Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNuméros2Partie 3 – Archéozoologie et taph...Taphonomic Impact of Prolonged Co...

Partie 3 – Archéozoologie et taphonomie

Taphonomic Impact of Prolonged Combustion on Bones Used as Fuel

Sandrine Costamagno, Delphine Kuntz, François Bon, Romain Mensan et Isabelle Théry-Parisot
Cet article est une traduction de :
Impact taphonomique d’une combustion prolongée sur des ossements utilises comme combustible [fr]

Résumé

The combustion of bones results in numerous processes whose impact on the representivity of fossil bone assemblages is increasingly well known due to the multiple experimental approaches developed over the last ten years. Recent experiments conducted with outdoor hearths have shown the consequences of prolonged combustion on bone combustion residues.
The average loss of bone mass after combustion is 65%. The weight of the fine fraction (ashes and fragments less than 2 cm) corresponds to more than one quarter of the residual mass of the remains collected, while the mass of calcined (i.e. white) bone represents an average of 77.2% of the residues. Finally, the residual bone mass is not correlated with the duration of use of a hearth, but with the manner in which it is maintained. These experiments thus clearly document the significant role of fire maintenance methods on the nature and form of bone residues.

Haut de page

Texte intégral

We thank all of the volunteer excavators at Régismont-le-Haut, and in particular, Marie Dias-Meirhino, Sébastien Dubois and Clément Ménard for their help in the preparation of the bones. The sorting of bone residues was realized in part with the financial support of the Regional Archaeology Service of Languedoc-Roussillon.

Introduction

  • 1 - e.g. Abri Pataud (Théry-Parisot, 2002), Cuzoul de Vers (Castel, 2003), Esquilleu (Yravedra et al.(...)

1The hypothesis that bone was used as fuel in hearths has been proposed for several Paleolithic1 sites. Until recently, these interpretations were most often based on the abundance of burned bones found in association, or not, with combustion features, regardless of the diversity of possible origins for bone combustion: intentional discard of bone waste in hearths (Spennemann & Colley, 1989; Cain, 2005), alimentary cooking (Gifford-Gonzalez, 1989; Pearce & Luff, 1994; Wandsnider, 1997; Costamagno & Fano Martínez, 2005), ritual combustion (Tchesnokov, 1995; Vaté & Beyries, 2007), accidental combustion after burying (David, 1990; Stiner et al., 1995; Bennett, 1999; Cain, 2005) and natural fires (Bellomo & Harris, 1990; Bellomo, 1993). A series of laboratory experiments (tab. 1) enabled the definition of the combustible properties of bones (Théry-Parisot & Costamagno, 2005; Théry-Parisot et al., 2005), as well as a more precise characterization of the bone remains originating from this type of hearth (Théry-Parisot et al., 2004; Costamagno et al., 2005). Based on these results, a statistical model of the origin of burned osseous assemblages was proposed (Costamagno et al., 2009). Despite these advances, a certain number of questions persist concerning both the post-depositional processes that can modify burned osseous assemblages and the identification of burned osseous residues originating from other combustion contexts (Costamagno et al., 2009). For example, with the exception of sites in acid contexts Gilchrist & Mytum, 1986; Costamagno in Bordes & Lenoble, 2000; Airvaux et al., 2003), the quantity of intensively burned bones (gray or white) is generally low in archaeological sites, which strongly contrasts the quantities obtained through the experimental use of bone as fuel. According to different studies, calcined (i.e. burned white) bones are more reactive to mechanical constraints than bones that are simply carbonized or a fortiori non-burned (Stiner et al., 1995; Thiébaut et al., in press), which could explain the recorded distortions. A prolonged exposition to atmospheric agents could result in a similar phenomenon (Gerbe, 2004, Gerbe this volume). Experiments in progress by two of us, conducted as part of the Gavarnie research program (directed by P. Bertran) and taphonomy workshops (directed by M.-P. Coumont), will contribute new elements concerning the biases introduced by other taphonomic processes in the context of burned osseous remains (human trampling, gelifraction and dissolution).

Tab. 1 - Experimental protocol and variables tested in the first experimental series realized in the laboratory

Experimental protocol

laboratory experiments bone (cow humerus) as only fuel used no fuel added

Variables tested

Bone dessication (dry (non humid)/fresh)
Bone fragmentation (whole/fractured)
Bone tissue (compact/spongy)

2In parallel to these experiments concerning the action of taphonomic processes after combustion, new experiments related to the combustion of bone materials have been undertaken. This project is conducted in conjunction with the study of the open-air Aurignacian site of Régismont-le-Haut (Poilhes, Hérault), which has yielded around a dozen combustion features, including several in association with wood charcoal and burned bone (Maurin & Ambert, 1979; Bon, 2002; Bon, Mensan and collaborators, 2007). In this paper, we present the results of a first series of experiments concerning the prolonged maintenance of hearths in which bone is used as fuel. These experiments, realized in August 2006 in close proximity to the site, were conducted with three objectives:

  1. to obtain a better understanding of the functioning of the hearths at Régismont-le-Haut and to determine the type(s) of combustible materials used by its Aurignacian occupants;

  2. to evaluate the constraints related to the behaviour of a fire fuelled with osseous materials;

  3. to evaluate the impact of prolonged combustion on osseous residues.

In this paper, we focus on the latter objective.

Experimental methods and procedures

3The experiments were conducted outside, in the open-air. The hearths (8) were installed on a horizontal ground surface in shallow pits 5 cm deep and 50 cm in diameter (fig. 1). The bones used as fuel were principally salted pork bones and a few fresh cow bones (tab. 2). The bones were meticulously defleshed and then fractured with quartzite cobbles on limestone anvils (fig. 2) comparable to those found on the site (Bon, Mensan and collaborators, 2006). The marrow was removed from the bones before they were burned. The wood necessary to start the fire represents 5% of the weight of the bone used during ignition (fig. 3). The hearths were then exclusively fuelled with bone (fig. 4), except when the temperature dropped too low for the combustion to continue. In this case, a quantity of bone identical to the initial one was used. At the moment of ignition, and at each reloading with combustible materials, the hour and exact nature of the bones (taxon and anatomical portion) was recorded, along with their total weight and number of fragments.

Fig. 1 - Hearth pit

Fig. 1 - Hearth pit

Tab. 2 - Experimental parameters: skeletal elements used, bone mass employed, fireplace maintenance methods, average maximal temperatures recorded by the three sensors in the same fireplace (the sensors in fireplace 1 of the first series did not function)

Series 1

Series 2

Hearth 1

Hearth 2

Hearth 3

Hearth 4

Hearth 1

Hearth 2

Hearth 3

Hearth 4

Pork

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pelvis

1

2

5

3

2

2

1

1

Proximal femur

30

32

32

31

15

16

17

16

Distal femur

33

30

32

33

18

15

15

14

Proximal tibia

35

33

33

32

15

15

15

15

Patella

17

16

18

18

5

5

6

5

Tarsal massif

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

2

Cow

 

Cervical

1

 

Thoracic

1

1

Rib

4

6

6

4

1

1

Scapula

1

1

1

1

1

1

 

Proximal humerus

1

1

 

Distal humerus

1

 

Proximal radius

1

 

Carpal massif

1

 

Pelvis

1

1

Proximal femur

1

 

Distal femur

1

1

 

Proximal tibia

1

1

Tarsal massif

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

Bone mass

17040

17603

17214

18235

9781

10327

10143

9503

Average maximal temperatures (°C)

-

560,8

681,6

-

503,5

569,3

692,7

-

Maintenance method

rapid

rapid

rapid

rapid

slow

slow

slow

slow

Fig. 2 - Bone defleshing and fracturation

Fig. 2 - Bone defleshing and fracturation

Fig. 3 - Combustibles before the fire was lit

Fig. 3 - Combustibles before the fire was lit

Fig. 4 - Feeding the fire with bones

Fig. 4 - Feeding the fire with bones

4The experiments were realized following two distinct protocols with the purpose of varying the combustion durations and rate of maintenance of the hearths. In the first series, the fires were fed with no particular precaution, which we designate as a “rapid feeding”. In the second series the fires were fed with objective of economizing the bone fuel and prolonging the combustion duration as long as possible: we designate this as “slow feeding”. Each series was replicated four times. In the first series, an average of 16,326 grams of bone was burned versus 9,334 grams in the second series (tab. 2). After they were completely cooled, the bone residues were collected (fig. 5), with the exception of those of the fourth hearth of each series, which were left in situ in order to record their evolution over several years.

Fig. 5 - Bone residues after combustion

Fig. 5 - Bone residues after combustion

5Several factors were recorded during these experiments, starting with temperature. To record the variability of thermal fluxes, the first three hearths in the two series were equipped with three sensors that simultaneously recorded the temperatures every two minutes during the full duration of the experiments. The data were recorded and transmitted into computer format by infrared. For each experiment, three curves that express the temperatures according to time were thus recorded. The second factor relates to kinetics by distinguishing between combustion with flame emission and pyrolysis without flames or calcination (the process that follows the extinction of the flames until the end of calcination). In practice, we considered that the combustion was finished when the average temperature of the hearth recorded by the sensors was below 100° C. In the experiments of the first series, the hearths were fed in two stages: in the morning for an average duration of two hours, then four hours later for a duration of two and a half hours. For the flame duration, we added the two recorded durations. For the calcination duration, we took into account only the first combustion phase. For this reason, the calcination durations of the fires of the first experimental series are not exploitable for taphonomic analyses as the osseous residues result from the two successive combustion phases.

6The bone residues were then sorted by 10 mm size classes. The fragments over 20 mm were also sorted according to their tissue type (spongy, compact or compact + spongy) and combustion intensity (non burned, partially burned, mostly black, mostly gray or mostly white) (fig. 6). The bones of each category were then weighed. The fine fraction, after sieving the residues through 0.5 and 0.2 mm screens, were systematically weighed for each experiment (fig. 7 and 8).

Fig. 6 - Sorting of bone residues

Fig. 6 - Sorting of bone residues

Fig. 7 - Fragments less than 2 cm

Fig. 7 - Fragments less than 2 cm

Fig. 8 - Bone ash

Fig. 8 - Bone ash

7The results of the experiments realized at Régismont-le-Haut were compared to those obtained in laboratory experiments (Théry et al., 2004; Costamagno et al., 2005; Théry et al., 2005) according to the following criteria:

  • combustion kinetics;

  • loss of material, recorded through the percentage of residual mass, meaning the percentage of bone mass collected after combustion relative to that of the bone mass put into the fire;

  • intensity of fragmentation, estimated based on the relative abundance of bone fragments by 10 mm size class;

  • combustion intensity, estimated based on the relative abundance of calcined bones, meaning those that are mostly white (fig. 9).

Fig. 9 - Calcined bones

Fig. 9 - Calcined bones

Results

Preliminary observations

8The first experiments conducted in the laboratory showed that the fresh or dry state of bone strongly influences the degree of fragmentation of bone residues; the high fragmentation of fresh bone relative to dry bone is probably due to the high pressure created by water evaporation (Théry et al., 2004; Costamagno et al., 2005).

9In the experiments conducted at Régismont-le-Haut, the use of salted pork bones, which are relatively dry, could thus explain the presence of numerous articular extremities and whole epiphyses among the bone residues (fig. 10). For comparisons, we thus favoured laboratory experiments in which the bones were burned after desiccation and fracturation.

Fig. 10 - Whole epiphyses of pork long bones

Fig. 10 - Whole epiphyses of pork long bones

Fig. 11 - Concentric surface scales that gradually expose the spongiosa

Fig. 11 - Concentric surface scales that gradually expose the spongiosa

10Meanwhile, some effects were observed only on the cow bones, and thus exclusively on fresh and humid bones. On certain spongy fragments, we observe the formation of compact surface scales that develop in a concentric manner over the entire surface (fig. 11). As they detach, they progressively expose the spongy tissue. The bones affected can thus eventually take the form of a spongy ball with no compacta. Such objects have been observed in many faunal assemblages.

11Numerous laboratory experiments have shown that the maximal temperatures attained in the hearths depends on the mass of the combustible material and not on the material itself (Théry‑Parisot & Costamagno, 2005).

12The hearths in the new experiments conducted in the open-air attained maximal temperatures between 561 and 692°C. The temperatures of these fires thus appear inferior to those recorded for the fires in the laboratory (605–805°C), though the mass of combustible material was greater. The differences observed can be easily explained by the impact of atmospheric agents on the combustion temperatures during the open-air experiments. In addition, the intra-series variability is greater than the inter-series variability (tab. 2). For this reason, the results obtained are difficult to exploit for questions concerning temperatures.

Parameters that influence the kinetics of combustion

13The first laboratory experiments showed that the flame duration is determined by the combined effects of humidity, the density of the bone tissues and their fragmentation, while the initial mass of the combustible material put into the fire explains only 24% of the variability (Théry‑Parisot & Costamagno, 2005).

14For an equivalent fuel mass, the flame duration appears to be longer in the open-air hearths than in the laboratory hearths (in which no bone materials were added) (fig. 10). In the latter, the average flame duration is 112 minutes for the hearths with proximal extremities versus 165 for those with distal extremities, as opposed to 232 minutes for series 1 at Régismont‑le-Haut and 356 for series 2. A variance analysis shows that the average duration of the flames in series 1 differs significantly from that of series 2 (fig. 12). The hearths of series 1 (rapid feeding) require 54% more bone than the hearths of series 2 (slow feeding) to produce flames for an identical amount of time. In terms of bone fuel consumption, the flame durations in series 1 generally follow the same tendency as those observed in the laboratory experiments, in which no fuel was added to the fires (fig. 13). The hearths of series 2, on the other hand, show a real economy of bone fuel when the fires are progressively fed. This is not the case for the calcination durations. Regardless of the maintenance methods, they remain low and are comparable to those recorded in the laboratory experiments (fig. 14).

Fig. 12 - Flame duration for an equivalent fuel mass

Fig. 12 - Flame duration for an equivalent fuel mass

Fig. 13 - Effect of maintenance methods on flame duration (Fisher’s exact test)

Fig. 13 - Effect of maintenance methods on flame duration (Fisher’s exact test)

Fig. 14 - Combustion duration in function of the fuel mass used:

Fig. 14 - Combustion duration in function of the fuel mass used:

a- flame duration, b- calcination duration.

Loss of material

15The laboratory experiments, conducted under controlled conditions, showed that the reduction of mass is strongly correlated with the bone density: the higher the density, the higher the percentage of residual mass. On the other hand, the state of the bone before combustion (fresh/dry, whole/fragmented) has no effect on this variable (Théry et al., 2004; Costamagno et al., 2005).

16In the experimental series realized at Régismont-le-Haut, the percentage of resdidual mass varies between 33.2 and 36.6% (fig. 15). These values, which are statistically comparable to those recorded for the distal extremities of humeri, could be explained by the simultaneous combustion of spongy and compact portions (fig. 16). If we consider the ensemble of experiments, it appears that flame duration is not a significant factor in the loss of mass, as is shown by the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, which is not statistically significant (rs = - 0,215). Even if we distinguish the laboratory experiments (proximal series and distal series) and those at Régismont-le-Haut, the correlation coefficients remain low and non significant, respectively - 0,288: ddl 13; - 0,350: ddl 13 et - 0,551: ddl 6 (fig. 15).

Fig. 15 - Percentage of residual bone mass in function of flame

Fig. 15 - Percentage of residual bone mass in function of flame

Fig. 16 - Effect of maintenance methods on the percentage of residual bone mass (Fisher’s exact test)

Fig. 16 - Effect of maintenance methods on the percentage of residual bone mass (Fisher’s exact test)

17Concerning the relationship between the loss of mass and calcination duration, in previous experiments we have shown the existence of three distinct groups: fires in which diaphyses without marrow were burned, fires in which distal extremities were burned, and fires with proximal extremities (fig. 17). In these latter, the loss of mass is strongly correlated with the duration of calcination (rs= - 0,790, p < 0,01): the longer the calcination duration, the greater the amount of material lost, which is not the case for combustions realized with distal extremities (rs= - 0,358). If we make the same comparison with series 2 of Régismont‑le-Haut (the data from series 1 is not exploitable in this context (cf. supra) the same type of relationship appears; once again, the longer the calcination duration, the greater the loss of material. Additional data will be necessary to determine if this relationship is statistically significant. In comparison to the hearths fueled by the proximal extremities of humeri, for the same calcination duration, the loss of mass in the hearths at Régismont‑le-Haut is clearly lower. It thus appears that the proximal extremities of humeri, and probably the portions with a low density, behave in a very specific way in fire, as is shown by a variance analysis (fig. 18).

Fig. 17 - Percentage of residual bone mass in function of calcination duration

Fig. 17 - Percentage of residual bone mass in function of calcination duration

Fig. 18 - Effect of bone density on the percentage of residual bone mass (Fisher’s exact test)

Fig. 18 - Effect of bone density on the percentage of residual bone mass (Fisher’s exact test)

Intensity of fragmentation

18The state of bone before combustion (dry/ fresh, whole/fragmented) plays a role in the degree of fragmentation of bone residues (Théry et al., 2004; Costamagno et al., 2005). The bones dried before burning fragment six times less than humid bones, while the fractured bones re-fracture very little, the average size of the combustion residues being greater. Therefore, for the comparisons, only the laboratory experiments in which the humeri were dry and fractured were used.

19In the experiments realized at Régismont-le-Haut, the 3-4 cm fragment class is the best represented in all series, while in the laboratory experiments, the 6-7 cm class is always dominant (fig. 19). Is this difference due to a more intensive fragmentation of bones in the series with a prolonged combustion? It is difficult to respond to this question since the bones used were not of the same size (tables 1 and 2). For the small fragments, the question of the size of bones put into the fire is not relevant. The fragments less than 2 cm appear clearly more abundant in the experimental series of Régismont-le-Haut, (average 13.3%) than in the laboratory series (2.3%) (fig. 19). As we could expect, a prolonged combustion results in a more intensive fragmentation of residues, which is represented by a significant increase in the quantity of small fragments (lower than 2 cm). At the same time, in the prolonged combustions, a notable part of the bone residues is reduced to the state of ashes (between 12 and 14% of the residual mass. The values recorded for the fine fraction (% of ash and fragments smaller than 2 cm) are comparable from one series to the other, as is shown by a variance analysis (fig. 20).

Fig. 19 - Distribution of bone residues according to their size

Fig. 19 - Distribution of bone residues according to their size

a- laboratory series, dry and fragmented proximal extremities; b- laboratory series, dry and fragmented distal extremities; c- Régismont, series 1; d- Régismont, series 2.

Fig. 20 - Effect of maintenance methods on the relative mass of the fine fraction (Fisher’s exact test)

Fig. 20 - Effect of maintenance methods on the relative mass of the fine fraction (Fisher’s exact test)

Intensity of combustion

20The calcined remains in the prolonged combustion hearths represent an average of 77.2% of the total weight of the osseous residues versus 32% in the laboratory experiments (fig. 21).

21In the laboratory experiments, we showed that the percentage of calcined bones was not correlated with the flame duration. The differences recorded are related to the density of the spongy tissue and the degree fragmentation of the bones before combustion (Théry‑Parisot et al., 2004). In the prolonged combustions, the hearths were initiated and then secondarily fed with the same types of combustible materials. In these experiments, in which the type of fuel does not play a role, the percentage of calcined bones seems logically correlated with the flame duration: the longer the hearth functions, the more intensively the bones are burned (fig. 21). The variance analysis shows a highly significant difference between the two experimental series at Régismont‑le-Haut in terms of the proportion of calcined bones: the rapidly fed hearths (series 1) have an average of 15% more calcined bones than the slowly fed hearths (series 2) (fig. 22). Therefore, in addition to the flame duration, the methods of maintaining the hearths also play a notable role in the combustion intensity of osseous residues. In the rapidly fed hearths, the greater intensity of the flames accentuates the combustion process.

Fig. 21 - Relative mass of calcined bones in function of flame duration

Fig. 21 - Relative mass of calcined bones in function of flame duration

Fig. 22 - Effect of maintenance modalities on the relative mass of calcined remains (Fisher’s exact test)

Fig. 22 - Effect of maintenance modalities on the relative mass of calcined remains (Fisher’s exact test)

Multi-criteria interrelations

22A confrontation of the criteria “fragment size class” and “combustion intensity” indicates that the calcined remains are more intensively fragmented once the combustion is completed than the mostly black or mostly gray remains, regardless of the series considered. Measured by weight, the fragments over 6 cm are clearly dominant among the black and gray bones, while for calcined bones, the 3-4 cm class dominates, the distribution by size class being more homogeneous (fig. 23).

Fig. 23 - Relative size of bone fragments according to combustion intensity

Fig. 23 - Relative size of bone fragments according to combustion intensity

a- Régismont, series 1; Régismont, series 2 (2: mostly black bones, 3: mostly gray bones, 4: mostly white bones).

23Concerning the tissue type, the spongy portions in both experimental series are more frequently calcined than the fragments of compact tissue or compact tissue with spongy tissue (fig. 24). Carbonized spongy remains are very poorly represented. The spongy tissues appear, moreover, to be more intensively fragmented than the compact tissues, which themselves are smaller in size than the fragments of compacta with spongiosa (fig. 25). The fragments smaller than 4 cm thus represent an average in the two series of 58.1% of the residual mass of spongy tissues versus 44.6% of the compact tissue and 30.8% of the fragments of compact tissue with spongy tissue. Since the initial size of the fragments of each tissue type was not recorded before combustion, a potential bias related to the type of material used cannot be excluded. In series 1, relative to series 2, we observe a greater fragmentation of osseous remains regardless of the tissue type in relation to the flame intensity (remains less than 4 cm: spongy – series 1: 61.2%; series 2: 55.1%; compact – series 1: 48.8%; series 2: 40.4%; compact + spongy – series 1: 34.4%; series 2: 27.2%).

Fig. 24 - Relative combustion intensity of bone fragments according to bone tissue type

Fig. 24 - Relative combustion intensity of bone fragments according to bone tissue type

a- Régismont, series 1; b- Régismont, series 2 (COMP: compact tissue fragment, COMPS: compact tissue with spongy tissue fragment, SPON: spongy tissue fragment)

Fig. 25 - Relative size of bone fragments according to bone tissue type

Fig. 25 - Relative size of bone fragments according to bone tissue type

a- Régismont, series 1; b- Régismont, series 2 (COMP: compact tissue fragment, COMPS: compact tissue with spongy tissue fragment, SPON: spongy tissue fragment)

Conclusions

24The experiments conducted at Régismont-le-Haut provide information complementary to that obtained in laboratory experiments and contribute to a better characterization of burned osseous residues associated with the use of bone as fuel.

25It appears that in a hearth maintained with bone fuel, the duration of the flames is not correlated with the mass of combustible material burned. In addition to the factors identified in laboratory experiments (tissue type, degree of fragmentation), the methods of hearth maintenance play a determinant role. If we vary only this parameter, for the production of an equivalent flame duration, the slow feeding method allows an economy of one third of the fuel necessary for the rapid feeding method. Therefore, even if we could identify the impact of the different taphonomic agents that can modify burned bones, it is impossible based on the mass of bone fuel recorded in an archaeological assemblage to estimate the use duration of hearths at a given site.

26These new experiments confirm that flame duration has very little influence on the loss of bone residue mass. It is the bone density, and thus probably the quantity of fat (Lyman, 1985), that plays a determinant role. In the experiments realized at Régismont‑le-Haut, the loss of bone mass is on average 65%. A prolonged combustion also results in a more intensive fragmentation and combustion of osseous residues: fragments less than 2 cm long are six times more abundant in the experiments conducted at Régismont‑le-Haut than in the laboratory experiments, and the calcined pieces two times more abundant. The fine fraction (ash and fragments less than 2 cm) corresponds to more than one quarter of the residual bone mass in the two open-air series, while the calcined pieces represent more than three quarters of this mass.

27Contrary to the degree of fragmentation, the intensity of calcination depends largely on the methods of maintaining the hearths: the residues from rapidly fed hearths (series 1 at Régismont‑le-Haut) are more intensively burned than those of slowly fed hearths (series 2 at Régismont‑le-Haut). It would be interesting, through the maintenance of hearths over several days, to determine if the fine fraction and calcined piece proportions increase progressively according to the duration of use of the hearths.

28Among the osseous residues produced by the combustions realized at Régismont‑le-Haut, calcined pieces are smaller in size than the black and gray fragments. They are also more numerous regardless of the bone tissue type (60.5 to 92.9% of the residual mass), though in both experimental series, the spongy fragments are always more intensively burned than compact bone or compact bone with spongy tissue fragments.

29What conclusions can be drawn from these observations? The experiments conducted at Régismont‑le-Haut show that a fire fuelled with bone for a few hours produces a significant quantity of ash (approximately 15% of the residual mass), as well as a multitude of bone fragments less than 2 cm long (13% of the residual mass). Since small fragments can be further reduced in size by diverse taphonomic agents, the use of bone as fuel can considerably diminish the proportion of faunal remains at a site relative to lithic remains, which can be problematic for interpretations of site function and animal exploitation. Various studies have moreover shown that certain taphonomic processes, such as trampling (Stiner et al., 1995; Thiébaut et al., in press) or weathering (Gerbe, this volume), result in a preferential destruction of spongy and calcined bones, which correspond more or less to the osseous residues collected when bone is used as fuel. In rock shelters and caves, where occupations can be repeated over time, human trampling can have significant repercussions for the preservation of burned bone residues and thus mask a potential use of bone as fuel. The same is true for the action of atmospheric agents at open-air sites.

Haut de page

Bibliographie

Airvaux J., Berthet A.-L. & Castel J.-C. 2003 - Le gisement aurignacien de Chez-Pinaud 2 à Jonzac, Charente-maritime. Préhistoire du Sud-Ouest, 10: 25-76.

Bellomo R.V. 1993 - A methodological approach for identifying archaeological evidence of fire resulting from human activities. Journal of Archaeological Science, 20: 525-553.

Bellomo R.V. & Harris J.W.K. 1990 - Preliminary reports of actualistic studies of fire within Virunga National Park, Zaïre: toward an understanding of archaeological occurence. In: Evolution of environments and Hominidae in the African Western Rift Valley, Boaz N.T. (ed). Martinsville, VA, Virginia Museum of Natural History: 317-338.

Bennett J.L. 1999 - Thermal alteration of buried bone. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26 : 1-8.

Bombail C. 1987 - Les structures de combustion des niveaux aurignaciens du Flageolet I. Mémoire de Maîtrise, Université de Neuchâtel.

Bon F., Mensan R. avec la collaboration de Costamagno S., Araujo Igreja M., Gardère Ph., Kuntz D., Ménard C., Sellami F. & Szmidt C. 2006 - Régismont-le-Haut (Poilhes, Hérault). Campagne de fouilles d’un habitat de plein air aurignacien. Rapport d’opération de fouille programmée, 68 pp. , 9 fig.

Bon F., Mensan R. avec la collaboration de Araujo Igreja M., Costamagno S., Gardère P., Ménard C., Sellami F., Szmidt C. & Théry-Parisot I. 2007 - Le site de plein air de Régismont-le-Haut : une halte aurignacienne dans les plaines du Languedoc. In : Qui est l’Aurignacien ? Aurignac, Editions Musée-forum : 53-71.

Bon F., 2002 - L’Aurignacien entre Mer et Océan. Réflexion sur l’unité des phases anciennes de l’Aurignacien dans le sud de la France. Mémoire de la Société Préhistorique Française, XXIX, 253 pp. 

Bordes J.-G. & Lenoble A. 2000 - Caminade (Sarlat, Dordogne). Document final de Synthèse, Service régional de l’Archéologie d’Aquitaine, Bordeaux.

Cain C.R. 2005 - Using burned animal bone to look at Middle Stone Age occupation and behavior. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32 : 873-884.

Castel J.-C. 2003 - Economie de chasse et d’exploitation de l’animal au Cuzoul de Vers (Lot) au Solutréen et au Badegoulien. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 100 : 41-65.

Costamagno S. & Fano Martínez M.A. 2005 - Pratiques cynégétiques et exploitation des ressources animales dans les niveaux du Magdalénien supérieur-final de El Horno (Ramales, Cantabrie, Espagne). Paleo, 17: 31-56.

Costamagno S., Griggo C. & Mourre V. 1998 - Approche expérimentale d’un problème taphonomique : utilisation de combustible osseux au Paléolithique. Préhistoire Européenne, 13 : 167-194.

Costamagno S., Théry-Parisot I., Brugal J.-P. & Guibert R. 2005 - Taphonomic consequences of the use of bones as fuel. Experimental data and archaeological applications. In: Biosphere to Lithopshere. New studies in vertebrate taphonomy, O’connor T. (ed). Proceedings of ICAZ, Durham, 2002. Oxford, Oxbow Books: 51-62.

Costamagno I. Théry-Parisot J-C Castel & J-P Brugal 2009 - Combustible ou non? Analyse multifactorielle et modèles explicatifs sur des ossements brûlés paléolithiques. In : Gestion des combustibles au Paléolithique et au Mésolithique : nouveaux outils, nouvelles interprétations, Théry-Parisot I., Costamagno S., Henry A. (eds). Proceedings of workshop 21. XV congress IUSPP, Lisbonne, 2006. BAR International Series 1914, Oxford, Archaeopress: 65-84.

David B. 1990 - How was this bone burnt? In: Problem solving in taphonomy, Solomon S., Davidson I. & Watson B. (eds). Tempus : 65-79.

Gerbe M. 2004 - Etude taphonomique d’ossements brûlés. Mémoire de D.E.A., Université de Provence, 93 pp. 

Gifford-Gonzalez D. 1989 - Ethnographic analogues for interpreting modified bones: some cases from East Africa. In: Bone modification, R. Bonnichsen & M. Sorg (eds). Orono, Maine, Center for the Study of First Americans: 179-246.

Gilchrist R. & Mytum C. 1986 - Experimental archaeology and burnt animal bone from archaeological sites. Circaea, 4 : 29-38.

Letourneux C. 2003 - Devine qui est venu dîner à Brassempouy ? Approche taphonomique pour une interprétation archéozoologique des vestiges osseux de l’Aurignacien ancien de la grotte des Hyènes (Brassempouy, Landes). Thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, 603 pp. 

Lyman R.L. 1985 - Bone frequencies, differential transport, and the MGUI. Journal of Archaeological Science, 12 : 221-236.

Maurin G. & Ambert P. 1979 - Une structure aurignacienne à Régismont-le-Haut. Les amis de Nissan-lez-Ensérune, 40: 6-9.

Pearce J. & Luff R. 1994 - The taphonomy of cooked bones. In: Whither environmental archaeology?, Luff R. & Rowley-Conwy P. (eds). Oxford, Oxbow Monograph : 51-56.

Rendu W. 2007 - Planification des activités de subsistance au sein du territoire des derniers moustériens. Thèse de doctorat, Université Bordeaux I, 363 pp. 

Schiegl S., Goldberg P., Pfretzschner H.U. & Conard N.J. 2003 - Paleolithic burnt bone horizons from the Swabian Jura: Distinguishing between in situ fireplaces and dumping areas. Geoarchaeology an International Journal, 18: 541-565.

Soffer O. 1985 - The Upper Paleolithic of the Central Russian Plain. Orlando, Academic Press, 539 pp. 

Spennemann D.H.R. & Colley S.M. 1989 - Fire in a pit: the effects of burning of faunal remains. Archaeozoologia, 3: 51-64.

Stiner M.C., Kuhn S.L., Weiner S. & Bar-Yosef O. 1995 - Differential burning, recrystallization, and fragmentation of archaeological bones. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22 : 223-237.

Tchesnokov Y. 1995 - La culture traditionnelle des éleveurs de rennes du Nord-Est de la Sibérie : problèmes et perspectives de développement. In : Peuples des Grands Nords. Traditions et transitions, Charrin A.-V.,Lacroix J.-M. & Therrien M. (eds). Paris, Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle, Institut National des Langues et civilisations Orientales : 305-314.

Théry-Parisot I. 2002 - Fuel management (bone and wood) during the Lower Aurignacian in the Pataud Rock Shelter (Lower Palaeolithic, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne, France). Contribution of experimentation. Journal of Archaeological Science, 29: 1415-1421.

Théry-Parisot I., Brugal J.-P., Costamagno S. & Guilbert R. 2004 - Conséquences taphonomiques de l’utilisation des ossements comme combustible. Approche expérimentale. Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie, 95 : 19-22.

Théry-Parisot I. & Costamagno S. 2005 - Propriétés combustibles des ossements. Données expérimentales et réflexions archéologiques sur leur emploi dans les sites paléolithiques. Gallia Préhistoire, 47 : 235-254.

Théry-Parisot I., Costamagno S., Brugal J.-P., Fosse P. & Guilbert R. 2005 - The use of bone as fuel during the Palaeolithic, experimental study of bone combustible properties. In: The zooarchaeology of fats, oils, milk and dairying, Mulville J. & Outram A.K. (eds). Proceedings of ICAZ, Durham, 2002. Oxford, Oxbow Books: 50-59.

Thiébaut C., Costamagno S., Coumont M.-P., Mourre V., Provenzano N. & Thery-Parisot I. sous presse - Approche expérimentale des conséquences du piétinement des grands herbivores sur les vestiges archéologiques. Paleo, numéro spécial.

Vaté V. & Beyries S. 2007 - Une ethnographie du feu chez les éleveurs de rennes du Nord-Est sibérien. In : Les civilisations du renne d’hier et d’aujourd’hui. Approches ethnohistoriques, archéologiques et anthropologiques, Beyries S. & Vaté V. (eds). XXVIIe rencontres internationales d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes. Antibes, APDCA-CNRS : 393-420.

Wandsnider L. 1997 - The roasted and the boiled: food composition and heat treatment with special emphasis on pit-hearth cooking. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 16 : 1-48.

Yravedra I., Baena J., Arrizabalaga A. & Iriarte M.J. 2005 - El empleo de material óseo como combustible durante el Paleolítico Medio y Superior en el Cantábrico. Observaciones experimentales. Museo de Altamira, Monografias, 20 : 10-38.

Haut de page

Notes

1 - e.g. Abri Pataud (Théry-Parisot, 2002), Cuzoul de Vers (Castel, 2003), Esquilleu (Yravedra et al., 2005), Le Flageolet I (Bombail, 1987), Hohle Fels (Schiegl et al., 2003), Labeko Koba (Yravedra et al., 2005), Pech de l’Azé I (Rendu, 2007), Le Placard (Costamagno et al., 1998), Saint-Germain-la-Rivière (Costamagno et al., 1998), Brassempouy (Letourneux, 2003) and several layers gravettians of central Europe (Soffer, 1985).

Haut de page

Table des illustrations

Titre Fig. 1 - Hearth pit
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-1.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 32k
Titre Fig. 2 - Bone defleshing and fracturation
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-2.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 32k
Titre Fig. 3 - Combustibles before the fire was lit
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-3.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 32k
Titre Fig. 4 - Feeding the fire with bones
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-4.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 36k
Titre Fig. 5 - Bone residues after combustion
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-5.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 40k
Titre Fig. 6 - Sorting of bone residues
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-6.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 7 - Fragments less than 2 cm
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-7.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 36k
Titre Fig. 8 - Bone ash
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-8.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 32k
Titre Fig. 9 - Calcined bones
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-9.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 36k
Titre Fig. 10 - Whole epiphyses of pork long bones
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-10.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 11 - Concentric surface scales that gradually expose the spongiosa
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-11.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 28k
Titre Fig. 12 - Flame duration for an equivalent fuel mass
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-12.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 13 - Effect of maintenance methods on flame duration (Fisher’s exact test)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-13.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 14 - Combustion duration in function of the fuel mass used:
Légende a- flame duration, b- calcination duration.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-14.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 32k
Titre Fig. 15 - Percentage of residual bone mass in function of flame
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-15.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 16 - Effect of maintenance methods on the percentage of residual bone mass (Fisher’s exact test)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-16.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 17 - Percentage of residual bone mass in function of calcination duration
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-17.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 20k
Titre Fig. 18 - Effect of bone density on the percentage of residual bone mass (Fisher’s exact test)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-18.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 19 - Distribution of bone residues according to their size
Légende a- laboratory series, dry and fragmented proximal extremities; b- laboratory series, dry and fragmented distal extremities; c- Régismont, series 1; d- Régismont, series 2.
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-19.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 52k
Titre Fig. 20 - Effect of maintenance methods on the relative mass of the fine fraction (Fisher’s exact test)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-20.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 21 - Relative mass of calcined bones in function of flame duration
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-21.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 22 - Effect of maintenance modalities on the relative mass of calcined remains (Fisher’s exact test)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-22.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 24k
Titre Fig. 23 - Relative size of bone fragments according to combustion intensity
Légende a- Régismont, series 1; Régismont, series 2 (2: mostly black bones, 3: mostly gray bones, 4: mostly white bones).
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-23.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 32k
Titre Fig. 24 - Relative combustion intensity of bone fragments according to bone tissue type
Légende a- Régismont, series 1; b- Régismont, series 2 (COMP: compact tissue fragment, COMPS: compact tissue with spongy tissue fragment, SPON: spongy tissue fragment)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-24.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 32k
Titre Fig. 25 - Relative size of bone fragments according to bone tissue type
Légende a- Régismont, series 1; b- Régismont, series 2 (COMP: compact tissue fragment, COMPS: compact tissue with spongy tissue fragment, SPON: spongy tissue fragment)
URL http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/docannexe/image/8995/img-25.jpg
Fichier image/jpeg, 31k
Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Sandrine Costamagno, Delphine Kuntz, François Bon, Romain Mensan et Isabelle Théry-Parisot, « Taphonomic Impact of Prolonged Combustion on Bones Used as Fuel »Palethnologie [En ligne], 2 | 2010, mis en ligne le 01 janvier 2010, consulté le 19 juin 2025. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/palethnologie/8995 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/palethnologie.8995

Haut de page

Auteurs

Sandrine Costamagno

TRACES – UMR 5608 du CNRS, Maison de la Recherche, Université de Toulouse 2 – Le Mirail, 5 allées A. Machado, 31058 Toulouse cedex
costamag[at]univ-tlse2.fr

Articles du même auteur

Delphine Kuntz

TRACES – UMR 5608 du CNRS, Maison de la Recherche, Université de Toulouse 2 – Le Mirail, 5 allées A. Machado, 31058 Toulouse cedex
kuntz[at]univ-tlse2.fr

François Bon

TRACES – UMR 5608 du CNRS, Maison de la Recherche, Université de Toulouse 2 – Le Mirail, 5 allées A. Machado, 31058 Toulouse cedex
bon[at]univ-tlse2.fr

Articles du même auteur

Romain Mensan

TRACES – UMR 5608 du CNRS, Maison de la Recherche, Université de Toulouse 2 – Le Mirail, 5 allées A. Machado, 31058 Toulouse cedex
mensrom[at]gmail.com

Isabelle Théry-Parisot

CEPAM – UMR 6130 du CNRS, 250 rue Albert Einstein 06560 Valbonne
thery[at]cepam.cnrs.fr

Articles du même auteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

Haut de page
Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search