34 | 2019
Le ḥadīṯ comme autorité du savoir
The canonization of Ḥadīṯ has not been without theological conflicts: between the Qurʾānic scholars, the traditionalists, and the rationalists, the question raised is always that of the authority of knowledge. How has the authority of Ḥadīṯ been built and how has the science of Ḥadīṯ been transmitted and gave birth, within the schools of Fiqh and the various currents of Islam (kalām, philosophy, etc.), not only to a plurality of interpretations but also to the elaboration of an epistemological framework? The theme of this issue of Midéo seeks to understand the source of the authority of Ḥadīṯ understood as an intellectual sovereignty, to grasp the reality of its authority as « text » (matn), and to question the extent of the fields of knowledge in which Ḥadīṯ is authoritative.
-
Liminaire [Full text]
-
Dossier
Éditeurs : Guillaume de Vaulx d’Arcy, Emmanuel Pisani-
Un acte manqué peut-il invalider le jeûne ? [Full text]À propos de l’oubli et de cas semblables
-
A Reading of al-Qāḍī ʿIyāḍ’s (476‒544/1083‒1149) Handbook of Hadith Science “The Elucidation of the Principles of Transmission and of the Transcription of Audition”
-
« Ḍaʿīf al-ḥadīṯ ḫayr min al-raʾy » [Full text]Force et faiblesse du ḥadīṯ dans la pensée théologique d’Ibn Taymiyya (m. 728/1328)
-
The Case of al-Zaylaʿī’s (d. 762/1361) Naṣb al-rāya as a Ḥadīṯ Companion to al-Marġīnānī’s (d. 593/1197) al-Hidāya
-
دراسة تأويليّة
-
-
Articles
-
The Case of al-ḥāl al-muqaddara
-
Les contributions de Saʿd al-Dīn al-Hilālī et de ʿAbd al-Ǧawwād Yāsīn
-
Bulletin critique
-
When the Re-Edition of a Text Can Be Its Destruction
-
-
In Memoriam
-
Recensions