Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNuméros37Dossier – La récitation dans les ...Sound-History of the Quran

Dossier – La récitation dans les premiers siècles de l’islam

Sound-History of the Quran

A Study of Mūsā ibn ʿUbayd Allāh ibn Ḫāqān (or al-Ḫāqānī)’s (d. 325/937) Qaīda fī al-taǧwīd
Lauren E. Osborne
p. 87-114

Résumés

Cet article est une étude d’un texte ancien sur la récitation du Coran. Il pose la question de ce qu’un texte prémoderne peut révéler des sons et des pratiques de la récitation à une époque ancienne. Plus particulièrement, l’analyse se concentre sur la Qaṣīda fī al-taǧwīd de Mūsā ibn ʿUbayd Allāh ibn Ḫāqān (m. 325/927), aussi connue sous le nom de la Qaṣīda rāʾiyya. Une lecture serrée du poème, en dialogue avec les textes anciens consacrés aux sciences coraniques, à la musique et à l’histoire musulmane, révèle des discours comparables sur la transmission du savoir et l’autorité religieuse appropriée, des débats anciens sur l’esthétique sonore du Coran récité, et les premiers développements des règles de sa prononciation (taǧwīd), ainsi que, plus généralement, une étiquette de la récitation. Si son attribution est correcte, ce poème représente le témoin historique le plus complet et le plus ancien des règles du taǧwīd.

Haut de page

Entrées d’index

‫الكلمات المفتاحيّة:

قصيدة, تجويد, قرآن, تلاوة
Haut de page

Texte intégral

  • 1 My sincere thanks to an anonymous reviewer, Asma Hilali, Anne-Sylvie Boisliveau, Jean Druel OP, Den (...)
  • 2 Hilali, The Sanaa Palimpsest; “The Qurʾān Before the Book”; Nasser, The Transmission of the Variant (...)
  • 3 Graham and Kermani, “Recitation and Aesthetic Reception”; Kermani, God is Beautiful.
  • 4 Neuwirth, The Qurʾan and Late Antiquity.
  • 5 Nelson, The Art of Reciting the Qurʾan.
  • 6 Frishkopf, “Mediated Qurʾanic Recitation”.
  • 7 Gade, Perfection Makes Practice.

1The story that has been told thus far about the recitation of the Quran has taken different shapes depending on the specific historical moments being examined.1 Recitation in the early empire is often understood as a means of transmission and dissemination, wherein recitation is a tool for spreading the words of the Quran and a developmental phase or process through which these words come to be codified in the form of a written text.2 Recitation at the moment of genesis of the Quran is also understood as demonstrating the aesthetic power and authority of orality to its original audience,3 or it may relate to a broader understanding of the Quran as reflective and guiding of liturgy in the early community.4 When looking to recitation in the modern period, while approaches have been wide-ranging in their specific conceptualizations of recitation (ranging from performed event5 to media6 to long-term devotional projects7), the ability of scholars to access sound recordings and hear the sounds of recitation live while conducting ethnographic research shape the conversation significantly. The availability of the sounds of the Quran in the modern period shapes the approaches taken to studying it and the questions scholars ask of it. Considering the sounds of the Quran in premodern periods presents a significant historiographical problem that has not yet been fully considered. Attention to premodern texts that describe and direct sonic practices lead us to ask what we can and cannot know about the sounds and practices being discussed, what other areas of life those sounds might come into contact with, and how we might fit an understanding of those sonic practices into the history of Quran recitation and Islamic tradition more broadly in such a way where we do not fall prey to the temptation of reading modern assumptions about sounds and practices back into early periods at the expense of seeing or hearing other possibilities.

  • 8 His name appears in sources as both Ibn Ḫāqān and al-Ḫāqānī. In his introduction to his edition of (...)

2In this article, I focus on an early text on the recitation of the Quran—its rules and ethics—to ask what a premodern text might tell us about the sounds and practices of recitation in the distant past. I consider the Qaṣīda fī al-taǧwīd, also referred to as his Qaṣīda rāʾiyya (qaṣīda rhyming on the letter rāʾ) attributed to Mūsā ibn ʿUbayd Allāh ibn Ḫāqān (or : Mūsā ibn ʿUbayd Allāh al-Ḫāqānī) (248/862‒325/937)8 as an early case study in the ethics of reciting the Quran aloud. I do so in relation to parallel discourses about transmission of knowledge and appropriate religious authority, early debates about sonic aesthetics of the recited Quran, and the early development of the rules of its pronunciation—taǧwīd—, and general etiquette of recitation. The poem represents a significant historical artefact with respect to Quran recitation in that, if correctly attributed, represents the earliest extant record of the developing rules of taǧwīd, just prior to when they are normally understood as being systematized. The poem also serves as a window into early 10th-century debates about religious practice, shedding light on the development and establishment of Sunni orthopraxy in the final decades of the Abbasid empire.

3In the article, I focus on the vocabulary and discussion of authority and sound of the recited Quran employed in the poem. First, I provide a brief overview of the considerations of authorship and reception of the poem. Then the second section of the essay considers the text of the poem, the concern about religious authority found therein, and its treatment of the rules of taǧwīd. The third and fourth sections of the essay focus on the poem’s points about sounds, revolving around the idea of pacing and clarity of pronunciation, and (relatedly) the issue of laḥn, meaning tune or melody or mispronunciation. The accompanying translation serves not only as a supplement to the argument made here, but also a broader contribution, as the first English-language translation of this poem, with the notes providing annotation of the technical vocabulary and specifics of taǧwīd employed in the poem.

Authorship, Reception, and Context of the Qaṣīda

  • 9 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 51; Brockelmann, History of the Arabic Written Tradition; “8 (...)
  • 10 Ibn al-Ǧazarī, Ġāyat al-nihāya fī ṭabaqāt al-qurrāʾ, vol. 2, pp. 279–280.
  • 11Huwa awwal man ṣannaf fī al-taǧwīd fīmā aʿlam.” Ibn al-Ǧazarī, Ġāyat al-nihāya fī ṭabaqāt al-qurrā (...)
  • 12 Al-Ḫaṭīb al-Baġdādī, Taʾrīḫ Baġdād, vol. 13, p. 59.

4A qaṣīda (ode) of 51 verses attributed to Mūsā ibn ʿUbayd Allāh ibn Ḫāqān Abū Muzāḥim al-Ḫāqānī al-Baġdādī (d. 325/927, hereafter Ibn Ḫāqān) is potentially one of the earliest preserved works on the rules of Quran recitation.9 Born in Baghdad, Ibn Ḫāqān came from a family of Abbasid ministers, with his grandfather, father, and brother all having served the empire.10 Ibn al-Ǧazarī (d. 833/1429), in his biographical dictionary of readers of the Quran, a key source recording names and biographical data of individuals involved in transmitting and preserving the recited words in early tradition records Ibn Ḫāqān as an imam, a reciter of Quran, and a trustworthy transmitter of authentic Sunni hadith. The entry notes that he was “the first who composed in taǧwīd, so far as I know”.11 Ibn Ḫāqān is also included in the Taʾrīḫ Baġdād of Abū Bakr Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī al-Ḫaṭīb al-Baġdādī (d. 463/1071), and while the entry confirms certain details of his life (birth, death, and that his father was a minister for the Abbasid caliph al-Mutawakkil), it does not mention the qaṣīda.12

  • 13 Ibn al-Ǧazarī, Ġāyat al-nihāya fī ṭabaqāt al-qurrāʾ, vol. 2, p. 280.
  • 14 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, pp. 80–82.

5The scant works of scholarship available on the poem are ambivalent concerning questions of how well-known it may have been during Ibn Ḫāqān’s own lifetime, or in subsequent generations. Writing approximately 500 years later, Ibn al-Ǧazarī claims in his biographical dictionary entry on Ibn Ḫāqān that the Qaṣīda rāʾiyya was famous and that the medieval Andalusian scholar Abū ʿAmr ʿUṯmān ibn Saʿīd al-Dānī (d. 444/1053)—known for his works on taǧwīd and the variant readings of the Quran (qirāʾāt)—wrote a commentary (šarḥ) on it around a century after the poem’s original composition.13 In his 1938 study of the poem, Paulo Boneschi suggests that the fact that Ibn Ḫāqān was given the title of “imam” during his lifetime (and he is recorded this way in Ibn al-Ǧazarī’s biographical dictionary of reciters, as described above) indicates that he was respected and considered as a scholar at least among his own students. However, Boneschi finds it curious that a didactic poem such as Ibn Ḫāqān’s qaṣīda would not have taken on more of a life in tradition, generating more commentaries for example, given its utility in teaching and transmitting the details of recitation. The fact of the relative absence of commentaries (save one by al-Dānī further described below), along with the fact that Ibn al-Nadīm does not mention Ibn Ḫāqān or his qaṣīda in the Fihrist, his encyclopaedic work on compiled a mere 60 years after Ibn Ḫāqān’s death, leads Boneschi to conclude that the poem may not have enjoyed great popularity during Ibn Ḫāqān’s lifetime or in the generations thereafter, and he further adds that Ibn Ḫāqān acquiring a circle of students may have been a result of his social standing, rather than through his possessing talent and knowledge.14

  • 15 Al-Ḫāqānī, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-qirāʾa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”.
  • 16 A concise and comprehensive portrait of the history of development of recitation practices is avail (...)
  • 17 Nasser, The Second Canonization of the Qurʾān, p. 2.

6While Ibn al-Nadīm indeed did not record evidence of Ibn Ḫāqān and his qaṣīda, al-Dānī produced the one extant commentary on the poem just over a century after Ibn Ḫāqān’s time.15 Al-Dānī and Abū Bakr Ibn Muǧāhid (d. 324/936) are known as the authors of some of the earliest extant systematic works on the rules of taǧwīd.16 Their works are often cited as being some of the earliest in a genre that became widely accessible after that time, serving to codify the body of knowledge governing proper recitation and pronunciation of the Quran, in addition to their works on the variant readings of the Quran—the qirāʾāt—serving a similarly key role in the codification of the variant readings. In particular, Ibn Muǧāhid has been understood as codifying in the early- to mid-10th century recitation practices that had long been debated and developing. In his recent study of Ibn Muǧāhid’s foundational work Kitāb al-sabʿa fī al-qirāʾāt, Shady Nasser articulates how he understands Ibn Muǧāhid’s work as a moment in a long process of editing and standardization of the quranic text, in which recitation played a key role (both orthographically as in the qirāʾāt and in terms of practice, via taǧwīd): “Qirāʾāt in general, and the sophisticated rules of tajwīd (recitation) in particular, were the tools Qurʾān readers and grammarians used to standardize and stabilize the Qurʾānic text. Standardizing the Qurʾān meant editing it, that is, correcting its substandard usages, eliminating its irregularities, and preparing it for public recitation. Thus, at a fundamental level, my treatment of the development of Qirāʾāt literature builds on the idea that it was a process of editing and standardizing.”17 So while Ibn Muǧāhid died roughly a decade after Ibn Ḫāqān, given that Ibn Muǧāhid systematized practices that had long been used in processes of standardization of the Quran, Ibn Ḫāqān’s qaṣīda can be understood as representing a slightly earlier moment in this process.

7Nearly a century later, al-Dānī came to further systematize the rules of taǧwīd as well as write his commentary on Ibn Ḫāqān’s qaṣīda, representing one record of the poem in the broader history of the development of recitation practices and the quranic sciences. This point demonstrates not only that al-Dānī was aware of the poem, but also that its composition definitely predated him, bolstering the claim of its 10th-century origins. Al-Dānī’s works on taǧwīd are far more detailed on the specifics of this body of knowledge than Ibn Ḫāqān’s qaṣīda. Angelika Neuwirth describes al-Dānī’s contributions to early works on taǧwīd as follows:

  • 18 Neuwirth, The Qurʾan and Late Antiquity, pp. 155–156.

His work… offers detailed compendia on the articulation sites of the consonants, the linking and doubling of the consonants, contraction, assimilation, the contextual use of case endings (tanwīn), and so on. In Abū ʿAmr al-Dānī, we also already find variations of vocalic pronunciation, such as the coloring of the a (imāla), the dropping of vowels (sukūn, the pause), ishmām, rawm, nasalization. These materials become fixed inventories added as propaedeutic components to the classical qirāʾāt-works on the foundations of pronunciation, uṣūl, which form the basis for the presentation of individual differences in pronunciation, farsh al-ḥurūf.18

8It is safe to say that the portrait of taǧwīd rules and practices found in al-Dānī’s oeuvre resembles modern practices a great deal, largely resulting from the significant role his works played in codifying this system and area of the quranic sciences.

  • 19 Al-Ḫāqānī, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-tilāwa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”; “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-qir (...)
  • 20 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 92.
  • 21 Al-Ḫāqānī, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-tilāwa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”.

9Ibn Ḫāqān’s qaṣīda serves as an opening onto a broader world of sonic and ethical practices in relation to the recited Quran in the tenth century. Interestingly, the poem has not generated a great deal of attention in modern scholarship, the main work dedicated to it including Boneschi’s 1938 article and accompanying French annotated translation, and the modern Arabic editions of the poem including notes from al-Dānī’s commentary by ʿAlī Ḥusayn Ḥassan al-Bawwāb.19 In commenting on the poem, Boneschi’s main considerations consist of unpacking the rules of taǧwīd described therein, in addition to critically analysing the question of authorship and with what degree of certainty we may trust that Ibn Ḫāqān indeed composed the poem. With regard to the latter, he concludes that through modern historical-critical methods the poem’s authorship cannot be established with certainty, but that the poem itself also does not allow the scholar to deny that it is likely from the tenth century.20 Al-Bawwāb, by contrast, considers the poem as a valuable didactic tool on key aspects of taǧwīd and the broader ethics of recitation, and considers Ibn Ḫāqān’s authorship as demonstrated in the traditional historical sources, including those such as Ibn al-Ǧazarī’s Ġāyat al-nihāya and the Taʾrīḫ Baġdād as discussed briefly earlier.21

  • 22 Bennison, The Great Caliphs, pp. 170–199.
  • 23 Bonner, “The Waning of Empire, 861–945”, p. 348.

10Especially given the fact that the poem includes a polemic about religious practice, it is also possible to understand it in the context of the broader development of Islamic thought and history. While it serves as a particularly early record of the development of taǧwīd specifically, it may also serve as a window into developing debates about orthopraxy in 10th-century Baghdad. Ibn Ḫāqān lived and worked in a moment of political turmoil and eventual decline in the Abbasid empire, as well as a great deal of debate, development, and flourishing of developing fields of Islamic theology and law, and translation of a wide range of bodies of knowledge in Baghdad specifically.22 This moment was approximately a century and a half after the founders of what came to be the major schools of Islamic law, and just after the major Abbasid translation movement introduced a wide range of types of new knowledge into Baghdad and the Islamic empire more broadly. Yet his life was also just prior to the major theological developments and cultural revival that took place in the century after his death. About this moment in history, Michael Bonner has noted that the first half of the tenth century has often fallen through the cracks in historical research: “Historians often neglect the history of the first half of the tenth century, perhaps because they see it as a painful transition between effective ʿAbbāsid rule and the ensuing period of Būyid domination in Iraq and western Iran, famous for its ‘renaissance of Islam’.”23 Here, we can see Ibn Ḫāqān as connecting these more thoroughly studied historical moments, and reflecting an ongoing debate at a period of the key development of Sunni orthopraxy.

The Text of the Qaṣīda

11The poem consists of 51 verses, composed in a strict rhyme and rhythm as is typical of much classical Arabic poetry. Each verse is organized into two halves or hemistiches. The poem divides roughly into 8 sections, with a long portion of the latter half reviewing and reminding reciters and listeners of specific rules of recitation. This material is preceded by a broader polemic about correctness in recitation and proper authority in transmission and learning the Quran, framing the establishment of recitational orthopraxy in a broader argument.

  • 24 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 57.

12The poem begins with a 4-verse introduction in which the speaker attests to his humility and makes an appeal for divine help and protection in his task of teaching recitation.24 Following, in verses 5‒7, the speaker turns to address the reciter of the Quran, assuring them of the reward in the hereafter for becoming proficient in recitation. However, there is, according to the poetic speaker, a problem at his current moment regarding appropriate authority in teaching and transmitting the recited Quran, as conveyed in verse 6:

  • 25 Verse 6: “Fa-mā kullu man yatlū al-kitāba yuqīmuhu / wa-lā kullu man fī al-nāsi yuqriʾuhum muqrī.” (...)

Not every person who recites the scripture (al-Kitāb) elevates it,
nor is everyone who teaches recitation a master thereof (muqrī)25

  • 26 Verses 9‒11. Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 58.
  • 27 Ibn Muǧāhid, Kitāb al-sabʿa fī al-qirāʾāt.
  • 28 Leemhuis, “Readings of the Qurʾān”; While an extended study of this connection to the development o (...)

13In verses 8‒11, the poet attests to the manner in which his teaching is based in authoritative tradition, and these verses name each of the seven reciters after which the seven original variant readings follow.26 The seven names listed in these verses correspond to the seven variant readings that Ibn Muǧāhid determined at approximately that same time to be authoritative in his Kitāb al-sabʿa fī al-qirāʾāt.27 Ibn Muǧāhid’s view on and systematization of variant readings was taken up as legal practice in by Abbasid vizier Ibn Muqla in 323/936, making the codification of the qirāʾāt roughly contemporaneous with or even slightly after the likely moment of composition of Ibn Ḫāqān’s Rāʾiyya.28 The readings themselves are attributed to individuals who lived earlier, however, with those seven individuals having died mid-2nd century/in the latter half of the eight century. Ibn Muǧāhid’s intervention was into a debate that had been ongoing concerning which variant readings were acceptable and on what grounds. Notably, his work became authoritative only a handful of years after the death of Ibn Ḫāqān.

14Verses 12‒16 argue for correctness and measured pacing in both one’s recitation and studies thereof. The following section, in verses 17‒22, references the poem itself and connects it to a broader point about the merits of correct Quran recitation, charging the student of recitation with studying well and reciting clearly. Verses 23‒27 elaborate on the idea of correct recitation with a specific polemic about the use of laḥn, a term discussed at greater length below, including a range of meanings from correct pronunciation, pacing or emphasis on syllables, or the use of melody in recitation. The poem clearly discourages laḥn in recitation, and exploring the use of this term in contemporaneous literatures reveals a range of possibilities as to what specific sounds or practices may be being referenced here.

15The latter half of the poem, consisting of verses 28‒49, largely serves as references to rules of recitation and didactic reminders to the student of recitation, lest he forget or mix any of them up. The poem concludes with a pair of signatory verses (taḫalluṣ) referencing Ibn Ḫāqān as “Ibn ʿUbayd Allāh Mūsā”. Although the section on taǧwīd rules consists of over 20 verses, it is hard to say whether it serves as a comprehensive portrait of the rules of taǧwīd that may have been practiced at that time. Everything mentioned here is in accordance with the rules presented later in the works of al-Dānī and Ibn Muǧāhid, although Ibn Ḫāqān’s qaṣīda does not include everything that appears in those later works.

16In this essay, I build on the research of Boneschi and al-Bawwāb in order to ask what the poem itself might tell us of the recited Quran in the tenth century, and how it does so. In reading the poem historically, I follow al-Bawwāb in assuming that the historical evidence suggests that Ibn Ḫāqān is indeed the author of the qaṣīda. To put it simply, my attention is focused on the text of the poem in so far as it is one historical record of recitation in a recitation-adjacent text. The poem largely focuses on the ethics of recitation, broadly construed. While it does discuss the rules of taǧwīd in the latter half, the rules included do not represent a complete portrait of how they appear in later forms of historical development—meaning, they are either presented in an abridged form in the poem, or they represent an early phase of development (or both, or there is another explanation). It could be similar to taǧwīd manuals in that it is not meant to be a comprehensive catalogue, but rather would only become so in combination with instruction. But Ibn Ḫāqān’s poem differs from most taǧwīd manuals in that it also engages in a broader polemic than a simple presentation of the rules would suggest. Rather, the Rāʾiyya treats the rules of taǧwīd within the broader framework of a larger argument on style of recitation and its ideals in terms of the sounds of the Quran. While the poem does contain and explain to some extent the rules of taǧwīd, these are in fact included in service of a larger polemic wherein Ibn Ḫāqān argues for the correctness of a particular style of recitation in a broader context of the developing establishment of Sunni orthopraxy.

  • 29 Qirāʾāt refers here to the system of variant readings of the Quran, a matter of discussion since th (...)
  • 30 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 52.
  • 31 Translations from Boneschi’s French article are my own. Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, pp. 52- (...)
  • 32 Here, Boneschi cites and includes a quotation in Arabic from the 17th-century Ottoman-era historian (...)

17The poem can be read as both reflective of and arguing to produce norms of embodied practice. In his study on the poem, Boneschi introduces the text of the poem with an overview of taǧwīd; specifically, he frames the science of taǧwīd as being about “norms…of orthopraxy”, as opposed to the science of qirāʾāt,29 which pertains more to “orthographic, grammatical, and lexicographical” issues.30 Boneschi frames the science of taǧwīd as being “more of a practical art than a theoretical science”.31 The point here is that Boneschi situates the science of taǧwīd as being a theoretical discourse describing (and prescribing, in the sense of providing rules for) embodied practice.32

  • 33 The relevant verses are discussed later in this section.

18In analysing the text of the Raʾiyya, we see that the vocabulary of describing recitation may be read in a range of ways, depending on how we situate that vocabulary with respect to Islamic tradition and the historicization of Arabic language. The poem may be read as a polemic on religious practice and knowledge as expressed through the aesthetics of recitation, written in poetic form. It is also didactic in the sense that it transmits knowledge about recitation, but it is didactic in a very different sense from the later Ǧazariyya poem—another much more widely known and studied poem on taǧwīd. The Ǧazariyya is a popular name for another didactic poem on taǧwīd by Ibn al-Ǧazarī. The Ǧazariyya is, similarly to Ibn Ḫāqān’s poem, written with a strict meter and rhyme pattern typical of premodern Arabic poetry, but in these cases often said to work particularly well as shaping a work meant to be a teaching tool likely to be memorized. The Ǧazariyya, by contrast to Ibn Ḫāqān’s Raʾiyya, has enjoyed significantly more popularity, and is still used on occasion as the backbone of modern taǧwīd manuals. The Ǧazariyya largely consists of a recitation of the rules of taǧwīd set to rhyming metrical verse, such that the student who recites the poem recalls not only all the rules of taǧwīd, but also enacts them in reading the poem. The rules of taǧwīd have also remained largely stable since the composition of the Ǧazariyya, so the poem has remained a comprehensive resource for learning in that way. The rules in their modern form, or even as presented in the Ǧazariyya, do not all appear in Ibn Ḫāqān’s Rāʾiyya, however. The Rāʾiyya is comparatively scant in this regard, which could mean several different things. It could be that the rules were in an earlier stage of development and those that do not appear came into practice later. Or, it could be the case that the rules are presented in an incomplete fashion, which also could be done for different reasons. The poem also does not purport completeness in this regard, nor does it seem to hold this as an implicit goal. Rather, the poem itself tells us that it is an abridgement or an introduction,33 but ties them in to a broader claim about ethics of style and aesthetics in relation to Quran recitation, as well as appropriate authority in transmitting the recitation. To this end, the guidelines of producing the sounds of recitation expand outward to what may be understood as para-sonic concerns of ethics, aesthetics, and authority. The guidelines about sound, such as phonetics, pronunciation, and pace of recitation, become microcosms expanded outward to broader points that are not about sound per se, but are interrelated with the points about sound.

19Turning then to the text of the poem: as previously mentioned, I noted that it is composed with rhyme and rhythm, following traditional formal patterns of Arabic poetry in these regards. The meter of the poem is ṭawīl, meaning that it scans as follows:

faʿūlun mafāʿīlun faʿūlun mafāʿīlun        faʿūlun mafāʿīlun faʿūlun mafāʿīlun

20The poem also follows a consistent end-rhyme; the end-words of all 51 verses rhyme on rāʾ, and also share the same morphological pattern (wazn), so the rhyme words are al-kibri, al-faḫri, ʿumri, ġafri, and so on, providing a consistent rhythm and rhyme at the ends of each verse. Wording and word-choices are in accordance with maintaining the meter and rhyme; for example, in verses 21, 23, and 26 ḏikr is used in the sense of meaning Quran recitation. This word has a broad range of meanings such as mentioning, remembrance, and can refer specifically to mentioning, chanting, or invoking the name of God (also serving as a reminder); while Quran recitation could be included within this range of meanings, the word is not typically used in this sense since there is more specific vocabulary available, even that is used in other places in the poem. In verse 21, ḏikr appears as the end-word as it is in keeping with the rhyme pattern as well as the meter; the word reappears in verses 23 and 26 where it fits the meter, and is understood as meaning Quran recitation since it was used in this sense in verse 21.

Pacing and Clarity: Ḥadr and Tartīl

21The Rāʾiyya states a polemic about different styles of recitation and pacing and clarity of pronunciation that set the stage for the subsequent lesson on taǧwīd that follows in the second half of the poem. In this way, the points about sound—pacing and clarity of pronunciation—are extended to broader concerns about the ethics of practice in the devotee’s approaches to their studies.

The skillful (ḥiḏq) [reciter] gives each letter its due,
whether he recites the Quran in a measured pace (rattala), or quickly (ḥadr).

If we hurry (ḥadarnā) our lesson, there is a concession for us in this;
the faithful are benefited with ease.

  • 34 Verses 12‒14: “Fa-ḏū al-ḥiḏqi muʿṭin li-l-ḥurūfi ḥuqūqahā / iḏā rattala al-Qurʾāna aw kāna ḏā ḥadri (...)

And our slow, even-paced recitation of the Quran (tartīl) is preferable; for that [is the one] to which
we were commanded through our abiding in him in thought.34

  • 35 Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, pp. 7, 15, 20–21.
  • 36 Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, pp. 19–20.

22Here, initially skill (ḥiḏq) and haste (ḥadr) are opposed, as well as reciting (rattala) and hastening (ḥadarnā). The point on the surface is that to hasten one’s studies and one’s reciting lessens the spiritual value of the practice. The faithful (ʿibād, typically used to express “servants of God”, meaning believers or the faithful) receive ease, so it is likely that by contrast those who hasten their lessons increase their burden in doing so. But a more specific and technical interpretation of these verses is also possible. The verb used here for “recite”, tartīl, most specifically describes a slow style of recitation, with emphasis on clarity and accuracy of pronunciation.35 The root being used here for haste and hastening—ḥadr, which is clearly used in a negative sense in the poem—is also a term denoting a specific style of Quran recitation. In ḥadr-style recitation, the reciter’s main priority is speed—to recite quickly in order to give voice to a certain amount of the Quran, either for spiritual merit or for the maintenance of memorization.36 Although in all styles the rules of pronunciation are meant to be followed, the critique here in the poem seems to be that ḥadr-style recitation does not incur the same divine favour as a recitation performed more slowly, with more distinct pronunciation.

  • 37 Q. al-Muzzammil 73:4.

23Ibn Ḫāqān’s point then, in verse 14, is that tartīl—more slow-paced, evenly-spaced recitation—incurs greater divine favour than fast-paced, ḥadr-style recitation. The point is bolstered by the quranic resonance of the term tartīl, which lends a quranic basis to Ibn Ḫāqān’s preference for tartīl-style recitation. Tartīl is one of a small handful of terms used in the Quran for the act of reading or reciting aloud, alongside qirāʾa and tilāwa. The second hemistich of verse 14 reads “we are commanded to it”, wherein the antecedent of “it” is tartīl al-Qurʾān in the first half of the verse, making tartīl the variety of recitation that is commanded. This point on one level likely refers to the second half of verse 4 of Sūrat al-Muzzammil, which reads “rattil al-Qurʾāna tartīlan”.37 This verse is often cited and interpreted as a divine command to recite the Quran. But even more, it is often cited as a command indicating that the Quran should be recited in a specific way. The sentence repeats the same root twice in what is known as an accusative of specification (al-mafʿūl al-muṭlaq), directing the quranic listener to recite (rattil) in the manner indicated by the adverbial form of that same root. Here in the Rāʾiyya, tartīl is understood in contradistinction to ḥadr, so the quranic verse is being interpreted specifically in this light. Going on then, the theme of slowness is carried through the verse with the wording “from our abiding in him in thought” (min mukṯinā fīhi bi-l-fikri) with mukṯinā meaning our abiding or tarrying. This point serves as one example of a point about sound broadening to other areas of practice—in this case, how a student of recitation would approach and conduct themselves with respect to their studies. Just as their recitation should be slow-paced and with an emphasis on clarity, so should their studies.

  • 38 Verse 23. Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 59.

24Following a short sequence of verses describing the virtues of learning the poem and studying taǧwīd (verses 16‒22), the poem turns to describe some details of how recitation should be studied and performed. First, there is memorization: “The principle of the science of dhikr is mastery of its memorization”;38 here, ḏikr is used again in the sense of meaning Quran recitation, allowing the meter to be maintained, and helpfully picking back up on the word’s earlier use at the end of verse 21, where it fit both the rhyme and the meter.

25While the bulk of the poem is about the rules of taǧwīd, it mentions many but not all of the rules and terms that came to be part of this body of knowledge in later generations, and it does not explain in great details how many of the rules should be enacted. The translation accompanying this article points out many of the taǧwīd rules included in the poem in the footnotes. For the purposes of analysis here, it is worth noting that the poem mentions rules and cautions reciters to get them right, but does not necessarily explain them or demonstrate them with the words of the poem. While they are not in conflict with the taǧwīd rules in their modern formulation, or as systematized by al-Dānī, their usage and explanation in the poem here does not allow the historian to assume that they would result in a sound in alignment with modern practice. For example, verse 29 cautions,

  • 39Wa-inna allaḏī tuḫfīhi laysa bi-mudġami / wa-baynahumā farqun faʿarrifhu bi-l-našri.”

That which you conceal is not done by assimilation.
There is a distinction between those two; make that explicit.39

26The roots used here for the words “conceal” and “assimilation” refer to what come to be specific taǧwīd rules, but the explanation in these verses cannot necessarily be assumed to be the same as modern practice. Here in the Qaṣīda rāʾiyya, Ibn Ḫāqān does not explained these details of the rules, and this is typical of the majority of his presentation of the taǧwīd rules that dominate the latter half of the poem. Rather, he names them and directs the reciter not to confuse them with one another.

27The treatment of the taǧwīd rules in the qaṣīda is in keeping with the fact that the author is making a broader polemic. While the poem is didactic, it is not entirely so in terms of the presentation of the rules, but rather in advising students of recitation on correct practice, both in sound and more broadly in studies and comportment. But the abridgment of the rules also poses a historiographical problem. Since they are not described in detail and there is not an extant prior work that describes the rules of taǧwīd (as of yet, at least), especially using this same vocabulary, we cannot reasonably conclude on this evidence that the rules elucidated here would necessarily be the same as their later canonization, or certainly as modern performance and practice. The poem does give other indications about the sounds of the Quran with respect to its polemic concerning laḥn, as I take up in the following and final section of the essay.

Reciting without Laḥn

  • 40 Melchert, “The Controversy over Reciting the Qurʾān with Tones”, p. 103.
  • 41 Melchert, “The Controversy over Reciting the Qurʾān with Tones”, p. 102.

28Following its earlier point about the importance of memorization, the poem makes a vehement point about removing the sound of laḥn from one’s recitation. The semantic range of this term is broad, and tracking its usage in contemporaneous and preceding bodies of literature of diverse genres demonstrates that its usage in Ibn Ḫāqān’s poem is similarly broad. As Christopher Melchert has shown, early Islamic sources show both that reciting with laḥn was an established practice by the late seventh century, as evidenced by the expressions of disapproval to the practice found in sources of that period.40 It is also the case that early men of religion (with some exceptions also discussed by Melchert) generally cautioned against reciting in a musical way, and sometimes employed the term laḥn in so doing.41 Melchert suggests that reciting the Quran with laḥn could have been an established practice in Medina by the mid-8th century, with the practice spreading in later centuries to Baghdad. My findings here add further evidence in this regard, and the expand the range of sources in understanding what Ibn Ḫāqān may mean by laḥn in his poem. Tracking the term in diverse literature—such as encyclopaedic works, early works on Arabic phonetics, works on music, and of course the quranic sciences—serves as a portrait into the development of early debates and practices of Quran recitation that may seem remote and surprising to the modern eye and ear. Laḥn is a word with a range of interrelated meanings including melody or tune, as well as accent in spoken language, dialect, variant readings of the Quran rejected from the canonical tradition, or simply ungrammatical or unclear Arabic. The message of these verses concerning laḥn, however, is clear, momentarily leaving aside the question of the precise meaning of laḥn in this specific case, when it first appears in verses 23‒24:

First in knowledge of ḏikr is mastery of its memorization,
and recognizing the laḥn therein when it happens.

  • 42Fa-awwalu ʿilmi al-ḏikri itqānu ḥifẓihi / wa-maʿrifatun bi-l-laḥni fīhi iḏā yajrī // wa-kun ʿārifa (...)

Be aware of the laḥn so that you can eliminate it.
For the one who doesn’t know the laḥn has no excuse.42

  • 43 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 70, n. 4; Ǧurǧānī, Hāḏā kitāb al-taʿrīfāt, p. 128.

29The message is that the use or appearance of laḥn is to be avoided in Quran recitation. But what is meant by laḥn here? Given the semantic range of the word, it may seem to mean anything from reciting the Quran with a melody, to reciting the Quran with an accent, to lending incorrect emphasis and pacing of syllables, to reciting the Quran with mispronunciations. Boneschi includes a note with his translation of these verses, reading as follows: “Laḥn signifies here ‘popular erroneous pronunciation; dialectical pronunciation; barbarism’. Laḥn often consists of qualitative and quantitative alteration of the vowels”; following, he includes a quotation from the encyclopaedia by ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad al-Ǧurǧānī (d. 815/1413), al-Taʿrīfāt, defining laḥn “in the Quran and in the long aḏān, [as] to prolong what is short and to shorten what is long”43 Boneschi’s reading is that laḥn thereby refers to mispronunciation, and his citation of al-Ǧurǧānī suggests that the mispronunciation could be specifically understood as incorrect emphasis or pacing between syllables. It is possible to expand this point as follows by turning to earlier literature in the genres of religious sciences as well as music.

  • 44 Ibn Qutayba, Taʾwīl muškil al-Qurʾān, pp. 36–45.
  • 45 Interestingly, although little is known about Ibn Qutayba’s career, he is said to have had contact (...)

30Understanding laḥn as referring to pronunciation—in terms of accent or dialect—has precedence in debates in the early tradition about acceptability of variant readings of the Quran. In his Taʾwīl muškil al-Qurʾān (Interpretation of the Difficulties of the Qurʾān, a work on understanding the particularities of quranic rhetoric), 9th-century theologian and author of adab Ibn Qutayba (d. 276/889) uses the term laḥn to refer to an accent or dialect in the context of debates about the acceptability of variant readings of the Quran. In the section, “Bāb mā udduʿiya ʿalā al-Qurʾān min al-laḥn”, (“The Section on What is Claimed about the Quran on Laḥn”, which immediately follows the chapter on the qirāʾāt, “Bāb al-radd ʿalayhim fī wuǧūh al-qirāʾāt”) Ibn Qutayba uses laḥn to refer to readings of the Quran that have been deemed to be incorrect or excessive in some way in their pronunciation.44 He provides numerous examples of specific verses that were said to have been read in different ways, primarily with different variations on the vocalization, often stemming from different understandings of the grammar and, relatedly, the proper declension (iʿrāb) of a word.45

31When the term reappears later in the poem, its usage is more clearly aligned with this understanding of laḥn as constituting some kind of mispronunciation or error. The latter half of the poem is largely dedicated to listing rules of taǧwīd and cautioning against different types of errors in recitation. Amidst this list appears verse 35:

  • 46Wa-mā kāna mahmūzan fa-kun hāmizan lahu / wa-lā tahmizan mā kāna laḥnan ladā al-nabri.”

And pronounce with a glottal stop that which has a hamza;
And don’t pronounce a glottal stop that precedes the nabra, which would be laḥn.46

  • 47 The quotation here is from my annotated translation accompanying this article. This citation refers (...)

32As I also explain in a note on this verse in the translation of the poem, “nabra generally refers to an accent or stress, so here in general terms the laḥn would mean that this would be a form of mispronunciation wherein the cadence of the recitation would be incorrect. Nabra can also refer to pronouncing something with a hamza or glottal stop. Most specifically, as Boneschi explains in note 5 on page 73, nabra refers to the final hamza on a word”.47 The point in this usage of laḥn is clearly about a mispronunciation of the text. In this sense, laḥn is being used to indicate an error.

  • 48 Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, p. 10.

33Alternatively, it has also been suggested that Ibn Ḫāqān’s use of laḥn may refer to certain practices of reciting the Quran with melodies of popular music, as had been done but was banned in the early Abbasid era. This explanation certainly seems more potentially applicable to the first uses of laḥn in the poem that do not necessarily indicate that they concern pronunciation. Frederick Denny notes that, “[T]he recitation by means of secular melodies, known as qirāʾa b’il-alḥān, came to be outlawed by the ʿUlamāʾ during early ʿAbbasid times”.48 On the surface level, reciting with melody (qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān) might mean reciting the Quran with variations in pitch, which is roughly a description of how many recitations sound today, potentially causing confusion as to what is meant in its usage here. As M. Talbi has shown, however, looking in to the meanings of qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān in literature on music dating to this period reveals a much more complex portrait, with meanings and practices shifting a great deal over time.

  • 49 Al-Kindī, Risāla fī ḫabar taʾlīf al-alḥān.
  • 50 This treatise is incomplete and exists only in manuscript. Shiloah, The Dimension of Music in Islam (...)
  • 51 Shiloah, The Dimension of Music in Islamic and Jewish Culture, vol. 3, p. 58.

34The term laḥn appears in Arabic works on music dating to the early centuries of Islam, preceding and up to the time of Ibn Ḫāqān, and is used in the sense of melody or tune. For example, the philosopher Abū Yūsuf Yaʿqūb ibn Isḥāq al-Kindī (d. 252/866‒867), wrote two treatises in the first half of the ninth century on melody and composition of music, Risāla fī ḫabar taʾlīf al-alḥān, “Treatise on the Composition of Melodies”,49 and Risāla fī al-luḥūn wa-l-naġam, “Treatise on Melodies and Modes”50). And in the “Epistle on Music” by the Rasāʾil Iḫwān al-Ṣafāʾ wa-ḫillān al-wafāʾ from the latter half of the tenth century, laḥn is used as meaning rhythm or rhythmical modes.51 That the term is also used in musical traditions in the early centuries of Islam is clear. When bearing in mind the fraught relationship between music and religious practice in Islamic tradition, one might ask whether the religious and musical bodies of literature are siloed in their respective uses of the term laḥn.

35Laḥn appears in the encyclopaedic work by Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Rabbih (d. 328/940), al-ʿIqd al-farīd (The Unique Necklace) in both of the senses of dialect or mispronunciation as well as tune or melody, demonstrating that these meanings of the term, which on the surface seem to be disparate and potentially isolated between different discourses and bodies of literature, can indeed be interrelated and come together in a single work. The subjects included in al-ʿIqd al-farīd are wide-ranging; while it does not include the religious sciences (although it does refer to religious practices in so far as they come up in relation to other topics, and hadith frequently serve as sources), it does cover most any body of knowledge or practice that a learned person might be expected to know, including discourse and rhetoric, and musical practices.

  • 52 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vol. 2, pp. 310–311.
  • 53 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, pp. 3–87.

36Al-ʿIqd al-farīd provides one particularly full Arabic-language portrait of key bodies of knowledge and related practices from the first half of the tenth century, and illustrates the two seemingly divergent but interpenetrating ways in which the term laḥn may be understood. For example, the “Book of the Ruby on Knowledge and Etiquette”, (the sixth book in the work, “Kitāb al-yāqūta fī al-ʿilm wa-l-adab”) contains a “Section on Laḥn and Mispronunciation” (“Bāb fī al-laḥn wa-l-taṣḥīf”).52 Later in the work, however, appears the “Book of the Second Ruby on the Knowledge of Alḥān and the Disagreement of People Thereupon” (“Kitāb al-yāqūta al-ṯāniya fī ʿilm al-alḥān wa-iḫtilāf al-nās fīh).53 Much of this book consists of reports representing differences of opinions concerning and reactions to singing (ġināʾ), particularly in so far as how that category may bump up against other related issues or categories and practices that it might resemble.

  • 54 See Nelson’s chapter “The Samāʿ Polemic” for a particularly thorough overview and consideration of (...)
  • 55 Farmer, A History of Arabian Music to the XIIIth Century, p. 22; Faruqi, “Music, Musicians and Musl (...)

37With respect to the use of laḥn in al-ʿIqd al-farīd’s section “Book of the Second Ruby on the Knowledge of Alḥān and the Disagreement of People Thereupon”, a word on the relationship between recitation and music is necessary. The overarching theme of this section of the work is laḥn (as melody), and while the theorization of this concept is broad and not strictly limited to music, music is obviously the theme of many of the subsections. The relationship between Islamic tradition and music has been fraught and complex.54 Thinking both historically and synchronically about recitation in relation to musical practices is complex in large part because, when looking to the foundational sources of Islamic tradition (Quran and hadith), it is possible to build opposing claims. This is in large part because the Quran is silent on the issue of music, so arguments made immediately rely on specific interpretive strategies and cannot be grounded in specific vocabulary in foundational texts in ways in which they may be on other topics. While arguments based in quranic sources can be and are made both in favour of and against musical practices, the Quran does not contain many of the key terms one would search for in asking about music.55 This ambiguity is compounded by the complex relationship between the messages of the Quran and early Islam in relation to pre-Islamic practices such as poetry and music.

  • 56 Talbi, “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”.
  • 57 Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, p. 10.
  • 58 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 3.

38While the contemporary sounds and practices of recitation may shape our assumptions of recitation in the past to a great deal, it is important to recognize that, especially given the ambiguity and silence of foundational sources on the issue of music, recitation practices of the remote past may surprise us in their contrast to modern sounds and practices. As Mohamed Talbi shows in his 1958 article, “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”, the meaning of qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān, or reciting with alḥān, changed a great deal in the first three centuries of Islam,56 and as Denny has suggested, the use of laḥn or alḥān may have been referring more immediately to particular practices associated with recitation that were associated with the developing musical tradition in Baghdad that were banned during Abbasid times,57 which could be the more direct point of reference for Ibn Ḫāqān’s reference to laḥn in the Rāʾiyya. Al-ʿIqd al-farīd’s section on musical practices reveals a range of perspectives on laḥn (conceived of as melody or tune, rather than as accent or mispronunciation as discussed above) from the early- to mid-3rd/10th century, and even considers some sources from the early history of Islam such as hadith. In the dialectical style that is typical of the work more broadly, Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih points out that diverse perspectives exist on the permissibility of laḥn, ranging from those who despise it (karahahu), why they might do so, and likewise those who condone it (istaḥsanahu), and why.58

  • 59 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 7.
  • 60 Exclaiming, “Hayh! Istiḥsānan lahā”. Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 8.

39A handful of perspectives included in the section comprise portraits of what may be meant by qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān, in the sense of “reciting with melody”. In the section, “Disagreement of People on Singing” (“Iḫtilāf al-nās fī al-ġināʾ”), Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih includes a saying attributed to the Prophet’s wife ʿĀʾiša. She is reported to have said, “teach your children poetry [which will] be sweet [on] their tongues”.59 Then, upon hearing a recitation of some hundred rhyming verses, the Prophet is reported to have exclaimed positively.60 The following passage from this section of al-ʿIqd al-farīd then elucidates further:

  • 61Qālū: ʻal-šiʿr ḥasan wa-lā narā an yuʾḫaḏa bi-laḥnin ḥasan; wa-ajāzū ḏālika fī al-Qurʾān wa-fī al- (...)

They said: “The poetry is good, and we don’t deem to be aggrieved by good melody (laḥn).” They allowed that [i.e., the use of melodies] in the Quran and the call to prayer. If melodies (alḥān) were despised (makrūha), so then the Quran and the call to prayer are more worthy of being liberated from them [i.e., the melodies]. And if they are not despised, then poetry is in greater need of them in order to establish the meter (al-wazn) and to distinguish it as such from narrative (ḫabar).61

  • 62 Here, in his translation, Farmer includes a note explaining that the Arabs have used set tunes in s (...)

40In this passage, laḥn is reasoned to be acceptable on the basis that it is acceptable to be used with the Quran and the call to prayer. Even more,poetry is in fact more reliant on the use of laḥn in so far as it may be helpful in establishing the poetic meter62 and identifying the poem as such in opposition to other genres. The implication here is that the Quran (as well as the call to prayer) being recited with laḥn is being treated as a standard by which the use of laḥn in other contexts may be deemed acceptable by extension.

  • 63ʿĀṣim ʿan Ǧurayǧ, qāla: ʻsaʾaltu ʿAṭāʾ ʿan qirāʾat al-Qurʾān ʿalā alḥān al-ġināʾ wa-l-ḥudāʾ, qāla: (...)

41Another report seems to be even more approving of reciting the Quran with laḥn, stating that “ʿĀṣim, from Ǧurayǧ, said: ‘I asked ʿAtāʾ about reciting the Quran with the alḥān of singing (ġināʾ) and of the caravan song (ḥudāʾ)’. He said: ‘[There is] no harm in that, oh son of my brother!’”63 And this report has been interpreted to indicate that the use of the alḥān that are also used in musical practices such as singing, and musical genres such as the caravan song, may also be used in reciting the Quran.

  • 64 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 16.

42Of course, in so far as Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih includes a range of perspectives on the acceptability of laḥn, not all are so positive. A final example that also refers to the recitation of the Quran provides a less straightforward message, which I will paraphrase here. A story of a man singing (ġannā) in a mosque is included, and it becomes a point of confusion whether he is in fact singing or reciting the Quran. He is said to have been singing in a mosque, and nearby a man of the Quraysh was praying. The mosque-attendants heard him and asked whether he was singing (tuġannī) in the mosque, taking him to the guard. The Qurayshi said, “He is only reciting!” (“Innamā kāna yaqraʾ!”), to which the guard responded (to the mosque-attendants), “Oh degenerates, have you brought me a man reciting the Quran, asserting that he is singing? Let him go on his way!”64 Notably, the report does not use the word laḥn. It does tell of a man’s recitation of the Quran (qirāʾat al-Qurʾān) being mistaken for singing (ġināʾ), however, and Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih has included the tale under the larger section centred on laḥn. The passage does not make explicit that the recitation was mistaken for singing because of the use of melody of laḥn specifically. The early reports employed in al-ʿIqd al-farīd demonstrates that the understanding of laḥn, and relatedly, the issue of tune or melody in Quran recitation, is ambivalent.

  • 65 Talbi, “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”, pp. 186–187.
  • 66 Al-Ṭurṭūšī, Kitāb al-ḥawādiṯ wa-l-bidaʿ.
  • 67 Talbi, “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”, pp. 186–187.

43Mohamed Talbi suggests that qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān may have meant most specifically the practice of reciting the Quran to the tunes of popular songs, and that this may have been a practice that thrived especially in early-Abbasid Baghdad. In “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”, Talbi refers not just to the understanding of laḥn as melody or tune in general, but to a usage whereby it would refer to a specific set of musical practices that had come to be associated with the recited Quran. Talbi points out that the mid-7th to mid-8th centuries witnessed, in Baghdad as well as Medina, the gradual systematization of recitation as well as music as artistic disciplines, through the development of theoretical discourses as well as the founding of educational institutions specific to each of these areas.65 At the same time that recitation was developing into an art “with rules and discipline”, so was music, and these developments also took expression on an institutional level through the founding of schools. Talbi points out that Baghdad was particularly a centre for qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān, citing both the work by 11th-century jurist Abū Bakr al-Ṭurṭūšī, Kitāb al-ḥawādiṯ wa-l-bidaʿ66 (ʻBook of Happenings and Innovationsʼ), as well as the 10th-century compendium of popular song, Kitāb al-aġānī, from Abū al-Faraǧ al-Iṣfahānī.67

44Returning to Ibn Ḫāqān’s qaṣīda, then, there is still some question about how the term laḥn should be understood in the poem. As previously mentioned, its usage in verse 35 clearly refers to mispronunciation. But a consideration of the term laḥn as used in reference to broad genres of literature and discourses about early Abbasid practices, particularly centred in Baghdad, does raise some questions about the specific performance and educational practices of which Ibn Ḫāqān may have been aware. The semantic range of laḥn is conveniently broad, indicating an interconnected set of meanings revolving around pronunciations—including errors, dialects, and pronunciations not understood as canonical—, but also could refer to the use of pitch and melody. Ibn Ḫāqān’s points in the poem overall are clear in that he argues for correctness and clarity in the sounds of recitation. But the specifics of what he may be aware of or referring to are still broad, and include possibilities that seem quite remote or heterodox in comparison to the assumptions we may bring from modern practice.

Conclusion

45In all, the poem represents a valuable and intriguing possibility for historicization of taǧwīd practices and the sounds of the recited Quran. While the rules of taǧwīd and broader recitation practices are understood as having become systematized in the works of Ibn Muǧāhid and al-Dānī, Ibn Ḫāqān’s poem provides us with a slightly earlier witness to the developing rules of recitation and its practice. It may also serve as a key source in the development of Sunni orthopraxy in a historical moment just prior to the “renaissance of Islam”, when key theological discourses and ideas of Sunnism came to be developed. But the poem also presents a broader argument about the practices of studying and reciting the Quran. Ibn Ḫāqān emphasizes the clarity of production of sound via correct pronunciation (and potentially eschewing the use of fixed melodies) and reciting in a slow, measured pace. But these aspects of the sonic presentation of the text also expand outward to illuminate a broader ethical field around practice and study of recitation. The slow, measured pace should also apply to one’s studies, which should be conducted with an authoritative master. And this claim is bolstered in the end by Ibn Ḫāqān’s references to the merits of reciting the Quran and potential divine judgment in relation to pursuing one’s studies.

Haut de page

Bibliographie

Primary Sources

Boneschi, Paulo, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd attribuée à Mūsà b. ʿUbayd Allāh b. Ḫāqān”, Rendiconti della R. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 14, 1–2, 1938, pp. 51–92.

al-Ḫāqānī (d. 325/937), Mūsā ibn ʿUbayd Allāh, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-tilāwa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”, in Min ḏaḫaʿiral-turāṯ, ʿAlī Ḥusayn al-Bawwāb (ed.), al-Riyāḍ, Kunūz Išbīliyyā li-l-Našr wa-l-Tawzīʿ, 2007, pp. 7–31.

al-Ḫāqānī, Mūsā ibn ʿUbayd Allāh, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-qirāʾa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ: maʿa muqtaṭafāt min šarḥ Abī ʿAmr al-Dānī li-l-qaṣīda”, ʿAlī Ḥusayn al-Bawwāb (ed.), Maǧalla turāṯiyya faṣliyya muḥkama 14, 1, 1985, pp. 115–128.

Ǧurǧānī (d. 816/1413), ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad, al-Sayyid al-Šarīf, Hāḏā kitāb al-taʿrifāt, Miṣr, al-Maṭbaʿa al-Wahhābiyya, 1283/1866.

al-Ḫaṭīb al-Baġdādī (d. 463/1071), Abū Bakr Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī, Taʾrīḫ Baġdād, vol. 13, al-Qāhira/Baġdād, Maktabat al-Ḫānǧī/al-Maktaba al-ʿArabiyya, 1931.

Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih (d. 328/940), Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vol. 2, Mufīd Muḥammad Qumayḥa (ed.), Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1983.

Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, Abd al-Maǧīd al-Tarḥīnī (ed.), Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1983.

Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, Music: The Priceless Jewel, Henry George Farmer (trans.), Bearsden, Scotland, Published by the Author, 1942.

Ibn al-Ǧazarī (d. 833/1429), Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad, Ġāyat al-nihāya fī ṭabaqāt al-qurrāʾ, Gotthelf Bergsträsser (ed.), vol. 2, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2006.

Ibn Muǧāhid (d. 324/936), Aḥmad ibn Mūsā, Kitāb al-sabʿa fī al-qirāʾāt, Miṣr, Dār al-Maʿārif, 1972.

Ibn Qutayba (d. 276/889), ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muslim, Taʾwil muškil al-Qurʾān, Bayrūt, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2014.

al-Kindī (d. 252/866-7), Yaʿqūb ibn Isḥāq, Risāla fī ḫabar taʾlīf al-alḥān = Über die Komposition der Melodien, Robert Lachmann and Mahmud el-Hefni (eds), Leipzig, Fr. Kistner & C.F.W. Siegel, 1931.

al-Ṭurṭūšī (d. 520/1126), Abū Bakr, Kitāb al-ḥawādiṯ wa-l-bidaʿ, Ibrāhīm Šams al-Dīn (ed.), Bayrūt, Dār al-Ġarb al-Islāmī, 1990.

Secondary Sources

Anonymous, “Adāʾ”, in Encyclopaedia of Islam. Second Edition, Bearman, P., Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, & W.P. Heinrichs (eds), Leiden, Brill Online, 2012.

Bennison, Amira K., The Great Caliphs: The Golden Age of the ‘Abbasid Empire, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2009.

Bonner, Michael, “The Waning of Empire, 861–945”, in The New Cambridge History of Islam: Vol. 1: The Formation of the Islamic World, Sixth to Eleventh Centuries, Chase F. Robinson (ed.), pp. 305–359.

Brockelmann, Carl, History of the Arabic Written Tradition, vol. 1, Joep Lameer (trans.), Leiden, Brill, 2016.

Brockelmann, Carl, “8. Sciences of the Qurʾān”, in Brockelmann in English: The History of the Arabic Written Tradition Online, Leiden, Brill Online, 2017.

Denny, Frederick M., “Qurʾān Recitation: A Tradition of Oral Performance and Transmission”, Oral Tradition 4, 1–2, 1989, pp. 5–26.

Farmer, Henry George, A History of Arabian Music to the XIIIth Century, London, Luzac, 1929.

al-Faruqi, Lois Ibsen, “The Status of Music in Muslim Nations: Evidence from the Arab World”, Asian Music 12, 1, 1980, pp. 56–85.

al-Faruqi, Lois Ibsen, “The Shariʿah on Music and Musicians”, in Ismāʿīl R. al Fārūqī (ed.), Islamic Thought and Culture: Papers Presented to the Islamic Studies Group of American Academy of Religion, Brentwood, MD, International Institute of Islamic Thought, 1402/1982, pp. 27–52.

al-Faruqi, Lois Ibsen, “Music, Musicians and Muslim Law”, Asian Music 17, 1, Autumn–Winter 1985, pp. 3–36.

al-Faruqi, Lois Ibsen, “Islamization Through the Sound Arts”, American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 3, 2, December 1986, pp. 171–180.

Frishkopf, Michael, “Mediated Qurʾanic Recitation and the Contestation of Islam in Contemporary Egypt”, in Music and the Play of Power in the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia, Laudan Nooshin (ed.), Surrey, Ashgate, 2009, pp. 75–114.

Gade, Anna M., Perfection Makes Practice: Learning, Emotion, and the Recited Qurʾān in Indonesia, Honolulu, University of Hawai’i Press, 2004.

Gade, Anna M., “Recitation of the Qurʾān”, in Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, Jane Dammen McAuliffe (ed.), Leiden, Brill Online, 2019.

Graham, William A., Beyond the Written Word: Oral Aspects of Scripture in the History of Religion, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Graham, William A. & Kermani, Navid, “Recitation and Aesthetic Reception”, in The Cambridge Companion to the Qurʾān, Jane Dammen McAuliffe (ed.), Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 115–141.

Hilali, Asma, The Sanaa Palimpsest: The Transmission of the Qurʾan in the First Centuries AH, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.

Hilali, Asma, “The Qurʾān Before the Book ‒ History and Concepts of Qurʾānic Variants (Qirāʾāt)”, Journal of College of Sharia & Islamic Studies 38, 2, January 2021, pp. 233–245.

Kâtip Çelebi, Lexicon Bibliographicum et Encyclopaedicum ...: Ad Codicum Vindobonensium Parisiensium et Berolinensis Fidem Primum, vol. 2, Gustav Lebrecht Fluegel (ed.), Leipzig, Published for the Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and Ireland, 1835.

Kermani, Navid, God Is Beautiful: The Aesthetic Experience of the Quran, Tony Crawford (trans.), Malden, MA, Polity Press, 2015.

Lecomte, G., “Ibn Ḳutayba”, in Encyclopaedia of Islam. Second Edition, P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W.P. Heinrichs (eds), Leiden, Brill Online, 2012.

Leemhuis, Frederik, “Readings of the Qurʾān”, in Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, Jane Dammen McAuliffe (ed.), Leiden, Brill Online, 2017.

Melchert, Christopher, “The Controversy over Reciting the Qurʾān with Tones (alqirāʾah bi’lalḥān)”, Journal of the International Qurʾanic Studies Association 4, 2019, pp. 85–110.

Nasser, Shady Hekmat, The Transmission of the Variant Readings of the Quran: The Problem of Tawatur and the Emergence of Shawadhdh, Leiden, Brill, 2012.

Nasser, Shady Hekmat, The Second Canonization of the Qurʾān (324/936): Ibn Mujāhid and the Founding of the Seven Readings, Leiden, Brill, 2020.

Nelson, Kristina, The Art of Reciting the Qurʾan, Austin, University of Texas Press, 1985.

Neuwirth, Angelika, The Qurʾan and Late Antiquity: A Shared Heritage, Samuel Wilder (trans.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019.

Shiloah, Amnon, The Dimension of Music in Islamic and Jewish Culture, Brookfield, VT, Variorum, 1993.

Talbi, Mohamed, “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”, Arabica 5, 2, 1958, pp. 183–190.

Haut de page

Notes

1 My sincere thanks to an anonymous reviewer, Asma Hilali, Anne-Sylvie Boisliveau, Jean Druel OP, Dennis Halft OP, Devin Stewart, and Francesca Chubb-Confer.

2 Hilali, The Sanaa Palimpsest; “The Qurʾān Before the Book”; Nasser, The Transmission of the Variant Readings of the Qurʾān; The Second Canonization of the Qurʾān.

3 Graham and Kermani, “Recitation and Aesthetic Reception”; Kermani, God is Beautiful.

4 Neuwirth, The Qurʾan and Late Antiquity.

5 Nelson, The Art of Reciting the Qurʾan.

6 Frishkopf, “Mediated Qurʾanic Recitation”.

7 Gade, Perfection Makes Practice.

8 His name appears in sources as both Ibn Ḫāqān and al-Ḫāqānī. In his introduction to his edition of the qaṣīda, ʿAlī Ḥusayn al-Bawwāb includes both forms of his name, Mūsā ibn ʿUbayd Allāh al-Ḫāqānī and al-Imām Abū Muzāḥim al-Ḫāqānī al-Baġdādī. See al-Ḫāqānī, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-tilāwa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”, p. 10.

9 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 51; Brockelmann, History of the Arabic Written Tradition; “8. Sciences of the Qurʾān”; Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, p. 15.

10 Ibn al-Ǧazarī, Ġāyat al-nihāya fī ṭabaqāt al-qurrāʾ, vol. 2, pp. 279–280.

11Huwa awwal man ṣannaf fī al-taǧwīd fīmā aʿlam.” Ibn al-Ǧazarī, Ġāyat al-nihāya fī ṭabaqāt al-qurrāʾ, vol. 2, p. 280.

12 Al-Ḫaṭīb al-Baġdādī, Taʾrīḫ Baġdād, vol. 13, p. 59.

13 Ibn al-Ǧazarī, Ġāyat al-nihāya fī ṭabaqāt al-qurrāʾ, vol. 2, p. 280.

14 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, pp. 80–82.

15 Al-Ḫāqānī, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-qirāʾa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”.

16 A concise and comprehensive portrait of the history of development of recitation practices is available in Gade, “Recitation of the Qurʾān”.

17 Nasser, The Second Canonization of the Qurʾān, p. 2.

18 Neuwirth, The Qurʾan and Late Antiquity, pp. 155–156.

19 Al-Ḫāqānī, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-tilāwa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”; “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-qirāʾa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”; Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”.

20 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 92.

21 Al-Ḫāqānī, “al-Qaṣīda al-ḫāqāniyya fī al-tilāwa wa-ḥusn al-adāʾ”.

22 Bennison, The Great Caliphs, pp. 170–199.

23 Bonner, “The Waning of Empire, 861–945”, p. 348.

24 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 57.

25 Verse 6: “Fa-mā kullu man yatlū al-kitāba yuqīmuhu / wa-lā kullu man fī al-nāsi yuqriʾuhum muqrī.” All translations into English from the poem are my own. Here, the use of al-Kitāb or “Book” functions in place of al-Qurʾān. The two words do not scan the same with respect to the meter; al-Kitāb allows the poet to maintain the metrical pattern. Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 57.

26 Verses 9‒11. Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 58.

27 Ibn Muǧāhid, Kitāb al-sabʿa fī al-qirāʾāt.

28 Leemhuis, “Readings of the Qurʾān”; While an extended study of this connection to the development of the qirāʾāt would be valuable for further research, it is beyond the purview of the present study. But for more detailed information on Ibn Muǧāhid and his work, see the recent work from Shady Nasser. Nasser, The Second Canonization of the Qurʾān.

29 Qirāʾāt refers here to the system of variant readings of the Quran, a matter of discussion since the early period of Islam with the first use of the terminology of qirāʾa referring to variant readings rather than the more general meaning of “manner of reciting the Qurʾān”. Leemhuis, “Readings of the Qurʾān”.

30 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 52.

31 Translations from Boneschi’s French article are my own. Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, pp. 52-53.

32 Here, Boneschi cites and includes a quotation in Arabic from the 17th-century Ottoman-era historian Kâtip Ҫelebi: “[ʿIlm al-tajwīd] is like music (mūsīqā) with respect that the science is not enough; rather, it is tantamount to a disposition resulting from one training his jaw and his custom, and from taking from the mouths of his teachers, etc.” Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 53, citing Kâtip Çelebi, Lexicon Bibliographicum et Encyclopaedicum, vol. 2, p. 208; quoted in Kâtip Çelebi, Lexicon Bibliographicum et Encyclopaedicum, vol. 2, p. 53. The quotation from Çelebi is striking in that the discourse about the relationship between Quran recitation and music is often contentious and fraught; and yet here he draws an analogy in making the point that both the science of taǧwīd and the science of music (what we might call music theory) are theoretical discourses describing embodied practices, that involve long-term discipline and training, and learning with one’s body and from teachers rather than what might be understood as an “intellectual pursuit”. Here, I do not wish to reinforce an assumed dichotomy between “embodied” versus “intellectual” learning, thereby implying that embodied modes of learning are not intellectual, and intellectual modes of learning are somehow disembodied. Rather, I take Çelebi’s point to be about the relationship between theoretical discourse and practice in relation to ideas of learning and knowledge. Additionally, it is likely that Çelebi’s analogy only functions in historical contexts in which there is a theoretical apparatus describing music through rules and expectations. In the Ottoman era, this was the case, but it may not have been quite the same in Ibn Ḫāqān’s milieu.

33 The relevant verses are discussed later in this section.

34 Verses 12‒14: “Fa-ḏū al-ḥiḏqi muʿṭin li-l-ḥurūfi ḥuqūqahā / iḏā rattala al-Qurʾāna aw kāna ḏā ḥadri // wa-ammā ḥadarnā darsanā fa-muraḫḫaṣun / lanā fīhi uzdiya al-ʿibādu ilā al-yusri // wa-tartīlunā al-Qurʾāna afḍalu li-l-laḏī / umirnā bihi min mukṯinā fīhi bi-l-fikri.”

35 Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, pp. 7, 15, 20–21.

36 Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, pp. 19–20.

37 Q. al-Muzzammil 73:4.

38 Verse 23. Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 59.

39Wa-inna allaḏī tuḫfīhi laysa bi-mudġami / wa-baynahumā farqun faʿarrifhu bi-l-našri.”

40 Melchert, “The Controversy over Reciting the Qurʾān with Tones”, p. 103.

41 Melchert, “The Controversy over Reciting the Qurʾān with Tones”, p. 102.

42Fa-awwalu ʿilmi al-ḏikri itqānu ḥifẓihi / wa-maʿrifatun bi-l-laḥni fīhi iḏā yajrī // wa-kun ʿārifan bi-l-laḥni kay-mā tuzīlahu / fa-mā li-l-laḏī lā yaʿrifu al-laḥna min ʿuḏri.”

43 Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 70, n. 4; Ǧurǧānī, Hāḏā kitāb al-taʿrīfāt, p. 128.

44 Ibn Qutayba, Taʾwīl muškil al-Qurʾān, pp. 36–45.

45 Interestingly, although little is known about Ibn Qutayba’s career, he is said to have had contact with Ibn Ḫāqān’s father who was a minister under the Abbasid caliph al-Mutawakkil, ʿUbayd Allāh ibn Yaḥyā ibn Ḫāqān, to whom he owed his appointment as a judge (qāḍī). Lecomte, “Ibn Ḳutayba”.

46Wa-mā kāna mahmūzan fa-kun hāmizan lahu / wa-lā tahmizan mā kāna laḥnan ladā al-nabri.”

47 The quotation here is from my annotated translation accompanying this article. This citation refers to the location of the note on Boneschi’s article that I reference here. Boneschi, “La qaṣīda fi ’t-taǧwīd”, p. 73, n. 5.

48 Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, p. 10.

49 Al-Kindī, Risāla fī ḫabar taʾlīf al-alḥān.

50 This treatise is incomplete and exists only in manuscript. Shiloah, The Dimension of Music in Islamic and Jewish Culture, vol. 1, p. 179; Farmer, A History of Arabian Music to the XIIIth Century, pp. 127–128.

51 Shiloah, The Dimension of Music in Islamic and Jewish Culture, vol. 3, p. 58.

52 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vol. 2, pp. 310–311.

53 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, pp. 3–87.

54 See Nelson’s chapter “The Samāʿ Polemic” for a particularly thorough overview and consideration of this topic, or any of the following articles by Faruqi. Nelson, The Art of Reciting the Qurʾan, pp. 32–51; Faruqi, “The Status of Music in Muslim Nations”; “Music, Musicians and Muslim Law”; “Islamization Through the Sound Arts”; “The Shariʿah on Music and Musicians”.

55 Farmer, A History of Arabian Music to the XIIIth Century, p. 22; Faruqi, “Music, Musicians and Muslim Law”, pp. 3–4.

56 Talbi, “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”.

57 Denny, “Qurʾān Recitation”, p. 10.

58 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 3.

59 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 7.

60 Exclaiming, “Hayh! Istiḥsānan lahā”. Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 8.

61Qālū: ʻal-šiʿr ḥasan wa-lā narā an yuʾḫaḏa bi-laḥnin ḥasan; wa-ajāzū ḏālika fī al-Qurʾān wa-fī al-aḏān; fa-in kānat al-alḥān makrūha fa-l-Qurʾān wa-l-aḏān aḥaqq bi-l-tanzīhi ʿanhā, wa-in kānat ġayr makrūha, fa-l-šiʿr aḥwaj ilayhā li-iqāmat al-wazn wa-iḫrājih ʿan ḥadd al-ḫabarʼ.” Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 8.

62 Here, in his translation, Farmer includes a note explaining that the Arabs have used set tunes in scanning the meters of poetry, these tunes referred to as “naġamāt al-buḥūr”, wherein “naġama” (sing.) may mean melody, notes, or mode, and “buḥūr” (sing., baḥr) refers to the set meters of the Arabic poetic tradition. Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, Music, p. 11, n. 3.

63ʿĀṣim ʿan Ǧurayǧ, qāla: ʻsaʾaltu ʿAṭāʾ ʿan qirāʾat al-Qurʾān ʿalā alḥān al-ġināʾ wa-l-ḥudāʾ, qāla: wa-mā baʾsa ḏālika yā ibn aḫī!’” Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 10.

64 Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, al-ʿIqd al-farīd, vols 7–8, p. 16.

65 Talbi, “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”, pp. 186–187.

66 Al-Ṭurṭūšī, Kitāb al-ḥawādiṯ wa-l-bidaʿ.

67 Talbi, “La qirāʾa bi-l-alḥān”, pp. 186–187.

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence papier

Lauren E. Osborne, « Sound-History of the Quran »MIDÉO, 37 | 2022, 87-114.

Référence électronique

Lauren E. Osborne, « Sound-History of the Quran »MIDÉO [En ligne], 37 | 2022, mis en ligne le 13 novembre 2022, consulté le 16 avril 2024. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/mideo/7989

Haut de page

Auteur

Lauren E. Osborne

Whitman College, Walla Walla, Wa

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search