Joana Etchart, Community Relations and the Troubles in Northern Ireland: A Policy History
Joana Etchart, Community Relations and the Troubles in Northern Ireland: A Policy History, Liverpool, Liverpool University Press, 2024, 256 p.
Texte intégral
1In this rich and dense work, Joana Etchart, a senior lecturer at the Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, aims at producing a comprehensive analysis of community relations policy in Northern Ireland, a crucial public policy during the Troubles.
2In a long introduction (p. 1-30), Etchart first explains how complex and elusive the very notion of community relations is as it covers different and sometimes conflictual meanings. For certain analysts the notion of community relations justifies a purely internal explanation of the Troubles. Yet for others like Michael Hall, community relations are intricately related to the roles played by the Irish and the British states during the conflict, bringing external factors in. Such ambivalence raises issues to which the book proposes to bring answers: as a public policy, were community relations policies aimed at imposing an internal interpretation of the Northern Irish Troubles? Was the objective of community relations policies simply to secure catholic allegiance and therefore to legitimise the Northern Irish state? In the second part of the introduction, Etchart explains her scientific method and objectives. She identifies two different phases of community relations policy, emerging at two different “critical junctures” (p. 8): one between its inception in 1969 and 1972 and a second phase between 1986 and 1990. She emphasises and justifies certain distinctive features and themes of her work: the importance of governance issues, the choice made to focus on these two critical junctures (or policy creation phases) rather than on rewriting the whole history of the Troubles, the variety of written and oral sources she uses, including subjective accounts. All this leads her to structure her analysis in four chronological chapters.
3In the first chapter, she studies the context in which community relations became a burning public policy issue in Northern Ireland. She shows how, as violence erupted in 1968/1969, it was first conceived as a comprehensive package of reforms by the British state, but was reluctantly endorsed by Stormont. Chapter 2 is dedicated to the first critical juncture and the period 1969-1972 when community relations policy was first implemented through newly established institutions such as the Ministry of Community Relations and the Northern Ireland Community Relations Commission. Etchart shows how, in spite of ambitious and innovating programmes, this policy was actually undermined and transformed by various external factors such as internment and the increasing involvement of paramilitary groups on the ground which gradually led the Ministry of Community Relations to become a partner of the security forces. The third chapter covers the period between 1972 and the 1980s when Stormont’s executive and legislative institutions were suspended and Direct Rule was imposed by London. Etchart shows that, although Direct Rule led to major institutional changes and a more centralised “machinery of governance” (p. 118), the British state first tried to stick to an ambitious community relations policy. Yet, after the failure of Sunningdale, the policy was significantly scaled down as shown by the disbandment of both the Ministry of Community Relations and the Northern Ireland Community Relations Commission. Community relations policy was revived and renewed from the mid 1980s to the early 1990s which is the object of the fourth and final chapter. Etchart shows how, on this second critical juncture, the intellectual and political context of the 1980s was conducive to the emergence of a renewed community relations policy embraced by both the Northern Ireland Office in London and the Northern Ireland civil service. One of Etchart’s main points in this chapter is that the revival of community relations policy after 1986 coincided with the dominance of an internal interpretation of the conflict.
4What is of particularly valuable scientific interest in this work is Etchart’s original and multi-faceted approach to this question. Thanks to the diversity of printed and oral sources she uses, thanks to her choice to combine micro and macro-level analyses, to focus on certain local initiatives such as in Dungannon or on certain particular actors, such as fieldworkers for instance, the book sheds new light on an essential aspect of the period known as the Troubles. It explores the major intellectual, institutional and political tensions which developed around community relations and demonstrates how, as a public policy, its efficiency and its coherence were often compromised by competition between various institutions and stakeholders. Doing so, Etchart reveals how, despite some real and ambitious programmes to improve Northern Irish people’s lives during the Troubles, community relations policy was simultaneously part and parcel of the conflict itself. Between 1969 and 1990, community relations policy was also a mechanism of legitimation and served to defend internal interpretations of the Northern Irish conflict.
Pour citer cet article
Référence papier
Philippe Cauvet, « Joana Etchart, Community Relations and the Troubles in Northern Ireland: A Policy History », Études irlandaises, 50-2 | 2025, 176-178.
Référence électronique
Philippe Cauvet, « Joana Etchart, Community Relations and the Troubles in Northern Ireland: A Policy History », Études irlandaises [En ligne], 50-2 | 2025, mis en ligne le 05 décembre 2025, consulté le 25 janvier 2026. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/etudesirlandaises/21305 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/15aab
Haut de pageDroits d’auteur
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont susceptibles d’être soumis à des autorisations d’usage spécifiques.
Haut de page


