Anderson, John R.., Bothell, Daniel, Byrne, Michael D., Douglass, Scott, Lebiere, Christian, & Qin, Yulin [2004], An integrated theory of the mind, Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036.
Baader, Franz, Calvanese, Diego, McGuinness, Deborah, Nardi, Daniele, & Patel-Schneider, Peter [2010], The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementations and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn.
Baader, Franz & Hollunder, Bernhard [1995], Embedding defaults into terminological knowledge representation formalisms, Journal of Automated Reasoning, 14(1), 149–180, 10.1007/BF00883932.
Bobillo, Fernando & Straccia, Umberto [2009], An owl ontology for fuzzy owl 2, in: Foundations of Intelligent Systems – 18th International Symposium (ISMIS 2009), edited by J. Rauch, Z.W. Raś, P. Berka, & T. Elomaa, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5722, 151–160, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04125-9_18.
Bonatti, Piero, Lutz, Carsten, & Wolter, Franz [2006], Description logics with circumscription, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 400–410.
Brachman, Ronald & Levesque, Hector [1985], Readings in Knowledge Representation, Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann.
Brachman, Ronald & Schmolze, James G. [1985], An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system, Cognitive Science, 9, 171–216, doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(85)80014-8.
Evans, Jonathan [2008], Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition, Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278, 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
Evans, Jonathan & Frankish, Keith (eds.) [2008], In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, New York: Oxford University Press.
Fodor, Jerry [1981], The present status of the innateness controversy, in: Representations, edited by J. Fodor, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 257–316.
Frixione, Marcello & Lieto, Antonio [2011], Representing concepts in artificial systems: A clash of requirements, in: Proceedings of the 4th International HCP11 Workshop, 75–82.
—— [2012], Representing concepts in formal ontologies. compositionality vs. typicality effects, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 21(4), 391–414, doi: 10.12775/LLP.2012.018.
—— [2013], Dealing with concepts: From cognitive psychology to knowledge representation, Frontiers in Psychological and Behavioural Science, 2(3), 96–106.
—— [2014], Towards an extended model of conceptual representations in formal ontologies: A typicality-based proposal, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(3), 257–276.
Gärdenfors, Peter [2000], Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ghignone, Leo, Lieto, Antonio, & Radicioni, Daniele [2013], Typicality-based inference by plugging conceptual spaces into ontologies, in: Proceedings of AIC 2013, International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Cognition, 68–79.
Giordano, Laura, Gliozzi, Valentina, Pozzato, Gianluca, & Olivetti, Nicola [2013], A non-monotonic description logic for reasoning about typicality, Artificial Intelligence, 195(0), 165–202, doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.004.
Hélie, Sébastien & Sun, Ron [2010], Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model, Psychological Review, 117(3), 994–1024, doi: 10.1037/a0019532.
Kennedy, William G. et al. [2012], Symposium: Cognitive modeling of processes “Beyond Rational”, in: Proceedings of ICCM 2012 11th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, 55–58.
Khemlani, Sangeet & Johnson-Laird, Philip N. [2013], The processes of inference, Argument & Computation, 4(1), 4–20, doi: 10.1080/19462166.2012.674060.
Laird, John E. [2008], Extending the soar cognitive architecture, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial General Intelligence, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 224–235.
Larue, Othalia, Poirier, Pierre, & Nkambou, Roger [2012], Emotional emergence in a symbolic dynamical architecture, in: BICA’12, Palermo, 199–204.
Machery, Edouard [2005], Concepts are not a natural kinds, Philosophy of Science, 72, 444–467.
McCarthy, John [2007], From here to human-level AI, Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1174–1182.
Minsky, Marvin [1975], A framework for representing knowledge, in: The Psychology of Computer Vision, edited by P. H. Winston, New York: McGraw-Hill, 211–277.
Murphy, Gregory [2002], The Big Book of Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Newell, Allen [1990], Unified Theory of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Osherson, Daniel N. & Smith, Edward E. [1981], On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts, Cognition, 9(1), 35–58, doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90013-5.
Piccinini, Gualtiero [2011], Two kinds of concept: Implicit and explicit, Dialogue, 50(1), 179–193, doi: 10.1017/S0012217311000187.
Pilato, Giovanni, Augello, Agnese, & Gaglio, Salvatore [2012], A modular system oriented to the design of versatile knowledge bases for chatbots, doi: 10.5402/2012/363840.
Rosch, Eleanor [1975], Cognitive representation of semantic categories, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 573–605.
Sloman, Steven A. [1996], The empirical case for two systems of reasoning, Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
Smolensky, Paul [1988], On the proper treatment of connectionism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–23.
Stanovich, Keith E. & West, Richard [2000], Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665.
Strannegård, Claes, von Haugwitz, Rickard, Wessberg, Johan, & Balkenius, Christian [2013], A cognitive architecture based on dual process theory, in: Artificial General Intelligence, edited by Kai-Uwe Kühnberger, Sebastian Rudolph, & Pei Wang, Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7999, 140–149, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39521-5_15.
Wermter, Stefan & Sun, Ron [2000], Hybrid Neural Systems, Heidelberg; New York: Springer.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1953], Philosophische Untersuchungen, Oxford: Blackwell.