Bakker, F.A. (2016), Epicurean Meteorology. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Bénatouïl, T. (2003), “La méthode épicurienne des explications multiples.” In T. Bénatouïl, V. Laurand and A. Macé (eds.): L’épicurisme antique, Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 15: 15–47.
Berno, F.R. (2011), “Seneca, Catone e due citazioni virgiliane (Sen. epist. 95, 67–71 e 104, 31–32).”, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica ser. 4, 9. 2: 233–253.
Berno, F.R. (2012), “Non solo acqua. Elementi per un diluvio universale nel terzo libro delle Naturales quaestiones.” In M. Beretta, F. Citti, L. Pasetti (eds.): Seneca e le scienze naturali, Florence: Casa Leo S. Olschki. 49–68
Berno, F.R. (2019), “Apocalypses and the Sage. Different Endings of the World in Seneca.”, Gerión 37.1: 75–95.
Berranger-Auserve, D. (2004), “Pindare et Eschyle, deux visions d’une même éruption de l’Etna.” In É. Foulon (ed.): Connaissance et représentations des volcans dans l’Antiquité. Actes du Colloque de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Blaise Pascal, 19–20 septembre 2002. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal. 39–48.
Billault, A. (2004), “Volcanisme et esthétique: À propos du traité Du sublime 35,4.” In É. Foulon (ed.): Connaissance et représentations des volcans dans l’Antiquité. Actes du Colloque de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Blaise Pascal, 19–20 septembre 2002. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal. 193–203.
Booth, W. (1974), A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Borgo, A. (1992), “Presenza ovidiana in Seneca. Un difficile rapporto tra poesia e filosofia.” In L. Spina, M. L. Astarita and A. De Vivo (eds.): Come dice il poeta… percorsi greci e latini di parole poetiche. Naples: Paolo Loffredo Editore. 131–138.
Buglass, A. (2022), “Atomistic Imagery: Repetition and Reflection of the World in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura.” In J. Strauss Clay, A. Vergados (eds.): Teaching through images: imagery in Greco-Roman didactic poetry. Mnemosyne supplements, 450. Leiden/Boston: Brill.105–136.
Buxton, R.G.A. (2016), “Mount Etna in the Greco-Roman imaginaire: Culture and Liquid Fire.” In J. McInerney and I. Sluiter (eds.): Valuing Landscape in Classical Antiquity: Natural Environment and Cultural Imagination. Mnemosyne supplements. Monographs on Greek and Latin language and literature, 393. Leiden/Boston: Brill. 25–45.
Conte, G.B. ([1991] 1994), “Instructions for a Sublime Reader: Form of the Text and Form of Addressee in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura.” In G.B. Conte, Genres and readers: Lucretius, love elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, trans. by Glenn W. Most (Baltimore MD), with reference made to the original 1991 Italian version, Generi e lettori, Milan. 1–34.
Corsi, F.G. (2017), “Il metodo delle molteplici spiegazioni in Diogene di Enoanda.”, Syzetesis 4: 253–284.
Crahay, R. and Hubaux, J. (1958), “Sous le masque de Pythagore. À propos du livre 15 des Métamorphoses.” In N. I. Herescu (ed.): Ovidiana: Recherches sur Ovide, Paris: Les Belles Lettres. 283–300.
De Vivo, A. (1995), “Seneca scienziato e Ovidio.” In I. Gallo and L. Nicastri (eds.): Aetates Ovidianae. Lettori Lettori di Ovidio dall’ antichità al Rinascimento, Naples: Editore Scientifiche Italiane. 39–56.
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (1990a), Tra Ovidio e Seneca. Bologna: Pàtron.
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (1990b), “Seneca, Ovidio e il diluvio.” In Tra Ovidio e Seneca, Bologna: Pàtron. 177–210.
Dupraz, E. (2004), “La représentation du volcanisme dans les Naturales quaestiones de Sénèque.” In É. Foulon (ed.): Connaissance et représentations des volcans dans l’Antiquité. Actes du Colloque de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Blaise Pascal, 19–20 septembre 2002. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal. 231–258.
Fairclough, H.R. (transl.) (1916,11999), Virgil, Vol. 1: Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid 1– 6; rev. G.P. Goold (Loeb Classical Library 63). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fantham, E. (2010), Seneca, Selected Letters. Oxford World’s Classics, Oxford
Gale, M. (2000), Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garani, M. (2007), Empedocles redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius. New York/London: Routledge.
Garani, M. (2009), “Going with the wind: Visualizing Volcanic Eruptions in Pseudo-Vergilian Aetna.” BICS 52: 103–121.
Garani, M. (2020a), “Seneca as Lucretius’ sublime reader (Naturales Quaestiones 3 praef.).” In P. Hardie, V. Prosperi and D. Zucca (eds.): Lucretius Poet and Philosopher. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 105–126.
Garani, M. (2020b), “Seneca on Pythagoras’ mirabilia aquarum (NQ 3.20-1, 25-6; Ovid Met. 15.270-336).” In M. Garani, A.N. Michalopoulos and S. Papaioannou (eds.): Intertextuality in Seneca’s Philosophical Writings. London/New York: Routledge. 198–224.
Garani, M. (2021), “Seneca’s medical imagery in the eschatological flood (Naturales Quaestiones 3.27-30).” Lucius Annaeus Seneca 1: 151–182.
Garani, M. (2022), “Keep up the good work: (Don’t) do it like Ovid (Seneca Naturales Quaestiones 3.27-30).” In G. Williams and K. Volk (eds.), Ovidius Philosophus: Philosophy in Ovid and Ovid as a Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 145–163.
Garani, M. (2024), “Miracula ignium: Theophrastus’ On the Lava Flow in Sicily, pseudo-Aristotle’s De mirabilibus auscultationibus 33–41, and Pliny HN 2.236-238.” In R. Mayhew, A. Zucker, and O. Hellmann (eds.): The Aristotelian Mirabilia and Peripatetic Natural Science (RUSCH series, Routledge). 112–138.
Garani, M. (forthcoming), “It’s the final countdown: Taking the philosophical test on the brink of death (Lucretius’ DRN, Seneca’s Nat. Quaest. 3.27-30).” In G. Kazantzidis (ed.), Lucretian Receptions in Prose (Trends in Classics).
Garani, M., A.N. Michalopoulos and S. Papaioannou (2020), Intertextuality in Seneca’s Philosophical Writings. London/New York: Routledge.
Gatzemeier, S. (2013), Ut ait Lucretius. Die Lukrezrezeption in der lateinischen Prosa bis Laktanz, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Hypomnemata 189).
Glauthier, P. (2023): “The Classical Sublime.” In C. Duffy (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Romantic Sublime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 17–28.
Gowers, E. (2011), “The Road to Sicily: Lucilius to Seneca.” Ramus 40: 168–197
Graver, M. (2015), “The Emotional Intelligence of Epicureans: Doctrinalism and Adaptation in Seneca’s Epistles.” In K. Volk and G.D. Williams (eds.): Roman Reflections: Essays on Latin Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 192–210.
Graver, M. (2020), “Epicurus and Seneca.” In P. Mitsis (ed.): Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism. Oxford. 487–506.
Graver, M. and A.A. Long, (2015), Seneca, Letters on Ethics: To Lucilius. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. The Complete Works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Guittard, C. (2004), “La représentation des volcans chez Lucrèce.” In É. Foulon (ed.): Connaissance et représentations des volcans dans l’Antiquité. Actes du Colloque de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Blaise Pascal, 19–20 septembre 2002. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal. 259–269.
Guzmán Arias, C. (2003), “Ovidio e el Etna.”, QUCC 74.2: 137–145.
Halliwell, S. (2022): Pseudo-Longinus: On the Sublime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hankinson, R.J. (2013), “Lucretius, Epicurus, and the Logic of Multiple Explanations.” In D. Lehoux, A.D. Morrison and A. Sharrock (eds.): Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford. 69–97.
Hardie, P.R. (2009), Lucretian Receptions. History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Hardie, P.R. (1995), “The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos.”, CQ n.s. 45: 204–214 [revised in P.R. Hardie (ed.) (2009), Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 136–152].
Hardie, P.R. (2008), “Lucretian multiple explanations and their reception in Latin didactic and epic.” In M. Beretta and F. Citti (eds.), Lucrezio, la natura e la scienza, Florence: Olschki, 2008 (Biblioteca di Nuncius 66), 69–96. [Now in Hardie, P.R. (2009), Lucretian Receptions. History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. 231–263].
Hardie, P.R. (2015), Ovidio Metamorfosi, vol. vi, libri xiii – xv. Rome; Milan: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla–Arnoldo Mondadori Editore.
Hine, H. M. (2010), Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Natural Questions, translated by Harry M. Hine. Chicago/London.
Hine, H.M. (1996), Lucii Annaei Senecae Naturalium quaestionum libros recognovit. B. G. Teubner.
Hine, H.M. (2002), “Seismology and Vulcanology in Antiquity?” In C.J. Tuplin and T.E. Rihll (eds.), Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 56–75.
Kidd, I.G. (1992), “Theophrastus’ Meteorology, Aristotle, and Posidonius.” In W. Fortenbaugh and D. Gutas (eds.), Theophrastus. His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings. New Brunswick and London. 294–306.
König, J. (2022), The Folds of Olympus: Mountains in Ancient Greek and Roman Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Masi, F.G. (2014), “The Method of Multiple Explanations: Epicurus and the Notion of Causal Possibility.” Ιn C. Natali and C. Viano (éd.), Aitia II. Avec ou sans Aristote: le débat sur les causes à l’âge hellénistique et impérial. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. 37–63.
McGill, S. (2021), Plagiarism in Latin Literature. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, F.J. (1916), Ovid, Metamorphoses. Volume II: Books 9-15. Transl. by F.J. Miller, rev. by G.P. Goold (1984). Loeb Classical Library 43. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Montiglio, S. (2006), “Should the Aspiring Wise Man Travel? A Conflict in Seneca’s Thought.”, AJPh 127: 553–586.
Muecke, D.C. (1969), The Compass of Irony. New York; London: Metheun and Co.
Muecke, D.C. (1970), Irony. London: Metheun and Co.
Myers, K.S. (1994), Ovid’s causes. Cosmogony and aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Papaioannou, S. (2020), “Reading Seneca reading Vergil.” In M. Garani, A.N. Michalopoulos and S. Papaioannou (eds.), Intertextuality in Seneca’s Philosophical Writings. London/New York. 107–129.
Porter, J.I. (2016), The Sublime in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press.
Reydams-Schils, G. (2010), “Seneca’s Platonism. The Soul and Its Divine Origin.” In A. W. Nightingale and D. N. Sedley (eds.), Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. 196–215.
Rouse, W.H. (transl.) (1924,11992), Lucretius; rev. M.F. Smith (Loeb Classical Library 181). London/ Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schiesaro, A. (2015), “Seneca and Epicurus: The Allure of the Other.” In S. Bartsch and A. Schiesaro (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Seneca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 239–251.
Schiesaro, A. (2021), “Lucretius On the Nature of Things: Eschatology in an age of anxiety.” In H. Marlow, K. Pollmann, H. Van Noorden (eds.), Eschatology in antiquity: forms and functions. Rewriting antiquity. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. 280–293.
Smith, M.F. (ed.) (1993), Diogenes of Oenoanda, the Epicurean Inscription (with translation). Naples.
Smolenaars, J.J.L. (2005), “Earthquakes and volcanic eruptions in Latin literature: reflections and emotional responses.” In M.S. Balmuth, D.K. Chester and P.A. Johnston (eds.), Cultural Responses to the Volcanic Landscape: The Mediterranean and Beyond. Archaeological Institue of America, Boston. 311–329.
Stöckinger, M., K. Winter and A. Zanker (eds.) (2017), Horace and Seneca. Interactions, Intertexts, Interpretation. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.
Thomas, R.F. (1999), Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Trinacty, C. (2014), Senecan Tragedy and the Reception of Augustan Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsouna, V. (2023), “The method of multiple explanations revisited.” In F. Masi, P.-M. Morel and F. Verde (eds.), Epicureanism and Scientific Debates. Antiquity and Late Reception: Volume I. Language, Medicine, Meteorology. Leuven: Leuven University Press. 221–256.
Verde, F. (2016), “Posidonius against Epicurus’ Method of Multiple Explanations?”, Apeiron 49: 437–449.
Verde, F. (2018), “Fenomeni fisici e spiegazioni multiple in Lucrezio e nell’Aetna pseudo-virgiliano”, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 99: 523–544.
Verde, F. (2020), “Epicurean Meteorology, Lucretius, and the Aetna.” In P.R. Hardie, V. Prosperi and D. Zucca (eds.), Lucretius Poet and Philosopher: Background and Fortunes of De Rerum Natura. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 83–102.
Verde, F. (2022), Peripatetic Philosophy in Context: Knowledge, Time, and Soul from Theophrastus to Cratippus. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Viarre, S. (2001), “Mythologie et philosophie à propos de l’Etna dans les Métamorphoses d’Ovide.” In D. Bertrand (ed.), Figurations du volcan à la Renaissance. Paris: Classiques Gernier. 25–34.
Wilcox, A. (2008), “Nature’s Monster: Caligula as Exemplum in Seneca’s Dialogues.” In I. Sluiter and R.M. Rosen (eds.), KAKOS: Badness and Anti- Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden/Boston: Brill. 451–75.
Williams, G.D. (2012), The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford University Press.
Williams, G.D. (2014), “Double Vision and Cross-Reading in Seneca’s Epistulae Morales and Naturales Quaestiones.” In J. Wildberger and M. Colish (eds.), Seneca Philosophus. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 135–166
Williams, G.D. (2016), “Minding the Gap: Seneca, the Self, and the Sublime.” In G.D. Williams and K. Volk (eds.), Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 172–191.
Williams, G.D. (2017), Pietro Bembo on Etna: The Ascent of a Venetian Humanist. New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams, G.D. (2021), “Eschatology in Seneca: the senses of an ending.” In H. Marlow, K. Pollmann, H. Van Noorden (eds.), Eschatology in antiquity: forms and functions. Rewriting antiquity. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. 320–332.