Abelson, J., Blacksher, E. A., Li, K. K., Boesveld, S. E., & Goold, S. D. (2013). Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an Emerging, Interdisciplinary Field. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9 (1), 5;
Abelson, J., Eyles, J., McLeod, C. B., Collins, P., McMullan, C. & Forest, P.-G. (2003a). Does Deliberation Make a Difference? Results from a Citizens Panel Study of Health Goals Priority Setting. Health Policy, 66, 95–106;
Abelson, J., Forest, P.-G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E. & Gauvin, F.-P. (2003b). Deliberations about Deliberative Methods: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Participation Processes. Social Science & Medicine, 57(2) 239–251;
Abelson, J., Warren, M. E. & Forest, P.-G. (2012). The Future of Public Deliberation on Health Issues. The Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 27–29;
Archard, D. (2011). Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts. Bioethics, 25(3), 119–127;
Black, J. (1998). Regulation as Facilitation: Negotiating the Genetic Revolution. The Modern Law Review, 61(5), 621–660;
Blacksher, E., Diebel, A., Forest, P.-G., Goold, S. D. & Abelson, J. (2012). What Is Public Deliberation? The Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 14–17;
Bohman, J. (1998). Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400–425;
Bowie, C., Richardson, A. & Sykes, W. (1995). Consulting the Public about Health Service Priorities. British Medical Journal, 311, 1155–1158;
Bowling, A., Jacobson, B. & Southgate, L. (1993). Explorations in Consultation of the Public and Health Professionals on Priority Setting in an Inner London Health District. Social Science and Medicine, 37(7), 851–857;
Calhoun, C. J. (2002). Dictionary of the social sciences. New York: Oxford University Press;
Chilvers, J. (2008). Deliberating Competence Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(2), 155–185;
Coote, A. & Lenaghan, J. (1997). Citizens’ Juries: Theory into Practice. London: Institute for Public Policy Research;
Cowley, C. (2012). Expertise, Wisdom and Moral Philosophers: A Response to Gesang. Bioethics, 26(6), 337–342;
Crawshaw, R., Garland, M. J., Hines, B. & Lobitz, C. (1985). Oregon Health Decisions: An Experiment with Informed Community Consent. Journal of the American Medical Association, 254, 3213–3216;
Dodds, S., & Thomson, C. (2006). Bioethics and Democracy: Competing Roles of National Bioethics Organisations. Bioethics, 20(6), 326–338;
Dryzek, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 651–669;
Dzur, A. W., & Levin, D. L. (2007). The Primacy of the Public: In Support of Bioethics Commissions as Deliberative Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 17(2), 133–142;
Engelhardt, T. H. (1996). The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press;
Farrar, C., Green, D. P., Green, J. E., Nickerson, D. W., & Shewfelt, S. (2009). Does Discussion Group Composition Affect Policy Preferences? Results from Three Randomized Experiments. Political Psychology, 30(4), 615–647;
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(2), 226–243;
Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press;
Fishkin, J. S. (2011). When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
Fishkin, J. S., Luskin, R. C. & Jowell, R. (2000). Deliberative Polling and Public Consultation. Parliamentary Affairs, 53(4), 657–666;
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review, 66.s1, 66–75;
Gerber, M. (2011). Who are the Voices of Europe? Evidence from a Pan-European Deliberative Poll. Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, 25–27 August;
Gesang, B. (2010). Are Moral Philosophers Moral Experts? Bioethics, 24(4), 153–159;
Goold, S. D., Neblo, M. A., Kim, S. Y. H., Devries, R., Rowe, G. & Muhlberger, P. (2012). What Is Good Public Deliberation? The Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 24–26;
Gordon, J.-S. (2014). Moral Philosophers Are Moral Experts! A Reply to David Archard. Bioethics, 28(4), 203–206;
Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;
Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (1997). Deliberating about Bioethics. The Hastings Center Report, 27(3), 38–41;
Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press;
Hendriks, C. M. (2006). Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society’s Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies, 54(3), 486–508;
Himmelroos, S. & Christensen, H. S. (2013). Deliberation and Opinion Change: Evidence from a Deliberative Mini-Public in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(1), 41–60;
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M. & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95;
Karpowitz, C. F., Mendelberg, T. & Shaker, L. (2012). Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation. American Political Science Review, 106(03), 533–547;
Landemore, H. (2012). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton: Princeton University Press;
Landwehr, C. (2014). Facilitating Deliberation: The Role of Impartial Intermediaries in Deliberative Mini-Publics. Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: ECPR Press. 77-92;
MacLean, S. & Burgess, M. M. (2010). In the Public Interest: Assessing Expert and Stakeholder Influence in Public Deliberation about Biobanks. Public Understanding of Science, 19(4), 486–496;
Manin, B. (2005). Democratic Deliberation: Why We Should Focus on Debate rather than Discussion. Presented at the Paper delivered at the Program in Ethics and Public Affairs Seminar, Princeton University;
Mansbridge, J., Hartz-Karp, J., Amengual, M. & Gastil, J. (2006). Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study. Journal of Public Deliberation, 2(1), 7;
McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental Methods in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 31–51;
Meagher, K. M. & Lee, L. M. (2016). Integrating Public Health and Deliberative Public Bioethics: Lessons from the Human Genome Project Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Program. Public Health Reports, 131, 44–51;
Moore, A. (2010). Public Bioethics and Public Engagement: The Politics of “Proper Talk”, Public Understanding of Science, 19(2), 197–211;
Moore, A. (2012). Following from the Front: Theorizing Deliberative Facilitation. Critical Policy Studies, 6(2), 146–162;
Moreno, J. D. (1995). Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus (Vol. 61). New York: Oxford University Press;
Mutz, D. C. (2002). The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855;
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy (1 edition). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press;
Nabatchi, T. (2010). Deliberative Democracy and Citizenship: In Search of the Efficacy Effect. Journal of Public Deliberation, 6(2);
Neblo, M. A. (2015). Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
Rasmussen, L. M. (2005). Introduction: In Search of Ethics Expertise. In L. Rasmussen (Ed.), Ethics Expertise (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer;
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Paperback edition, 1996; Second edition, 2005;
Rei, W., & Yeh, J. W. (2009). Promises and Pitfalls of Using National Bioethics Commissions as an Institution to Facilitate Deliberative Democracy-Lessons from the Policy Making of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. National Taiwan University Law Review, 4, 69;
Robertson, J. A. (1983). Procreative Liberty and the Control of Conception, Pregnancy, and Childbirth. Virginia Law Review, 405-464;
Robertson, J. A. (1985). Embryos, Families, and Procreative Liberty: The Legal Structure of the New Reproduction. Southern California Law Review, 59(5):939-1041;
Sanchini, V. (2015). Bioethical Expertise: Mapping the Field. Biblioteca della libertà, L-213: 43-61;
Schicktanz, S., Schweda, M. & Wynne, B. (2012). The Ethics of “Public Understanding of Ethics”—Why and How Bioethics Expertise Should Include Public and Patients’ Voices. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 15(2), 129–139;
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
Steinkamp, N. & Gordijn, B. (2003). Ethical Case Deliberation on the Ward. A Comparison of Four Methods. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 6(3), 235–246;
Steinkamp, N. L., Gordijn, B. & ten Have, H. A. M. J. (2008). Debating Ethical Expertise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 18(2), 173–192;
Stewart, J., Kendall, E. & Coote, A. (1994). Citizens’ Juries. London: IPPR;
Sunstein, C. R. (2000). Deliberative Trouble – Why Groups Go to Extremes. 110 Yale Law Journal, 71–119;
Trotter, G. (2006). Bioethics and Deliberative Democracy: Five Warnings from Hobbes. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31(3), 235-250;
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis, London: Pearson;
Varelius, J. (2008). Is Ethical Expertise Possible? Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 11(2), 127–132;
Verba, S. (1961). Small Groups and Political Behavior: A Study of Leadership. Princeton University Press;
Weinstein, B. D. (1994). The Possibility of Ethical Expertise. Theoretical Medicine, 15(1), 61–75.
Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and Democracy (1 edition). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.