Navegação – Mapa do site

InícioNúmeros42Crime, Justice and Media: Debatin...

Crime, Justice and Media: Debating (Mis) representations and Renewed Challenges

Crime, Justiça e Média: Debates Sobre Representações Mediáticas e Desafios Atuais
Sílvia Gomes, Thais Sardá e Rafaela Granja
Tradução de Anabela Delgado
p. 7-24
Este artigo é uma tradução do:
Crime, Justiça e Média: Debates Sobre Representações Mediáticas e Desafios Atuais [pt]

Notas da redacção

DOI: 10.17231/comsoc.42(2022).4467

Texto integral

1. Introduction

1Understanding the ever-complex relationship between the media, society and crime requires exploring several fluid discussions that connect these domains. How does the media affect the way people think about social issues such as criminality and justice? What is the impact of media coverage of crime on how society responds to it? Do the media have a central role in forming public opinion, does public opinion influence what media report, and/or are there multiple and complex influences within this spectrum? What are the challenges imposed by the several forms of media in the scope of mass communication regarding crime and violence? These and other queries are persistent among media scholars researching this field of study. However, studies have shown no clear-cut answers to these questions as they show complex intersections between them and might change significantly according to geopolitical issues, affected social groups and types of media involved.

2A robust field of literature on the relations between media, crime, and justice has shown that media play a relevant and decisive role in the overall perception of crime and justice (see, for example, Greer, 2013). In fact, contemporary views of crime are di- rectly connected to how media represent aspects of the criminal justice system, includ- ing violent crimes, police activity, criminal investigations, high-profile trials, prison life and others. News media, social media, fictional representations of crime and justice, and the relatively new but effervescent field of “true crime” depictions (in the form of podcasts, movies, and books) make oppositions between collective security and human rights more visible. These media platforms also reify discourses that rely on notions of “us” and “others”. However, further debate is essential to evidence the profound social inequalities that promote such social cleavages.

3Aside from the media’s role in representing crime and justice, we have recently wit- nessed how it can also be used as a platform for promoting and acting upon violence and criminality. Our daily lives have become increasingly reliant on the digital world, thanks to advances in telecommunications, the rapid dissemination of mobile information, and the popularity of social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter (Thukral & Kainya, 2022) and, more recently, TikTok. Such a pervasive use of social me- dia has, consequently, changed the way we understand and experience victimisation and crime. Examples of this relate to online gender violence (Afrouz, 2021; Backe et al., 2018; Bound Alberti, 2021) or online hate crime and hate speech (Castaño-Pulgarín et al., 2021; Müller & Schwarz, 2020; Williams et al., 2020), as well as phishing, identity theft, online job fraud, cyberbullying, cyberstalking, and so much more (Thukral & Kainya, 2022).

4In this thematic issue of Comunicação e Sociedade, we invited social sciences researchers to reflect upon the various forms of interconnection and disconnection between crime, justice and media. We propose to understand how the media play an essential heuristic instrument for understanding crime and justice, as it both (re)presents and impacts our understanding of criminal events and can be a platform for violent and criminal activity.

5This introductory article provides a reflection on the pressing issues around the links between media, crime and justice. It starts with a debate around media representations of crime and justice, moves to discuss the impact of media on the public perception of crime and justice, and then underlines how new media can be used to fuel crime and violence. Finally, the structure of this thematic issue is provided, briefly describing and contextualising the 10 articles that comprise it.

2. Media Representations of Crime and Justice

6Media representations (a core field in the broad field of media studies) concern how various media platforms portray particular groups, communities, experiences, ideas, or topics from a particular ideological or value perspective. These representations do not necessarily reflect or mirror “reality” but (re)present the reality, creating a new reality. Lippmann (1922) coined this as the pseudo-environment, corresponding to the stereotypical reality presented by the media, which is not the reality in itself, but the real- ity conveyed to the audience and the reality that the audience perceived as being “real”. In this regard, media theorists have long argued about how certain social groups and events are represented in the media (see some examples in Jewkes, 2004).

7Because this pseudo-environment becomes the “reality”, it is essential to understand how much of this actually impacts and influences our understanding of the world. For many, the media are the main (or only) source of access to certain facts, events, sto- ries, reports, testimonies or images; and it is also in this way that such individuals form opinions, reinforce beliefs, build images, and give meaning to a complex and changing social reality (Carvalho, 2007; Gomes, 2015; Penedo, 2003). Although the way the public receives information is not completely uncritical and passive (Guibentif, 2002; Sacco, 1995), most of what people perceive about a certain reality is provided by the media, es- pecially in the case of realities distant from their daily lives (Lippmann, 1922). Media may not say how people should think about a certain topic or event, but they are definitely decisive in defining the topics, and events the public should consider through the way information is highlighted and represented (Machado & Santos, 2009b).

8As such, media assume key importance in societies, and media representations are worthy of in-depth investigation as we cannot ignore how certain social issues are conveyed (Gomes, 2015; Greer, 2013). The media are a powerful agent of social control (Pina, 2009) and social construction of reality (Berger & Luckmann, 1966/2004). The media, therefore, constitute a powerful ideological apparatus, as its discourses are based on assumptions with a strong ideological character. On the one hand, media contribute to social control and reproduction and, on the other hand, operate as cultural commodities, entertaining people, keeping them politically and socially informed and reflecting changes in values and identities (Mendes, 2004, p. 153).

9In this regard, it is paramount to understand how media are key producers and purveyors of “knowledge” about crime, disorder and control (Greer, 2013). Our under- standing of crime — how much crime is out there, what types of crime are most preva- lent, who is most at risk, who are the offenders and what are the best responses — derives mostly from sources other than personal experience. Most people only experience criminality through the news. That is, most individuals are subjected to a representation of the crime instead of facing criminality itself (either as offenders and/or as victims). Consequently, the media’s coverage of a certain type of crime is directly related to fear of such crime (Chadee & Ditton, 2005). Moreover, how the media represent crime not only shapes community identity but also encourages personal and shared senses of fear and security (Banks, 2005).

10News about crime and justice and entertainment centring on it are quite wide- spread (Robinson, 2018). Crime news is one of the most popular and constant in the total amount of news broadcast by the media (Machado & Santos, 2008; Penedo, 2003; Robinson, 2018). Moreover, crime has become the widest and most competitive area of journalism (Pina, 2009). Besides this tendency to the exaggerated coverage of crime news by the media in general, it is relevant to consider how the media report the stories of alleged criminals and their victims and the feelings they consequently provoke in the audience, feeding people’s stereotypes and urban myths about crime (McCombs, 2002). That is why, of the many themes that can be found in the media, that of crime and justice is referred to as being the most revealing of what the ideology of a given society is, involving notions of good and evil, morality, social achievement and social structure (Surette, 1998, pp. 37–38). Wacquant (2000) also adds that the media function like the prison or the ghetto since they are institutions in charge of stigmatising certain groups to neutralise the material and/or symbolic threat they represent or may represent for the surrounding society.

11However, why is “crime” so popular in the media? Ericson et al. (2010) argue that the media’s appetite for crime stems from a more general concern with the question of order, in which order is conceived in terms of morality, in a procedural way and as a social hierarchy (see also Sparks, 2001). This order is embedded in reality by the particular interests of certain dominant groups and is masked in the name of objectivity, neutrality and balance that the media aim to achieve (Ericson et al., 2010, p. 98). Surette (1998) summa- rises the following explanations advanced by different authors for the popularity of crime news: (a) crime news is described as serving a positive social function by defining the limiting acceptable social behaviour, deterring offenders, cautioning potential victims, and providing crime surveillance; (b) crime is an important social issue, and therefore crime news is made to reflect the world we live in; and, lastly (c) crime news increase circulation and has entertainment value for companies that own the media. Each of these reasons explains why crime news is so popular, the types of crime that are most favourable to them and the reasons for their coverage (Surette, 1998).

12However, as we already alluded to in this introduction, the problem with crime in the media is not only how crime is portrayed but also the frequency in which it is reported, ex-aggerating the importance of crime in people’s lives. Media analysis studies evidence that the news shows a map of criminal events that differs, in many ways, from that provided by official crime statistics (Gomes, 2013; Katz, 1987; Robinson, 2018; Sacco, 1995). Indeed, several studies show that, even when statistics indicate that most crimes committed are non-violent, the media show us exactly the opposite (Sacco, 1995). The media overwhelm- ingly focus on violent and sexual crimes, which have greater news value (Greer, 2013), and on crimes committed by strangers rather than by acquaintances or family members (cases of domestic violence are, for example, less often reported than street crimes; Pina, 2009). By doing so, media representations exaggerate both the levels of serious interpersonal crime in society and the risk of becoming a crime victim (Greer, 2013). Also, media reports of criminal facts are usually limited to the description of the event and immediate conse- quences, not focusing on critical perspectives or wider debates around causes, prevention, or policy (Carvalho, 2007; Greer, 2012, 2013). Criminal events are simply represented as a result of aberrant individual deviations (Bortner, 1984; Haney & Manzolati, 1981; Hans & Dee, 2010), practised by crazy or evil people (Pina, 2009) with a vast set of choices (Surette, 1998). In this sense, offenders are often seen as if they were not part of the world in which rules, values and considerations of justice apply and, no less commonly, are as- sociated with the more vulnerable social classes (Machado & Santos, 2009a) and racial and ethnical minoritised groups (Gomes, 2013, 2015). In sum, offenders from the most disadvantaged social groups are portrayed as the culprits for the existence of violence in the streets (Hayward & Yar, 2006; Ramos & Novo, 2008).

13Considering the dramatic and emotional potential of criminal stories, the media explore emotionally shocking scenarios, elect heroes, and punish villains, always with an exemplary perspective of restoring order, truth and justice (Ferin-Cunha, 2003, pp. 2–3), being, thus, ideologically imbued. This replacement of the order is again in line with the idea of Ericson et al. (2010) that crime news would have a positive social function of social control. The darkest side of human nature is scrutinised, stimulating the most voyeur- istic eyes (Peelo, 2006) and exacerbating feelings of repulsion towards criminal acts, anger towards injustice and offenders and the shame, remorse or guilt of offenders (Karstedt, 2010).

3. Media Effects on Public Perception of Crime and Justice

14Media representations of crime have been a perennial cause of concern (Reiner, 2007). It is undeniable that the media representations of crime end up influencing policy and practice related to crime control in Western societies. That is alarming because coverage of criminological issues by the media is interspersed with moral pan- ics (see Altheide, 2009; Cohen, 2011; Cyr, 2003; Garland, 2008; Goode & Ben-Yehuda, 1994; Hall et al., 1978; Hunt, 1997), a fear-producing process of strong disapproval of moral threats (Garland, 2008) that exemplifies a right-wing inclination of the media (Cohen, 2011). In fact, moral panics can be actually considered more dangerous than the crime itself, as it induces authorities’ actions for crime control in the direction of social fears and anxieties instead of in the direction of what statistics prove to occur (Hickman, 1982).

15The issue of the media’s effects on the public perception of crime has given rise to research on the relationship between levels of exposure to media content and the sensationalist treatment of certain crimes and opinions and public attitudes towards criminal reality (Carvalho, 2007; Ferin-Cunha et al., 2007; Guibentif, 2002; McCombs, 2002; Penedo, 2003; Pina, 2009; Santos, 2009; Webster, 2001). Media are not solely responsible for inducing fear of crime since the risk of victimisation, previous experi- ence as a victim, environmental conditions, ethnicity, and previous contacts with the police and the criminal justice system are also among the many factors that interact through complex processes that influence public anxiety about crime (Rego, 2015). Nonetheless, media play an important role in creating a “cultural climate” in which certain types of criminal behaviour are portrayed more often, and with greater inten- sity, than others (Jewkes, 2004, p. 167). The same can be concluded regarding certain groups of people, usually poor, foreign and ethnic groups, who are portrayed as deviants, offenders or villains of the stories narrated in the news (Cádima & Figueiredo, 2003; Carvalho, 2007; Ferin-Cunha et al., 2008; Gomes, 2015; Mills et al., in press; Santos, 2008). The media are thus responsible for manipulating and feeding public fears about some crimes and certain social groups (Jewkes, 2004).

16As such, crime and justice are at the same very appealing matters for the media and a projective matter of tensions and social imbalances (Penedo, 2003). Surette (1998) identifies five different ways the media influence the collective perception of crime and fear of crime — (a) substitution: people who do not have alternative sources of knowledge to replace fear-promoting media information; (b) resonance: people with a concrete experience of victimisation who corroborate or come across the informa- tion conveyed by the media; (c) vulnerability: people less able to prevent victimisation are more easily frightened by information from the media; (d) affinity: people with demo- graphic similarities to crime victims also become more fearful and more susceptible to be- ing influenced by the media; and (e) maximum effect: people who already feel high levels of fear are, because of that, beyond the reach of the media’s influence (Chiricos et al., 1997). Therefore, the media can be seen as a cause and a way to fight crime (Brown, 2003; Surette, 1998). This paradox stems from how the media are, at the same time, responsi- ble for reporting crime and for telling us how it can be fought. Not only do we learn about crime and justice through the media, we learn to live with it through the same source (Surette, 1998). The media sell the fear of crime while lamenting it (Brown, 2003, p. 26) and demanding it to be fought. The idea of a “socially constructed reality” about crime, in which the processes of information flows create our perception and understanding of the world we live in, is a central and profoundly important aspect of knowing where the truth about crime ends and the truth about the media begins (Surette, 1998).

4. New Media As a Platform for Violence and Crime

17In the last decades, the web has transformed the rules of socialisation, defying no- tions of space and time and setting an over-stimulated imagination about itself as a new medium (Malbreil, 2007). This added complexities and new challenges to everyday life, including the way crime and justice events happen and are portrayed. In fact, nowadays, it is common that crime and justice events are webcast as they happen, high-profile “celeb- rity” trials are tweeted live, and riots and revolutions are orchestrated through social media (Greer, 2013). Furthermore, the web can be used as a platform for criminal behaviour, and a means to prevent and fight crime. To understand how new media enable cybercrime and the social implications of crime and violence mediated by technology, we must first place new media representation in the common imagination.

18The web has been feeding people’s fantasy and imagination since its earliest predictions: when the novelist Jules Verne talked of a network to send documents through signs in the 1860s; when the documentalist Paul Otlet imagined a telepicture book at the end of the 19th century; when the poet Paul Valery started a discussion about ubiquity almost a century ago. Overall, views of the web have been positive, and cyberspace has been de- scribed through optimistic metaphors, such as “digital library”, “information highway”, “virtual community”, “digital ecology”, and “narrative stream” (Mosco, 2004). While there were certainly negative uses of the web from its very first days of widespread use — for example, discussions about spam in the middle 1990s (Brunton, 2013) — only recently have negative and positive perspectives become more evenly balanced. Part of the process in which new media’s positive meaning is constructed through media representation is responsible for nurturing people’s minds and bringing together real and fantastical mean- ings (Orgad, 2012).

19Contemporary debates about the impact of the web finally include emerging nega- tive issues, focusing especially on online social networks and their uses. For instance, de Vries and Schinkel (2019) discuss the imaginary surveillance surrounding social media applying facial recognition technologies, thereby allowing the rise in “algorithmic anxi- ety”. McGregor (2019) argues that journalists currently co-opt social media activity in their political reporting to reflect and represent public opinion, which attributes to com- panies such as Twitter and Facebook a legitimised role in creating a general idea of public opinion. According to Oz et al. (2018), these platforms are constantly seen as enabling uncivil and impolite behaviours, especially in interactions with strangers. In addition, these platforms might also be used to enact gender violence (Afrouz, 2021; Backe et al., 2018; Bound Alberti, 2021), hate crime and hate speech (Castaño-Pulgarín et al., 2021; Müller & Schwarz, 2020; Williams et al., 2020), cyberbullying, cyberstalking, economic fraud, and several other types of crimes (Thukral & Kainya, 2022). Recent research also discusses the use of Twitter for the distribution of misinformation, commonly labelled “fake news”, now a reality inserted into political discussions and imposing a challenge to democracies (Brummette et al., 2018; Vargo et al., 2018). There is also research showing the negative social and psychological impacts of social media, especially amongst the youth (van Dijck, 2013); the lack of protection of users’ privacy by technology corpora- tions such as Google, Facebook and Amazon (Striphas, 2015); abuses perpetrated by governments in liberal regimes (Greenwald, 2014); and individual, corporate and gov- ernmental vulnerability to cyber-attacks (Landau, 2017).

20Positive representations of new media still focus on how they can be used to pro- tect people’s right to private communication and access to information (Floridi, 2014; Hoang & Pishva, 2014; Jardine, 2018; McLeod, 2011; Sharon & John, 2018; Wu & Atkin, 2018). However, new and growing forms of crime and violence through new media ex- emplify to which extent technological development adds sophistication to cybercrime, promoting more sceptical views and representations of the web (Larsson et al., 2012; Martin, 2014; Morselli et al., 2017; van Hardeveld et al., 2017). Interestingly, Curtis and Oxburgh (2022) argue that victims of online crimes and cybercriminals rely on a sense of security given by both the use of technology and the distance between themselves: while victims feel falsely protected by these things, offenders are actually enabled by them, avoiding any accountability. As mentioned by Dupont and Holt (2022), there is a clear relationship between the increase in the use of new technologies in everyday lives and its appropriation for criminal and anti-social activities, which makes it “vital to increase our understanding of the nature of offender behaviour, correlates of victimisation, and the utility of policies to deter crime” (p. 860). That said, victimisation is a topic that requires special attention and research, considering that it is undeniable that criminals have explored the web. Victims must be empowered to report a crime, which will only happen if cases are dealt with seriously, preventing further victimisation and mental health issues; considering that in a post-pandemic world, most people have to spend time online, this is not optional anymore (Button et al., 2022).

5. Introducing This Thematic Issue

21As we argued so far, links between crime, justice and media are deep and complex, as media and social media (re)present, (mis)represent and impact our understanding of crime and justice but can also be used as a platform for violent and criminal acts. This special issue addresses this complexity by comprising research about traditional mass media such as newspapers and television (Luhmann, 1996), as well as new media that is not based on the broadcasting logic (Scolari, 2009), which Manovich (2002) equates to digital media, for instance, social media.

22Considering the efforts for decolonisation in academia and the prominent global feature of the media, this special issue brings together research about multiple coun- tries, contexts and realities. As argued by Laidler et al. (2017), research about the crime- media nexus has to include the nuances in the Global North and Global South, taking into consideration not only political and social situations but also geopolitics and eco- nomic aspects.

23This thematic issue consists of 10 research papers, distributed in three main themes: media representations of crime and justice, online crime and violence, and technology.

24The first set of articles explores media representations of certain violent and criminal events in news and entertainment media. The first article, written by Célia Belim and Artur Simões, explores two Portuguese newspapers’ agenda-setting and framing when representing the Hong Kong protests. These protests originated in March 2019 after the Hong Kong government proposed an extradition bill, which led to citizens’ fear that they could become subject to a different legal system, undermining the region’s autonomy and the citizens’ rights. Reports of attacks on protesters, arrests of activists and communications problems during protests concerned United Nations human rights experts. Regardless of the differences between media outlets, this article provides an interesting debate on the importance of covering protests and social movements. After all, as stated by the authors, “a protest without media coverage is a non-event (Gamson & Wolfsfeld, 1993), assuming the logic that it exists if the protest is represented in the media” (Belim & Simões, p. 44). More than that, the way the media cover these events might strengthen or compromise the cause, and the impact of media representations is discussed.

25Then, Gilmar José dos Santos discusses how the online media have been repre- senting corporate manslaughter by focusing on two case studies: Samarco’s and Vale’s criminal tragedies in Brazil. Among other findings, the author evidenced that online news is reluctant to report the cases as corporate manslaughter, framing the episodes as accidents or tragedies. Although the alternative-independent media appeared to be more inclined to frame it as a homicide, not enough resources were available to produce their own content. As such, it was observed that the reporting approach neutralised and re-signified the crimes, favouring the companies. This article raises relevant debates around what voice is given to the victims in such criminal tragedies, how the transgressors do not fit in the media or society’s representation of the criminal and how this ends up impacting the way media convey corporate crime.

26Continuing with the focus on news articles, Ester Amaral de Paula Minga explores the social representations around the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God in two influential Portuguese newspapers. This Church was the subject of many news reports during the 1990s due to accusations of serious crimes such as charlatanism, connections to drug trafficking and child abduction. Much of the news linked the Church with stereotypes about Brazil and Brazilians and referenced Brazilian soap operas, which were quite popular in the country at that time. Via critical discourse analysis and framing analysis, the author analysed if these same ideas persisted through time. The author concludes that the negative image of the Church identified in the 1990s remained, although the Church’s media presence has since reduced. Although the current presence of the Church in the media is less pronounced, recent cases such as the 2017 O Segredo dos Deuses (The Secret of Gods) suggest that the emphasis on melodrama in coverage of the Church remains and may come once again, to be associated with contexts of xenophobia and religious intolerance. This analysis over time allows us to discuss the eventual impact media have on public opinion through time.

27The following article focuses on the discourse of photographs instead of the common analysis of the journalistic text. Ângela Cristina Salgueiro Marques, Angie Biondi and Ana Paula da Rosa provide an analysis of a set of journalistic photographs about two major police operations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, one of them at Complexo da Maré in 2014 and the other one at Jacarezinho in 2021, both considered massacres as civil- ians have lost their lives. Analysing those photographs and comparing the position and attitude of police officers and local people, amongst other nuances, the authors enrol in a philosophical debate around visibility conditions and journalistic context. According to the authors, the presence of ordinary people in those images, while doing their daily chores, gesturing, glancing and simply reacting to the horror of the situation, interfere with the images’ enunciative character. The article then takes a step further to discuss these appearances’ political and aesthetic power, as they can highlight the nuances be- tween the visible and the readable.

28While the previous articles focus on media representations through newspaper ar- ticles (text or image), the last two articles within the media representations section of the special issue focus on media representations of entertainment, particularly televi- sion series. Melina Meimaridis and Rodrigo Quinan explore the normalisation of brutal- ity and police authority in American television series. The authors argue, for instance, how television series reinforce the police institution’s authority treating its actions as unquestionable, or how they normalise police brutality, with narratives often justifying violent acts as an efficient investigative tool. By doing so, this article creates a great plat- form to discuss the significant role that television fiction accomplishes in mediating and constructing meaning about the police. It also helps question these representations in the face of conflicting events such as the death of George Floyd, a Black man who was murdered by a White police officer who knelt over his neck, suffocating him, and the subsequent debate around the defund the police movement.

29Jesús Jiménez-Varea and Antonio Pineda, on the other hand, focus their analysis on the popular television show Arrow to discuss the representation of vigilantism, a form of extra-legal crime fighting. This empirical analysis explores the various rhetorical strategies used by the television series to justify vigilantism, such as the representation of legal and governmental institutions as corrupt and inefficient, the multiple rationales whereby vigilantism is practised, and the sanctioning of private crime fighting by institu- tions. Among other debates, the authors evidence that the show boosts individualism and anti-government neoliberalism ideologies by portraying the state as inefficient and/ or corrupt. Ultimately, this article evidences the importance television series might have in impacting societal views on crime, justice and law enforcement, particularly on who should be in charge of keeping everyone’s safe.

30The two subsequent articles focus on another important theme of this thematic issue: online crime and violence and the existent continuum between offline and online prac- tices. Considering the impact that the involvement of young people on social media might have on the opportunities for delinquent practices and the action of specialised courts, Maria João Leote de Carvalho delves into an exploratory analysis of qualitative informa- tion collected in courts of male and female young offenders. By looking at the use(s) of social media in the perpetration of unlawful acts as recorded in judicial proceedings in Portugal, the author concluded that less than a third of the young individuals were proven to have been involved in unlawful acts using social media. Furthermore, there is a significant overrepresentation of girls as perpetrators of unlawful acts, especially those involving a high degree of violence. Regardless of gender, the relationships established in school seem to dominate the interaction between aggressors-victims. Additionally, more than the anonymity afforded by the digital platforms, violent action is the catalyst to gain respect through the instant gratification offered by social media in an online-offline continuum, which characterises the lives of young people today. These conclusions shed light on the gender dynamics of delinquent practices when using social media, as well as the eventual challenges the justice system has in understanding and applying measures to these particular acts.

31The other article focuses on online violence against women during the COVID-19 pandemic. By analysing in-depth interviews with women victims/survivors of online vio- lence during the pandemic in Portugal, Rita Basílio de Simões, Inês Amaral, Sílvio Santos and Juliana Alcantara explore how women experience the nature, prevalence, and impacts of online violence. The data enabled the identification of 10 types of dynamic and hybrid modalities of online violence against women. By exploring the particularities of the online context as a space of continuity of the dynamics of violence existing offline, this study evi- dences the continuum of misogyny and gender violence to which women are exposed in their daily lives. It also contributes to deepening the knowledge about the online as a space of power networks, inequalities and gender injustice in a country where online gender vio- lence is still underexplored.

32The two last articles are related to technology and online media, particularly how we can use these to fight crime and promote a certain social order. Paulo Victor Melo and Paulo Serra discuss the relationship between digital technologies and general security in Brazil by analysing government program proposals of the mayors of Brazilian state capitals, which mentioned keywords such as “facial recognition”, “artificial intelligence”, “surveillance”, “video surveillance”, “monitoring”, “drone”, “camera”, “video”, “data” and “technology”. The study provides important debates around the ethical, social, political, and cultural implications of adopting digital technologies for public security. This debate is especially relevant in countries marked by structural racism so that, in fighting crime and expanding protection, violence against historically discriminated groups is not perpetuated.

33Lastly, Tine Munk and Juan Ahmad focus their analysis on the Ukrainian cyber war and how the use of online communication platforms to reach out to populations, within and outside the country, has been instrumental for military success. In fact, as evidenced by the authors, inventive thinking has enabled the actors to utilise the online space and develop new computing tactics to defend the country. This way, Ukrainian leadership has been able to carry out a successful speech act that has activated numerous online users and enabled a new form of online civic activism where online actors fight with the military forces. This article sheds light on the importance of online as a way of promoting a certain social order across borders and trying to surpass offline national constraints.

34Finally, this thematic issue presents timely and diverse discussions that connect media studies to criminological research. This combination is not only interesting and relevant but also necessary for a broader and deeper comprehension of social and cul- tural processes within the criminal justice system. Considering traditional and new me- dia, photographs and television series, from Global North challenges to Global South realities, these 10 articles offer clear contributions to the current understanding of how the media influence perceptions of criminality and security and, therefore, the way that crime is prevented, experienced and controlled.

This work is supported by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the project UIDB/00736/2020 (base funding) and UIDP/00736/2020 (programmatic funding).

Topo da página

Bibliografia

Altheide, D. L. (2009). Moral panic: From sociological concept to public discourse. Crime, Media, Culture, 5(1), 79–99.

Afrouz, R. (2021). The nature, patterns and consequences of technology-facilitated domestic abuse: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211046752

Backe, E. L., Lilleston, P., & McCleary-Sills, J. (2018). Networked individuals, gendered violence: A literature review of cyberviolence. Violence and Gender, 5(3), 135–146. http://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0056

Banks, M. (2005). Spaces of (in)security: Media and fear of crime in a local context. Crime, Media, Culture, 1(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659005054020

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2004). A construção social da realidade (2nd ed., F. de S. Fernandes, Trans.). Dinalivro. (Original work published 1966)

Bortner, M. A. (1984). Media images and public attitudes toward crime and justice. In R. Surette (Ed.), Justice and the media: Issues and research (pp. 15–30). Charles C. Thomas.

Bound Alberti, F. (2021). Fat shaming, feminism and Facebook: What ‘women who eat on tubes’ reveal about social media and the boundaries of women’s bodies. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(6), 1304– 1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211055499

Brown, S. (2003). Crime and law in media culture. Open University Press.

Brummette, J., DiStaso, M., Vafeiadis, M., & Messner, M. (2018). Read all about it: The politicisation of “fake news” on Twitter. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018769906

Brunton, F. (2013). Spam: A shadow history of the internet. The MIT Press.

Button, M., Shepherd, D., Blackbourn, D., Sugiura, L., Kapend, R., & Wang, V. (2022). Assessing the seriousness of cybercrime: The case of computer misuse crime in the United Kingdom and the victims’ perspective. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 1–22. Publicação eletrónica antecipada.

Cádima, F., & Figueiredo, A. (2003). Representações (imagens) dos imigrantes e das minorias étnicas na imprensa. Observatório da Comunicaço.

Carvalho, M. (2007). A construção da imagem dos imigrantes e das minorias étnicas pela imprensa portuguesa: Uma análise comparativa de dois jornais diários [Master’s thesis, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa]. Repositório do Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. http://hdl.handle.net/10071/675

Castaño-Pulgarín, S. A., Suárez-Betancur, N., Vega, L. M. T., & López, H. M. H. (2021). Internet, social media and online hate speech. Systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608

Chadee, D., & Ditton, J. (2005). Fear of crime and the media: Assessing the lack of relationship. Crime, Media, Culture, 1(3), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659005057644

Chiricos, T., Eschholz, S., & Gertz, M. (1997). Crime, news and fear of crime: Toward an identification of audience effects. Social Problems, 44(3), 342–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097181

Cohen, S. (2011). Folk devils and moral panics. Routledge Classics.

Curtis, J., & Oxburgh, G. (2022). Understanding cybercrime in ‘real world’ policing and law enforcement. The Police Journal, 1–20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X221107584

Cyr, J. (2003). The folk devils reacts: Gangs and moral panic. Criminal Justice Review, 28(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680302800103

de Vries, P., & Schinkel, W. (2019). Algorithmic anxiety: Masks and camouflage in artistic imaginaries of facial recognition algorithms. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719851532

Dupont, B., & Holt, T. (2022). The human factor of cybercrime. Social Science Computer Review, 40(4), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211011584

Ericson, R., Baranek, P., & Chan, J. (2010). Research approaches (1987). In C. Greer (Ed.), Crime and media: A reader (pp. 97–107). Routledge.

Ferin-Cunha, I. (2003). Imigração e racismo: Dez anos nos media. http://bocc.ubi.pt/pag/cunha-isabel-ferin-sos-racismo.html

Ferin-Cunha, I., Policarpo, V., Monteiro, T. L., & Figueiras, R. (2007). Media and discrimination: An exploratory study on the Portuguese case. http://bocc.ufp.pt/pag/ferin-isabel-media-and-discrimination.pdf

Ferin-Cunha, I., Santos, C. A., Silveirinha, M. J., & Peixinho, A. T. (2008). Media, imigração e minorias étnicas – 2005-2006. Alto Comissariado para a Imigraço e Diálogo Intercultural.

Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution. Oxford University Press.

Garland, D. (2008). On the concept of moral panic. Crime, Media, Culture, 4(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659007087270

Gomes, S. (2013). Criminalidade, etnicidade e desigualdades – Análise comparativa entre os grupos nacionais dos PALOP e leste europeu e o grupo étnico cigano [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Minho]. RepositóriUM. https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25413

Gomes, S. (2015). Media e crime. Dos media e da construção das realidades criminais. In M. I. Cunha (Ed.), Do crime e do castigo – Temas e debates contemporâneos (pp. 81–97). Editora Mundos Socias.

Goode, E., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (1994). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Blackwell. Greenwald, G. (2014). No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA & the surveillance state. Penguin Books. Greer, C. (2012). Sex crime and the media: Sex offending and the press in a divided society. Routledge.

Greer, C. (2013). Crime and media: Understanding the connections. In C. Hale, K. Hayward, A. Wahadin, & E. Wincup (Eds.), Criminology (3rd ed., pp. 143–164). Oxford University Press.

Guibentif, P. (2002). Comunicação social e representação do crime. Gabinete de Estudos Jurídico-Sociais do CEJ.

Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state, and law and order. Palgrave Macmillan.

Haney, C., & Manzolati, J. (1981). Television criminology: Network illusions of criminal justice realities. In E. Aronson (Ed.), Readings about the social animal (pp. 125–136). Freeman.

Hans, V., & Dee, J. (2010). Cobertura mediática da justiça: O impacto nos jurados e no público. In H. Machado & F. Santos (Eds.), Justiça, ambientes mediáticos e ordem social (pp. 39–56). Húmus.

Hayward, K., & Yar, M. (2006). The “chav” phenomenon: Consumption, media and the construction of a new underclass. Crime, Media, Culture, 2(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659006061708

Hickman, M. (1982). Crime in the streets — A moral panic: Understanding “get tough” policies in the criminal justice system. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 7(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373788

Hoang, N. P., & Pishva, D. (2014, February 16–19). Anonymous communication and its importance in social networking [Conference presentation]. The 16th IEEE International Conference on Advanced

Communication Technology, Pyeongchang, South Korea. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACT.2014.6778917

Hunt, A. (1997). Moral panic and moral language in the media. The British Journal of Sociology, 48(4), 629– 648. https://doi.org/10.2307/591600

Jardine, E. (2018). Tor, what is it good for? Political repression and the use of online anonymity-granting technologies. New Media & Society, 20(2), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816639976

Jewkes, Y. (2004). Media & crime. Key approaches to criminology. Sage Publications.

Karstedt, S. (2010). Emoções e direito penal. In H. Machado & F. Santos (Ed.), Justiça, ambientes mediáticos e ordem social (pp. 17–38). Edições Húmus.

Katz, J. (1987). What makes crime “news”? Media, Culture & Society, 9, 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344387009001004

Laidler, K. J., Lee, M., & Wong, G. P. (2017). Doing criminology on media and crime in Asia. Crime, Media, Culture, 13(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659017710296

Landau, S. (2017). Listening in: Cybersecurity in an insecure age. Yale University Press.

Larsson, S., Svensson, M., & Kaminski, M. de. (2012). Online piracy, anonymity and social change: Innovation through deviance. Convergence, 19(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512456789

Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. The Free Press.

Luhmann, N. (1196). The reality of the mass media. Stanford University Press.

Machado, H., & Santos, F. (2008). Crime, drama e entretenimento: O caso Maddie e a meta-justiça popular na imprensa portuguesa. Oficina do CES, 310, 1–32. https://ces.uc.pt/pt/publicacoes/outras-publicacoes-e-colecoes/oficina-do-ces/numeros/oficina-310

Machado, H., & Santos, F. (2009a). Dramatizaço da justiça e mediatizaço da criminalidade: Que rumos para o exercício da cidadania? Configurações, (5/6), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.4000/configuracoes.374

Machado, H., & Santos, F. (2009b). A moral da justiça e a moral dos media: Julgamentos mediáticos e dramas públicos. Oficina do CES, 333, 1–18. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/32674

Malbreil, X. (2007). About the internet imaginary and its evolution. Texto Digital, 3(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.5007/%25x

Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media. The MIT Press.

Martin, J. (2014). Lost on the Silk Road: Online drug distribution and the ‘cryptomarket’. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 14(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895813505234

McCombs, M. (2002). The agenda-setting role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion [Unpublished manuscript]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458

McGregor, S. C. (2019). Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion. Journalism, 20(8), 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458

McLeod, P. L. (2011). Effects of anonymity and social comparison of rewards on computer-mediated group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 42(4), 475–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410397381

Mendes, J. M. (2004). Media, públicos e cidadania: Algumas notas breves. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, (70), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.1054

Mills, J., Gomes, S., & Walzak, J. (in press). The press has gone crazy: Online media and political rhetoric of immigrants in the US. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies. https://.doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2022.10048342

Morselli, C., Décary-Hétu, D., Paquet-Clouston, M., & Aldridge, J. (2017). Conflict management in illicit drug cryptomarkets. International Criminal Justice Review, 27(4), 237–254. https://doi. org/10.1177/1057567717709498

Mosco, V. (2004). The digital sublime. The MIT Press.

Müller, K., & Schwarz, C. (2020). Fanning the flames of hate: Social media and hate crime. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082972

Orgad, S. (2012). Media representation and the global imagination. Polity Press.

Oz, M., Zheng, P., & Chen, G. M. (2018). Twitter versus Facebook: Comparing incivility, impoliteness, and deliberative attributes. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3400–3419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817749516

Peelo, M. (2006). Framing homicide narratives in newspapers: Mediated witness and the construction of virtual victimhood. Crime, Media, Culture, 2(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659006065404

Penedo, C. (2003). O crime nos media: O que nos dizem as notícias quando nos falam de crime. Livros Horizonte.

Pina, S. (2009). Media e leis penais. Edições Almedina.

Ramos, F., & Novo, H. (2008). Mídia, violência e alteridade: Um estudo de caso. Estudos de Psicologia, 8(3), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2003000300016

Rego, X. (2015). Da insegurança de rua. Notas sobre um objeto complexo. In M. I. Cunha (Ed.), Do crime e do castigo – Temas e debates contemporâneos (pp. 63–80). Editora Mundos Socias.

Reiner, R. (2007). Media made criminality: The representation of crime in the mass media. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 302–337). Oxford.

Robinson, M. B. (2018). Media coverage of crime and criminal justice (3rd ed.). Carolina Academic Press. Sacco, V. (1995). Media constructions of crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716295539001011

Santos, C. (2008). Imagem da imigraço e minorias étnicas nos media. In A. Fidalgo, F. Ramos, J. P. de Oliveira, & O. Mealha (Eds.), Livro de actas: 4º Congresso da Associação Portuguesa de Ciências da Comunicação (pp. 967–975). Sopcom.

Santos, F. (2009). Jornalistas e magistrados: Perspectivas cruzadas nas relações entre os media e a justiça [Master’s thesis, Universidade do Minho].

Scolari, C. A. (2009). Mapping conversations about new media: The theoretical field of digital communication. New Media & Society, 11(6), 943–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809336513

Sharon, T., & John, N. A. (2018). Unpacking (the) secret: Anonymous social media and the impossibility of networked anonymity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4177–4194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818768547

Sparks, R. (2001). The media, populism, public opinion and crime. Criminal Justice Matters, 43, 6–7. https:// www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/publications/cjm/article/media-populism-public-opinion-and-crime

Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392

Surette, R. (1998). Media, crime and criminal justice. Wadsworth.

Thukral, P., & Kainya, V. (2022). How social media influence crimes. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 4(2), 1–11. https://doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2022-64941518/IJLLR/V4/I2/A18

van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.

van Hardeveld, G. J., Webber, C., & O’Hara, K. (2017). Deviating from the cybercriminal script: Exploring tools of anonymity (mis)used by carders on cryptomarkets. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(11), 1244–1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217734271

Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2018). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028–2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086

Wacquant, L. (2000). The new “peculiar institution”: On the prison as surrogate ghetto. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480600004003007

Webster, C. (2001). Representing race and crime. Criminal Justice Matters, (43), 16–17.

Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Javed, A., Liu, H., & Ozalp, S. (2020). Hate in the machine: Anti-Black and anti- Muslim social media posts as predictors of offline racially and religiously aggravated crime. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz049

Wu, T.-Y., & Atkin, D. J. (2018). To comment or not to comment: Examining the influences of anonymity and social support on one’s willingness to express in online news discussions. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4512–4532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818776629

Topo da página

Para citar este artigo

Referência do documento impresso

Sílvia Gomes, Thais Sardá e Rafaela Granja, «Crime, Justice and Media: Debating (Mis) representations and Renewed Challenges»Comunicação e sociedade, 42 | 2022, 7-24.

Referência eletrónica

Sílvia Gomes, Thais Sardá e Rafaela Granja, «Crime, Justice and Media: Debating (Mis) representations and Renewed Challenges»Comunicação e sociedade [Online], 42 | 2022, posto online no dia 16 dezembro 2022, consultado o 16 julho 2025. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/cs/7914

Topo da página

Autores

Sílvia Gomes

Sílvia Gomes is currently a lecturer in criminology at Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom). She holds a PhD in sociology (2013) with a thesis focusing on crime, ethnicities, and social inequalities. She is a researcher at the Interdisciplinary Center of Social Sciences and at the Critical Criminology and Social Justice Research Group at Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom). She is co-coordinating the Thematic Section on Sociology of Law and Justice of the Portuguese Sociological Association. Author of several books, book chapters, and papers in scientific journals, her main areas of research are focused on crime and media, prison studies, crime and ethnicity, social inequalities, intersectional approaches, and more recently on reentry, recidivism, and criminal desistance. Her recent books are Female Crime and Delinquency in Portugal: In and Out of the Criminal Justice System (Palgrave, 2018), Prisons, State and Violence (Springer, 2019), Incarceration and Generation, Volumes 1 and 2 (Palgrave, 2021), and Gender, Prison and Reentry Experiences: A Matter of Time (Routledge, 2023 forthcoming).
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5503-0037
Email: silvia.damotagomes@ntu.ac.uk
Morada: Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice (CCJ), Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham. NG1 4FQ

Thais Sardá

Thaís Sardá is a lecturer in criminology at Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom) focused on researching and teaching cybercrime. Before that, she was a post-doctoral research associate at the TECHNGI Project at the School of Business and Economics of Loughborough University. She also holds a PhD in communication and media studies (Loughborough University), a masters’ degree in information, social networks and technology (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), a bachelor degree in social communication and journalism (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), a post-graduate degree in criminology (Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), and a master business administration in people management (Fundação Getulio Vargas, Brazil). Moreover, she has a background working as a profes- sional journalist (newspaper and online news) and with advertising (social media, busi- ness intelligence and public relations).
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-6568
Email: thais.sarda@ntu.ac.uk
Address: Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice (CCJ), Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham. NG1 4FQ

Rafaela Granja

Rafaela Granja holds a PhD in sociology (2015) by Institute of Social Sciences, University of Minho. Her research explores topics of technological surveillance of crimi- nalized populations, the interconnections between family, genetics and crime, and recon- figurations of family relationships inside and outside the prison. She was awarded a grant from “scientific employment stimulus” (second edition) promoted by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia), CEECIND/ 00984/2018. Since October 2021, she is developing the research project “Between control and repair: The reconfiguration of genetic surveillance at the intersec- tion of criminal investigation and civil identification” at the Communication and Society Research Centre, University of Minho, Portugal. Publications include the books Genetic Surveillance and Crime Control: Social, Cultural and Political Perspectives (Routledge, 2021), Forensic Genetics in the Governance of Crime (Palgrave, 2020) and Modes of Bio-Bordering: The Hidden (Dis)integration of Europe (Palgrave, 2020).
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4430-9061
Email: r.granja@ics.uminho.pt
Address: Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar , 4710-057 Braga, Portugal

Artigos do mesmo autor

Topo da página

Direitos de autor

CC-BY-4.0

Apenas o texto pode ser utilizado sob licença CC BY 4.0. Outros elementos (ilustrações, anexos importados) são "Todos os direitos reservados", à exceção de indicação em contrário.

Topo da página
Pesquisar OpenEdition Search

Você sera redirecionado para OpenEdition Search