Skip to navigation – Site map

HomeIssues136Book ReviewsLIN, Jean Yen-Chun. 2023. A Spark...

Book Reviews

LIN, Jean Yen-Chun. 2023. A Spark in the Smokestacks: Environmental Organizing in Beijing Middle-class Communities. New York: Columbia University Press.

Yanhua Deng
p. 87-88

Full text

1I thoroughly enjoyed A Spark in the Smokestacks: Environmental Organizing in Beijing Middle-class Communities by Jean Yen-Chun Lin. Drawing on data collected through online and offline research, the book offers a fluent and vivid account of associational life among the emerging middle class in Beijing. Despite numerous studies on environmental protests in China, Lin contributes significantly to the current literature by systematically tracing the processes and consequences of protests staged in three gated communities (Meadow, Rose, and Marigold). The book adopts a Tocquevillian perspective and argues that gated communities could serve as “schools of democracy” (p. 1). Informal associational interactions, according to Lin, may cultivate civic skills among homeowners and build civic capacities in communities. Lin pays particular attention to place-based identities, emphasising the importance of “becoming homeowners and neighbors” (p. 11) for community collective actions. She goes as far as claiming that a sense of collective identity was a precondition for environmental protests in China.

2Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this book consists of six chapters. Chapter One lays out the background of the research, helping readers make sense of the formation of middle-class homeownership due to the housing reforms of the 1990s and the environmental challenges community homeowners have faced during the process of urbanisation. Chapter Two is pivotal to the book. In this chapter, the author illustrates a process of becoming neighbours: from early community activity participation to place-based collective identity formation, to the attempted establishment of homeowners’ associations. The author argues that activities such as organising group purchases, documenting homeowners’ meeting minutes, and drafting letters of complaint to property management contribute to civic capacity building. Chapter Three details how residents of Meadow, Rose, and Marigold made sense of environmental threats outside their communities. While all communities had their representatives, the results of sensemaking varied. Only Meadow’s figureheads succeeded in transforming the landfill problem into a collective responsibility by moderating the sharing and interpretation of common grievances related to external threats.

3In Chapter Four, Lin examines the mobilising and organising of community actions. Once again, she emphasises the significance of community leaders. More capable leaders could effectively organise collective action, employing concrete plans and coherent rhetoric while drawing on community volunteers and expertise. Lin points out that different tactics would encounter varying degrees of repression and intervention, with institutional communications being more acknowledged by the authorities. Chapter Five is particularly interesting. The author is right to point out that using citizen science, which includes data collection and research on environmental and health impacts, is an important alternative to disruptive protest for the moderate middle class in China – a characteristic that differs from the rural environmental resistance I have studied. In China, the legitimacy of action is the central concern for both leaders and followers of protests. Drawing on citizen science means relying on facts and reason, which could enhance the legitimacy of collective action. Equally important, using the approach of citizen science is a process of capacity building and civic learning.

4Chapter Six explores the consequences of community organising in the three communities. The author is an optimist and sees many positive impacts of grassroots collective organising, such as increased environmental consciousness, a deeper understanding of environmental rights and laws, enhanced civic skills in interacting with the government system, and an extended sense of civic duty that goes beyond community boundaries. While I acknowledge that a difference has been made, I tend to doubt the durability of these positive changes and perceive the limits of grassroots organising. This scepticism is rooted in my own research on environmental protests in a town in eastern China, where peasants produced serious pollution themselves after vehemently and successfully opposing chemical pollution from an industrial park. In other words, their environmental consciousness was conditional and therefore limited. The likelihood of villagers lodging complaints and engaging in collective action depended on the entity responsible for the pollution. I also observed the transient nature of their enthusiasm for environmental participation. My intention here is not to negate the positive transformations that can follow a series of grassroots collective actions, but rather to underscore the formidable challenge of sustaining long-term civic engagement for systemic change among participants in both rural and urban areas.

5Amidst the enjoyment of the captivating narratives woven by the author, I would like to offer three general critiques. First, Lin heavily relies on data collected from the Internet, which is acceptable but inevitably limits the scope of her observations. Regarding data collection, I also expected to see more interviews with local officials who dealt with protests and resistance in both institutional and noninstitutional fashions, as well as with ordinary residents other than the key leaders of the communities examined. However, I fully understand that conducting fieldwork on sensitive topics, especially for scholars with overseas backgrounds, is challenging. Second, although the author does not explicitly claim the book is a comparative case study, her storytelling style, with each empirical chapter evenly detailing what was happening in the three major communities, might lead readers to interpret it as such. Nonetheless, the three communities are not easily comparable. They have different population structures, and, more importantly, the locations of incinerators slated for construction are different. The relocation of the one that was targeted by Meadow and its two neighbour communities, Willow and Pine, matters more for the entirety of Beijing (p. 171). Therefore, we cannot quickly conclude that the cancellation of the incinerator near the Meadow community was solely due to mobilising potential and protest activities. Finally, I agree that the Tocquevillian perspective effectively explains how associational life could lead to the birth of “civil society” within a gated community. Many readers, I presume, would appreciate the author’s deeper engagement with other streams of literature, such as contentious politics, and the development of additional theoretical reflections.

6Despite these critiques, I believe A Spark in the Smokestacks is an important book that will be necessary reading for political sociology in general and contentious politics in particular. It can also serve as a useful reference for students studying environmental politics in China.

Top of page


Bibliographical reference

Yanhua Deng, LIN, Jean Yen-Chun. 2023. A Spark in the Smokestacks: Environmental Organizing in Beijing Middle-class Communities. New York: Columbia University Press.China Perspectives, 136 | 2024, 87-88.

Electronic reference

Yanhua Deng, LIN, Jean Yen-Chun. 2023. A Spark in the Smokestacks: Environmental Organizing in Beijing Middle-class Communities. New York: Columbia University Press.China Perspectives [Online], 136 | 2024, Online since 01 March 2024, connection on 14 April 2024. URL:; DOI:

Top of page

About the author

Yanhua Deng

Yanhua Deng is Professor at the Department of Sociology, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Nanjing University, No. 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, China (

Top of page


The text and other elements (illustrations, imported files) are “All rights reserved”, unless otherwise stated.

Top of page
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search