Campos Daniel, (2011), “On the Distinction between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation,” Synthese, 180, 419-42. Online: doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9709-3.
Chakravartty Anjan, (2017), “Scientific Realism,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Online: plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/.
Churchland Paul M. & Clifford A. Hooker, (1985), Images of Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Chiason Phyllis, (2001) “Abduction as an Aspect of Retroduction,” Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce. Online: www.digitalpeirce.fee.unicamp.br/home.htm.
Cohen Laurence Jonathan, (1992), Belief and Acceptance, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Conee Earl & Richard Feldman, (2004), Evidentialism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
De Regt Henk W., Leonelli Sabina & Kai Eigner, (2009), Scientific Understanding, Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh University Press.
DeRose Keith, (1991), “Epistemic Possibilities,” Philosophical Review, 100, 581-605.
Dougherty Trent, (2011), Evidentialism and its Discontents, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Foley Richard, (1994), “Pragmatic Reasons for Belief,” in Jeff Jordan (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 31-46.
Gabbay Dov M. & John Woods, (2005), The Reach of Abduction, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Gutting Gary, (1980), “Science as Discovery,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 131, 26-48.
Hanson Norwood Russell, (1958), Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hanson Norwood Russell, (1960), “Is there a Logic of Scientific Discovery?,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 38, 91-106.
Hanson Norwood Russell, (1965), “Notes Toward a Logic of Discovery,” in Richard J. Bernstein (ed.), Perspectives on Peirce. Critical Essays on Charles Sanders Peirce, New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 42-65.
Hintikka Jaakko, (1998), “What is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34, 503-33.
Hoyningen-Huene Paul, (1987), “Context of Discovery and Context of Justification,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 18, 501-15.
Huemer Michael, (2007), “Epistemic Possibility,” Synthese, 156, 119-42. Online: doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-4782-8.
Kapitan Tomis, (1990) “In What Way is Abductive Inference Creative?,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 26, 499-512.
Kapitan Tomis, (1992), “Peirce and the Autonomy of Abductive Reasoning,” Erkenntnis, 37, 1-26.
Kapitan Tomis, (1997), “Peirce and the Structure of Abductive Inference,” in Nathan Houser, Don D. Roberts & James Van Evra (eds), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 477-96.
Khalifa Kareem, (2010), “Default Privilege and Bad Lots: Underconsideration and Explanatory Inference,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 24, 91-105.
Kordig Carl, (1978), “Discovery and Justification,” Philosophy of Science, 45, 110-7.
Laudan Larry, (1977), Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, London, Routledge.
Laudan Larry, (1980), “Why was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned?,” in Thomas Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality, Dordrecht, D. Reidel, 173-84.
Laudan Larry, (1981), “A Problem-Solving Approach to Scientific Progress,” in Ian Hacking (ed.), Scientific Revolutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Leplin Jarrett, (1984), Scientific Realism, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Leplin Jarrett, (1987), “The Bearing of Discovery on Justification,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17, 805-14.
Lipton Peter, (2004), Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd ed., London, Routledge.
Marxen Chad, (forthcoming), “Epistemic Utility Theory’s Difficult Future,” Synthese.
McCain Kevin & Ted Poston, (2017), Best Explanation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
McKaughan Daniel J., (2008), “From Ugly Duckling to Swan: C. S. Peirce, Abduction and the Pursuit of Scientific Theories,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 44, 446-68.
McMullin Ernan, (1992), The Inference that Makes Science, Marquette, Marquette University Press.
Nickles Thomas, (1980), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality, Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
Niiniluoto Iikka, (2018), Truth-seeking by Abduction, Cham, Springer.
Park Woosuk, (2015), “On Classifying Abduction,” Journal of Applied Logic, 13, 215-38.
Peirce Charles Sanders, (1931-35), The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (vol. I-VI), Cambridge, Harvard University Press. [CP]
Peirce Charles Sanders, (1976), The New Elements of Mathematics of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 1-4, ed. by Carolyn Eisele, The Hague, Mouton.
Pettigrew Richard, (2016), Accuracy and the Laws of Credence, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Popper Karl, (1959 [1934]), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York, Routledge.
Psillos Statis, (1996), “On van Fraassen’s Critique of Abductive Reasoning,” Philosophical Quarterly, 46, 31-47.
Psillos Statis, (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, Routledge.
Reichenbach Hans, (1938), Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Schickore Jutta, (2018), “Scientific Discovery,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Online: plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/scientific-discovery/.
Shaffer Michael, (2006), “The Publicity of Belief, Morality and Epistemic Norms,” Social Epistemology, 20, 41-54.
Shaffer Michael, (2011), “Three Problematic Theories of Conditional Acceptance,” Logos & Episteme, 2 (1), 117-25.
Shaffer Michael, (2012), Counterfactuals and Scientific Realism, New York, Palgrave-MacMillan.
Shaffer Michael, (2013a), “Doxastic Voluntarism, Epistemic Deontology and Belief-contravening Commitments,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 73-82.
Shaffer Michael, (2013b), “Epistemic Paradox and the Logic of Acceptance,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 25, 337-53.
Shaffer Michael J., (2019), “The Availability Heuristic and Inference to the Best Explanation,” Logos & Episteme, 10 (4), 409-32.
Shaffer Michael J., (2020), “Unification and the Myth of Purely Reductive Understanding,” Organon F 27, 142-68.
Shaffer Michael J., (2021), “Van Fraassen’s Best of a Bad Lot Objection, IBE and Rationality,” Logique et Analyse, 255, 267-73.
van Fraassen Bas C., (1989), Laws and Symmetry, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Woods John, (2013), Errors of Reasoning, London, College Publications.
Wray K. Brad, (2006), Exceeding our Grasp, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Wray K. Brad, (2007) “A Selectionist Explanation of the Success and Failures of Science,” Erkenntnis, 67, 81-9.
Wray K. Brad, (2008) “The Argument from Underconsideration as Grounds for Anti-Realism: A Defense,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22, 317-26.
Zahar Elie, (1983), “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Invention?,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 34, 243-61.
Zemach Eddy, (1997), “Pragmatic Reasons for Belief?,” Nous, 4, 525-7.