Aguilar, M., & Muñoz, C. (2014). The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in engineering students in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 24(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12006.
Agustín-Llach, M. P., & Canga Alonso, A. (2016). Vocabulary growth in young CLIL and traditional EFL learners: evidence from research and implications for education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 26(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12090.
Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2018). Trained and non-trained language teachers on CLIL methodology: Teachers’ facts and opinions about the CLIL approach in the primary education context in Spain. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 39-64. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.3
Atkinson, D., Byrnes, H., Doran, M., Duff, P., Ellis, N. C., Hall, J. K., … Tarone, E. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100, 19-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301.
Auerbach, E. (1986). Competency-based ESL: One step forward or two steps back? TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 411-429.
Azkarai, A., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Negotiation of meaning strategies in child EFL mainstream and CLIL settings. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 844-870. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.249.
Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (3rd ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Ball, P. (2009). Does CLIL work? In D. A. Hill & A. Pulverness (Eds.), The best of both worlds? International Perspectives on CLIL (pp. 32-43). Norwich: Norwich Institute for Language Education.
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education : Models , benefits , and challenges. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.1.6.
Banegas, D. L. (2016). Teachers develop CLIL materials in Argentina: A workshop experience. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.2.
Basso, J. (2014). La prise en compte de la dimension linguistique dans les disciplines non-linguistiques : du prescrit au réel. Contextes et Didactiques, 5, 52-71. https://doi.org/10.4000/ced.423.
Beacco, J.-C., Bouquet, S., & Porquier, R. (2003). Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues: apprendre, enseigner, évaluer. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16802fc3a8.
Béliard, J., & Gravé-rousseau, G. (2009). Les programmes EMILE : principes , objectifs et mise en œuvre. In Comission européene. Retrieved from http://www.ienmaroc.org/site_ien/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Les-programmes-EMILE-principes-objectifs-et-mise-en-oeuvre-1.pdf.
Bell, D. M. (2003). Method and postmethod: Are they really so incompatible? TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 325. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588507.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2003). Contemporary youth and the postmodern adventure. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 25(2), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714410390198949.
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. New York, USA: Multilingual Matters.
Brown, D. H. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. UK, London: Pearson Longman.
Brown, D. H. (2002). English language teaching in the “post-method” era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (1st ed., pp. 9-18). Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. The Child Conception of Language, 2(3), 241-256.
Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002.
Bruton, A. (2015). CLIL: Detail matters in the whole picture. More than a reply to J. Hüttner and U. Smit (2014). System, 53, 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.07.005.
Castellotti, V. (2006). Une conception plurielle et intégrée de l ’ enseignement des langues - principes , modalités , perspectives. In Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures. Les cahiers de l’Acedle, 2, 1-10.
Causa, M. (2009). Enseignement d ’ une LE et d’une DNL : mettre en place une « compétence discursive » dans la production écrite de niveau avancé. Synergies Roumanie, 4, 179-188.
Causa, M. (2014). Compétence discursive et enseignement d’une discipline non linguistique : définition, diversification et pratiques formatives. Les Carnets Du Cediscor, 12, 115-37.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2014). An overview of language teaching methods and approaches. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 2-13). Boston, USA: Sherrise Roehr.
Cendoya, A. M., & Di Bin, M. V. (2010). A CLIL experience based on the use of tasks and different genre types. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 3(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2010.3.1.2.
Cenoz, J. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070010501.
Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: the same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011.
Cenoz, J., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2015). Learning through a second or additional language: content-based instruction and CLIL in the twenty-first century. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000921.
Coste, D., Moore, D., & Zarate, G. (2009). Plurilingual and pluricultural competence. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publication.
Council of Europe. (2003). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). Retrieved from Cambridge University Press website: https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1bf.
Coyle, D. (2002). Relevance of CLIL to the European Commission’s language learning objectives. In D. Marsh (Ed.), CLIL/EMILE. The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential (pp. 27-28). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Coyle, D. (2005). CLIL: Planning tools for teachers. In The University of Nottingham, School of Education. Nottingham.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0.
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL—A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In J. Cenoz & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and educationducation (2nd ed., pp. 97-111). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_92.
Coyle, D. (2013). Listening to learners: An investigation into ‘successful learning’ across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 244-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777384.
Coyle, D., Holmes, B., & King, L. (2009). Towards an integrated curriculum - CLIL national statement and guidelines. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085878.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL : Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cross, R. (2010). Language teaching as sociocultural activity: Rethinking language teacher practice. Modern Language Journal, 94(3), 434-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01058.x.
Cross, R. (2012). Creative in finding creativity in the curriculum: The CLIL second language classroom. Australian Educational Researcher, 39(4), 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0074-8.
Cross, R. (2013). Research and evaluation of the content and language integrated learning (CLIL) approach to teaching and learning languages in Victorian schools. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/55778.
Cross, R. (2014). Best-evidence synthesis: Current approaches to language education. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/55777.
Cross, R. (2016). Language and content ‘integration’: the affordances of additional languages as a tool within a single curriculum space. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 388-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1125528.
Cummins, J. (1980). The construction of language proficiency in billingual education. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (pp. 81-103). Retrieved from https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/555473/GURT_1980.pdf?se.
Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and theoretical underpinnings of bilingual education. Journal of Education, 163(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748116300104.
Cummins, J. (1998). Immersion education for the millennium: What have we learned from 30 years of research on second language immersion? Learning through Two Languages: Research and Practice. Second Katoh Gakuen International Symposium on Immersion and Bilingual Education, 34-47. Katoh Gakuen, Japan.
Cummins, J. (2001a). Bilingual children’s mother tongue: Why is it important for education? Sprogforum, 7(19), 15-20.
Cummins, J. (2001b). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (2014). Bilingualism in education: Aspects of theory, research and practice (6th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
Dafouz, E., & Hibler, A. (2013). ‘Zip your lips’ or ‘Keep quiet’: Main teachers’ and language assistants’ classroom discourse in CLIL settings. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 655-669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12026.x.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007a). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007b). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): current research from Europe. Future Perspectives for English Language Tearching, (May).
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2017). Putting CLIL into practice. ELT Journal, 72(1), 109-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx063.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014, May 1). ‘You can stand under my umbrella’: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, Vol. 35, pp. 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu010.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (2014). Content and language integrated learning. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891370.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.01dal.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46(4), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000256.
Darn, S. (2009). Teaching other subjects through English, cross-curricular resources for young learners, uncovering CLIL. ELT Journal, 63(3), 275-277. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp042.
Davies, A., & Elder, C. (2005). Validity and validation in testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 795-814). Manwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davies, A., & Elder, C. (2008). The handbook of applied linguistics. In A. Davies & Eld (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.
De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052.
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2005). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Duff, P. A. (2015). Transnationalism, multilingualism, and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051400018X.
Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism , connectionism and language learning. Language Learning Journal, 48(4), 631-664.
European Commission. Proposal for a council decision establishing the Lingua programme to promote training in foreign languages in the European Community. , Pub. L. No. 07, 7 (1989).
Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. In Eurydice.org. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730685200121.
Evnitskaya, N., & Morton, T. (2011). Knowledge construction, meaning-making and interaction in CLIL science classroom communities of practice. Language and Education, 25(2), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2010.547199.
Findley, C. A., & Nathan, L. A. (1980). Functional language objectives in a competency based ESL curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 14(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586316.
Fontecha, A. F. (2009). Spanish CLIL: Research and official actions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 3-21). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Gabillon, Z., & Ailincai, R. (2013). CLIL: A science lesson with breakthrough level young EFL learners. Education, 3(3), 168-177. Retrieved from http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.edu.20130303.05.html.
Gabillon, Z., & Ailincai, R. (2015). Content and language integrated learning: In search of a coherent conceptual framework. The European Conference on Language Learning (ECLL), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4027.6963.
Gabillon, Z., & Ailincai, R. (2016). The role of artefacts and gestures in CLIL lessons. TESOLANZ Journal, 24(Special edition, CLESOL 2014), 26-37. Retrieved from https://www.tesolanz.org.nz/publications/tesolanz-journal/volume-24-2016-se/.
Gabillon, Z., Vernaudon, J., Marchal, E., Ailincai, R., & Paia, M. (2016). Maeha’a Nui: A multilingual primary school project in French Polynesia. The IAFOR International Conference on Language Learning, 137-152. Retrieved from https://papers.iafor.org/submission21845/.
Gajo, L. (2009). De la DNL à la DdNL: principes de classe et formation des enseignants: Enseignants de DNL et de LV: à armes égales? Les Langues Modernes, 103.(4), 15-24.
García Mayo, M. del P., & Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 54, 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.12.001.
Gierlinger, E. (2015). ‘You can speak German, sir’: on the complexity of teachers’ L1 use in CLIL. Language and Education, 29(4), 347-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1023733.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (1997). Content-based instruction: Research Foundations. The Content-Based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content., pp. 5-21.
Gravé-Rousseau, G. (2011). L’EMILE d’hier à aujourd’hui: une mise en perspective de l’apprentissage d’une discipline en langue étrangère. In Сharte européenne du plurilinguisme. Retrieved from http://www.emilangues.education.fr/files/par-rubriques/L_EMILE_d_hier_a_aujourdhui_G_Grave-Rousseau.pdf.
Griva, E., & Mattheoudaki-sayegh, M. (2017). CLIL implementation in foreign language contexts: Exploring challenges and perspectives - Part II. Research Papers in Lnguage Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 63-73.
Ikeda, M. (2013). Does CLIL work for Japanese secondary school students? International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), 31-43.
Ioannou Georgiou, S. (2012). Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT Journal, 66(4), 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs047.
Johnson, R. K., & Swain, M. (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104.
Kubota, R. (2004). The politics of cultural diffeences in second language education. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 1(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427595cils0101.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587197.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Forum critical language pedagogy: A postmethod perspective on English language teaching. World Englishes, 22(4), 539-550.
Lantolf, J. P. (2004). Introducing sociocultural theory. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8.
Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(01), 67-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037.
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15(04), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002646.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2004). Chaos/complexity, science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011a). A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48-72). New York, USA: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011b). Technique and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.).
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). Complexity theory. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (1st ed., pp. 73-87). London, UK: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2016). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2015). A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on affective factors. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 688-712. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv059.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009a). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009b). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4-17.
Lazaruk, W. (2007). Linguistic, academic, and cognitive benefits of French immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(5), 605-627. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.5.605.
Leal, J. P. (2016). Assessment in CLIL: Test development at content and language for teaching natural science in English as a foreign language. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 293-317. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.3.
Leaver, B. Lou, & Stryker, S. B. (1989). Content‐based instruction for foreign language classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 22(3), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02746.x.
Lin, A. M. Y. (2015). Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926.
Little, D. (2007). The common European framework of reference for languages: Perspectives on the making of supranational language education policy. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 645-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_2.x.
Littlewood, W. (2011). Communicative language teaching: An expanding concept for a changing world. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Volume II (pp. 541-557). New York, USA: Routledge.
Llinares, A. (2015). Integration in CLIL: a proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925.
Lorenzo, F. (2007). An analytical framework of language integration in L2 content-based courses: The European dimension. Language and Education, 21(6), 502-514. https://doi.org/10.2167/le708.0.
Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. A. T. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education : Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418-442. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp041.
Lyster, R., & Ballinger, S. (2011). Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401150.
Marsh, D. (2000). Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. TIE-CLIL, 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.tieclil.org/html/products/pdf/ 1 UK.pdf.
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Marsh, D. (2008). Language awareness and CLIL. In J. Cenoz & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 233-246). Boston, MA: Springer.
Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2007). CLIL as a catalyst for change in languages education. Babylonia, 15(3), 33-37. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/375567a0.
Marsh, D., & Hartiala, A.-K. (2001). Dimensions of content and language integrated learning. In D. Marsh, A. Maljers, & A.-K. Hartiala (Eds.), Profiling European CLIL classrooms (pp. 15-53). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
Marsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A.-K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL classrooms. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2012). European framework for CLIL teacher education: A framework for the professional development of CLIL teachers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publication.
Mehisto, P. (2008). CLIL counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 93-119.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. New York, USA: Macmillan Education.
Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i2.137.
Mercer, S. (2013). Towards a complexity-informed pedagogy for language learning. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13(2), 375-398. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-63982013005000008.
Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2018). The effect of content and language integrated learning programmes’ intensity on English proficiency: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 28(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12177.
Michaud, C. (2014). Disciplines non linguistiques en Langues Vivantes Étrangères: quelle prise en compte des effets de contextes pour améliorer les enseignements? Contextes et Didactiques, 5, 35-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/ced.413.
Moate, J. (2010). The integrated nature of CLIL: A sociocultural perspective. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 38-45.
Monceri, F. (2003). The transculturing self: A philosophical approach. Language and Intercultural Communication, 3(2), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470308668094.
Moore, D. (2019). Conversations autour du plurilinguisme. Théorisation du pluriel et pouvoir des langues. Cahiers de l’ILOB, 10, 43-64. https://doi.org/10.18192/olbiwp.v10i0.3828.
Moore, D., & Gajo, L. (2009). Introduction-French voices on plurilingualism and pluriculturalism: Theory, significance and perspectives. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902846707.
Narcy-Combes, J.-P. (2019a). Comment la réflexion sur le transculturing conduit à repenser la compétence interculturelle. Neofilolog, 52(2), 353-371. https://doi.org/10.14746/n.2019.52.2.10.
Narcy-Combes, J.-P. (2019b). Le transculturing : un construit pour découvrir les ressorts du translanguaging. Language Education and Multilingualism - The Langscape Journal, 1, 52-65.
Narcy-Combes, J.-P., & Narcy-Combes, M.-F. (2014). Formations hybrides en milieu pluriculturel: comment concilier théories, pratiques et contraintes. In D. Abendroth-Timmer & E.-M. Hennig (Eds.), Plurilingualism and multiliteracies: International research on identity construction in language education (pp. 211-226). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Narcy-Combes, J.-P., & Narcy-Combes, M.-F. (2019). Cognition et personnalité dans l’apprentissage des langues: Relier théories et pratiques. Paris, France: Didier.
Narcy-Combes, M.-F., Narcy-Combes, J.-P., McAlister, J., Leclère, M., & Miras, G. (2019). Language learning and teaching in a multilingual world. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Nikula, T. (2015). Hands-on tasks in CLIL science classrooms as sites for subject-specific language use and learning. System, 54, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.003.
Nunan, D. (2007). Standards-based approaches to the evaluation of ESL instruction. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 421-434). Boston, MA: Springer.
Otto, A. (2019). Assessing language in content and language Integrated learning: A review of the literature towards a functional model. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(2), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.6.
Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587534.
Pennycook, A. (2006). Postmodernism in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to langauge policy: Theory and method (pp. 60-76). Victoria, Australia: Blackwell Publishing.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe : past , present , and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341. https://doi.org/0.1080/13670050.2011.630064.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2013). Competency-based language teaching in higher education. New York, USA: Spr.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2018). CLIL and pedagogical innovation: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 28(3), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12208.
Pinner, R. (2013a). Authenticity and CLIL: Examining authenticity from an international CLIL perspective. International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), 44-54.
Pinner, R. (2013b). Authenticity of purpose: CLIL as a way to bring meaning and motivation into EFL contexts. Asian EFL Journal, 15(4), 138-159.
Pistorio, M. I. (2010). A blend of CLIL and cooperative learning creates a socially constructed learning environment. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2010.3.1.1.
Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2016). CLIL subject selection and young learners’ listening and reading comprehension skills. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 26(1), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12079.
Pladevall-Ballester, E., & Vallbona, A. (2016). CLIL in minimal input contexts: A longitudinal study of primary school learners’ receptive skills. System, 58, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.02.009.
Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method-why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586897.
Reitbauer, M., Fürstenberg, U., Kletzenbauer, P., & Marko, K. (2018). Towards a cognitive-linguistic turn in CLIL: Unfolding integration. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.5.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848709543281.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. UK, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. In Most (4th ed.). London, UK: Pearnson-Longman.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 60-73. Retrieved from http://www.icrj.eu/11/article5.html.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2013). CLIL implementation: from policy-makers to individual initiatives. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777383.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (2009). Content and language integrted learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Sasajima, S. (2013). How CLIL can impact on EFL teachers’ mindsets about teaching and learning : An exploratory study on teacher cognition. International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), 55-66.
Savignon, S. J., & Sysoyev, P. V. (2005). Cultures and comparisons: Strategies for learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02222.x.
Soler, D., González-Davies, M., & Iñesta, A. (2016). What makes CLIL leadership effective? A case study. ELT Journal, 71(4), 478-490. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw093.
Somers, T., & Surmont, J. (2012). Clil and immersion: How clear-cut are they? ELT Journal, 66(1), 113-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr079.
Stryker, S. B., & Leaver, B. Lou. (1997). Content-based instruction in foreign language education: Models and methods. In Content-based instruction in foreign language education. https://doi.org/10.2307/3531892.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1983). Evaluating bilingual education : A Canadian case study. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2013). A Vygotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education: The L1/L2 debate. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.05swa.
Sylvén, L. K. (2013). CLIL in Sweden-why does it not work? A metaperspective on CLIL across contexts in Europe. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 301-320.
Tardieu, C., & Dolitsky, M. (2012). Integrating the task-based approach to CLIL teaching. In Teaching and Learning English through Bilingual Education, (pp. 3-35). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ting, Y. L. T. (2011). CLIL... not only not immersion but also more than the sum of its parts. ELT Journal, 65(3), 314-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr026.
Turner, M., & Cross, R. (2016). Making space for multilingualism in Australian schooling. Language and Education, 30(4), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1114627.
Van de Craen, P., Mondt, K., Ceuleers, E., & Migom, E. (2010). EMILE a douze ans. Douze ans d’enseignement de type immersif en Belgique. Résultats et perspectives. Synergies Monde, 7, 127-140.
Várkuti, A. (2010). Linguistic benefits of the CLIL approach: Measuring linguistic competences. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 67-79.
Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470600.00023.
Vertovec, S., & Posey, D. (2003). Globalization, globalism, environments, and environmentalism consciousness of connections. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Weideman, A. (2007). The redefinition of applied linguistics: Modernist and postmodernist views. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 25(4), 589-605. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610709486483.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(September 1974), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.
Yamano, Y. (2013). Utilizing the CLIL approach in a Japanese primary school: A comparative study of CLIL and EFL lessons. Asian EFL Journal, 15(4), 160-183.
Yang, W., & Gosling, M. (2013). National appraisal and stakeholder perceptions of a tertiary CLIL program me in Taiwan. International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), 67-81.
Zarate, G., Gohard-Radenkovic, A., Lussier, D., & Pens, H. (2004). Cultural mediation and language learning and teaching. Kapfenberg: Council of Europe publishing. Kapfenberg: Council of Europe publishing.
Zhyrun, I. (2016). Culture through comparison: creating audio-visual listening materials for a CLIL course. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 345-373. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.5.