Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNuméros51-1Actualité de la rechercheDébats. Reflections on the Interp...Reassessing Race and Ethnicity th...

Actualité de la recherche
Débats. Reflections on the Interplay between Race, Ethnicity and Migration

Reassessing Race and Ethnicity through a Migration Lens

Michael Jones-Correa
p. 277-280

Texte intégral

1It is now taken as a given in the social sciences that race and ethnicity are constructed social categories, with situational elements that vary by individuals’ contexts. However, because of the role that state institutions play in assigning ethnicity, and reifying these categories from everything from the date they collect to their assignment of public goods, in practice social scientists still treat ethnic and racial categories as fixed. So, despite an underlying acknowledgment that race and ethnicity are of course socially constructed and situational (reflected in linguists’ interest in code-switching and the like), we actually know quite little about the malleability of these identities in the course of people’s lives—about the practice of situational ethnicity. But if there is any group of individuals for whom that should not be true, it should be migrants.

  • 1 See the project «Immigrant Native Relations in 21st-Century America», lead by Michael Jones-Correa (...)

2Migrants, as they leave their communities of origin, are constantly adapting to new social contexts as they move within and across national borders, and consequently play up (or downplay) aspects of their ethnic identities in favor of others, at times in order to minimize threat or friction, or to generally fit in1. For instance, a migrant who leaves Niger, from a Djerma village traveling north en route to Europe may likely find themselves emphasizing their national identity as Nigerien, as Muslim, or as African as they travel to Libya or Algeria, and then, say, to Italy. In the course of their journey, some aspects of their ethnic identities will become salient; others will be submerged. Similarly, a migrant who leaves from a K’iche community in the western part of Guatemala making their way to the United States might have to negotiate their identity as indigenous K’iche in Guatemala, as Guatemalan or Central American while in Mexico, as Central American or Latino on arrival to the United States. Each of these identities, at different times and places, can trigger racial/ethnic discrimination, and therefore which identity becomes a migrant’s «public» identity requires finessing, and at times, dissembling. Each of migrant's identities is therefore both «true» and «false» depending on the context, and the state’s role in shaping that context.

  • 2 Nobles, Melissa (2000), Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics, Palo Alto, (...)
  • 3 Mora, Cristina (2014), Making Hispanics: How Activists, Bureaucrats, and Media Constructed a New A (...)

3This brings us to the role of states, and particularly the role of receiving states in the categorization of race and ethnicity, and the effect these have on migrant identification. The work, for instance of Nobles2 and Mora3, illuminates the role the U.S. government agencies, such as the Census, have played, through ethnic categorization, in creating ethnic groupings. In the 1980s, for instance, as the Census was conducting trials of possible question wordings for the next decennial census. One of the possible categories the Bureau was pre-testing was «Central American» as a possible ethnic identifier. The Bureau had selected different sites around the U.S. as test sites, including one in the state of Kansas. The results they received back from Kansas puzzled analysts—a higher than expected percentage of respondents were responding positively to this new identifier. Looking more closely at the data, it became apparent that a good number of U.S. born whites were choosing this identity, which was even more of a puzzle. In probing further, it became clear, however, that these respondents were choosing that identifier because, of course, if Kansas is in the middle of the United States, of course they were «central Americans». The Census quickly dropped that category from consideration for use in its decennial census, but it illustrates, if a bit tongue in cheek, how easily the state’s categorization of ethnicity can shape ethnic identification.

  • 4 Hanna, Mary, Batalova, Jeanne (2020), Indian Immigrants in the United States, Migration Policy Ins (...)
  • 5 National Asian American Survey [available online].
  • 6 Mishra, Sangay (2018), Desis Divided: The Political Lives of South Asian Americans, Minneapolis, U (...)
  • 7 Kapur, Devesh (2016), The Other One Percent: Indians in America, New York, Oxford University Press

4The point here is that if one examines the kind of information that governments collect, and in particular the racial and ethnic categories they use, and by adopting, impose more widely, then it is easy to see, first, how government imposed categories matter, and second, how the use of these categories mask more nuanced understandings of race, ethnicity and religion. The U.S. Census, for instance, collects information on the country of origin of migrants from India, but nothing on their state of origin, their caste, or their religion. Once in the U.S., our hypothetical migrant from Kerala is simply «Indian», subsumed within a broader category of «Asian American». These state-assigned categories are picked up and replicated by highly respected policy and academic researchers. To give one example, the Migration Policy Institute, perhaps the highest profile immigration policy think tank in Washington D.C., regularly puts out briefs on immigrant populations in the U.S. But because of its reliance on U.S. Census data, its brief on Indian immigrants in the U.S. makes no mention of characteristics by region of origin, religion, language or caste—information which is arguably hugely important in understanding these immigrants’ outcomes4. Academic research like the National Asian American Survey (NAAS)5, which tries to survey a representative sample of all «Asian Americans»—which describes individuals with origins in Asia, itself a contested Census category—similarly pays no attention at all to key subnational identities. The work that I and collaborators have done on Indian migrants in the Atlanta and Philadelphia metropolitan areas also falls short: we collected information on respondents’ religion and region of origin, but only imperfectly recorded migrants’ language(s), and asked nothing at all about caste. There is careful research being conducted on the South Asian immigrant community in the U.S.—see, for example, work by Mishra6 and Kapur7—but it is still little and far between.

  • 8 Menjívar, Cecilia, Abrego, Leisy (2012), «Legal Violence: Immigration Law and the Lives of Central (...)

5Similarly, there is very good work on indigenous migrants to the U.S. from Mexico and Central America (see for instance, research published by Fox, Rivera-Salgado, Menjivar, Abrego and others)8. But the fact is that in the social sciences the distinctiveness of indigenous identity and language gets lost as these indigenous migrants become subsumed under the «Hispanic» or «Latino» pan-ethnic categories in use in the United States. Other ethnic categories, notably Muslim or Arab (which are quite salient in Europe), are played down in the United States, in part because of the oddities of how the U.S. government categorizes individuals as «White», and the absence of any public data on religion. Immigrants from the Middle East are, for the purposes of race in the U.S., considered «White» rather than being considered as either Asian or African, and no public data is collected on religious identification and practices, traceable to the Constitution’s emphasis on the separation of Church and State. Existing estimates of the Muslim population in the U.S. are simply that—estimates—and what we know of the demographics and public opinions of Muslims comes from private surveys, like those from the Public Religion Research Institute, or the Pew Research Center.

  • 9 Fraga, Luis, Rodney Hero, John Garcia, Jones-Correa, Michael, Martinez, Valerie, Segura, Gary (201 (...)

6In the U.S. context, then, caste disappears, subsumed under national origin; indigeneity disappears, subsumed under pan-ethnic labels; religion disappears, subsumed under racial or national origin categories. Perhaps more importantly, these state-sanctioned categories are eventually adopted by the people they cover. Research I (and others) have conducted on Latino/a populations in the U.S. suggest, for example, that on first arrival Latin American migrants identify with their national origin over identification with any larger pan-ethnic grouping such as «Hispanic», or with national identities like «American», but these preferences shift over time in the U.S .and over generations9. In the end, people often adopt state-sponsored ethnic and racial categories.

7Are state-sponsored ethnic categories detrimental? This is by no means clear. It could be, for example, that not having any data on caste is actually beneficial to low-caste Indian migrants in the United States. To return to our hypothetical lower-caste migrant from Kerala state in India: they may find, after migrating to the U.S., that their caste, language and religion simply do not carry the same valence in their new context, with their identities being subsumed under the label «Indian» or «Asian», allowing for kinds of social mobility that might not have been possible for them in India itself. It could be the case as well that the relatively lower salience of Islam in the United States contributes to Muslim’s socio-economic mobility. However, a lack of attention may also mean the disappearance of language and culture for indigenous migrants, or the conflation of groups that might otherwise remain distinct, like Sikhs in the United States, who are lumped together with Indians or South Asians.

8The argument in this essay is that while identities are understood to be situational and contextual, in practice social scientists and policy makers do not treat them as such, eliding key aspects of how identities function in social contexts. Migrants, however, provide particularly salient examples of individuals’ adaptation of identities as they move from one context to another, and their conscious (or unconscious) adaptation as they move should be informative to social scientists interested in the malleability of ethnic identities (and its limits), and the ways identities respond to social and institutional categorizations, even as these highlight some aspects of identity and subsume others.

Haut de page

Notes

1 See the project «Immigrant Native Relations in 21st-Century America», lead by Michael Jones-Correa, Helen Marrow, Dina Okamoto and Linda Tropp [details availables online <https://philadelphia-atlanta.weebly.com/>].

2 Nobles, Melissa (2000), Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics, Palo Alto, Stanford University Press.

3 Mora, Cristina (2014), Making Hispanics: How Activists, Bureaucrats, and Media Constructed a New American, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

4 Hanna, Mary, Batalova, Jeanne (2020), Indian Immigrants in the United States, Migration Policy Institute, [online at <https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/indian-immigrants-united-states-2019>].

5 National Asian American Survey [available online].

6 Mishra, Sangay (2018), Desis Divided: The Political Lives of South Asian Americans, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

7 Kapur, Devesh (2016), The Other One Percent: Indians in America, New York, Oxford University Press.

8 Menjívar, Cecilia, Abrego, Leisy (2012), «Legal Violence: Immigration Law and the Lives of Central American Immigrants», American Journal of Sociology, 117 (5), pp. 1380-1421, DOI: 10.1086/663575; Rivera-Salgado, Gaspar (2015), «From Hometown Clubs to Transnational Social Movement: The Evolution of Oaxacan Migrant Associations in California», Social Justice, 42 [3/4 (142)], pp. 118-136 (retrieved February 3, 2021, from <http://www.jstor.org/stable/24871330>); Fox, Jonathan, Rivera-Salgado, Gaspar [eds.] (2004), Indigenous Mexican Migrants in the United States, La Jolla (CA), Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies and Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California, San Diego.

9 Fraga, Luis, Rodney Hero, John Garcia, Jones-Correa, Michael, Martinez, Valerie, Segura, Gary (2012), Latinos in the New Millennium: An Almanac of Opinion, Behavior and Policy Preferences, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence papier

Michael Jones-Correa, « Reassessing Race and Ethnicity through a Migration Lens »Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez, 51-1 | 2021, 277-280.

Référence électronique

Michael Jones-Correa, « Reassessing Race and Ethnicity through a Migration Lens »Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez [En ligne], 51-1 | 2021, mis en ligne le 15 mars 2021, consulté le 18 juin 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/mcv/14774 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/mcv.14774

Haut de page

Auteur

Michael Jones-Correa

University of Pennsylvania

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

Licence Creative Commons
La revue Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 3.0 France.

Haut de page
  • Logo Casa de Velázquez
  • DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals
  • OpenEdition Journals
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search