Skip to navigation – Site map

HomeElectronic supplementsBook reviews2018Reviews 2018-3Petr Antene, Campus Novel Variati...

2018
Reviews 2018-3

Petr Antene, Campus Novel Variations: A Comparative Study of an Anglo-American Genre

Evangelia Kyriakidou

Full text

1Petr Antene, Campus Novel Variations: A Comparative Study of an Anglo-American Genre

2Palacky University Olomouc, 2015. Pp. ISBN 978-80-244-4859-6

3Evangelia Kyriakidou

4Petr Antene’s monograph came out in 2015 by Palacky University Olomouc and it originated as the author’s PhD dissertation. In his introduction, Antene does a literature review on the existing research on the campus novel proving that there is a persisting scholarly interest in the genre but also pointing out the fact that no other monograph has systematically compared the development of the campus novel in Britain and America as his current work.

5The author not only provides his readership with a thorough chronological overview of the campus novel from the 1950s to 2000s but he also compares and contrasts the American and British campus novel concluding that the authors of the British campus novel are far more diverse than their American counterparts. Another interesting finding of Campus Novel Variations is that campus novels foster satire alongside their comic elements. The author claims that the type of satire inherent in the campus novel targets the various problematic aspects of the academic world while at the same time trying to—in the words of the author—“reform” them. To achieve this Antene masterfully compares two representative texts from each decade, starting from the fifties and reaching the early 2000s, in each chapter. In this way, a British and an American campus novel are examined and juxtaposed to each other chapter by chapter. The first duo of campus novels to be examined by Antene is Kingsley Amis Lucky Jim and Vladimir Nabokov’s Pnin. The chapter deals with outsiders in Academia in the fifties. Antene sees a pattern of difference between the “more light-hearted British campus novel and its darker American counterpart” (36) while underlining the fact that academic politics and conflicts within Academia are portrayed in the campus novels of the following decades.

6The next chapter deals with the sixties and examines Malcolm Bradbury’s Stepping Westward and Bernard Malamud’s A New Life. The author points out that although there are significant similarities to Bradbury and Malamud’s approach to academia: Bradbury employs a comic tone while Malamud presents a far more complicated depiction of university life. His seventies chapter investigates issues of adultery and student unrest in Alison Lurie’s The War Between the Tates and David Lodge’s Changing Places: A Tale of Two Campuses. Apart from the mild satire and comic tone employed by both Lurie and Lodge to depict academic life in the late sixties both texts encourage the need for reformation in higher education and academia by making the characters that oppose the student unrest leave academia. The next chapter analyzes the eighties in academia through Don DeLillo’s White Noise and David Lodge’s Nice Work. Lodge validates feminist theory and embraces its insertion in the more traditional university curriculum, while DeLillo heavily satirizes the consumer culture that has infiltrated academia as well as the too narrow specialization within the university in the example of the field of Hitler Studies that Jack Gladney introduced to the fictional Midwestern College-on-the-Hill. Antene places the two campus novels within the comic literary tradition since both novels end with an affirmative ending that reflects the need to restore order. The chapter devoted to the nineties views academic research as a form of detection and focuses on A.S. Byatt’s Possession: A Romance and Michael Dorris and Louise Erdrich’s The Crown of Columbus. The author contends that the ground-breaking discoveries in both novels transform the depiction of academic research from a pedantic pursuit into a significant occupation while at the same time the presentation of personal relationships within academia paints a more humane picture of academics. The satirical elements in both campus novels target the division of the academic world into conservative traditionalists and postmodern theorists pointing out to the need of synthesizing both trends in order to achieve well-rounded research.

7Antene concludes his campus novel juxtaposition with the early 2000s in a chapter that investigates racial conflict in academia through a thorough examination of Philip Roth’s The Human Stain and Zadie Smith’s On Beauty. Both novels, as the author explains, have similar satirical targets, yet Smith depicts higher education reform as easier to implement as opposed to the darker tone adopted by Roth who opts for minimal humorous touches and chooses to end the novel with the tragic demise of the protagonist and his loved-one. The author argues that The Human Stain gives a dark image of academia full of corruption and power struggles while in On Beauty academia is demonstrated as able to change with the contribution of students.

8In his textual analysis Antene has used Christian Gutleben’s distinction between the tone of a text and its final effect, its mode. He has argued that campus novels employ comic tone with a satirical effect in order to bring out the vices in academia and eventually seek to modify the academic world. Campus Novel Variations is a useful book for students as well as scholars who wish to kick-start their research on the Anglophone campus novel. It is also a straightforward and well-researched piece of work that highlights the importance and relevance of the campus novel as a genre that reflects the changes in Anglo-American higher education.

Top of page

References

Electronic reference

Evangelia Kyriakidou, “Petr Antene, Campus Novel Variations: A Comparative Study of an Anglo-American GenreEuropean journal of American studies [Online], Book reviews, Online since 07 January 2019, connection on 18 April 2024. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejas/13489; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.13489

Top of page

Copyright

CC-BY-NC-4.0

The text only may be used under licence CC BY-NC 4.0. All other elements (illustrations, imported files) are “All rights reserved”, unless otherwise stated.

Top of page
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search