Barchiesi, A. (2006) ‘Women on top: Livia and Andromache’, in R.K. Gibson, S. Green, A. Sharrock (eds.) The Art of Love: bimillennial essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris. Oxford. 96-120.
Bucheit, V. (1965) ‘Tibull II 5 und die Aeneis’, Philologus 109.1: 104-20.
Buffière, F. (1956) Les myths d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris.
Cairns, F. (1979) Tibullus: A Hellenistic Poet at Rome. Cambridge.
———— (2003) ‘Propertius 3.4 and the Aeneid incipit’, CQ 53: 309-11.
———— (2006) Sextus Propertius: the Augustan elegist. Cambridge.
Campbell, G.L. (2003) Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura 5.772–1104. Oxford.
Casali, S. (2006) ‘The Making of the Shield: Inspiration and Repression in the Aeneid’, G&R 53.2: 185-204.
Caston, R.R. (2012) The Elegiac Passion: jealousy in Roman love elegy. New York and Oxford.
Clay, D. (1983) Lucretius and Epicurus. Ithaca, New York and London.
Clay, J.S. (2003) Hesiod’s Cosmos. Cambridge.
Conte, G.B. (2000) ‘A Humorous Recusatio: on Propertius 3.5’, CQ 50.1: 307-10.
Costa, C.D.N. (1984) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura V. Oxford.
Courtney, E. (1969) ‘Three Poems of Propertius’, BICS 16.1: 70-87.
DeBrohun, J.B. (2003) Roman Propertius and the Reinvention of Elegy. Ann Arbor.
Eden, P.T. (1975) A Commentary on Virgil Aeneid VIII. Leiden.
Edmunds, L. (2002) ‘Mars as a Hellenistic Lover: Lucretius, De rerum natura 1.29-40 and its Subtexts’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 8.3: 343-58.
Estévez Sola, J.A. (2011) ‘Milicia de Amor’, in R. Moreno Soldevila (ed.) Diccionario de motivos amatorios en la literatura latina (siglos III A.C.-II D.C.). Huelva. 275-86.
Fabre-Serris, J. (2005) ‘L'élégie et les images romaines des origines: les choix de Tibulle’, in J. Schwindt (ed.) La representation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne/ Zur Poetik der Zeit in augusteischer Dichtung. Heidelberg. 141-157.
———— (2008) Rome, l’Arcadie et la mer des Argonautes: essai sur la naissance d’une mythologie des origines en occident. Villeneuve d’Ascq.
———— (2013) ‘Genre et Gender : usages et enjeux de l’emploi de durus chez les élégiaques’, EuGeStA 3: 209-39
———— (2014) ‘La réception d’Empédocle dans la poésie latine : Virgile (Buc. 6), Lucrèce, Gallus et les poètes élégiaques’, Dictynna 11.
Fantham, E. (1998) Ovid, Fasti: Book IV. Cambridge.
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.
———— (2008) ‘The Six Books of Lucretius’ De rerum natura: Antecedents and Influence’, Dictynna 5 (http://dictynna.revues.org/385 [accessed 11.12.2014]).
Fedeli, P. (1985) Properzio: Il Libro Terzo delle Elegie. Bari.
Fowler, D. (1989) ‘Lucretius and Politics’, in M. Griffin and J. Barnes (eds.) Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford. 120-50.
Furley, D.J. (1970) ‘Variations on themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’ proem’, BICS 17: 55-64.
Gale, M.R. (1994) Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.
———— (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: the Georgics, Lucretius and the didactic tradition. Cambridge.
Garani, M. (2007) Empedocles Redivivus: poetry and analogy in Lucretius. New York and Abingdon.
———— (2011) ‘Revisiting Tarpeia’s myth in Propertius (IV, 4)’, LICS 10.3: 1-22.
———— (2013) ‘Lucretius and Ovid on Empedoclean Cows and Sheep’, in D. Lehous, A.D. Morrison, and A. Sharrock (eds.) Lucretius: poetry, philosophy, science. Oxford. 233-59.
Gee, E. (2013) Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition. Oxford.
Gibson, R.K. (2003) (ed.) Ovid Ars Amatoria Book 3. Cambridge.
Giesecke, A.L. (2000) Atoms, Ataraxy, and Allusion: cross-generic imitation of the De rerum natura in early Augustan poetry. Hildesheim.
Gold, B.K. (2012) ‘Patronage and the elegists: social reality or literary construction?’, in B.K. Gold (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, MA-Oxford. 303-17.
Gordon, P. (2002) ‘Some Unseen Monster: Rereading Lucretius on Sex’, in D. Fredrick (ed.), The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power and the Body. Baltimore. 86-109.
Gransden, K.W. (1976) Virgil. Aeneid Book VIII. Cambridge.
Hardie, A. (2013) ‘Empedocles and the Muse of the Agathos Logos’, AJPh 134.2: 209-46.
Hardie, P.R. (1985) ‘Imago mundi: cosmological and ideological aspects of the shield of Aeneas’, JHS 105: 11-31.
———— (1986a) Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.
———— (1986b) ‘Cosmological Patterns in the Aeneid’, PLLS 5: 85-97.
———— (1995) ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos’, CQ 45: 204–14.
———— (2007) ‘Lucretius and later Latin literature in antiquity’, in S. Gillesie and P.R. Hardie (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge. 111-27.
———— (2009) Lucretian Receptions: History, The Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge.
Harrison, S.J. (2007) Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.
Heyworth, S.J. (2007a) (ed.) Sexti Properti Elegi. Oxford.
———— (2007b) Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. Oxford.
Hinds, S.E. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry. Cambridge.
Hollis, A.S. (2007) Fragments of Roman Poetry c. 60 BC-AD 20. Oxford.
Ingleheart, J. (2010) A Commentary on Ovid, Tristia, Book 2. Oxford.
Inwood, B. (2001) The Poem of Empedocles: A Text and Translation with an Introduction. 2nd ed. Toronto.
Janka, M. (1997) Ovid Ars Amatoria Buch 2: Kommmtar. Heidelberg.
Keith, A.M. (2008) Propertius: Poet of Love and Leisure. London.
Kennedy, D.F. (1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.
———— (2013) ‘The political epistemology of infinity’, in D. Lehous, A.D. Morrison, and A. Sharrock (eds.) Lucretius: poetry, philosophy, science. Oxford. 51-68.
Kenney, E.J. (1961) (ed.) P. Ovidi Nasonis Amores, Medicamina Faciei Femineae, Ars Amatoria, Remedia Amoris. Oxford.
———— (1970) ‘Doctus Lucretius’, Mnemosyne 23: 366-92.
King, J. (1998) ‘Erotodidaxis: Iucunda Voluptas in Lucretius 2.3 and Propertius 1.10.3’, in G. L. Schmeling, J. D. Mikalson, P. L. MacKendric (eds.), Qui Miscuit Utile Dulci: Festschrift Essays for Paul Lachlan MacKendrick. Wauconda, Il. 201-22
Knauer, G.N. (1964) Die Aeneis und Homer. Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Hypomnemata 7. Göttingen.
Maltby, R. (2002) Tibullus: Elegies. Text, Introduction and Commentary. ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 41. Cambridge: Francis Cairns.
———— (2009) ‘Tibullus and Ovid’, in P.E. Knox (ed.) A Companion to Ovid. Malden MA and Oxford. 297-93.
Martin, A. and Primavesi, O. (1999) L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666): Introduction, edition, et commentaire. Strasbourg, Berlin and New York.
Merrill, W.A. (1917) Lucreti de Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Berkley.
Miller, J. F. (1997) ‘Lucretian Moments in Ovidian Elegy’, Classical Journal 92: 384-398.
———— (2009) Apollo, Augustus, and the Poets. Cambridge.
Mozley, J.H., rev. G.P. Goold (1979) Ovid: the Art of Love and Other Poems. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.
Murgatroyd, P. (1975) ‘Militia Amoris and the Roman elegists’, Latomus 34: 59-79.
Mynors, R.A.B. (1969) P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford.
Nelis, D.P. (2001) Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius (ARCA 39). Cambridge: Francis Cairns.
———— (2004) ‘Georgics 2.458–542: Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles’, Dictynna 1 (http://dictynna.revues.org/161 [accessed 17.11.2014]).
———— (2009) ‘Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.416–51: Noua monstra and the foedera naturae’, in P.R. Hardie (ed.), Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford. 248–67.
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire. Princeton.
O’Brien, D. (1969) Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle. Cambridge.
———— (2001) ‘Empedocles: the wandering daimon and the two poems’, Aevum Antiquum N.S. 1: 79-179,
O’Rourke, D. (2010) ‘Maxima Roma in Propertius, Virgil, and Gallus’, Classical Quarterly 60.2: 470-85.
———— (2011) ‘‘Eastern’ Elegy and ‘Western’ Epic: reading ‘orientalism’ in Propertius 4 and Virgil’s Aeneid’, Dictynna 8 (http://dictynna.revues.org/699 [accessed 11.12.2014])
———— (2012) ‘Intertextuality in Roman Elegy’, in B.K. Gold (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, Ma-Oxford. 390-409.
———— (forthcoming) ‘Make War not Love: militia amoris and domestic violence in Roman love-elegy’, in M.R. Gale and D.H. Scourfield (eds.) Texts and Violence in Roman Culture. Cambridge.
Pillinger, H.E. (1971) ‘Tibullus 1.10 and Lucretius’, Classical Journal 66.3: 204-8.
Postgate, J.P. (1915) (ed.) Tibulli Aliorumque Carminum Libri Tres (2nd ed.). Oxford.
Postgate, J.P., rev. Goold, G.P. (1988), in F.W. Cornish, J.P. Postgate, and J.W. Mackail, rev. G.P. Goold, Catullus. Tibullus. Pervigilium Veneris. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.
Putnam, M.C.J. (1980) ‘Propertius and the new Gallus fragment’, ZPE 39: 49-56.
———— (1998) Virgil’s Epic Designs: ecphrasis in the Aeneid. New Haven and London.
———— (2005) ‘Virgil and Tibullus 1.1’, CP 100: 123-141.
Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.
Rusten, J.S. (1982) ‘Ovid, Empedocles, and the Minotaur’, AJPh 103: 332-3.
Schiesaro (2007) ‘Lucretius and Roman politics and history’, in S. Gillespie and P.R. Hardie (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge. 41-58.
Schmidt, E.G. (1994) ‘Die Schneeweissen Arme der Venus: zur Homer-Imitation in Vergils Aeneis’, RhM 137: 101-17.
Sedley, D. (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge.
———— (2003) ‘Lucretius and the New Empedocles’, LICS 2.4: 1-12.
Shulman, J. (1981) ‘Te quoque falle tamen: Ovid’s Anti-Lucretian Didactics’, Classical Journal 76: 242-53.
Smith, M.F., rev. Rouse W.H.D. (1992) Lucretius. De Rerum Natura. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.
Sommariva, G. (1980) ‘La parodia di Lucrezio nell’ Ars e nei Remedia Ovidiani’, A&R: 123-4.
Spies, A. (1930) Militat omnis amans: Ein Beitrag zur Bildersprache der antiken Erotik. Diss., Tübingen.
Stahl, H.-P. (1985) Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’: Individual and State under Augustus. Berkeley.
Steudel, M. (1992) Die Lieraturparodie in Ovids Ars Amatoria. Hildesheim, Zürich, and New York.
Tränkle, H. (1960) Die Sprachkunst des Properz und die Tradition der Lateinischen Dichtersprache. Wiesbaden.
Trépanier, S. (2003a) ‘Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 24: 1-57.
———— (2003b) ‘‘We’ and Empedocles’ Cosmic Lottery: P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-1666, Ensemble A’, Mnemosyne 56.4: 385-419.
———— (2004) Empedocles, An Interpretation. New York and London.
Wigodsky, M. (1972) Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. Weisbaden.
Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, trans. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor.