Phoenicians and Biblical floods”. G. Bourogiannis, C. Mühlenbock (eds.), Ancient Cyprus today. Museum collections and new research, SIMA PB184. Uppsala, pp. 5-17.

Hübner U. 1992. “Der Tanz um die Ascheren”. Ugarit-Forschungen 24, pp. 121-132.

Kaltsas N. 2017. The National Archaeological Museum. Athens.

Karageorghis V. 1962. Treasures in the Cyprus Museum. Nicosia.
— 1977. The Goddess with Uplifted Arms in Cyprus, Scripta-Minora 1977-78 in honorem Einari Gjerstad. Lund.
— 1989. The Cyprus Museum, 5th ed. Nicosia.
— 1995. The coroplastic art of ancient Cyprus, IV. The Cypro-Archaic period small male figurines. Nicosia.
— 2003. The Cyprus collections in the Medelhavsmuseet. Nicosia.

Karageorghis V., Des Gagniers J. 1974a. La céramique chypriote de style figuré. Âge du fer (1050-500 av. J.-C.), 2.1. Texte, Biblioteca di antichità cipriote 2.1. Rome.
— 1974b. La céramique chypriote de style figuré. Âge du fer (1050-500 av. J.-C.), 2.2. Illustrations et descriptions des vases, Biblioteca di antichità cipriote 2.2. Rome.

Karageorghis V., Mertens J. R., Rose M. E. 2000. Ancient Art from Cyprus: the Cesnola collection in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York.

Kleine B. 2004. Bilder tanzender Frauen in frühgriechischer und klassischer Zeit. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kiel.

Knapp A. B. 2011. “Sound of silence: music and musical practice in Late Bronze–Iron Age Cyprus”. W. Heimpel, G. Szabo (eds.), Strings and threads. University Park (PA), pp. 121-132.

Koch I. 2014. “Goose keeping, elite emulation and Egyptianized feasting at Late Bronze Age Lachish”. Tel Aviv 41, pp. 161-179.

Kopestonsky T. B. 2009. Kokkinovrysi: a Classical shrine to the Nymphs at Corinth. Doctoral Dissertation, University at Buffalo.

Leriou A. 2017. “The musician, the dancer and the priest: readdressing Cypro-Archaic ritual”. V. Vlachou, A. Gadolou (eds.), Terpsis. Studies in Mediterranean archaeology in honour of Nota Kourou. Brussels, pp. 525-540.

Lovatt P. 2018. Dance psychology: the science of dance and dancers. Norfolk.

Matthäus H. 1985. Metallgefässe und Gefässuntersätze der Bronzezeit, der geometrischen und archaischen Periode auf Cypern mit einem Anhang der bronzezeitlichen Schwertfunde auf Cypern. München.

Mazar A. 2003. “Ritual dancing in the Iron Age”. Scham, Garfinkel 2003, pp. 126-127.

McNeill W. H. 1995. Keeping together in time: dance and drill in human history. Cambridge (MA).

Mikrakis M. 2016. “Musical performance and society in protohistoric Cyprus: coroplastic and other visual evidence”. A. Bellia, C. Marconi (eds.), Musicians in ancient coroplastic art. Iconography, ritual contexts and functions, Telestes 2. Pisa & Rome, pp. 57-71.

Murphy C. 2016. “Choreographed frenzy: a sequence of steps towards understanding movement and dance in Aegean Bronze Age iconography”. S. Cappel, U. Günkel-Maschek, D. Panagiotopoulos (eds.), Minoan archaeology: perspectives for the 21st century. Louvain-la-Neuve, pp. 311-318.

Ohnefalsch-Richter M. 1893. Kypros, die Bibel und Homer. Berlin.

Papantoniou G., Bourogiannis G. 2018. “The Cypriot extra-urban sanctuary as a central place: the case of Agia Irini”. Land 7, 139. Accessed 24 March 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040139.

Pryce F. N. 1931. A catalogue of sculpture in the Department of Greek and Roman Antiquities of the British Museum I, Part 2: Cypriote and Etruscan. London.

Scham S., Garfinkel Y. (eds.) 2003. Dance in the Ancient World. Near Eastern Archaeology 66(3).

Schenk L. 2022. Das Thema „Tanz“ in der hellenistischen Rund- und Reliefplastik: Bewegungsmotive und ihre Intentionen. München.

Seger J. 1992. “Limping about the Altar”. Eretz-Israel 23, pp. 120-127.

Soar K. 2010. “Circular dance performances in the prehistoric Aegean”. A. Michaels (ed.), Ritual dynamics and the science of ritual, II. Body, performance, agency, and experience. Wiesbaden, pp. 137-156.

Tubb J. N. 2003. “Phoenician Dance”. Scham, Garfinkel 2003, pp. 122-125.

Ulbrich A. 2008. Kypris: Heiligtümer und Kulte weiblicher Gottheiten auf Zypern in der kyproarchaischen und kyproklassischen Epoche (Königszeit). Münster.

Vandervondelen M. 1992. “De dans op Cyprus: Cypro-Geometrische en Cypro-Archaïsche figurines”. Tijdschrift voor Mediterrane Archeologie 10, pp. 10-16.
— 1994. “Danseuses inédites du British Museum”. F. Vandenabeele, R. Laffineur (eds.), Cypriot stone sculpture. Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Cypriote Studies, Brussels-Liège, 17-19 May 1993. Brussels-Liège, pp. 149-151.

Warren P. 1984. “Circular platforms at Minoan Knossos”. ABSA 79, pp. 307-323.

Webb J. 2001. “The Sanctuary of the Ingot God at Enkomi in Cyprus. A new reading of its construction, use and abandonment”. P. M. Fischer (ed.), Contributions to the archaeology and history of the Bronze and Iron Ages in the eastern Mediterranean. Studies in honour of Paul Åström. Vienna, pp. 69-82.

Weege F. 1926. Der Tanz in der Antike. Halle.

Wegner M. 1968. Musik und Tanz. Göttingen.

Wieland D. L., Frey-Asche L. 2011. Weihgeschenke aus dem Heiligtum der Aphrodite in Alt-Paphos. Terrakotten, Skulturen und andere figürliche Kleinvotive, Ausgrabungen in Alt-Paphos auf Cypern 7. Darmstadt.

Young J. H., Young S. H. 1955. Terracotta figurines from Kourion in Cyprus. Philadelphia.

Haut de page

Notes

1 In contrast, the study of the literary evidence of dance, particularly in the Greek and Roman worlds has gained significant traction in recent years, see e.g. Gianvittorio-Ungar 2017; Gianvittorio-Ungar, Schlapbach 2021; Fernández, Olsen 2024.

2 Weege 1926; Wegner 1968.

3 For Greece, see Kleine 2004; German 2007; Soar 2010; Murphy 2015; Schenk 2022. For western Asia, see Scham, Garfinkel 2003; Garfinkel 2003.

4 Murphy 2016, p. 315.

5 See e.g. Garfinkel 2003, p. 44 who proposed in his analysis of Neolithic depictions of dance that the equal distribution of the dancers on an object may be reflective of the rhythmical aspect of dance.

6 For further information on the objects from Enkomi and their dating, see below. The seemingly latest examples of ring dance figurines date from the Cypro-Classical II or the early Hellenistic period, are made of limestone and were recently unearthed at Athienou-Malloura, see Counts et al. 2020, pp. 177-178. Another limestone example dating from the early Hellenistic period is housed in the British Museum and was excavated by Max Ohnefalsch-Richter at Achna, see Ohnefalsch-Richter 1893, p. 485, pl. CCXI:9-10; Pryce 1931, no. C338, p. 129, fig. 205.

7 Karageorghis 1977; Karageorghis 1995, pp. 132-135, pl. LXXVIII.

8 Dunn-Vaturi 2003; Vandervondelen 1994; see also Caubet 1979, p. 19.

9 Vandervondelen 1992; cf. Karageorghis 1977.

10 Soar 2010, pp. 139, 143, figs. 1, 4.

11 Ohnefalsch-Richter 1893, pp. 130-134; see also Hübner 1992, who discussed Cypriot ring dance figurines in connection to ritual dances in the sanctuary of Apollo Hylates at Kourion.

12 Averett 2002; Mikrakis 2016; Knapp 2011; Bourogiannis 2025, p. 83.

13 For the Hubbard amphora, see Dikaios 1936; Karageorghis 1962, p. 17, pl. XXI; Karageorghis 1989, p. 75; Karageorghis, Des Gagniers 1974a, pp. 8-9; Karageorghis, Des Gagniers 1974b, pp. 6-9. For the Idalion amphora, see SCE II, no. 1518, p. 569, pl. CLXV:8-9; Dikaios 1936, p. 68, pl. 9b. For the Cypro-Phoenician bronze bowl, see Matthäus 1985, no. 423, p. 161, pl. 33:423; Karageorghis, Mertens, Rose 2000, no. 306, pp. 187-188. For the limestone relief, see Hermary, Mertens 2014, no. 448, pp. 320-321.

14 Kopestonsky 2009; see also Kaltsas 2017, p. 168 for a 9th century BCE bronze figurine of dancers from Olympia.

15 Mazar 2003; Tubb 2003; a striking parallel to Cypriot dance representations is offered by the impression of a Late Bronze Age Mittanni cylinder seal preserved on a bulla from Tel Halif, depicting four figures dancing by a tree and wearing horned headdresses, see Seger 1992; of particular interest is also a 12th century BCE Egyptianizing ivory plaque from Tell el-Fārʿa, showing musicians and a dancer entertaining a seated figure in a feasting context, see Koch 2014, pp. 169-170, fig. 3.

16 Buitron, Soren 1979; Houby-Nielsen 2016, p. 110, fig. 1.

17 Soar 2010, p. 141 offers a discussion of such platforms in Crete, where paved areas associated with dance performances first appear in the Early Minoan II; see also Warren 1984.

18 See e.g. McNeill 1995; Beaman 2017; Lovatt 2018.

19 Dikaios 1969; Courtois 1971; SCE I-III; Young, Young 1955; Counts et al. 2020.

20 Wieland, Frey-Asche 2011, cat. nos. 853-896, pp. 51-53, pl. 15.

21 Ohnefalsch-Richter 1893, pp. 130-134, 421, pl. LXXVI; see also Caubet et al. 1998, cat. no. 513, pp. 317-318.

22 Karageorghis 1977, p. 15; Karageorghis 1995, p. 132; Vandervondelen 1994, p. 16; Averett 2002, p. 17; Dunn-Vaturi 2003, p. 110; Leriou 2017, pp. 528-529.

23 Knapp 2011, p. 121.

24 Courtois 1971, pp. 328-343, figs. 141-154; Courtois 1973, p. 236, fig. 13; Courtois 1984, nos. 747, 749, 754-756, 777-778, p. 80, figs. 24:13, 25:5-6, 25:9, 25:11, 25:16-17; Karageorghis 1977, p. 7; Webb 2001, p. 76. Further investigation and digitisation of previously published data concerning the Enkomi assemblage will be conducted as a part of this project to gain a deeper understanding of the depositional practice in the last phases of the Sanctuary of the Ingot God at Enkomi.

25 Courtois 1971, p. 343 remarks the discovery of “plus d’une centaine de figurines brisées” and his catalogue contains notes on around 240 fragments of mostly torsos, heads, and arms; Webb 2001, p. 75 suggests a counting of “at least 120 fragmentary figurines.”

26 Examples of fragments of large human figurines: Courtois 1971, nos. 641n-o, p. 334; example of a fragment of a human figurine deviating from the schematic style of the ring dance figurines: Courtois 1971, no. 642, p. 335; fragment of a duck: Courtois 1971, no. 678, p. 338; examples of fragments of handles and vases: Courtois 1971, no. 841g, p. 341.

27 E.g. Courtois 1971, no. 655a, p. 335, figs. 143:4, 153.

28 Courtois 1971, p. 326.

29 Webb 2001, p. 76.

30 Courtois 1984, nos. 747, 749, 754-757, 777-778, pp. 78-79, figs. 24-25.

31 Dikaios 1969, no. 618/6, pp. 302-303, pl. 107:37.

32 Dikaios 1969, no. 253, pp. 291, 720, pl. 276, 137:4, 170:3.

33 Courtois 1971, p. 343; Karageorghis 1977, p. 7.

34 Webb 2001, p. 78.

35 SCE II, p. 789; the object is kept at the Medelhavsmuseet, Stockholm, inv. no. A.I. 1169, and dates from the Cypro-Archaic I-II. The four figures are fixed on a rectangular, rather than a circular platform facing each other in two lines and the arms of the figures seem to extend downward along their bodies, rather than extended to the sides: see SCE II, no. 1169, p. 714.

36 SCE II, no. 123, p. 679, pl. CCXXXIII:6 (note: one figure is missing on the photograph); the object is kept at the Medelhavsmuseet, Stockholm, inv. no. A.I. 0123.

37 SCE  II, no. 1693+2083, p. 735; Karageorghis 1995, no. III(i):1, p. 132, pl. LXXVIII:1; Karageorghis 2003, cat. no. 228, pp. 198-199; Papantoniou, Bourogiannis 2018, fig. 6; the object is kept at the Medelhavsmuseet, Stockholm, inv. no. A.I. 1693+2083.

38 Ulbrich 2008, p. 248; Papantoniou, Bourogiannis 2018; Bourogiannis 2025.

Haut de page

Table des illustrations

Titre Figure 1 — Terracotta ring dance figurine from Arsos, Cypro-Archaic. Cyprus Museum, inv. no. B241. Photo by the author, with permission of the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/cchyp/docannexe/image/2446/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 145k
Titre Figure 2 — Terracotta ring dance figurine with double-flute player, said to be from Lapithos, Cypro-Archaic II. Metropolitan Museum of Art, inv. no. 74.51.1650.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/cchyp/docannexe/image/2446/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 175k
URL http://journals.openedition.org/cchyp/docannexe/image/2446/img-3.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 137k
Titre Figure 3 — Limestone relief from Golgoi-Ayios Photios, Cypro-Classical II. Metropolitan Museum of Art, inv. no. 74.51.2338.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/cchyp/docannexe/image/2446/img-4.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 483k
Titre Figure 4 — Preliminary distribution map of dance representations during the Cypriot Iron Age (Late Cypriot IIIB to the beginning of the Hellenistic period). Drawn by the author.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/cchyp/docannexe/image/2446/img-5.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 143k
Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence papier

Marina Weiss, « Evidence and distribution of dance representations in Iron Age Cyprus: a preliminary report »Cahiers du Centre d’Études Chypriotes, 56 | 2026, 171-182.

Référence électronique

Marina Weiss, « Evidence and distribution of dance representations in Iron Age Cyprus: a preliminary report »Cahiers du Centre d’Études Chypriotes [En ligne], 56 | 2026, mis en ligne le 23 juillet 2026, consulté le 14 septembre 2026. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/cchyp/2446 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/16n5u

Haut de page

Auteur

Marina Weiss

Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont susceptibles d’être soumis à des autorisations d’usage spécifiques.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search