Adak, Sevgi ; Lamprou, Alekos (2023). ‘Giriş: Tek Parti Dönemini Yeniden Düşünmek’, in Adak, Sevgi; Lamprou, Alekos (eds.), Tek Parti Dönemini Yeniden Düşünmek: Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset, Istanbul, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
Akçam, Taner (1991). Türk Ulusal Kimliği ve Ermeni Sorunu, Istanbul, İletişim.
Akın, Yiğit (2007). ‘Reconsidering State, Party, and Society in Early Republican Turkey: Politics of Petitioning’, International Journal of Middle East Studies 39 (3), pp. 435-457.
Alemdaroğlu, Ayça (2022), ‘The University in the Making of Authoritarian Turkey’, European Journal of Turkish Studies 34. https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/8114
Aydın, Hakan ; Çağlar, İsmail ; Üslü, İbrahim, eds. (2023). Yalan Haber, Nefret Söylemi ve Kültürel Irkçılık Kıskacında İslam. I. Uluslararası Medya ve İslamofobi Sempozyumu Bildirileri, Ankara, Radyo ve Televizyon Üst Kurulu. URL: https://www.erciyes.edu.tr/EditorUpload/Files/2d6c54c4-7bf5-4d26-b6e2-921b28c8a41f.pdf
Aymes, Marc ; Gourisse, Benjamin ; Massicard, Élise (2013). L’Art de l’État en Turquie. Arrangements de l’action publique de la fin de l’Empire ottoman à nos jours, Paris, Karthala.
Aytürk, İlker (2011). ‘The Racist Critics of Atatürk and Kemalism, from the 1930s to the 1960s’, Journal of Contemporary History 46 (2), pp. 308-335.
Aytürk, İlker (2015). ‘Post-post-Kemalizm: Yeni Bir Paradigmayı Beklerken’, Birikim 319, pp. 34-48.
Aytürk, İlker (2019). ‘Post-Kemalizm Nedir? Post-Kemalist Kimdir? Bir Tanım Denemesi’, Varlık 1337, pp. 4-7.
Aytürk, İlker (2020). ‘Bir Defa Daha Post-Post-Kemalizm: Eleştiriler, Cevaplar, Düşünceler’, Birikim 374-375, pp. 101-119.
Aytürk, İlker (2021a). ‘In the Turkish Context, the Term Conservatism Creates More Problems of Categorization than It Solves…”, European Journal of Turkish Studies 33. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/7582
Aytürk, İlker (2021b). ‘Post-post-kemalismo: in attesa di un nuovo paradigma’, Rivista italiana di storia internazionale IV (2), pp. 337-364
Aytürk, İlker (2022). ‘Erken Cumhuriyet’te Modernleşme, Laiklik ve Milliyetçilik: Mete Tunçay’ın Tek-Parti’sinin Kırk Yıl Gecikmiş Bir Eleştirisi’, in Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk (eds.), Post-Post-Kemalizm. Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar, Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 315-353.
Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk eds. (2022a). Post-Post-Kemalizm. Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar, Istanbul, İletişim.
Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk (2022b). ‘Önsöz’, in Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk (eds.), Post-Post-Kemalizm. Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar, Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 7-21.
Bayraktar, Seyhan (2015). ‘The Grammar of Denial: State, Society, and Turkish-Armenian Relations’, International Journal of Middle East Studies 47, pp. 801-806.
Beşikçi, İsmail (1977). Türk Tarih Tezi, Güneş-Dil Teorisi ve Kürt Sorunu, Istanbul, Komal Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
Bloch, Marc (2006). ’Apologie pour l’histoire ou métier d’historien (1949)’, in L’Histoire, la Guerre, la Résistance (Becker, Annette, préf.), Paris, Quarto Gallimard, pp. 843-985.
Bohnstedt, John W. (1968). The Infidel Scourge of God. The Turkish Menace as Seen by German Pamphleteers of the Reformation Era, Philadelphia, The American Philosophical Society.
Bonin, Hubert (2007). Compte rendu de ‘Lefeuvre Daniel, Pour en finir avec la repentance coloniale, Paris, Flammarion, 2006’, Outre-Mers. Revue d’Histoire, pp. 354-355.
Bora, Tanıl (2017a). Cereyanlar. Türkiye’de Siyasi İdeolojiler, Istanbul, İletişim.
Bora, Tanıl (2017b). ‘Kemalizm ve ’Eleştirinin Eleştirisi’’, Birikim.
URL: https://birikimdergisi.com/haftalik/8395/kemalizm-ve-elestirinin-elestirisi
Bora, Tanıl (2022). ‘Kemalist Kültüralizm: Eleştirinin Eleştirisi ve Ayrışmalar’, in Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk (eds.), Post-Post-Kemalizm. Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar, Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 277-313.
Bora, Tanıl ; Taşkın, Yüksel (2002). ‘Sağ Kemalizm’, in Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce, III, Kemalizm. Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 518-545.
Bouquet, Olivier (2020). ‘Erdogan et la politique de l’histoire en Libye’, Le Monde, 9 janvier.
Bouquet, Olivier (2023). ‘Élections en Turquie : ’Erdogan a gagné sur le terrain du nationalisme plus que sur celui de l’islamisme’’, Le Monde, 23 mai.
Bozarslan, Hamit (1989). ‘Révolution française et Jeunes Turcs (1908-1914)’, Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Méditerranée 52-53, pp. 160-172.
Bozarslan, Hamit (2011). ‘İsmail Beşikçi ve Türkiye Tarihyazımında Bilim Yöntemi Şoku’, in Ünlü, Barış ; Değer, Ozan, İsmail Beşikçi, Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 57-64.
Bozarslan, Hamit ; Duclert, Vincent ; Kévorkian, Raymond H. (2016). Comprendre le génocide des Arméniens. De 1915 à nos jours, Paris, Tallandier.
Bursa-Millet, Zeynep ; Garapon, Béatrice ; Sarmis, Dilek (2021). ‘Étudier les conservatismes turcs. Historiographies et tournants dans l’approche d’une catégorie complexe de l’histoire de la Turquie républicaine’, European Journal of Turkish Studies 33. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/7915
Caporal, Bernard (1982). ‘La femme turque à travers le kémalisme et le post-kémalisme (1919-1970) ’, thèse de doctorat non publiée, Université d’Aix-Marseille.
Çıtak, Zana (2020). ‘Transformation of the State-Religion Relationship under the AKP: The Case of the Diyanet’, in Bedirhanoğlu, Pınar ; Dölek, Çağlar ; Hülagü, Funda ; Kaygusuz, Özlem (eds.), Turkey’s New State in the Making: Transformation in Legality, Economy and Coercion, Londres, Zed Books, pp. 167-187.
Çıtak, Zana (2022). ‘Post-Kemalizm ve Laiklik: Bir Eleştiriyi Yeniden Düşünmek’, in Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk (eds.), Post-Post-Kemalizm. Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar, Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 315-353.
Clayer, Nathalie (2013). ‘Un laiklik imposé ou négocié ? L’administration de l’enseignement de l’islam dans la Turquie du parti unique’, in Aymes, Marc ; Gourisse, Benjamin ; Massicard, Élise (eds.), L’Art de l’État en Turquie. Arrangements de l’action publique de la fin de l’Empire ottoman à nos jours, Paris, Karthala, pp. 103-125.
Clayer, Nathalie ; Giomi, Fabio ; Szurek, Emmanuel (2019). ‘Transnationalizing Kemalism: A Refractive Relationship’, in Clayer, Nathalie ; Giomi, Fabio ; Szurek, Emmanuel (eds.), Kemalism: Transnational Politics in a Post-Ottoman World, Londres-New York, I.B. Tauris, pp. 1-37.
Copeaux, Étienne (1997). Espaces et temps de la nation turque : analyse d’une historiographie nationaliste (1931‑1993), Paris, CNRS Éditions.
Ekmekçioğlu, Lerna (2021). ‘Of Dark Pasts and Pipe Dreams: The Turkish University’, Yıllık. Annual of Istanbul Studies 3, pp. 185-193.
Engin, M. Saffet (1938). Kemalizm İnkılâbının Prensipleri. Büyük Türk Medeniyetinin Tarihî ve Sosyolojik Tetkikine Methal, Istanbul, Cumhuriyet Matbaası, 3 vols.
Engin, Arın [Saffet Engin] (1953). Atatürkc̡ülük ve Moskofluk-Türklük Savas̡ları […], Istanbul, Atatürkkent.
Ersanlı, Büşra (1992). İktidar ve Tarih: Türkiye’de ‘Resmi Tarih’ Tezinin Oluşumu (1929‑1937), Istanbul, Afa Yayınları.
Esen, Berk (2022). ‘Post-Kemalizmin Vesayet Eleştirisi: AKP Rejiminin Resmî Tezi’, in Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk (eds.), Post-Post-Kemalizm. Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar, Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 355-415.
Frémeaux, Jacques (2007). Compte rendu de ‘Lefeuvre Daniel, Pour en finir avec la repentance coloniale, Paris, Flammarion, 2006’, Outre-Mers. Revue d’Histoire, pp. 356-357.
Gentile, Emilio (2023). ‘’Nous sommes à l’ère du post-quelque chose’, une conversation avec l’historien du fascisme Emilio Gentile’, Le Grand Continent, 23 avril.
Göbel, Arda (2022). ‘Mehmet Saffet (Arın) Engin’in Modern Türk Siyasal Düşüncesine Katkıları Üzerine Bir Inceleme’, thèse de doctorat non publiée, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi.
Gourisse, Benjamin (2013). ‘Ordonner et transiger : l’action publique au concret dans l’Empire ottoman et en Turquie’, in Aymes, Marc ; Gourisse, Benjamin ; Massicard, Élise (dir.), L’Art de l’État en Turquie. Arrangements de l’action publique de la fin de l’Empire ottoman à nos jours, Paris, Karthala, pp. 11-34.
Gourisse, Benjamin (2014). La violence politique en Turquie. L’État en jeu, 1975-1980, Paris, Karthala.
Greilsammer, Ilan (1998). La nouvelle histoire d’Israël. Essai sur une identité nationale, Paris, Gallimard.
Haenich, Nathalie (2023). Le wokisme serait-il un totalitarisme ?, Paris, Albin Michel.
Haksever, Oğuz Ufuk (2023). Compte rendu de ‘İlker Aytürk and Berk Esen (eds.), PostPost-Kemalizm: Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar (İletişim Yayınları, 2022)’, Uluslararası Ilişkiler, 1er décembre, pp. 1-4. URL : https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uidergisi/issue/77333/1400894
Hanioğlu, Şükrü (2012). ‘Kemalist Oryantalizm’, Sabah, 12 février. URL : https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/hanioglu/2012/02/12/kemalist-oryantalizm
İnsel, Ahmet (2017). ‘La chasse aux intellectuels en Turquie’, La Vie des idées. URL: https://laviedesidees.fr/La-chasse-aux-intellectuels-en-Turquie
İnsel, Ahmet ; Massicard, Élise ; Türesay, Özgür (2020). ‘Témoignage d’un universitaire ’agitateur d’idées’ en France et en Turquie’, European Journal of Turkish Studies 30. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/6636
Kieser, Hans-Lukas (ed.) (2006). Turkey beyond Nationalism: Towards Post-nationalist Identities, Londres, IB Tauris.
Koyuncu-Lorasdağı, Berrin (2022). ‘Türkiye’de Kadın Çalışmalarında Post-Kemalizmin İzini Sürmek: Açmazlar ve Yeni Yönelimler’, in Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk (eds.), Post-Post-Kemalizm. Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar, Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 97-149.
Lacour, Philippe (2008). ‘Portrait de l’intellectuel en DJ. Wikipédia face à l’expertise scientifique’, La Vie des idées. URL: https://laviedesidees.fr/Portrait-de-l-intellectuel-en-DJ
Lacroix, Bernard (1985). ‘Ordre politique et ordre social. Objectivisme, objectivation et analyse politique’, in Grawitz, Madeleine ; Leca, Jean (eds.), Traité de science politique, III : L’action politique, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 469-565.
Lamprou, Alexandros (2015). Nation-Building in Modern Turkey: The ‘People’s Houses, the State and the Citizen, London - New York, I.B. Tauris, 2015
Lamprou, Alexandros (2017). ‘Political Petitioning, Denunciation and State-Society Relations during the Single-Party Period in Turkey’, Turkish Studies 18 (3), pp. 514-541.
Lefeuvre, Daniel (2006). Pour en finir avec la repentance coloniale, Paris, Flammarion.
Mardin, Şerif (1973). ‘Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?’, Daedalus 102 (1), pp. 169-190.
Mardin, Şerif (1974). ‘Super Westernization in Urban Life in the Ottoman Empire in the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth Century’, in Benedict, Peter ; Tümertekin, Erol ; Mansur, Fatma (eds.), Turkey. Geographic and Social Perspectives, Brill, Leiden, 1974, pp. 403-449.
Massicard, Élise (2009). Compte rendu de ‘Hans-Lukas Kieser, Vorkämpfer der „Neuen Türkei“. Revolutionäre Bildungseliten am Genfersee (1870-1939)’, European Journal of Turkish Studies. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/734
Metinsoy, Murat (2011). ‘Fragile Hegemony, Flexible Authoritarianism, and Governing from Below: Politician’s Reports in Early Republican Turkey’, International Journal of Middle East Studies 43 (4), pp. 699-719.
Migdal, Joel S. (2001). State in Society. Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Morvan, Yoann (2011). ‘La vie juive à Istanbul : entre post-kémalisme et néo-ottomanisme’, Regard sur l’Est. URL: https://regard-est.com/la-vie-juive-a-istanbul-entre-post-kemalisme-et-neo-ottomanisme
Muhidine, Timour (2012). ‘Lumières sur le Bosphore’, Le Monde diplomatique 698. URL: https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2012/05/MUHIDINE/47684
Nealon, Jeffrey Thomas (2012). Post-postmodernism or, the Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Noiriel, Gérard (2003). Penser avec, penser contre. Itinéraire d’un historien, Paris, Belin.
Noiriel, Gérard (2004). ‘Remarques pour un débat’, Revue d’Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine 51 (4 bis), pp. 7-17.
Nourallah, Riad Atef (1991). ‘Sorcerers, Straight Swords, and Scimitars: The Arab-Islamic East in Modern Fantasies of Magic and Conflict’, Langues et Littératures 9, pp. 119-152.
Özatalay, Cem (2020). ‘Purge, Exile, and Resistance: Rethinking the Conflict of the Faculties through the Case of Academics for Peace in Turkey’, European Journal of Turkish Studies 30. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/6746
Suciyan, Talin (2016). The Armenians in Modern Turkey. Post-genocide Society, Politics and History, Londres-New York, I.B. Tauris.
Szurek, Emmanuel (2010). ‘Le recteur, le professeur et le Büyük Önder. La théorie de la Langue-Soleil sous l’œil de Jean Deny’, Turcica 42, pp. 279-303.
Szurek, Emmanuel (2011). ‘Go West. Variations sur le cas kémaliste’, in Pouillon, François ; Vatin, Jean-Claude (eds.), Après l’Orientalisme. L’Orient créé par l’Orient, Paris, IISMM-Karthala, pp. 303-323.
Szurek, Emmanuel (2013). ‘Dil Bayramı. Une lecture somatique de la fête politique dans la Turquie du parti unique », in Clayer, Nathalie ; Kaynar, Erdal (eds.), Penser, agir et vivre dans l’Empire ottoman et en Turquie. Études réunies pour François Georgeon, Louvain, Peeters, pp. 497-523.
Szurek, Emmanuel (2016). ‘Penser la révolution turque’, in Dakhli, Leyla (ed.), Le Moyen-Orient. Fin XIXe-XXe siècle, Paris, Le Seuil, pp. 365-400.
Taşkın, Yüksel (2022). ‘Post-Kemalist Paradigmanın İslâm Çalışmalarına Etkileri: Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme’, in Aytürk, İlker ; Esen, Berk (eds.), Post-Post-Kemalizm. Türkiye Çalışmalarında Yeni Arayışlar, Istanbul, İletişim, pp. 417-440.
Tunçay, Mete (1978). ‘Atatürk’e Nasıl Bakmak’, Toplum ve Bilim 4, pp. 86-92.
Tunçay, Mete (2005 [1981]). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde Tek Parti Yönetimi’nin Kurulması (1923-1931), Istanbul, Tarih Vakfı.
Turan, Ömer (2019). ‘Yeni Bir Paradigmayı Beklemek ya da Tarihsel Sosyolojinin İlhamı’, Birikim 366, pp. 67-79.
Turan, Ömer ; Öztan, Güven Gürkan (2018). Devlet Aklı ve 1915 Türkiye’de “Ermeni Meselesi” Anlatısının İnşası, Istanbul, İletişim.
Türköz, Meltem (2018). Naming and Nation-building in Turkey The 1934 Surname Law, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Vacarme (2001). « La nouvelle histoire israélienne », Vacarme 16 (3), pp. 104-106. URL : https://www.cairn.info/revue-vacarme-2001-3-page-104.htm
Yenen, Alp (2022). ‘The Talat-Tehlirian Complex: Contentious Narratives of Martyrdom and Revenge in Post-conflict Societies’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 64 (2) pp. 394-421.
Yenen, Alp (2023). ‘İttihatçılığın Laneti: İmparatorluk’tan Cumhuriyet’e Geçiş Döneminin Tarihyazımında Bazı Meseleler’, Toplum ve Bilim 164, pp. 72-96.
Yenen, Alp ; Zürcher, Erik-Jan (eds.) (2023). A Hundred Years of Republican Turkey. A History in a Hundred Fragments, Leiden, Leiden University Press.
Yılmaz, Hale (2013). Becoming Turkish. Nationalist Reforms and Cultural Negotiations in Early Republican Turkey 1923-1945, Syracuse, Syracuse University Press.
Zürcher, Erik-Jan (1984). The Unionist Factor. The Role of the Committee of Union and Progress in the Turkish National Movement, 1905-1926, Leiden, Brill.
Zürcher, Erik-Jan (1992). ‘The Ottoman Legacy of the Turkish Republic: An Attempt at a New Periodization’, Die Welt des Islams 32 (2), pp. 237‑253.