<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF 
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
>
  <channel rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/2590">
    <title>Lexis</title>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/2590</link>
    <description>Revue d’études du lexique anglais</description>        
    <items>    
      <rdf:Seq>      
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4428" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4471" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4291" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4096" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4227" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4146" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4366" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4322" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4467" />
              </rdf:Seq>  </items>  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4428">
    <title>Differentiating synonyms and adjective subclasses by syntactic profiling</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="resume"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Twenty adjectives belonging to five intuitively recognizable semantic families, age (</span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">old</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">young</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">), size (</span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">large</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">small</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">big</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">), color (</span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">black</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">white</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">red</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">yellow</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">blue</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">), modality (</span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">possible</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">impossible</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, necessary, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">likely, sure</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">) and emotion (</span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">happy</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">sad</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">glad</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">sorry</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">) were inventoried in a 5-million word corpus tagged for part of speech (POS) and lemma. Regular expressions were used to target specific contextual parameters including syntactic function (adnominal or predicative), determiners, grammatical subject and intensifiers, while manual estimates were obtained from random samples of 500 occurrences per adjective. Benchmark data, for purposes of comparison, were first collected for the category as a whole using POS tags, from which it was observed that four major determiners and six copula verbs were present in 80-90% of all occurrences. Adjective families were found to share common, distinctive syntactic profiles, with similar predispositions to adnominal or predicative function and sim...</span></p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Daniel Henkel</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4428</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4471">
    <title>List of references</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">This select bibliography lists a number of references which will be useful to all scholars wishing to keep abreast of a variety of recent discussions on the adjective category.</span></p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Vincent Hugou</dc:creator> 
    <dc:creator>Vincent Renner</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4471</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4291">
    <title>An Aslian origin for the word gibbon</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="resume"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">This article examines the etymology of the word </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">gibbon</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, which is not yet clear. The article presents a phonemic analysis using the ALINE algorithm which suggests that the root word is Northern Aslian </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">kbɔɲ</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, used by Menraq communities in the heart of Peninsular Malaysia. This article reviews morphological, ethno-geographical, semantic, historical and linguistic evidence that supports this hypothesis. The article proposes Malay as an intermediary, noting that several other Aslian words entered European languages via Malay.</span></p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Teckwyn Lim</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4291</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4096">
    <title>It looks like this complementizer used to be an adjective</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="resume"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The conjunction </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">like</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> meaning ‘as if’ is usually considered to derive from the preposition. There exists, however, a striking parallel between the impersonal post-copula use of the conjunction (e.g. </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">It’s like</span></em><sub><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">AS IF</span></em></sub><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> he didn’t see it</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">) and the extraposed construction of the now extinct adjective </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">like</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> meaning ‘likely’ with a covert complementizer (e.g. </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">It’s like</span></em><sub><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">ADJ</span></em></sub><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> ø he didn’t see it</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">). This paper therefore aims at sustaining the hypothesis of the adjectival origin of </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">like</span></em><sub><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">AS IF</span></em></sub><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> with the help of the Corpus of Historical American English. By documenting the geographic, semantic and syntactic expansion of </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">like</span></em><sub><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">AS IF</span></em></sub><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, this study suggests that the disappearance of the attributive use of the adjective for reasons of isomorphism triggered the constructionalization of the two remaining adjectival constructions. The constructionalization of </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">like</span></em><sub><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">AS IF</span></em></sub><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> can be formalized as follows: [</span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">it</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> copula Adj [ø + Clause]] ↔ [probability] &#62; [</span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">it</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> copula [Comp + Clause]] ↔ [comparison].</span></p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Mathilde Pinson</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4096</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4227">
    <title>Sur les spécificités discursives de (be) likely</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="resume">Cet article vise à remplir un manque relatif dans les études consacrées à la modalité en anglais en explorant les propriétés discursives de l’adjectif modal <em>likely</em> au sein d’un corpus stratifié en modes de discours. L’étude quantitative et qualitative permet d’identifier trois emplois différents de <em>likely </em>qui se distinguent chacun par leur attraction pour un mode de discours spécifique, pour un type de modalité donné (épistémique ou existentielle), ainsi que pour des configurations syntaxiques et argumentatives particulières. Toutefois, l’étude permet également de mettre au jour des propriétés communes à tous les emplois de la forme étudiée, à savoir une forte compatibilité avec les procès existentiels, avec le renvoi à l’avenir et avec des enchaînements logiques, en particulier, le lien de cause/conséquence.</p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Grégory Furmaniak</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4227</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4146">
    <title>Adjectives or Verbs? The Case of Deverbal Adjectives in -ED</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="resume"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Among the different ways an adjective can be formed, one of them is the use of the past participle of a verb, as in, for instance: </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The house was tucked far back from the main road</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">. This process is not a straightforward case of derivation: an ambiguity often remains as to the status of the V-ED form, between adjective and verb, especially with adjectival passives. The aim of this article is to show how verbs can be “stabilised” into adjectives. With </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">excited</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> in </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">they were excited</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, the stabilisation is complete, whereas with </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">locked</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> in </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">the door was locked</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, the deriving verb can be reactivated, as in </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">the door was suddenly locked</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">. The parameters surveyed are: the semantics of the verb, agentivity (recoverable or not), prefixing (for instance the prefix </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">be</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">- in </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">bedecked</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> or the negative prefix </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">un-</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> in </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">unchecked</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">), lexicalization (particularly the contribution of the noun in a collocation of the type </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">abandoned child</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">) and, finally, syntax (attributive or predicative position). The conclusion whic...</span></p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Jean Albrespit</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4146</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4366">
    <title>Composite colour strings in English: adjectival or nominal?</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="resume"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">This paper looks into the category membership of colour words that enter into combination with modifiers like </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">bright</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">dark</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">light</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, or </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">pale</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">. The English grammatical literature usually assumes that these ‘composite colour strings’, used attributively or predicatively, form adjective-adjective compounds. Closer scrutiny, however, reveals difficulties with this view. First, it is unusual for adjectives to modify adjectives. Second, even if they are compounds, it is unusual for their comparative and superlative inflections to be marked not on the head of the structure, but internally on the modifier, as in </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">brighter red</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">. These difficulties lead us to question the compoundhood of those strings, but also to explore the possibility that, at least in some predicative and attributive uses, the colour words in them are nouns. Using data from the BNC and COCA, we test our intuitions and those found in the literature. We conclude that the adjective-adjective compound analysis of composite colour ...</span></p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Philippe De Brabanter</dc:creator> 
    <dc:creator>Saghie Sharifzadeh</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4366</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4322">
    <title>Feeling, emotion and the company they keep: what adjectives reveal about the substantives feeling and emotion</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="resume"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">This paper analyzes the adjectives modifying the substantives </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">emotion</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> and </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">feeling </span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">in contemporary American and British English. It argues that although the two nouns refer to affects and are treated as synonyms in dictionary definitions, they are not semantic equivalents. The study of their collocations with adjectives shows that </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">emotion</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> refers to pre-semantic experience, whereas </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">feeling</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> designates affects that have been the object of a more elaborate cognitive treatment. This paper also aims to show that the semantic characteristics of the two substantives reflect their morphology and their historical evolution.</span></p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Stéphanie Béligon</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4322</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4467">
    <title>Introduction</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">This thematic issue presents a collection of six papers devoted to the adjective category which illustrates the breadth of current research interests found in the French/Belgian community of English linguistics scholars. The first article, written by </span><strong><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Daniel Henkel</span></strong><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> (Université Paris 8), offers a quantitatively documented overview of five semantic families of adjectives (age, size, color, modality, emotion) that demonstrates that the items within each family share a distinctive syntactic profile and that the profiling approach is also well-suited to observe a number of significant differences between certain quasi-synonyms.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><strong><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Stéphanie Béligon</span></strong><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> (Sorbonne Université) analyzes the different adjectives modifying the substantives </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">emotion</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> and </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">feeling</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> in contemporary American and British English. The study shows that in spite of their semantic similarities, the two lexemes correspond to different visions of affects, since </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">emotion</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> refers to pre-semantic experience whereas </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">feeling </span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">designates affe...</span></p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Vincent Hugou</dc:creator> 
    <dc:creator>Vincent Renner</dc:creator>
    <link>http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/4467</link>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>