Abboud-Blanchard, M., Cazes, C., & Vandebrouck, F. (2007). Teachers’ activity in exercises-based lessons. Some case studies. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), *Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education* (pp. 1826-1836). Larnaca: CERME-5.

Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. *Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,* 3(3), 205–224.

Amarel, M. (1983). Classrooms and computers as instructional settings. *Theory into Practice,* 22, 260-266.

Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. *International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,* 7(3), 245-274.

Artigue, M. (2007). Digital technologies: a window on theoretical issues in mathematics education. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.),*Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education* (pp. 68-82). Larnaca: CERME-5.

Assude. T. (2005). Time management in the work economy of a class. A case study: Integration of Cabri in primary school mathematics teaching. *Educational Studies in Mathematics,* 59(2), 183-203.

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is –or might be– the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform. *Educational Researcher, *25(9), 6-8 & 14.

Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Towards technology integration in schools: Why it isn’t happening. *Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,* 13(4), 519-546.

Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). *Making Sense of Teaching.* Buckingham: Open University Press.

Bueno-Ravel, L., & Gueudet, G. (2007). Online resources in mathematics: Teachers’ genesis of use. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), *Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education* (pp. 1369-1378). Larnaca: CERME-5.

Burns, R. B., & Anderson, L. W. (1987). The activity structure of lesson segments. *Curriculum Inquiry,* 17(1), 31-53.

Burns, R. B., & Lash, A. A. (1986). A comparison of activity structures during basic skills and problem-solving instruction in seventh-grade mathematics. *American Educational Research Journal,* 23(3), 393-414.

Caliskan-Dedeoglu, N. (2006). *Usages de la géométrie dynamique par des enseignants de collège. Des potentialités à la mise en oeuvre: quelles motivations, quelles pratiques.* Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris 7.

Conlon, T., & Simpson, M. (2003). Silicon Valley versus Silicon Glen: the impact of computers upon teaching and learning: a comparative study. *British Journal of Educational Technology,* 34(2), 137-150.

Crisan, C., Lerman, S., & Winbourne, P. (2007). Mathematics and ICT: a framework for conceptualising secondary school teachers’ classroom practices. *Technology, Pedagogy and Education,* 16(2), 21-39.

Cuban, L. (1986). *Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920.* New York: Teachers College Press.

Cuban, L. (1993). Computer meets classroom: Classroom wins. *Teachers College Record,* 95(2), 185-210.

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. *American Educational Research Journal, *38(4), 813-834.

Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2006). Teachers’ developing ‘practical theories’ of the contribution of information and communication technologies to subject teaching and learning: An analysis of cases from English secondary schools. *British Educational Research Journal,* 32(3), 459-480.

Fey, J. (2006). Connecting technology and school mathematics: A review of *The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,* 36(4), 348-352.

Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (in press). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? *Educational Studies in Mathematics.*

Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., & Ruthven, K. (2005). Emerging teacher strategies for mediating technology-integrated instructional conversations: a socio-cultural perspective. *The Curriculum Journal,* 16(3), 265-292.

Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution and change. *Journal of Curriculum Studies,* 37(2), 155-192.

Jenson, J., & Rose, C B. (2006). Finding space for technology: Pedagogical observations on the organization of computers in school environments. *Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology* 32(1). Accessed at http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol32.1/jenson.html

Jewitt, C., Moss, G., & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers’ design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom. *Learning, Media and Technology, *32(3), 303-317.

Kennedy, M. M. (1999). Ed schools and the problem of knowledge. In J. Raths & A. McAninch (Eds.), *What counts as Knowledge in Teacher Education?* (pp. 29-45). Stamford, CT: Ablex.

Kerr, S. (1991). Lever and fulcrum: Educational technology in teachers’ thought and practice. *Teachers College Record,* 93(1), 114-136.

Kroath, F. (1989). How do teachers change their practical theories? *Cambridge Journal of Education*, 19(1), 59-69.

Kynigos, C., Bardini, C., Barzel, B., & Maschietto, M. (2007). Tools and technologies in mathematical didactics. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), *Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education* (pp. 1332-1338). Larnaca: CERME-5.

Lagrange, J.-B., & Caliskan-Dedeoglu, N. (in press). Usages de la technologie dans des conditions ordinaires: Le cas de la géométrie dynamique au collège: Potentialités, attentes, pratiques. *Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques.*

Leinhardt, G. (1988). Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.) *Teachers’ Professional Learning *(pp. 146-168). London: Falmer.

Leinhardt, G., Putnam T., Stein, M.K., & Baxter, J. (1991). Where Subject Knowledge Matters. *Advances in Research in Teaching,* 2, 87-113.

Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K. M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. *Curriculum Inquiry,* 17(2), 135-176.

Monaghan, J. (2004). Teachers’ activities in technology-based mathematics lessons. *International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,* 9(3), 327-357.

Morgan, C. (1990). Carry on SMILEing. *Micromath,* 6(3), 14-15.

Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2006). *Interactive whiteboard evaluation for the Secondary National Strategy: Developing the use of interactive whiteboards in mathematics: Final report.* Keele: Keele University.

Mullis, I., Martin, M., Gonzalez, E., & Chrostowski, S. (2004). *TIMMS 2003 International Mathematics Report.* Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001) Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), *Handbook of Research on Teaching*, Fourth Edition (pp. 877-904). New York: Macmillan.

Papert, S. (1997). Why school reform is impossible. *The Journal of the Learning Sciences, *6(4), 417-427.

Remillard, J. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. *Review of Educational Research,* 75(2), 211-246.

Ruthven, K. (2002a). Linking researching with teaching: towards synergy of scholarly and craft knowledge. In L. English (Ed.), *Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education *(pp. 581-598). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ruthven, K. (2002b). Instrumenting mathematical activity: Reflections on key studies of the educational use of computer algebra systems. *International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,* 7(3), 275-291.

Ruthven, K. (2007). Teachers, technologies and the structures of schooling. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), *Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education* (pp. 52-67). Larnaca: CERME-5.

Ruthven, K. (in press). The didactical challenge of technology integration in school mathematics. In D. Moreira (Ed.), *Proceedings of the 17*^{th}* Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Section of the Portuguese Society for Educational Sciences*.

Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2002). A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning. *Educational Studies in Mathematics,* 49(1), 47-88.

Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school English, Mathematics and Science. *Teaching and Teacher Education,* 20(3), 259-275.

Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2005a). Incorporating dynamic geometry systems into secondary mathematics education: Didactical perspectives and practices of teachers. In D. Wright (Ed.), *Moving on with Dynamic Geometry* (pp. 138-158). Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics.

Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2005b). Incorporating Internet resources into classroom practice: Pedagogical perspectives and strategies of secondary-school subject teachers. *Computers and Education,* 44(1), 1-34.

Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: a study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. *Computers and Education, *51(1), 297-317.

Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., Angeles, J., & Greene, B. (2000). *Teachers’ tools for the 21*^{st}* century: A report on teachers’ use of technology. *Washington DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. *Review of Educational Research,* 72(3), 387-431.

Trouche, L. (2005). Instrumental genesis, individual and social aspects. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven, & L. Trouche (Eds.), *The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument* (pp. 197-230)*.* New York: Springer.

Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? *American Educational Research Journal,* 31(3), 453-479.

Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2005). *First year evaluation report: Fullerton School District Laptop Program.* Irvine CA: University of California, Irvine.

Wood, D. (1998). *The UK ILS evaluations: Final report.* Coventry: BECTA.

Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,* 27(4), 458-477.

Zucker, A., & McGhee, R. (2005). *A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary Level in Henrico County public schools.*Menlo Park CA: SRI International.