Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilHors-série16Questions/réponses15 Questions and Answers on “Cuba...

Questions/réponses

15 Questions and Answers on “Cuba and the Struggle for Algerian Independence, 1959–1962”

Salim Lamrani
Cet article est une traduction de :
15 questions/réponses sur « Cuba et la lutte pour l’indépendance de l’Algérie, 1959-1962 » [fr]
Autre(s) traduction(s) de cet article :
15 preguntas/respuestas sobre “Cuba y la lucha por la independencia de Argelia, 1959-1962” [es]

Texte intégral

“For the Cuban Revolution, Algerian independence is a sacred cause”
Salim Lamrani

1. Why take an interest in the relationship between Algeria and Cuba during the war of independence?

This relationship is both central and little known. Cuban involvement in Algeria is often portrayed as a purely symbolic gesture, one solidarity statement among many. Yet a close examination of French, U.S., and United Nations archives, along with Cuban and Algerian sources, shows that between 1959 and 1962 Cuba carried out diplomatic, political, and material actions of remarkable scope.

This commitment took place at a pivotal geopolitical moment: the Algerian insurrection was shaking the French colonial order, while thousands of miles away the Cuban Revolution was overthrowing the Batista dictatorship. Very early on, Cuban revolutionaries saw the Algerian mujahideen as “brothers in arms”: the same anti-colonial struggle, the same rejection of imperialism. Algeria thus became a major reference point in their revolutionary consciousness.

2. Why is the 1959–1962 period distinctive from a historiographical standpoint?

The Algerian War has generated abundant scholarship, as has the foreign policy of the Cuban Revolution, particularly in Africa (Angola, Southern Africa, etc.). Yet the short 1959-1962 sequence, when Cuba supported the FLN before independence, has remained largely in the shadows.

Studies on “Algeria, Mecca of the revolutionaries” focus mainly on the post-1962 period, when Algiers became a major hub of Third Worldism. Research on Cuban internationalism, meanwhile, emphasizes interventions in Africa during the 1970s. But as early as the late 1950s, Cuba made the Algerian cause the top priority of its state internationalism, from UN platforms to material and military aid.

3. How did Cuban revolutionaries perceive the Algerian people’s struggle as early as the 1950s?

In the Sierra Maestra, Fidel Castro’s fighters closely followed the Algerian War. They felt a strong affinity with the mujahideen: they themselves were fighting a U.S.-backed military dictatorship and clearly identified the colonial nature of French domination in Algeria.

Fidel Castro first mentioned the struggle in 1957 in an interview with The New York Times, explaining that the Cuban people were following everything related to Algeria on the radio. Later he summed up this bond with a striking phrase: “When we were fighting in the mountains, the Algerians were fighting in the wilayas.”

For him, it was one and the same front: that of peoples of the Global South refusing subordination and demanding sovereignty.

4. How did France and the United States react to the outbreak of the Algerian insurrection?

On the French side, the reaction was one of shock. The uprising was coordinated and simultaneous in several parts of the territory. Troops were redeployed from Indochina, and the military and police apparatus was massively reinforced. France took the revolt very seriously, but responded with repression rather than politics.

The United States, for its part, quickly understood that a military solution was a dead end. From the mid-1950s onward, U.S. diplomats viewed Algerian independence as inevitable. Internally, they criticized France’s “narrowness of view” and its inability to propose a credible political project for the Algerian population. Yet despite this clear-eyed assessment, Washington continued to support Paris at the UN, to the point of being accused by the Provisional Government of the Algerian Republic (GPRA) of acting as “France’s lawyer.”

Cuba, by contrast, unequivocally chose the side of independence.

5. What role did the regime change in Cuba in 1959 play?

It was decisive. Under Batista, Cuba was a compliant ally of France on the Algerian issue. At the UN, the Cuban delegate vigorously defended the French position and even challenged the organization’s competence to address the Algerian question.

On January 1, 1959, everything changed: the Revolution overthrew Batista. Very quickly, Fidel Castro expressed explicit sympathy for the Algerian people and received the only medal ever awarded by the FLN. French diplomats in Havana were alarmed: they understood that Cuba was switching sides and that, given the prestige of the Cuban Revolution in Latin America, this shift could influence other countries on the continent.

6. Concretely, how did Cuba support Algeria at the UN?

As early as 1959, Cuba’s new foreign minister, Raúl Roa, announced that Cuba would vote for Algerian independence at the General Assembly. This was not discreet support: his speeches were particularly harsh toward French colonialism.

French diplomacy noted that Roa’s discourse was among the most violent against Paris. Cuba voted in favor of resolutions calling for the rapid application of the Algerian people’s right to self-determination, alongside a handful of other Latin American countries. For France, which had previously relied on near-automatic Latin American support, this was a major strategic loss.

At the same time, the Cuban press waged a constant campaign in favor of the Algerian struggle. Havana became a bridge between Afro-Asian countries and Latin America, a “moral guide” for underdeveloped peoples fighting imperialism. For the Cuban Revolution, Algerian independence was a sacred cause.

7. Was Cuba therefore hostile to France as such?

No, and this is an important point. Raúl Roa, for example, admired the France of the Resistance. Cuba continued to send students to France, cooperate in certain areas, and use Air France. The break concerned neither French culture nor history, but colonialism.

For Havana, the antagonism was not with “France as a country,” but with the colonial policy pursued in Algeria. Anti-colonialism was a non-negotiable principle that took precedence over the desire to accommodate a major Western power. This was already a way for Cuba to define the hierarchy of its foreign-policy priorities.

8. How did de Gaulle and French diplomacy view their own room for maneuver in Algeria?

De Gaulle quickly understood that the situation was unsustainable in the long run. In private, he acknowledged that Algeria would eventually become Algerian. But he did so reluctantly, with concern about the massive arrival of new African and Asian states at the UN, which would challenge Western dominance.

French diplomacy, meanwhile, remained trapped for a long time in colonial reflexes: it struggled to accept negotiating on an equal footing with the GPRA. Remarks by certain French officials about “Arabs” or about the reliability of agreements reveal how deeply ingrained the colonial mindset was. This gap between the reality of the balance of power on the ground and the perceptions of French elites fueled the duration and violence of the conflict.

9. How did the Cuban Revolution position itself toward the United States and the Third World during these years?

Initially, Havana did not intend to align itself with the USSR. Cuban leaders wanted to maintain relations with Washington, but on a less unequal footing. It was successive U.S. aggressions – economic pressure, support for exiles, the Bay of Pigs invasion – that pushed Cuba toward Moscow.

At the same time, the Cuban example resonated enormously in Latin America and the Third World. Many peoples saw it as proof that a small country could break with dependency and pursue ambitious social policies. This is precisely what frightened Washington, which feared a “domino effect” and therefore sought to make Cuba a deterrent example: a revolution that breaks with the United States must be punished.

In this context, support for Algeria was seen in Washington as a dangerous convergence: an anti-colonial and anti-imperialist front linking North Africa and the Caribbean.

10. Did Cuba limit itself to diplomatic support for Algeria?

No, and this is one of the most striking aspects. In 1961, Cuba was the only country in the Americas to officially recognize the GPRA. This gesture came just weeks after the Bay of Pigs invasion, at a time when the island was already under intense U.S. pressure.

In 1962, Havana went a step further by sending a shipment of weapons intended for the FLN via Morocco, to Oujda. The ship carrying the weapons, the Bahía de Nipe, returned to Cuba with wounded Algerian fighters and about twenty war orphans, who were treated and educated there. This was concrete, material solidarity that went far beyond declarations.

11. How did France and the United States react to this Cuban material aid to the FLN?

For France, it was another humiliation. The Cuban Revolution was now seen not only as a political adversary at the UN, but as a direct military supporter of its enemies. Reports from French embassies highlighted the “collusion” between the FLN and Cuba and worried about its implications for U.S. policy in Africa.

The United States incorporated this development into its broader view of Cuba as a “subversive hub” for the Third World. The convergence between insurgent Algeria and revolutionary Cuba appeared as the concrete realization of what they feared most: transnational solidarity among anti-colonial and anti-imperialist movements.

12. Are there examples of how Fidel Castro himself viewed the FLN’s strategy?

Yes. During a visit by Lakhdar Brahimi to Havana in December 1961, Fidel Castro, when asked for his opinion, gave very pragmatic advice on negotiations with France: secure political and security control of the country at all costs, even if that meant making concessions on the economy (especially gas), guarantees for the European minority, or even military bases.

His argument was simple: once political sovereignty was achieved and peace restored, France would no longer be able to return militarily. International conditions would no longer allow it. This advice shows Fidel Castro’s clear understanding of what is essential to independence: control of state power and the security apparatus.

13. How did Algerians perceive this Cuban commitment?

The Algerian people received this support with deep gratitude. Within the National Liberation Army, and later the People’s National Army, Fidel Castro enjoyed great prestige. Algerian officers displayed his portrait in their headquarters and openly criticized U.S. policy toward Cuba as imperialist.

More broadly, independent Algeria would remember a country that supported it as early as 1959, even at the cost of tensions with powers such as France or the United States. After 1962, this memory translated into military, medical, and technical cooperation, as well as shared positions in international forums.

14. How does this Algeria-Cuba relationship go beyond simple bilateral history?

It embodies the birth of state internationalism. Cuba did not merely sympathize with liberation movements; it structured its foreign policy around a principle: the duty of solidarity with peoples in struggle. And it accepted the cost, whether in economic sanctions or diplomatic tensions.

Algeria, for its part, did not view its war solely as a Franco-Algerian conflict. It placed it within a broader horizon: the emancipation of the Third World. This is what would later make Algiers the “Mecca of the revolutionaries.” The encounter between the Cuban Revolution and the Algerian War of Independence illustrates the link between national struggle and universal project.

15. What is the contemporary significance of this “revolutionary friendship”?

It first reminds us that international relations are not limited to cold calculations of narrowly defined interests. In Cuba’s case, support for Algeria was not rational in the classical sense: the country was isolated in Latin America, under economic sanctions, threatened with invasion, yet it chose to help another people fighting a major power.

Second, this history shows how Third World struggles were interconnected. Algerian independence was not merely a Franco-Algerian event; it was part of a global movement that included Nasser’s Egypt, Tito’s Yugoslavia, Sékou Touré’s Guinea, and, of course, Fidel Castro’s Cuba.

Finally, it sheds lasting light on the political memory of both countries. For Cuba, Algeria was the first major test of its internationalism. For Algeria, Cuba remains one of the symbols of solidarity received at the most difficult moment of its struggle. It is this exemplary dimension that gives this revolutionary friendship its relevance more than sixty years later.

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Salim Lamrani, « 15 Questions and Answers on “Cuba and the Struggle for Algerian Independence, 1959–1962” »Études caribéennes [En ligne], 16 | Février 2026, mis en ligne le 12 février 2026, consulté le 13 mars 2026. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/etudescaribeennes/38189 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/15qcp

Haut de page

Auteur

Salim Lamrani

Professeur des universités, Faculté de Lettres et Sciences Humaines, Département d’études hispaniques et latino-américaines, Université de La Réunion

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-NC-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY-NC 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont susceptibles d’être soumis à des autorisations d’usage spécifiques.

Haut de page
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search