Aman, Bogdan, Ciobanu, Gabriel, et al. [2020], Foundations of reversible computation, in: Reversible Computation: Extending Horizons of Computing: Selected Results of the COST Action IC1405, edited by I. Ulidowski, I. Lanese, U. P. Schultz, & C. Ferreira, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 1–40, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47361-7_1.
Andree, Kerstin, Ihde, Sven, et al. [2022], An exception handling framework for case management, Software and Systems Modeling, 21(3), 939–962, doi: 10.1007/s10270-022-00993-3.
Antunes, Pedro, A. Pino, José, et al. [2023], The composite approach as a hybrid approach to business process modeling: Proposition and empirical evaluation, Business Process Management Journal, 29(6), 1633–1654, doi: 10.1108/bpmj-11-2022-0569.
Becker, Christoph [2023], Insolvent: How to reorient computing for just sustainability, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, doi: 10.7551/mitpress/14668.001.0001.
Beerepoot, Iris, Di Ciccio, Claudio, et al. [2021], The biggest business process management problems of our time, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on BPM Problems to Solve Before We Die (PROBLEMS 2021), 1–5, https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2938/paper-PROBLEMS-01.pdf.
Benveniste, Albert, Caillaud, Benoît, et al. [2018], Contracts for System Design, Hanover, Mass.: Now Publishers.
Biagini, Cedric, Carnino, Ghuillaume, et al. (eds.) [2007], La Tyrannie technologique. Critique de la société numérique, Paris: L’Échappée.
BPMN [2013], Business Process Model and Notation – version 2.0.2, http://www.omg.org/oceb-2/.
Carlisle, Keith & Gruby, Rebecca L. [2017], Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons, Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 927–952, doi: 10.1111/psj.12212.
Carrey, Julian, Lachaize, Sebastien, et al. [2021], Les low-techs comme objet de recherche scientifique. Vers une société pérenne, équitable et conviviale, https://lapenseeecologique.com/6312-2/.
Casilli, Antonio [2025], Waiting for the Robots—The hired hands of automation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chen, Yan, Richter, Jack I., et al. [2020], Decentralized governance of digital platforms, Journal of Management, 47(5), 1305–1337, doi: 10.1177/0149206320916755.
CMMN [2016], OMG specification—Case management model and notation – version 1.1.
Coeckelbergh, Mark [2018], Technology and the good society: A polemical essay on social ontology, political principles, and responsibility for technology, Technology in Society, 52, 4–9, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.12.002.
Coroama, Vlad C. & Mattern, Friedemann [2019], Digital rebound—Why digitalization will not redeem us of our environmental sins, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, ICT4S 2019, edited by A. Wolff, 31.
Dardot, Pierre & Laval, Christian [2015], Commun – Essai sur la révolution au xxie siècle, Paris: La Découverte.
de Majo, Claudio [2016], Ivan Illich’s radical thought and the convivial solution to the ecological crisis, The International Journal of Illich Studies, 5(1), 113–139.
van Dijck, José, Poell, Thomas, et al. [2018], The Platform Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donia, Joseph & Shaw, James. A. [2021], Ethics and values in design: A structured review and theoretical critique, Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(5), doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00329-2.
Dumas, Marlon, Fournier, Fabiana, et al. [2023], AI-augmented business process management systems: A research manifesto, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 14(1), 1–19, doi: 10.1145/3576047.
Ekchajzer, David, Bornes, Laetitia, et al. [2024], Decision-making under environmental complexity: The need for moving from avoided impacts of ICT solutions to systems thinking approaches, in: 10th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, ICT4S 2024, Stockholm, Sweden, June 24–28, 2024, IEEE, 29–40, doi: 10.1109/ICT4S64576.2024.00013.
Ellul, Jacques [2012], Le Système technicien, Paris: Le Cherche Midi, 3rd ed.
Ensmenger, Nathan [2018], The environmental history of computing, Technology and Culture, 59(4S), S7–S33, doi: 10.1353/tech.2018.0148.
Felsenstein, Lee [1995], Convivial cybernetic devices—An interview with Lee Felsenstein (Part 1), The Analytical Engine, 3.1(November), 2–7, http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/chac/CHAC\_Analytical\_Engine/3.1\_November\_1995.pdf.
Felt, Ulrike, Fouché, Rayvon, et al. (eds.) [2017], The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 4th ed.
Fischer, Gerhard & Lemke, Andreas C. [1987], Constrained design processes: Steps towards convivial computing, Tech. Rep. CS-CU-369-87, University of Colorado.
Flipo, Fabrice [2021], La Numérisation du monde – Un désastre écologique, Paris: L’Échappée.
Forte, Andrea, Larco, Vanesa, et al. [2009], Decentralization in Wikipedia governance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 49–72, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260103.
Freitag, Charlotte, Berners-Lee, Mike, et al. [2021], The real climate and transformative impact of ICT: A critique of estimates, trends, and regulations, Patterns, 2(9), 100 340, doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100340.
Friedman, Batya & Hendry, David G. [2019], Value Sensitive Design: Shaping technology with moral imagination, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Gardiner, Stephen M. [2011], A Perfect Moral Storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change, Cary: Oxford University Press.
Gerhardt, Hannes [2023], From Capital to Commons—Exploring the promise of a world beyond capitalism, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Gilabert, Pablo [2018], Human Dignity and Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gonzalez-Lopez, Fernanda, Pufahl, Luise, et al. [2021], Case model landscapes: Toward an improved representation of knowledge-intensive processes using the fCM-language, Software and Systems Modeling, 20(5), 1353–1377, doi: 10.1007/s10270-021-00885-y.
Harris-Braun, Eric, Brock, Arthur, et al. [2024], Holochain—Distributed coordination by scaled consent, not global consensus, https://www.holochain.org/documents/holochain-white-paper-2.0.pdf.
Hewelt, Marcin & Weske, Mathias [2016], A hybrid approach for flexible case modeling and execution, in: Business Process Management Forum, edited by A. Senderovich, C. Cabanillas, I. Vanderfeesten, & H. A. Reijers, Cham: Springer, 38–54, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45468-9_3.
van den Hoven, Jeroen, Vermaas, Pieter E., et al. (eds.) [2015], Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, Dordrecht: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0.
Hursthouse, Rosalind & Pettigrove, Glen [2023], Virtue ethics, in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2023 ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/ethics-virtue/.
Illich, Ivan [1973], Tools for Conviviality, New York: Harper & Row.
Jonas, Hans [1984], The Imperative of Responsibility, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
HCJ [2025], Human Computation Journal, https://hcjournal.org.
Julisch, Klaus, Suter, Christophe, et al. [2011], Compliance by design—Bridging the chasm between auditors and IT architects, Computers & Security, 30(6-7), 410–426, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2011.03.005.
Kalibatiene, Diana & Vasilecas, Olegas [2021], A survey on modeling dynamic business processes, PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e609, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.609.
Kallis, Giorgos, Kostakis, Vasilis, et al. [2018], Research on degrowth, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43(1), 291–316, doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941.
Keizer, Navin V., Ascigil, Onur, et al. [2024], A survey on content retrieval on the decentralized Web, ACM Computing Surveys, 56(8), 1–39, doi: 10.1145/3649132.
Koomey, Jonathan, Berard, Stephan, et al. [2011], Implications of historical trends in the electrical efficiency of computing, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 33(3), 46–54, doi: 10.1109/mahc.2010.28.
Kostakis, Vasilis, Niaros, Vasilis, et al. [2015], Design global, manufacture local: Exploring the contours of an emerging productive model, Futures, 73, 126–135, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.09.001.
La Rosa, Marcello, Aalst, Wil M. P. van der, et al. [2017], Business process variability modeling: A survey, ACM Computing Surveys, 50(1), 1–45, doi: 10.1145/3041957.
Lau, Kung-Kiu & di Cola, Simone [2017], An Introduction to Component-Based Software Development, Singapore: World Scientific, doi: 10.1142/10486.
Lerner, Barbara, Christov, Stefan, et al. [2010], Exception handling patterns for process modeling, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 36(2), 162–183, doi: 10.1109/tse.2010.1.
Lizarralde, Iban & Tyl, Benjamin [2018], A framework for the integration of the conviviality concept in the design process, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(2), 1766–1777, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.108.
Manders-Huits, Noemi [2011], What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 271–287, doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9198-2.
Marrella, Andrea, Mecella, Massimo, et al. [2016], Intelligent process adaptation in the SmartPM System, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 8(2), 1–43, doi: 10.1145/2948071.
Mitcham, Carl [1991], Tools for conviviality: Argument, insight, influence, in: Europe, America, and Technology: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by P. T. Durbin, Dordrecht: Springer, 17–56, doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-3242-8_3.
Morozov, Evgeny [2013], To Solve Everything, Click Here—The folly of technological solutionism, New York: Public Affairs.
Mosesso, Lea, Maudet, Nolwenn, et al. [2023], Obsolescence paths: Living with aging devices, in: International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, ICT4S 2023, Rennes, France, June 5–9, 2023, IEEE, 13–23, doi: 10.1109/ICT4S58814.2023.00011.
O’Neil, Cathy [2016], Weapons of Math Destruction, UK: Penguin Random House.
Ostrom, Elinor [1990], Governing the Commons—Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pelluchon, Corine [2018], Éthique de la considération, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Pessis, Céline & Angeli Aguiton, Sara [2015], Entre occultation volontaire et régulation publique: les petites morts de la critique radicale des sciences, Écologie & Politique, 51(2), 93, doi: 10.3917/ecopo.051.0093.
Rinaldi, S.M., Peerenboom, J.P., et al. [2001], Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6), 11–25, doi: 10.1109/37.969131.
Robert, Jean [2023], Introduction to The Age of Systems in Illich’s Later Thinking, Conspiratio, Fall 2023, 103–125.
Robeyns, Ingrid [2024], Limitarianism—The Case against Extreme Wealth, London: Penguin Books.
Rozas, David, Tenorio-Fornés, Antonio, et al. [2021], Analysis of the potentials of blockchain for the governance of global digital commons, Frontiers in Blockchain, 4, doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2021.577680.
Samerski, Silja [2018], Tools for degrowth? Ivan Illich’s critique of technology revisited, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(2), 1637–1646, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.039.
Schismenos, Alexandros, Ioannou, Nikos, et al. [2020], Castoriadis and Autonomy in the Twenty-First Century, London: Bloosmbury Academic.
Schmelzer, Matthias, Vetter, Andrea, et al. [2022], The Future is Degrowth: A guide to a world beyond capitalism, London: Verso.
Schneider, Nathan, De Filippi, Primavera, et al. [2021], Modular politics: Toward a governance layer for online communities, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1–26, doi: 10.1145/3449090.
Shields, Liam [2016], Just Enough—Sufficiency as a Demand of Justice, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Smicek, Nick [2017], Platform Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Suchman, Lucy A. [1983], Office procedure as practical action: Models of work and system design, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1(4), 320–328, doi: 10.1145/357442.357445.
Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William A., et al. (eds.) [2019], Governing Complexity: Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi: 10.1017/9781108325721.
Tipper, David [2017], Critical resilient interdependent infrastructure systems and processes, online, https://www.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/crisp-20-critical-resilient-interdependent-infrastructure-systems/505277/nsf18-523.
Tomlinson, Bill, Norton, Juliet, et al. [2015], Self-obviating systems and their application to sustainability, in: iConference 2015, 1–10, https://raghavan.usc.edu/papers/selfobviating-iconference15.pdf.
van Dijk, Jan [2020], The Digital Divide, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Van Vulpen, Paul & Jansen, Slinger [2023], Decentralized autonomous organization design for the commons and the common good, Frontiers in Blockchain, 6, doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2023.1287249.
Vetter, Andrea [2018], The matrix of convivial technology—Assessing technologies for degrowth, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(2), 1778–1786, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.195.
Voinea, Cristina [2018], Designing for conviviality, Technology in Society, 52, 70–78, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.07.002.
Weigand, Hans, Johannesson, Paul, et al. [2013], Conceptualizing auditability, in: Proceedings of the CAiSE‘13 Forum at the 25th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, edited by R. Deneckere & H. Proper, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 998, 49–56.
Weske, Mathias [2024], Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures, Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 4th ed., doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-69518-0.
Wilson, David S., Ostrom, Elinor, et al. [2013], Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 90S, S21–S32, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010.
Xian, Jia, You, Lin, et al. [2025], A survey on decentralized identity management systems, Computer Science Review, 58, 100 811, doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100811.
Zittrain, Jonathan L. [2008], The Future of The Internet—And How to Stop It, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zuboff, Shoshana [2019], The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York: Public Affairs.


