Amit, M., & Vinner, S. (1990). Some misconceptions in calculus: Anecdotes or the tip of the iceberg? In G. Booker, P. Cobb, & T. N. de Mendicuti (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 14th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1* (pp. 3-10). Oaxtepec, Mexico: CINVESTAV.

Artigue, M. (1991). Analysis. In D. Tall (Ed.), *Advanced mathematical thinking* (pp. 167-198). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

Asiala, M., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., & Schwingendorf, K. E. (1997). The development of students’ graphical understanding of the derivative. *Journal of Mathematical Behavior*, *16*(4), 399-431.

Bernard, H. (1994). *Research methods in anthropology* (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bingolbali, E., Monaghan, J., & Roper, T. (2007). Engineering students' conceptions of the derivative and some implications for their mathematical education. *International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology*, *38*(6), 763-777.

Bingolbali, E., & Monaghan, J. (2008). Concept image revisited. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, *68*(1), 19-35.

Biza, I., Christou, C., & Zachariades, T. (2008). Student perspectives on the relationship between a curve and its tangent in the transition from Euclidean Geometry to Analysis. *Research in Mathematics Education*, *10*(1), 53-70.

Biza, I., & Zachariades, T. (2010). First year mathematics undergraduates’ settled images of tangent line. *Journal of Mathematical Behavior*, 29, 218-229.

Borwein, J. M., & Bailey, D. H. (2003). *Mathematics by experiment: Plausible reasoning in the 21st century*. AK Peters Ltd.

Borwein, J. M. (2005). The experimental mathematician: The pleasure of discovery and the role of proof. *International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning*,* 10*, 75-108.

Boyatzis, R. (1998). *Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development*. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Bremigan, E. (2005). Analysis of diagram modification and construction in students' solutions to applied calculus problems. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, *36*, 248-277.

Castela, C. (1995). Apprendre avec et contre ses connaissances antérieures: Un example concret, celui de la tangente. *Recherches en Didactiques des Mathématiques*, *15*(1), 7-47.

Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. Tall (Ed.), *Advanced mathematical thinking* (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Davis, R. B., & Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. *Journal of Mathematical Behavior*, *5*(3), 281-303.

Dick, T. P. (2008). Keeping the faith: Fidelity in technological tools for mathematics education. In G. W. Blume & M. K. Heid (Eds.), *Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Vol. 2. Cases and perspectives* (pp. 333-339). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

Dick, T. P., & Edwards, B. S. (2008). Multiple representations and local linearity: Research influences on the use of technology in calculus curriculum reform. In G. W. Blume & M. K. Heid (Eds.), *Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Vol. 2. Cases and perspectives* (pp. 255-275). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), *Constuctivism in the computer age* (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. *Cognition and Instruction*, *22*(3), 293-331.

Duval, R. (1993). Registres de représentation sémiotique et fonctionnement cognitif de la pensée*. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives*, *5*, 37-65.

Eves, H. (2006). *An introduction to the history of mathematics* (6^{th} edition). Brooks/Cole – Thomson Learning.

Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Graham, K. (1994). Research in calculus learning: Understanding of limits, derivatives, and integrals. In J. J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), *Research issues in undergraduate mathematics learning*, MAA Notes (Vol. 33, pp. 31-46). Washington, D. C: Mathematical Association of America.

Frid, S. (1994). Three approaches to calculus instruction: Their nature and potential impact on students’ language use and sources of conviction. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld & J. Kaput (Eds.), *Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education I* (pp. 69-100). Washington, D. C: Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences.

Gass, F. (1992). Limits via graphing technology. *PRIMUS*, *2*(1), 9-15.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). *The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research*. Chicago: Aldine.

González-Martín, A., Bloch, I., Durand-Guerrier, V., Maschietto, M. (2014). Didactic Situations and Didactical Engineering in University mathematics: cases from the study of Calculus and proof. *Research in Mathematics Education*, *16*(2) 117-134.

Harrington, W. J. (2006). Student understanding of the concept of limit in a technological environment. In L. R. van Zoest (Ed.) *Teachers engaged in research : inquiry into mathematics classrooms, grades 9-12* (pp.39-57). Greenwich, CT: IAP-Information Age Publications.

Hughes-Hallett, D. (1991). Visualization and calculus reform. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (Eds.), *Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics* (pp. 121-126). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Izsak, A., Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2009). Meta-representation in a Algebra I classroom. *Journal of the Learning Sciences*, *4*, 549-587.

Katz, V. J. (2009). *A history of mathematics, an introduction, third edition*. Pearson.

Kleiner, I. (2001). History of the infinitely small and the infinitely large in calculus. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, *48*, 137-174.

Kvale, S. (2007). *Doing interviews*. London: Sage.

Lecorre, T. (2015). Définir: une nécessité à construire. Le cas de la définition de la limite d’une fonction. *Repères Irem*, *100*, 51-64.

Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier, (Ed.), *Problems of representations in the teaching and learning of mathematics* (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mamolo, A., & Zazkis, R. (2012). Stuck on convention: A story of derivative-relationship. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, *81*(2), 161-167.

Mamona-Downs, J. (2001). Letting the intuitive bear on the formal: a didactical approach for the understanding of the limit of a sequence. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, *28*, 259-288.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). *Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.

Norman, F. A., & Prichard, M. K. (1994). Cognitive obstacles to the learning of calculus: a Krutetskiian perspective. In J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), *Research issues in undergraduate mathematics learning: Preliminary analyses and results* (pp. 63-78). Mathematical Association of America.

Oehrtman, M. (2009). Collapsing dimensions, physical limitation, and other student metaphors for limit concepts. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, *40*(4), 396-426.

Orton (1983). Students’ understanding of differentiation. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, *14*(3), pp. 235-250.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). *Qualitative research and evaluation methods*. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Przenioslo, M. (2004). Images of the limit of function formed in the course of mathematical studies at the university. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, *55*, 103-132.

Robert, A. (1982). L’acquisition de la notion de convergences des suites numériques dans l’enseignement supérieur. *Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques*, *3*(3), 305-341.

Roberts, W. (1996). A modern course in calculus. In W. Roberts (Ed.), *Calculus: The dynamics of change* (pp. 1-5). Washington, D.C: Mathematical Association of America.

Robinet, J. (1983). Une expérience d’ingénierie didactique sur la notion de limite de fonction. *Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques*, *4*(3), 232-292.

Rogalski, M. (1990). *Comment étudier la convergence d’une suite réelle? Un exemple de méthode. Commission Inter-IREM Université Enseigner autrement les mathématiques en DEUG A première année* (pp. 197-204). Lyon, Paris: IREM Université Paris-Diderot.

Rogalski, M. (2015). De la notion couplée de tangente et dérivée à la notion de limite. In *Autour de la notion de limite en classe de première scientifique*, Brochure Irem n°97, Irem de l’Université Paris-Diderot.

Rogalski, M. (2016). *Revenir au sens de la notion de limite par certaines de ses raisons d’être : un chantier pour le début de l’analyse à l’université*. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01337945/

Schneider, M. (2001). Praxéologies didactiques et praxéologies mathématiques. A propos d’un enseignement des limites au secondaire. *Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques*, *21*(1.2), 7-56.

Sinclair, N. (2008). Computer-based technologies and plausible reasoning. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), *Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics *(pp. 233–244). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Sofronas, K. S., DeFranco, T. C., Vinsonhaler, C., Gorgievski, N., Schroeder, L., & Hamelin, C. (2011). What does it mean for a student to understand the first-year calculus? Perspectives of 24 experts. *The Journal of Mathematical Behavior*, *30*(2), 131-148.

Stewart, J. (2012). *Calculus: Early Transcendentals*. Cengage.

Struik, D. J. (1963). The origin of l'Hopital's rule. *Mathematics Teacher*, *56*(4), 257-260.

Swinyard, C. (2011). Reinventing the formal definition of limit: The case of Amy & Mike. *Journal of Mathematical Behavior*, *30*, 93-114.

Swinyard, C., & Larsen, S. (2012). Coming to understand the formal definition of limit: Insights gained from engaging students in reinvention. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, *43*(4), 465-493.

Szydlik, J. E. (2000). Mathematical beliefs and conceptual understanding of the limit of a function. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, *31*(3), 258-276.

Tall, D. (1987). Constructing the concept image of a tangent. In J. C. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, & C. Kieran (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 11th PME international conference* (Vol. 3, pp. 69-75). Montréal, Canada.

Tall, D. (1991). The psychology of advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), *Advanced Mathematical Thinking* (pp. 3-23). Kluwer: The Netherlands.

Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition with particular reference to limits and continuity. *Educational Studies in Mathematics*, *12*, 151-169.

Thomas, M. O. J., & Holton, D. (2003). Technology as a tool for teaching undergraduate mathematics. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), *Second international handbook of mathematics education* (pp. 347-390). London: Kluwer.

Williams, S. R. (1991). Models of limit held by college calculus students. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, *22*(3), 219-236.

Zimmerman, W. (1991). Visual thinking in calculus. In W. Zimmerman & S. Cunningham (Eds.), *Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics* (pp. 127-137). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Zimmerman, W., & Cunningham, S. (1991). Editor’s introduction: What is mathematical visualization? In W. Zimmerman & S. Cunningham (Eds.), *Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics* (pp. 1-8). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.