Navigation – Plan du site


Texte intégral

1Part I of the special issue on ‘Panopticons in Australia’ ended with a call for more detailed investigation in the areas of gender relations. Part II partly aims to answer this call in offering first to fill the gap with a paper by Lucy Frost and Hamish Maxwell-Stewart on female convicts in Australia.

  • 1 Jeremy Bentham, Pauper Management Improved, in Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. J. Bowring (Edinburgh, (...)

2Secondly, the significance of the sequel is to reassess the influence of the Panopticon, by focusing less on architecture than in Part I, and more on surveillance networks in the colony. This is one of the achievements of Frost and Maxwell-Stewart’s and Matthew Allen’s contributions. Both papers show the relative failure of closed systems of surveillance (be they in Tasmanian female factories or in metropolitan Panopticon projects) compared to what Allen calls a ‘remarkably comprehensive system of surveillance which sought to constantly monitor, discipline and record [convicts]’. The success story of convict surveillance in Australia is not to be read in its ability to emulate the design of the prison panopticon, but in developing a network of ‘bureaucratic surveillance’, as Frost and Maxwell-Stewart label it, outside the walls. Ironically, this bureaucratic surveillance is also panoptic in its principles, as Bentham also believed that surveillance networks could be effectively monitored outside the panopticon architecture.1

3Thirdly, as Claire Wrobel and Matthew Allen remind us, the Panopticon writings fit into in a complex argument against transportation. Therefore, the shadow of convicts in New South Wales is never far from the rhetoric used to convince contemporary readers and decision-makers of the advantages of closed incarceration over the open-air penitentiary of the Antipodes. Wrobel takes the argument a step further by highlighting the Gothic motifs used in relation to transportation to New South Wales by Bentham to buttress his arguments in favour of the alternative option: Panopticons. The penal colony is turned into a Gothic dystopia which was, in Wrobel’s words, ‘a state of “depravity”, [where] crime remained unpunished and convicts could not be reformed’.

4There is still much which remains unsaid about Panopticons in Australia in relation to colonial studies, penal theory, migration studies and race. Indeed, Western-centered academia should not forget that punishment, race and displacement stand at the core of the panoptic archipelago that develops from the end of the 18th c., as Graeme Dixon laments in relation to the plight of indigenous convicts incarcerated in the colonists’ penitentiaries:

Shipped to an alien place

Where the icy, death wind blows

Imprisoned by the cruel regime

  • 2 Graeme Dixon, Holocaust Revisited (Crawley; WA, Centre for Indigenous History and the Arts, School (...)

not understanding why2

Haut de page


1 Jeremy Bentham, Pauper Management Improved, in Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. J. Bowring (Edinburgh, 1843), vol. VIII, 398f.

2 Graeme Dixon, Holocaust Revisited (Crawley; WA, Centre for Indigenous History and the Arts, School of Indigenous Studies, University of Western Australia, 2003), p. 77.

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Anne Brunon-Ernst, « Editorial »Revue d’études benthamiennes [En ligne], 21 | 2022, mis en ligne le 30 mai 2022, consulté le 13 juin 2024. URL : ; DOI :

Haut de page


Anne Brunon-Ernst

Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas and Centre Bentham

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

Le texte et les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés), sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search