Albertazzi, Liliana (éd.) [2013], Handbook of Experimental Phenomenology: Visual Perception of Shape, Space and Appearance, Londres : Wiley; Blackwell, doi : 10.1002/9781118329016.
Albertazzi, Liliana [2015], Spatial elements in visual awareness. challenges for an intrinsic “geometry” of the visible, Philosophia Scientiae, 19(3), 95–125, doi : 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1126.
Albertazzi, Liliana [2018], Naturalizing phenomenology: A must have ?, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1933, doi : 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01933.
Berthoz, Alain [1997], Le Sens du mouvement, Paris : Odile Jacob.
Blum, Harry [1973], Biological shape and visual science (part I), Journal of Theoretical Biology, 38(2), 205–287, doi : 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90175-6.
Carey, Susan & Spelke, Elizabeth [1996], Science and core knowledge, Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 515–533, doi : 10.1086/289971.
Carman, Christián C. [2018], Accounting for overspecification and indifference to visual accuracy in manuscript diagrams: A tentative explanation based on transmission, Historia Mathematica, 45(3), 217–236, doi : 10.1016/j.hm.2018.05.001.
Cassou-Noguès, Pierre [1999], Recherches de Husserl pour une philosophie de la géométrie, Revue d’histoire des sciences, 52(2), 179–206, doi : 10.3406/rhs.1999.1350.
Cheng, Ken [1986], A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation, Cognition, 23(2), 149–178, doi : 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90041-7.
Cheng, Ken & Newcombe, Nora S. [2005], Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence, Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 12(1), 1–23, doi : 10.3758/bf03196346.
Clark, Andy [2006], Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8), 370–374, doi : 10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.012.
Clements, Douglas H. & Battista, Michael T. [1992], Geometry and spatial reasoning, dans Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Tearning, édité par D.A. Grouws, New York : Macmillan, 420–464.
da Silva, Jairo José [2012], Husserl on geometry and spatial representation, Axiomathes, 22(1), 5–30, doi : 10.1007/s10516-011-9161-0.
De Toffoli, Silvia & Giardino, Valeria [2013], Forms and roles of diagrams in knot theory, Erkenntnis, 79(4), 829–842, doi : 10.1007/s10670-013-9568-7.
Dehaene, Stanislas, Izard, Véronique et al. [2006], Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian Indigene group, Science, 311(5759), 381–384, doi : https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121739.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. & Hall, Harrison [1984], Husserl Intentionality and Cognitive Science, MIT Press.
Epstein, William & Hatfield, Gary C. [1994], Gestalt psychology and the philosophy of mind, Philosophical Psychology, 7(2), 163–181, doi : 10.1080/09515089408573118.
Ferreirós, José & García-Pérez, Manuel J. [2019], Beyond natural geometry: on the nature of proto-geometry, Philosophical Psychology, 33(2), 181–205, doi : 10.1080/09515089.2019.1683726.
Fitch, W. Tecumseh [2014], Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition, Physics of Life Reviews, 11(3), 329–364, doi : 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.005.
Fodor, Jerry A. [1983], The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Giaquinto, Marcus [2005], From symmetry perception to basic geometry, dans Visualization, Explanation and Reasoning Styles in Mathematics, édité par P. Mancosu, K. F. Jørgensen & S. A. Pedersen, Dordrecht: Springer, 31–55, doi : 10.1007/1-4020-3335-4_3.
Hafri, Alon, Green, E. J. et al. [2023], Compositionality in visual perception, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e277, doi : 10.1017/s0140525x23001838.
Hamami, Yacin, van der Kuil, Milan N. A. et al. [2020], Cognitive processing of spatial relations in Euclidean diagrams, Acta Psychologica, 205, 103 019, doi : 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103019.
Hatfield, Gary C. [2009], Perception and Cognition: Essays in the philosophy of psychology, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hermer, Linda & Spelke, Elizabeth S. [1994], A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children, Nature, 370(6484), 57–59, doi : 10.1038/370057a0.
Hohol, Mateusz [2020], Foundations of Geometric Cognition, Milton Park: Routledge.
Husserl, Edmund [1900-1901], Logische Untersuchungen, Tübingen: Niemayer, trad. fr. Recherches logiques, Paris : Presses universitaires de France, 1961.
Husserl, Edmund [1950], Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge, Husserliana, t. I, La Haye : Nijhoff, trad. fr. par G. Peiffer et E. Levinas, Méditations cartésiennes, Paris : Vrin, 1931.
Husserl, Edmund [1972], Philosophie de l’arithmétique. Recherches psychologiques et logiques, Épiméthée, Paris : Presses universitaires de France, 6e éd., trad. et intro. par J. English, 2010.
Husserl, Edmund [1983], Studien zur Arithmetik und Geometrie : Texte aus dem Nachlass (1886-1901), Husserliana, t. 21, La Haye : M. Nijhoff, éd. par I. Strohmeyer.
Husserl, Edmund [1986], Méditations cartésiennes, Paris : Vrin.
Husserl, Edmund [1989], Chose et espace : Leçons de 1907, Paris : Presses universitaires de France, trad. fr. J.-F. Lavigne.
Husserl, Edmund [2010], L’Origine de la géométrie, Paris : Presses universitaires de France, trad. fr. J. Derrida.
Jones, Alexander (éd.) [1986], Pappus of Alexandria Book 7 of the Collection, Sources in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, t. 8, New York: Springer, doi : 10.1007/978-1-4612-4908-5.
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette [2017], From constructivism to neuroconstructivism: The activity-dependent structuring of the human brain, dans After Piaget, édité par E. Marti & C. Rodríguez, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1–14.
Keller, Olivier [2004], Aux origines de la géométrie, Paris : Vuibert.
Koenderink, Jan [2014], Methodological background: Experimental phenomenology, dans The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization, édité par J. Wagemans, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 41–54, doi : 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.013.033.
Koenderink, Jan, van Doorn, Andrea et al. [2015], The nature of the visual field, a phenomenological analysis, Pattern Recognition Letters, 64, 71–79, doi : 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.02.003.
Köhler, Wolfgang [1964], Psychologie de la forme, Paris : Gallimard.
Laflaquière, Alban, O’Regan, J. Kevin et al. [2018], Discovering space — Grounding spatial topology and metric regularity in a naive agent’s sensorimotor experience, Neural Networks, 105, 371–392, doi : 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.06.001.
Larkin, Jill H. & Simon, Herbert A. [1987], Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words, Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100, doi : 10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x.
Lever, Colin, Burton, Stephen et al. [2009], Boundary vector cells in the subiculum of the hippocampal formation, The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(31), 9771–9777, doi : 10.1523/jneurosci.1319-09.2009.
Longo, Giuseppe [2002], Le continu mathématique, de l’intuition à la logique, dans Naturaliser la phénoménologie, édité par J. Petitot, J.-M. Roy, B. Pachoud & F. Varela, Paris : CNRS Éditions, 525–558, doi : 10.4000/books.editionscnrs.31961.
Longo, Giuseppe [2012], Theorems as constructive visions, dans Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education, édité par G. Hanna & M. de Villiers, Dordrecht : Springer, 51–66, doi : 10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_3.
Manders, Kenneth [2008], The Euclidean Diagram (1995), dans The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice, édité par P. Mancosu, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 80–133, doi : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296453.003.0005.
Marr, David [1982], Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and proceedings of visual information, New York: Freeman.
Moser, Edvard I., Kropff, Emilio et al. [2008], Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31(1), 69–89, doi : 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.061307.090723.
Mumma, John [2011], Le rôle du contenu géométrique dans le raisonnement diagrammatique d’Euclide, Les Études philosophiques, 97(2), 243–258, doi : 10.3917/leph.112.0243.
Netz, Reviel [2003], The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi : 10.1017/CBO9780511543296.
Núñez, Rafael [2009], Numbers and arithmetic: Neither hardwired nor out there, Biological Theory, 4(1), 68–83, doi : 10.1162/biot.2009.4.1.68.
O’Keefe, John & Dostrovsky, Jonathan [1971], The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat, Brain Research, 34(1), 171–175, doi : 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1.
Pelland, Jean-Charles [2018], Which came first, the number or the numeral?, dans Naturalizing Logico-Mathematical Knowledge: Approaches from Psychology and Cognitive Science, édité par S. Bangu, Milton Park: Routledge, 179–194.
Petitot, Jean [1992], Continu et Objectivité. La bimodalité objective du continu et le platonisme transcendantal, dans Le Labyrinthe du continu, édité par J.-M. Salanskis & H. Sinaceur, Paris : Springer, 239–263.
Petitot, Jean [1995], La réorientation naturaliste de la phénoménologie, Archives de Philosophie, 58(4), 631–658, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43037384.
Petitot, Jean [2004], Géométrie et vision dans Ding und Raum de Husserl, Intellectica. Revue de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive, 39(2), 139–167, doi : 10.3406/intel.2004.1215.
Petitot, Jean [2008], Neurogéométrie de la vision. Modèles mathématiques et physiques des architectures fonctionnelles, Paris : Ellipses.
Petitot, Jean, Roy, Jean-Michel et al. (éd.) [2002], Eidétique morphologique de la perception, Paris : CNRS Éditions, doi : 10.4000/books.editionscnrs.32211.
Piaget, Jean [1973], Introduction à l’épistémologie génétique, Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
Pinna, Baingio, Koenderink, Jan et al. [2015], The phenomenology of the invisible: From visual syntax to “shape from shapes”, Philosophia Scientiæ, 19(3), 127–151, doi : 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1135.
Quilty-Dunn, Jake, Porot, Nicolas et al. [2022], The best game in town: The reemergence of the language-of-thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, doi : 10.1017/s0140525x22002849.
Roy, Jean-Michel [2002], Sauver les phénomènes intentionnels : intentionnalité, représentation et symbole, dans Naturaliser la phénoménologie, édité par J. Petitot, J.-M. Roy, B. Pachoud & F. J. Varela, Paris : CNRS Éditions, 143–189, doi : 10.4000/books.editionscnrs.32086.
Sablé-Meyer, Mathias, Ellis, Kevin et al. [2022], A language of thought for the mental representation of geometric shapes, Cognitive Psychology, 139, 101 527, doi : 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101527.
Sablé-Meyer, Mathias, Fagot, Joël et al. [2021], Sensitivity to geometric shape regularity in humans and baboons: A putative signature of human singularity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(16), e2023123 118, doi : 10.1073/pnas.2023123118.
Saito, Aya, Hayashi, Misato et al. [2014], The origin of representational drawing: A comparison of human children and chimpanzees, Child Development, 85(6), 2232–2246, doi : 10.1111/cdev.12319.
Salanskis, Jean-Michel [2002], Sens et continu chez Husserl, dans Naturaliser la phénoménologie, édité par J. Petitot, J.-M. Roy, B. Pachoud & F. J. Varela, Paris : CNRS Éditions, 635–655, doi : 10.4000/books.editionscnrs.32316.
Shimojima, Atsushi [2015], Semantic Properties of Diagrams and Their Cognitive Potentials, Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Shusterman, Anna & Spelke, Elizabeth [2005], Language and the development of spatial reasoning, dans The Innate Mind: Structure and contents, New York: Oxford University Press, 89–106, doi : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179675.003.0006.
Sidoli, Nathan & Saito, Ken [2012], Diagrams and arguments in ancient Greek mathematics, dans The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions, édité par K. Chemla, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 189–209.
Spelke, Elizabeth, Lee, Sang Ah et al. [2010], Beyond core knowledge: Natural geometry, Cognitive Science, 34(5), 863–884, doi : 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01110.x.
Sun, Zekun & Firestone, Chaz [2022], Seeing and speaking: How verbal “description length” encodes visual complexity, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(1), 82–96, doi : 10.1037/xge0001076.
Taube, Jeffrey S., Muller, R.-U. et al. [1990], Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis, The Journal of Neuroscience, 10(2), 420–435, doi : 10.1523/jneurosci.10-02-00420.1990.
Teissier, Bernard [2019], Géométrie et cognition : l’exemple du continu, dans Ouvrir la logique au monde, édité par J.-B. Joinet & S. Tronçon, Paris : Hermann, 85–102.
Trojano, Luigi, Grossi, Dario et al. [2009], Cognitive neuroscience of drawing: Contributions of neuropsychological, experimental and neurofunctional studies, Cortex, 45(3), 269–277, doi : 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.11.015.
Varela, Francisco [1997], The naturalization of phenomenology as the transcendence of nature: Searching for generative mutual constraints, Alter, 5, 365–381.
Wagemans, Johan (éd.) [2015], The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization, Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.
Weyl, Hermann [1918], The Continuum: A Critical Examination of the Foundation of Analysis, New York: Dover, 1994.
Xu, Fei [2023], Is core knowledge in the format of lot ?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e291, doi : 10.1017/s0140525x23001966.