Bella Michela & Thibaud Trochu, (2022), “William James: lectures européennes,” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 147(4), 447-54.
Bessire Lucas & David Bond, (2014), “Ontological Anthropology and the Deferral of Critique,” American Ethnologist, 41(3), 440-56. Online: https://www.bennington.edu/sites/default/files/sources/docs/Bond_David-Bessire_Lucas-Ontological_Anthropology_and_the_Deferral_of_Critique_2014_AE.pdf.
Charbonnier Pierre, Salmon Gildas & Peter Skafish (eds), (2017), Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology after Anthropology, London, Rowman & Littlefield.
Cefaï Daniel, (2023), “Le public selon Bruno Latour,” Pragmata. Revue d’études pragmatistes, 6, 583-696. Online: https://revuepragmata.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pragmata-2023-n6-19-daniel-cefai.pdf.
De la Cadena Marisol & Mario Blaser (eds), (2018), A World of Many Worlds, Durham, Duke University Press.
Debaise Didier, (2023), “La terre des modernes: le sens du pragmatisme de Bruno Latour,” Pragmata. Revue d’études pragmatistes, 6, 408-24. Online: https://revuepragmata.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pragmata-2023-n6-13-didier-debaise.pdf.
Descola Philippe, (2014a), “Modes of Being and Forms of Predication,” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 271-80. Online: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.14318/hau4.1.012.
Descola Philippe, (2014b/2024), The Composition of Worlds: Interviews with Pierre Charbonnier, Cambridge Polity.
Edie James, (1987), William James and Phenomenology, Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
Elam Mark, (1999), “Living Dangerously with Bruno Latour in a Hybrid World,” Theory, Culture & Society, 16(4), 1-24.
Escobar Arturo, (2020), Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible, Durham, Duke University Press.
Fortun Kim, (2014) “From Latour to Late Industrialism,” Hau: Journal of Anthropological Theory, 4(1), 309-29. Online: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.14318/hau4.1.017.
Frigerio Christian, (2024), “The Flywheel of the Collective: Bruno Latour on Aesthetic Habits and the Practice of Sensibility,” Aisthesis, 17(1), 93-109. Online: https://mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/4208/3307.
Gabriel Markus, (2015), Fields of Sense: A New Realist Ontology, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
Gallagher Shaun, (2009), “Delusional Realities,” in Matthew R. Broome & Lisa Bortolotti (eds), Psychiatry as Cognitive Neuroscience: Philosophical Perspectives, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 245-66.
Gamberi Valentina, (2019), “Metamorfosi: decolonizzazione vera o apparente?,” in Roberto Brigati & Valentina Gamberi (eds), Metamorfosi: la svolta ontologica in antropologia, Macerata, Quodlibet, 11-52.
Gille Baptiste, (2017), “Ordering What is: The Political Implications of Ontological Knowledge,” in Pierre Charbonnier, Gildas Salmon & Peter Skafish (eds), Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology after Anthropology, London, Rowman & Littlefield, 301-26.
Graeber David, (2013), “It is Value that Brings Universes Into Being,” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 219-43. Online: https://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/article/view/hau3.2.012.
Hennion Antoine, (2018), “Préface,” in François Thoreau & Ariane D’Hoop (eds), L’Appel des entités fragile: enquêter avec les modes d’existence de Bruno Latour, Liège, Presse universitaires de Liège, 7-12.
Hennion Antoine, (2023), “Introduction,” Pragmata. Revue d’études pragmatistes, 6, 296-340. Online: https://revuepragmata.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pragmata-2023-n6-9-antoine-hennion.pdf.
Heywood Paolo, (2012), “Anthropology and What There is: Reflections on ‘Ontology’,” Cambridge Anthropology, 30(1), 143-51.
James William, (1889), “The Psychology of Belief,” Mind, 14(55), 321-52. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2247316.pdf.
James William, (1890a/2019), The Principles of Psychology, vol. I, New York, Dover.
James William, (1890b/2019), The Principles of Psychology, vol. II, New York, Dover.
James William, (1909), The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to Pragmatism, New York, Longmans.
James William, (1910/2009), A Pluralistic Universe, Rockville, Arc Manor.
James William, (1911), Some Problems of Philosophy, New York, Longmans.
James William, (1912), Essays in Radical Empiricism, New York, Longmans.
Kersten Fred, (1969), “Franz Brentano and William James,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 7(2), 177-91. Online: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/229468/pdf.
Latour Bruno, (1996/2010), On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods, Durham, Duke University Press.
Latour Bruno, (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Latour Bruno, (2007a), “A Textbook Case Revisited: Knowledge as Mode of Existence,” in Edward J. Hackett (ed.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 83-112.
Latour Bruno, (2007b), “Turning Around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries’ Paper,” Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 811-20. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25474548.
Latour Bruno, (2011), “Love your Monsters,” in Ted Nordhaus & Michael Shellenberger (eds), Love your Monsters: Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene, New York, Breakthrough, 17-25.
Latour Bruno, (2012/2013), An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Latour Bruno, (2014), “Another Way to Compose the Common World,” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 301-7. Online: https://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/article/view/hau4.1.016.
Latour Bruno, (2015), “Waking Up From ‘Conjecture’ As Well As From ‘Dream’ – A Presentation of AIME,” Tsantsa, 20, 34-40. Online: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/133-GAD-TSANTSA-2015pdf.pdf.
Latour Bruno & Christophe Leclercq (eds), (2016), Reset Modernity!, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
Linschoten Johannes, (1961), Auf dem Wege zu einer Phänomenologischen Psychologie: Die Psychologie von William James, Berlin, De Gruyter.
Mallavarapu Srikanth & Prasad Amit, (2006), “Facts, Fetishes, and the Parliament of Thing: Is there Any Space for Critique?,” Social Epistemology, 20(2), 185‐99. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720600784782.
Maniglier Patrice, (2014), “A Metaphysical Turn? Bruno Latour’s An Inquiry into Modes of Existence,” Radical Philosophy, 187, 37-40.
Marty Anton, (1892), “Anzeige von William James’ Werk ‘Principles of Psychology’,” in Anton Marty, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. I/1, Mit einem Lebensabriss und einem Bildnis, Niemeyer, Halle, 105-56.
Mulligan Kevin, (2019), “Modes of Being and the Mind,” in Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Quo Vadis, Metaphysics? Essays in Honor of Peter van Inwagen, Berlin, De Gruyter, 183-202.
Querejazu Amaya, (2016), “Encountering the Pluriverse: Looking for Alternatives in other Worlds,” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 59(2). Online: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbpi/a/3pnFKpXVxnqS4vs5jBPwJXv/?lang=en.
Ramos Alcida, (2012), “The Politics of Perspectivism,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 481-94.
Salinas Francisco, (2014), “Bruno Latour’s Pragmatic Realism: An Ontological Inquiry,” Global Discourse, 1-14. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2014.992597.
Schmidgen Henning, (2016), “Mode d’existence: Memoir of a Concept,” in Bruno Latour & Christophe Leclercq (eds), Reset Modernity!, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 320-7.
Serres Michel, (2003), “The Science of Relations: An Interview,” Angelaki, 8(2), 227-38.
Sheehey Bonnie, (2019), “Methodologies of Travel: William James and the Ambulatory Pragmatism of Bruno Latour,” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 33(4), 571-89.
Simondon Gilbert, (1958/2017), On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, Minneapolis, Univocal.
Souriau Étienne, (1943/2015), The Different Modes of Existence, Minneapolis, Univocal.
Todd Zoe, (2016), “An Indigenous Feminist’s Take on the Ontological Turn: ‘Ontology’ is just Another Word for Colonialism,” Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4-22.
Veyne Paul, (1983), Did the Greeks believe in their Myths?, Chicago, The Chicago University Press.
Viveiros de Castro Eduardo, (1996/2014), Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology, Minneapolis, Univocal.
Viveiros de Castro Eduardo, (2016), “On the Modes of Existence of the Extramoderns,” in Bruno Latour & Christophe Leclercq (eds), Reset Modernity!, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 491-6.
Walton Kendall, (1990), “Existence as Metaphor?,” in Anthony Everett & Thomas Hofweber (eds), Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-Existence, Stanford, CSLI Publications, 69-94.
Watson Matthew, (2014), “Derrida, Stengers, Latour, and Subalternist Cosmopolitics,” Theory, Culture & Society, 31(1), 75-98.
Weber Tomas, (2016), “Metaphysics of the Common World: Whitehead, Latour, and the Modes of Existence,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 30(4), 515-33.
Wilde Jessica, (2013), “Mit Bruno Latour auf der Spur zu einer pragmatistischen Sozialtheorie,” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38, 215-39.





