Bauters M., (2006), “Semiosis of (Target) Groups: Peirce, Mead and the Subject,” Subject Matters 206 (2[2]), 73-102.
Bergman M., (2000a), Meaning and Mediation: Toward a Communicative Interpretation of Peirce’s Theory of Signs, Helsinki, Dept. of Communication.
Bergman M., (2000b), “Reflections of the Role of the Communicative Sign in Semeiotic,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36 (2), 225-54.
Bergman M., (2004), “Fields of Signification: Explorations in Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of Signs,” Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 6.
Bergman M., (2009), Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication, London-New York, Continuum.
Haaparanta L., (1994), “Peirce and the Logic of Logical Discovery,” in E. C. Moore (ed.), Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science: Papers from the Harvard Sesquicentennial Congress, Tuscaloosa and London, The University of Alabama Press, 105-18.
Hartama-Heinonen R., (2012), “‘Interpretation is Merely Another Word for Translation.’ A Peircean Approach to Translation, Interpretation and Meaning,” COLLEGIUM: Studies across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences 7, 113-29.
Hilpinen R., (1982), “On C. S. Peirce’s Theory of the Proposition: Peirce as a Precursor of Game-Theoretical Semantics,” The Monist 65 (2), 182-88.
Hilpinen R., (1992), “On Peirce’s Philosophical Logic: Propositions and Their Objects,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (3), 467-88.
Hilpinen R., (2011), “Remarks on the Iconicity and Interpretation of Existential Graphs,” Semiotica 186, 169-87.
Hintikka J., (1976), “Quine vs. Peirce?,” Dialectica 30 (1), 7-8.
Hintikka J., (1980), “C. S. Peirce’s ‘First Real Discovery’ and Its Contemporary Relevance,” The Monist 63 (3), 304-15.
Hintikka J., (1998), “What Is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (3).
Kaila E., (1934), Persoonallisuus [Personality], Helsinki, Otava.
Ketonen O., (1954), “John Dewey 1859-1952,” Ajatus 18, 85-98.
Kilpinen E., (2000), The Enormous Fly-Wheel of Society: Pragmatism’s Habitual Conception of Rationality and Social Theory, Research Reports 235, Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Kilpinen E., (2010), “Problems in Applying Peirce in Social Sciences,” in Mats Bergman, Sami Paavola, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds), Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference, Helsinki, Nordic Pragmatism Network, 86-104.
Kirjavainen H., (1999), “Peirce, Rantala and Theological Semiotics,” Acta Semiotica Fennica 7 (Eero Tarasti (ed.), Snow, Forest, Silence: The Finnish Tradition of Semiotics), 81-94.
Knuuttila T., (2010), “Not Just Underlying Structures: Towards a Semiotic Approach to Scientific Representation and Modeling” in Mats Bergman, Sami Paavola, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds), Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference, Helsinki, Nordic Pragmatism Network, 163-72.
Määttänen P., (2007), “Semiotics of Space: Peirce and Lefebvre,” Semiotica 166 (1/4), 453-61.
Marila M., (2013), “Abduktiivinen päättely arkeologiassa: Arkeologian epistemologiasta sen historian ja nykytilanteen valossa” [“Abductive Reasoning in Archaeology. On the Epistemology of Archaeology in Light of Its History and Current Situation”], Muinaistutkija 3, 45-63.
Niiniluoto I., (1993), “Peirce’s Theory of Statistical Explanation,” in E. C. Moore (ed.), Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press.
Niiniluoto I., (2010), “Peirce, Abduction and Scientific Realism,” in Mats Bergman, Sami Paavola, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds), Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference, Helsinki, Nordic Pragmatism Network, 252-63.
Paavola S., (2006). On the Origin of Ideas: An Abductivist Approach to Discovery, Doctoral dissertation, Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 15.
Paavola S., Hakkarainen K. & M. Sintonen, (2006), “Abduction with Dialogical and Trialogical Means,” Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2), 137-50.
Pietarinen A.-V., (2004), “Peirce’s Magic Lantern: Moving Pictures of Thought,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society.
Pietarinen A.-V., (2006), Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication, Dordrecht, Springer.
Pietarinen A.-V., (2010), “Challenges and Opportunities for Existential Graphs,” in Mats Bergman, Sami Paavola, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds), Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference, Helsinki, Nordic Pragmatism Network, 288-303.
Pihlström S., (1998), “Peircean Scholastic Realism and Transcendental Arguments,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (2), 382-413.
Pihlström S., (2004), “Peirce’s Place in the Pragmatist Tradition,” in Cheryl Misak (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 27-57.
Rantala V., (2002), Explanatory Translation: Beyond the Kuhnian Model of Conceptual Change, New York, Kluwer.
Rydenfelt H., (2011), “Epistemic Norms and Democracy: A Response to Talisse,” Metaphilosophy 42 (5).
Rydenfelt H., (2014), “Realism without Mirrors,” in M. C. Galavotti, D. Dieks, W. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds), New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, New York, Springer.
Tarasti E., (2006), “Peirceläistä käännösteoriaa” [“Peircean Theory of Translation”], Synteesi 25 (1), 94-96.
Veivo H., (2011), Portti ja polku. Tutkimus kirjallisuuden semiotiikasta [The Gate and the Path. A Study on the Semiotics of Literature], Helsinki, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
Vehkavaara T., (2005), “Limitations on Applying Peircean Semeiotic. Biosemiotics as Applied Objective Ethics and Esthetics rather than Semeiotic,” Journal of Biosemiotics 1 (2), 269-308.





