Allison, Scott T., Messick, David M., et al. [1989], On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect, Social Cognition, 7(3), 275–295, doi: 10.1521/soco.1989.7.3.275.
Ancona, Leonardo & Pareyson, Rosetta [1968], Contributo allo studio della aggressione: La dinimica della obbedienza distruttiva (Contribution to the study of aggression: The dynamics of destructive obedience), Neurologia e Psichiatria, 29, 340–372.
Arpaly, Nomy [2005], Comments on lack of character by John Doris, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 71(3), 643–647, doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00477.x.
Badhwar, Neera K. [2009], The Milgram experiments, learned helplessness, and character traits, The Journal of Ethics, 13(2–3), 257–289, doi: 10.1007/s10892-009-9052-4.
Baumrind, Diana [1964], Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “Behavioral Study of Obedience”, American Psychologist, 19(6), 421–423, doi: 10.1037/h0040128.
Beauvois, Jean-Léon, Courbet, Didier, et al. [2012], The prescriptive power of the television host. A transposition of Milgram’s obedience paradigm to the context of TV game show, European Review of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 111–119, doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2012.02.001.
Bem, Daryl J. [2011], Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425, doi: 10.1037/a0021524.
Blass, Thomas [1999], The Milgram Paradigm after 35 years: Some things we now know about obedience to authority, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 955–978, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00134.x.
Blass, Thomas [2004], The Man Who Shocked the World: The life and legacy of Stanley Milgram, New York: Basic Books.
Blum, Ben [2018], The lifespan of a lie, [Blog post], https://medium.com/s/trustissues/the-lifespan-of-a-lie-d869212b1f62.
Bocchiaro, Piero, Zimbardo, Philip G., et al. [2012], To defy or not to defy: An experimental study of the dynamics of disobedience and whistle-blowing, Social Influence, 7(1), 35–50, doi: 10.1080/15534510.2011.648421.
Bock, D. C. [1972], Obedience: A response to authority and Christian commitment, Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 3276B-3279B, University Microfilms N. 72-31, 651.
Bonny Miranda, Francisca S., Bordes Caballero, Rosa, et al. [1981], Obediencia a la autoridad, Psiquis: Revista de Psiquiatría, Psicología y Psicosom’atica, 2(6), 212–221.
Bortolotti, Lisa & Sullivan-Bissett, Ema [2021], Is choice blindness a case of self-ignorance?, Synthese, 198(6), 5437–5454, doi: 10.1007/s11229-019-02414-3.
Brannigan, Augustine & Perry, Gina [2016], Milgram, genocide and bureaucracy: A post-Weberian perspective, State Crime Journal, 5(2), 287–305, doi: 10.13169/statecrime.5.2.0287.
Brown, Roger [1986], Social Psychology, New York: MacMilllan, 2nd edn.
Browning, Christopher R. [1992], Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland, New York: Harper-Collins.
Burger, Jerry M. [2009], Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today, American Psychologist, 64(1), 1–11, doi: 10.1037/a0010932.
Burger, Jerry M. [2014], Situational features in Milgram’s experiment that kept his participants shocking, Journal of Social Issues, 70(3), 489–500, doi: 10.1111/josi.12073.
Burley, Peter M. & McGuinness, John [1977], Effects of social intelligence on the Milgram paradigm, Psychological Reports, 40(3), 767–770, doi: 10.2466/pr0.1977.40.3.767.
Chambers, Chris [2017], The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: A manifesto for reforming the culture of scientific practice, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chan, David [2008], So why ask me?—Are self-report data really that bad?, in: Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends, edited by C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg, New York: Routledge, 309–336, doi: 10.4324/9780203867266-22.
Corneille, Olivier & Lush, Peter [2023], Sixty years after Orne’s American psychologist article: A conceptual framework for subjective experiences elicited by demand characteristics, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(1), 83–101, doi: 10.31234/osf.io/jqyvx.
Costanzo, Elaine M. [1976], The effect of probable retaliation and sex-related variables on obedience, Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 4214B, University Microfilms N. 77, 3253.
Cushman, Fiery, Gray, Kurt, et al. [2012], Simulating murder: The aversion to harmful action, Emotion, 12(1), 2–7, doi: 10.1037/a0025071.
Dambrun, Michaël & Vatiné, Elise [2010], Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment, European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 760–773, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.646.
Darley, John M. [1995], Constructive and destructive obedience: A taxonomy of principal‐agent relationships, Journal of Social Issues, 51(3), 125–154, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01338.x.
de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada & Intemann, Kristen [2018], The Fight Against Doubt. How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public, New York: Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190869229.001.0001.
Doliński, Dariusz, Grzyb, Tomasz, et al. [2017], Would you deliver an electric shock in 2015? Obedience in the experimental paradigm developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 years following the original studies, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 927–933, doi: 10.1177/1948550617693060.
Doris, John M. [2002], Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139878364.
Doris, John M. [2015], Talking to Our Selves: Reflection, Ignorance, and Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570393.001.0001.
Doris, John M. [2022], Character Trouble: Undisciplined Essays on Moral Agency and Personality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198719601.001.0001.
Doris, John M. & Murphy, Dominic [2007], From My Lai to Abu Ghraib: The moral psychology of atrocity, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31(1), 25–55, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2007.00149.x.
Dunning, David [2006], Self-Insight: Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself, New York: Psychology Press.
Edwards, D. M., Franks, P., et al. [1969], An experiment on obedience. Unpublished student report, Tech. rep., University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Elms, Alan C. [2009], Obedience lite, American Psychologist, 64(1), 32–36, doi: 10.1037/a0014473.
Epley, Nicholas & Dunning, David [2000], Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861–875, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861.
Francis, Gregory [2013], Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57(5), 153–169, doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2013.02.003.
Funt, Peter [2014], Curses, fooled again!, The New York Times, sept., 27, A23, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/27/opinion/curses-fooled-again.html.
Gigerenzer, G., Wegwarth, O., et al. [2010], Misleading communication of risk, BMJ, 341(oct12 2), c4830–c4830, doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4830.
Gilovich, Thomas [1991], How We Know What Isn’t So: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life, New York: Free Press.
Glass, Gene V. [1976], Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research, Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8, doi: 10.3102/0013189x005010003.
Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah [1996], Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, London: Little, Brown and Co.
Gosling, Samuel D., John, Oliver P., et al. [1998], Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1337–1349, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1337.
Graham, Jesse [2014], Morality beyond the lab, Science, 345(6202), 1242–1242, doi: 10.1126/science.1259500.
Green, Jeffrey D., Sedikides, Constantine, et al. [2017], Self-enhancement, righteous anger, and moral grandiosity, Self and Identity, 18(2), 201–216, doi: 10.1080/15298868.2017.1419504.
Griffin, Brandon J., Purcell, Natalie, et al. [2019], Moral injury: An integrative review, Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32(3), 350–362, doi: 10.1002/jts.22362.
Hall, Lars, Johansson, Petter, et al. [2010], Magic at the marketplace: Choice blindness for the taste of jam and the smell of tea, Cognition, 117(1), 54–61, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.010.
Hall, Lars, Johansson, Petter, et al. [2012], Lifting the veil of morality: Choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey, PLoS ONE, 7(9), e45 457, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045457.
Hall, Lars, Strandberg, Thomas, et al. [2013], How the polls can be both spot on and dead wrong: Using choice blindness to shift political attitudes and voter intentions, PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60 554, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060554.
Hardesty, David M. & Bearden, William O. [2004], The use of expert judges in scale development, Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98–107, doi: 10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00295-8.
Harman, Gilbert [1999], Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error, in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 315–331, doi: 10.1093/0198238045.003.0010.
Haslam, Nick, Loughnan, Steve, et al. [2014], Meta-Milgram: An empirical synthesis of the obedience experiments, PLoS ONE, 9(4), e93 927, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093927.
Hedges, Larry V. [1981], Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators, Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128, doi: 10.2307/1164588.
Holland, Charles Howard [1968], Sources of Variance in the Experimental Investigation of Behavioral Obedience, Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.
Hollander, Matthew M. & Turowetz, Jason [2017], Normalizing trust: Participants’ immediately post-hoc explanations of behaviour in Milgram’s “obedience” experiments, British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(4), 655–674, doi: 10.1111/bjso.12206.
Holzman, Philip & Kagan, Jerome [1995], Whither or wither personality research, in: Personality Research, Methods, and Theory: A Festschrift Honoring Donald W. Fiske, edited by P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske, New York: Psychology Press, 3–11, doi: 10.4324/9781315806815-1.
Jewett, Andrew [2020], Science under Fire: Challenges to Scientific Authority in Modern America, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Johansson, Petter, Hall, Lars, et al. [2005], Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task, Science, 310(5745), 116–119, doi: 10.1126/science.1111709.
Johansson, Petter, Hall, Lars, et al. [2006], How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection, Consciousness and Cognition, 15(4), 673–692, doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.004.
Kilham, Wesley & Mann, Leon [1974], Level of destructive obedience as a function of transmitter and executant roles in the Milgram obedience paradigm, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(5), 696–702, doi: 10.1037/h0036636.
Landis, Carney [1924], Studies of emotional reactions. II. General behavior and facial expression, Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4(5), 447–510, doi: 10.1037/h0073039.
Le Texier, Thibault [2019], Debunking the Stanford prison experiment, American Psychologist, 74(7), 823–839, doi: 10.1037/amp0000401.
Lilienfeld, Scott O. [2012], Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific, American Psychologist, 67(2), 111–129, doi: 10.1037/a0023963.
Lykken, David T. [1991], What’s wrong with psychology, anyway?, in: Thinking Clearly about Psychology, edited by D. Chiccetti & W. Grove, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–39.
Machery, Edouard [2020], What is a replication?, Philosophy of Science, 87(4), 545–567, doi: 10.1086/709701.
Machery, Edouard [2021], A mistaken confidence in data, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(2), 34, doi: 10.1007/s13194-021-00354-9.
Machery, Edouard & Doris, John M. [2017], An open letter to our students: Doing interdisciplinary moral psychology, in: Moral Psychology, edited by B. G. Voyer & T. Tarantola, Cham: Springer, 119–143, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61849-4_7.
Machery, Edouard & Doris, John M. [forth], Mistrusting Science, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Makel, Matthew C., Plucker, Jonathan A., et al. [2012], Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur?, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 537–542, doi: 10.1177/1745691612460688.
Mantell, David Mark [1971], The potential for violence in Germany, Journal of Social Issues, 27(4), 101–112, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1971.tb00680.x.
Meeus, Wim H. J. & Raaijmakers, Quinten A. W. [1986], Administrative obedience: Carrying out orders to use psychological‐administrative violence, European Journal of Social Psychology, 16(4), 311–324, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420160402.
Milgram, Stanley [1963], Behavioral study of obedience, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378, doi: 10.1037/h0040525.
Milgram, Stanley [1974], Obedience to Authority: An experimental view, New York: Harper and Row.
Miller, Arthur G. [1986], The Obedience Experiments: A case study of controversy in social science, New York: Praeger.
Miller, Arthur G. [2009], Reflections on Replicating Milgram (Burger 2009), American Psychologist, 64(1), 20–27, doi: 10.1037/a0014407.
Miller, Arthur G. [2016], Why are the Milgram Obedience Experiments still so extraordinarily famous-and controversial?, in: The Social Psychology of Good and Evil, edited by A. G. Miller, New York; London: Guilford Press, 185–223.
Miller, Christian B. [2013], Moral Character: An empirical theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, Christian B. [2014], Character and Moral Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mischel, Walter [1968], Personality and Assessment, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mixon, Don [1972], Instead of deception, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 2(2), 145–178, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1972.tb00309.x.
Mosier, Charles I. [1947], A critical examination of the concepts of face validity, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 7(2), 191–205, doi: 10.1177/001316444700700201.
Mummolo, Jonathan & Peterson, Erik [2019], Demand effects in survey experiments: An empirical assessment, American Political Science Review, 113(2), 517–529, doi: 10.1017/s0003055418000837.
Open Science Collaboration (OSC) [2015], Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, Science, 349(6251), ac4716, doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
Orne, Martin T. [1962], On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications, Prevention & Treatment, 17(11), 776–783, doi: 10.1037/h0043424.
Orne, Martin T. & Holland, Charles Howard [1968], Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. On the ecological validity of laboratory deceptions, International Journal of Psychiatry, 6(4), 282–293.
Packer, Dominic J. [2008], Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 301–304, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00080.x.
Pashler, Harold, Coburn, Noriko, et al. [2012], Priming of social distance? Failure to replicate effects on social and food judgments, PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42 510, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042510.
Patten, Steven C. [1977a], Milgram’s shocking experiments, Philosophy, 52(202), 425–440, doi: 10.1017/s0031819100028916.
Patten, Steven C. [1977b], The case that Milgram makes, The Philosophical Review, 86(3), 350–364, doi: 10.2307/2183787.
Perry, Gina [2013], Beyond the Shock Machine: The Untold Story of the Milgram Obedience Experiments, Melbourne: Scribe.
Perry, Gina, Brannigan, Augustine, et al. [2020], Credibility and incredulity in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A reanalysis of an unpublished test, Social Psychology Quarterly, 83(1), 88–106, doi: 10.1177/0190272519861952.
Pervin, Lawrence A. [1996], Personality: A view of the future based on a look at the past, Journal of Research in Personality, 30(3), 309–318, doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1996.0021.
Podd, Marvin H. [1970], The relationship between ego identity status and two measures of morality, Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 5634, University Microfilms No. 71-6107.
Powers, Patrick C. & Geen, Russell G. [1972], Effects of the behavior and the perceived arousal of a model on instrumental aggression, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 175–183, doi: 10.1037/h0033037.
Reicher, Stephen D., Haslam, S. Alexander, et al. [2012], Working toward the experimenter: Reconceptualizing obedience within the Milgram paradigm as identification-based followership, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 315–324, doi: 10.1177/1745691612448482.
Ring, Kenneth, Wallston, Kenneth, et al. [1970], Mode of debriefing as a factor affecting subjective reaction to a Milgram-type obedience experiment: An ethical inquiry, Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1(1), 67–88.
Ritchie, Stuart [2020], Science Fictions: How fraud, bias, negligence, and hype undermine the search for truth, New York: Metropolitan Books.
Rogers, R. W. [1973], Obedience to authority: Presence of authority and command strength, in: Southeastern Psychological Association Meeting.
Rosenhan, David [1968], Some origins of concern for others, in: Trends and Issues in Developmental Psychology, edited by P. Mussen, J. Langer, & M. Covington, New York: Rinehart & Winston, 143–153, doi: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00557.x.
Rosenthal, Robert & Rubin, Donald B. [1978], Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(3), 377–386, doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00075506.
Ross, Lee & Nisbett, Richard E. [2011], The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of social psychology, Philadelphia: Pinter & Martin Publishers.
Russell, Daniel C. [2009], Practical Intelligence and the Virtues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Russell, Nestar [2018], Understanding Willing Participants. Milgram’s Obedience Experiments and the Holocaust, vol. 1: Milgram’s Obedience Experiments and the Holocaust, Cham: Palgrave MacMilllan, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-95816-3.
Sabini, John & Silver, Maury [2005], Lack of character? Situationism critiqued, Ethics, 115(3), 535–562, doi: 10.1086/428459.
Schurz, Grete [1985], Experimentelle Überprüfung des Zusammenhangs zwischen Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen und der Bereitschaft zum destruktiven Gehorsam gegenüber Autoritäten [Experimental test of the relationship between personality characteristics and the readiness for destructive obedience authorities], Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 32(1), 160–177.
Shalala, Samuel R. [1975], A study of various communication settings which produce obedience by subordinates to unlawful superior orders, Dissertation Abstracts International, 36(2-B), 979, University Microfilms No. 75-17,675.
Shanab, Mitri E. & Yahya, Khawla A. [1977], A behavioral study of obedience in children., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(7), 530–536, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.7.530.
Shanab, Mitri E. & Yahya, Khawla A. [1978], A cross-cultural study of obedience, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11(4), 267–269, doi: 10.3758/bf03336827.
Sheridan, Charles L. & King, Richard G. [1972], Obedience to authority with an authentic victim, in: Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, American Psychological Association (APA), vol. 2, 165–166.
Sinatra, Gale & Hofer, Barbara [2021], Science Denial: Why it Happens and What to Do about It, New York: Oxford University Press.
Slater, Mel, Antley, Angus, et al. [2006], A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments, PLoS ONE, 1(1), e39, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000039.
Smith, Mary L. & Glass, Gene V. [1977], Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies, American Psychologist, 32(9), 752–760, doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752.
Sober, Elliott [2015], Ockham’s Razors: A User’s Manual, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi: 10.1017/cbo9781107705937.
Stroebe, Wolfgang & Strack, Fritz [2014], The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 59–71, doi: 10.1177/1745691613514450.
Van Lange, Paul A. M. [1991], Being better but not smarter than others: The muhammad ali effect at work in interpersonal situations, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(6), 689–693, doi: 10.1177/0146167291176012.
Vranas, Peter B. M. [2005], The indeterminacy paradox: Character evaluations and human psychology, Noûs, 39(1), 1–42, doi: 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00492.x.
Zeigler-Hill, Virgil, Southard, Ashton C., et al. [2013], Neuroticism and negative affect influence the reluctance to engage in destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm, The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(2), 161–174, doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.713041.
Zimbardo, Philip [2007], The Lucifer Effect: Understanding how good people turn evil, New York: Random House.




