Aibar, E. & Bijker, W. (1997). Constructing a City: The Cerda Plan for the Extension of Barcelona. Science Technology Human Values, 22(1), 3-30.
Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Simons, R. J. & Niessen, T. (2006). Considering Diversity: Multivoicedness in International Academic Collaboration. Culture Psychology, 12(4), 461-485.
Almklov, P. G. (2008). Standardized Data and Singular Situations. Social Studies of Science, 38(6), 873-897.
Anagnostopoulos, D., Smith, E. R. & Basmadjian, K. G. (2007). Bridging the University-School Divide: Horizontal Expertise and the ‘Two-Worlds Pitfall’. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), 138-152.
Andrews, C., Jonas, H. C., Mantell, N. & Solomon, R. (2008). Deliberating on Statewide Energy Targets. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(1), 6-20.
Barley, S. R. & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing Work Back In Organization. Science, 12(1), 76-95.
Barnett, J. (2008). Peace and Development: Towards a New Synthesis. Journal of Peace Research, 45(1), 75-89.
Barreteau, O., Le Page, C. & Perez, P. (2007). Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: An introduction. Simulation Gaming, 38(2), 185-194.
Bartel, C. A. & Garud, R. (2009). The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation. Organization Science, 20(1), 107-117.
Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312-330.
Berends, H., Boersma, K. & Weggeman, M. (2003). The Structuration of Organizational Learning. Human Relations, 56(9), 1035-1056.
Berg, M. (1997). Of Forms, Containers, and the Electronic Medical Record: Some Tools for a Sociology of the Formal. Science, Technology & Human Values, 22(4), 403-433.
Berg, M. (1998). The Politics of Technology: On Bringing Social Theory into Technological Design. Science Technology Human Values, 23(4): 456-490.
Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K. & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631-647.
Broom, A. (2005). Medical specialists’ accounts of the impact of the Internet on the doctor/patient relationship. Health, 9(3), 319-338.
Bruun, H. & Sierla, S. (2008). Distributed Problem Solving in Software Development: The Case of an Automation Project. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 133-158.
Burman, E. (2004). Boundary Objects and Group Analysis: Between Psychoanalysis and Social Theory. Group Analysis, 37(3), 361-379.
Callon, M. (1986). Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc. L’année sociologique (36), 169-208.
Callon, M. (1994). Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture. Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993, Science Technology Human Values, 19(4), 395-424.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. & Barthes, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique, Paris : Seuil.
Carlile, P. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization science, 13(4), pp. 442-455.
Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-568.
Cash, D. W., Borck, J. C. & Patt, A. G. (2006). Countering the Loading-Dock Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making: Comparative Analysis of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Forecasting Systems. Science Technology Human Values, 31(4), 465-494.
Cassidy, A. (2006). Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work. Public Understanding of Science, 15(2), 175-205.
Chapoulie, J.-M. (2001). La tradition sociologique de Chicago 1892-1961. Paris : Seuil.
Chrisman, N. (1999), Trading Zones or Boundary Objects: Understanding Incomplete Translations of Technical Expertise. Paper presented at the Presented at Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Meeeting, 1999, pp.28-31. http://faculty.washington.edu/chrisman/Present/4S99.pdf.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T. & Dean, C. (2003). Situating Teachers’ Instructional Practices in the Institutional Setting of the School and District. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13-24.
Cochoy, F. (2009). Driving a Shopping Cart from STS to Business, and the Other Way Round: On the Introduction of Shopping Carts in American Grocery Stores (1936-1959). Organization, 16(1), 31-55.
Constantinides, P. & Barrett, M. (2006). Large-Scale ICT Innovation, Power, and Organizational Change: The Case of a Regional Health Information Network. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(1), 76-90.
Damarin, A. K., (2006). Rethinking Occupational Structure: The Case of Web Site Production Work. Work and Occupations, 33(4), 429-463.
Davenport, E. & Bruce, I. (2002). Innovation, knowledge management and the use of space: questioning assumptions about non-traditional office work. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 225-230.
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60(1), 179-215.
DeNora, T. (1996). From Physiology to Feminism: Reconfiguring body, gender and expertise in natural fertility control. International Sociology, 11(3), 359-383.
Derksen, M. (1997). Are We not Experimenting then?: The Rhetorical Demarcation of Psychology and Common Sense Theory. Psychology, 7(4), 435-456.
Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M. & Salter, A. (2007). ‘In Case of Fire, Please Use the Elevator’: Simulation Technology and Organization in Fire Engineering. Organization Science, 18(5), 849-864.
Ebeling, M. F. E. (2008). Mediating Uncertainty: Communicating the Financial Risks of Nanotechnologies. Science Communication, 29(3), 335-361.
Epstein, S. (1995). The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials. Science Technology Human Values, 20(4), 408-437.
Evans, M. S. (2009). Defining the public, defining sociology: hybrid science--public relations and boundary-work in early American sociology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(1), 5-22.
Faraj, S. & Xiao, Y. (2006). Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations. Management Science, 52(8), 1155-1169.
Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and Bolts and People’: Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331-356.
Fujimura, J. (1992). Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects, and ‘Translation’. In A. Pickering (ed.). Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 168-211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glasner, P. (2005). Banking on Immortality? Exploring the Stem Cell Supply Chain from Embryo to Therapeutic Application. Current Sociology, 53(2), 355-366.
Griesemer, J. R. (1992). The Role of Instruments in the Generative Analysis of Science. In A. Clarke & J. Fujimura (eds.). The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth Century Life Sciences (pp. 47-76). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gunnarsdottir, K. (2005). Scientific Journal Publications: On the Role of Electronic Preprint Exchange in the Distribution of Scientific Literature. Social Studies of Science, 35(4), 549-579.
Halfon, S. (2006). The Disunity of Consensus: International Population Policy Coordination as Socio-Technical Practice. Social Studies of Science, 36(5), 783-807.
Handley, K., Clark, T., Fincham, R. & Sturdy, A. (2007). Researching Situated Learning: Participation, Identity and Practices in Client-Consultant Relationships. Management Learning, 38(2), 173-191.
Harvey, F. & Chrisman, N. (1998). Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1683-1694.
Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering. Science Technology Human Values, 16(4), 448-473.
Henderson, K. (1998a). The Role of Material Objects in the Design Process: A Comparison of Two Design Cultures and How They Contend with Automation. Science Technology Human Values, 23(2), 139-174.
Henderson, K. (1998b). On Line and on Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Henke, C. R. (2007). Situation Normal? Repairing a Risky Ecology. Social Studies of Science, 37(1), 135-142.
Hess, D. J. (2005). Technology- and Product-Oriented Movements: Approximating Social Movement Studies and Science and Technology Studies. Science Technology Human Values, 30(4), 515-535.
Hunter, S. (2008). Living documents: A feminist psychosocial approach to the relational politics of policy documentation. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 506-528.
Hyysalo, S. (2006). Representations of Use and Practice-Bound Imaginaries in Automating the Safety of the Elderly. Social Studies of Science, 36(4), 599-626.
Im, G. & Rai, A. (2008). Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships. Management Science, 54(7), 1281-1296.
Jeantet, A. (1998). Les objets intermédiaires dans les processus de conception des produits. Sociologie du travail, (3), 291-316.
Jensen, C. B. (2005). An Experiment in Performative History: Electronic Patient Records as a Future-Generating Device. Social Studies of Science, 35(2), 241-267.
Jensen, T. E. (2008). Experimenting with Commodities and Gifts: The Case of an Office Hotel. Organization, 15(2), 187-209.
Kazemi, E. & Hubbard, A. (2008). New Directions for the Design and Study of Professional Development: Attending to the Coevolution of Teachers’ Participation Across Contexts. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 428-441.
Keller, A. C. (2009). Credibility and Relevance in Environmental Policy: Measuring Strategies and Performance among Science Assessment Organizations. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, February 16, 2009.
Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (2006). Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 22-44.
Kelly, S. E. (2003). Public Bioethics and Publics: Consensus, Boundaries, and Participation in Biomedical Science Policy. Science Technology Human Values, 28(3), 339-364.
Kleinman, D. L. (1998). Untangling Context: Understanding a University Laboratory in the Commercial World. Science Technology Human Values, 23(3), 285-314.
Kwa, C. (2005). Local Ecologies and Global Science: Discourses and Strategies of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Social Studies of Science, 35(6), 923-950.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: MA, Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1992). Aramis ou l’amour des techniques. Paris : La Découverte.
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Law, J. & Singleton, V. (2005). Object Lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331-355.
Lee, S. & Roth, W.-M. (2003). Science and the ‘Good Citizen’: Community-Based Scientific Literacy. Science Technology Human Values, 28(3), 403-424.
Locke, J. & Lowe, A. (2007). A Biography: Fabrications in the Life of an ERP Package. Organization, 14(6), 793-814.
Lopez, J. J. (2007). Notes on Metaphors, Notes as Metaphors: The Genome as Musical Spectacle. Science Communication, 29(1), 7-34.
MacEachren, A. M. (2001). Cartography and GIS: extending collaborative tools to support virtual teams. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 431-444.
Majchrzak, A., Cooper, L. P. & Neece, O. E. (2004). Knowledge Reuse for Innovation. Management Science, 50(2), 174-188.
Marie, J. (2008). For Science, Love and Money: The Social Worlds of Poultry and Rabbit Breeding in Britain, 1900-1940. Social Studies of Science, 38(6), 919-936.
Marres, N. (2007). The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759-780.
Mehalik, M. & Gorman, M. (2006). A Framework for Strategic Network Design Assessment, Decision Making, and Moral Imagination. Science Technology Human Values, 31(3), 289-308.
Milanovic, F. (2006). Travail d’articulation et organisations-frontières dans la recherche urbaine française. Social Science Information, 45(1), 109-138.
Mondada, L. (2007). Commentary: transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 809-821.
Moore, L. J. & Clarke, A. E. (2001). The Traffic in Cyberanatomies: Sex/Gender/Sexualities in Local and Global Formations. Body and Society, 7(1), 57-96.
Moreira, T. (2006). Heterogeneity and Coordination of Blood Pressure in Neurosurgery. Social Studies of Science, 36(1), 69-97.
Morrill, C. (2008). Culture and Organization Theory. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619(1), 15-40.
Myers, G. (1993). Centering: Proposals for an Interdisciplinary Research Center. Science Technology Human Values, 18(4), 433-459.
Myers, G. (1996). Out of the Laboratory and Down to the Bay: Writing in Science and Technology Studies. Written Communication, 13(1), 5-43.
Nersessian N. J. (2006). The Cognitive-Cultural Systems of the Research Laboratory. Organization Studies, 27(1), 125-145.
Neyland, D. (2007). Achieving Transparency: The Visible, Invisible and Divisible in Academic Accountability Networks. Organization, 14(4), 499-516.
Nutch, F. (1996). Gadgets, Gizmos, and Instruments: Science for the Tinkering. Science Technology Human Values, 21(2), 214-228.
Popham S. L. (2005), F”orms as Boundary Genres in Medicine, Science, and Business. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(3), 279-303.
Prasad, A. (2007). The (amorphous) anatomy of an invention: the case of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Social Studies of Science, 37(4), 533-560.
Prentice, R. (2005). The Anatomy of a Surgical Simulation: The Mutual Articulation of Bodies in and through the Machine. Social Studies of Science, 35(6), 837-866.
Prior, L. (2007). Talking About the Gene for Cancer: A Study of Lay and Professional Knowledge of Cancer Genetics. Sociology, 41(6), 985-1001.
Ratto, M. (2006). Foundations and profiles: splicing metaphors in genetic databases and biobanks. Public Understanding of Science, 15(1), 31-53.
Ribeiro, R. (2007). The Language Barrier as an Aid to Communication. Social Studies of Science, 37(4), 561-584.
Saj, T. L., Mather, C. & Sicotte, P. (2006). Traditional taboos in biological conservation: the case of Colobus vellerosus at the Boabeng-Fiema Monkey Sanctuary, Central Ghana. Social Science Information, 45(2), 285-310.
Schneider, A. L., (2009). Why do Some Boundary Organizations Result in New Ideas and Practices and Others only Meet Resistance? Examples From Juvenile Justice. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(1), 60-79.
Shackley, S. & Wynne, B. (1996). Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science Technology Human Values, 21(3), 275-302.
Shostak, S. (2007). Translating at Work: Genetically Modified Mouse Models and Molecularization in the Environmental Health Sciences. Science Technology Human Values, 32(3), 315-338.
Simpson, B. & Carroll, B. (2008). Re-viewing ‘Role’ in Processes of Identity Construction. Organization, 15(1), 29-50.
Sommer, M. (2006). Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Neanderthal as Image and ‘Distortion’ in Early 20th-Century French Science and Press. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 207-240.
Sommerlund, J. (2006). Classifying Microorganisms: The Multiplicity of Classifications and Research Practices in Molecular Microbial Ecology. Social Studies of Science, 36(6), 909-928.
Soneryd, L. (2007), Deliberations on the Unknown, the Unsensed, and the Unsayable? Public Protests and the Development of Third-Generation Mobile Phones in Sweden, Science Technology Human Values, 32(3), 287-314.
Star, S.L. & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutionnal ecology, ‘Translations’, and Boundary objects: amateurs and professionals on Berkeley’s museum of vertrebate zoologie. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
Star, S.L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377-391.
Star, S.L. (2007). The History and Boundaries of Boundary Objects. Conference at the workshop “Boundary Object, Boundary work”. Grenoble University, 13 septembre 2007.
Strauss, A., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B. & Wiener, C. (1985). Social Organization of medical Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Sundberg, M. (2007). Parameterizations as Boundary Objects on the Climate Arena. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 473-488.
Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S. & Robertson, M. (2007). The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations, 60(12), 1809-1837.
Swan, J., Scarbrough, H. & Robertson, M. (2002). The Construction of `Communities of Practice’ in the Management of Innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477-496.
Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L. & DeFillippi, R. (2004). Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1475-1489.
Thurk, J. & Fine, G. A. (2003). The Problem of Tools: Technology and the Sharing of Knowledge. Acta Sociologica, 46(2), 107-117.
van de Poel, I. (2008). The Bugs Eat the Waste: What Else is There to Know?: Changing Professional Hegemony in the Design of Sewage Treatment Plants. Social Studies of Science, 38(4), 605-634.
Vinck, D. (dir.) (1999). Ingénieurs au quotidien. Ethnographie de l’activité de conception et d’innovation. Grenoble : PUG.
Vinck, D. & Jeantet, A. (1995). Mediating and Commissioning Objects in the Sociotechnical Process of Product Design: a conceptual approach. In D. Maclean D., P. Saviotti & D. Vinck (eds). Designs, Networks and Strategies (vol. 2, pp. 111-129, COST A3 Social Sciences). Bruxelles: EC Directorate General Science R&D.
Wasser, J. D. & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in the Interpretive Zone: Conceptualizing Collaboration in Qualitative Research. Teams Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5-15.
Weedman, J. (1998). The Structure of Incentive: Design and Client Roles in Application-Oriented Research. Science Technology Human Values, 23(3), 315-345.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.
White, R. & Bradshaw, M. (2004). Business in Action: Framing and Overflowing in the Logistics of an Australian Company. Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 5-20.
Wilson, G. & Herndl, C. G. (2007). Boundary Objects as Rhetorical Exigence: Knowledge Mapping and Interdisciplinary Cooperation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(2), 129-154.
Zeiss, R. & Groenewegen, P. (2009). Engaging Boundary Objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the Subtleties of Layered Engagement. Organization, 16(1), 81-100.



