- 1 Developed between 2017 and 2021 in the Graduate Program in Visual Art and Culture of the Universi (...)
- 2 Titled (as outras fazedoras de sentidos) imaginaturas e visuaisvivências das artistas de goiás, t (...)
1As a poignant concern that I have had since the first year of my doctoral program1, the realization that women’s theoretical production is still little referred to in academia came to me as an inevitable provocation that I considered, at the time, fundamental: to study this production more and more without parsimony. The doctoral thesis2 that I had proposed to defend was, after all, about common-women-artists-citizens from the non-metropolitan areas of a Brazilian state (itself considered non-metropolitan), and my first decision was that I would need, at least, to dialogue with theoretical references other than those always considered as the most recurrent or indispensable to be included in art research.
2Although, as a researcher, I had already taken upon myself the task of conducting a more thorough reading of the contemporary theoretical production, published mainly in national and foreign journals, it started there, in my doctoral process, a rigor-of-mine as to reading directed to the epistemologies of women authors – whose contributions were not only aligned to the field of Visual Culture, but were also situated in varied contexts of transdisciplinarity.
3In addition to mapping the production of women theorists who could, in their analysis, consider the practice of women artists such as those with whom I was with during the preparation of the thesis, I also mapped this production in order to examine the imaginative experiences of these other meaning makers from a standpoint of criticality closer to their artistic creations. Certainly, it was thus established the approach between visual experiences – which, in the thesis, I call “visuexperiences” [visuaisvivências, in Portuguese] (in manifest analogy with the writexperiences [escrevivências, in Portuguese] of Brazilian writer Conceição Evaristo, as I show below3) – and theoretical experiences (here referred to as theorexperiences [teóricasvivências, in Portuguese]). I, in fact, reserved the right to defend a thesis based on metalanguage, in which all references – artistic, theoretical and methodological – had been composed/performed/elaborated by women.
4Having completed my doctoral program and already preparing to start the postdoctoral internship, the continuation of this basic research was then projected in the field of Performance Studies, whose epistemes I had been mobilizing for more than half a decade.
5What interested me immediately was the possibility of following a doubt so as to prove or not my preliminary hypothesis: that the theoretical production on Cultural Performances is not necessarily mostly produced by men, but – as in practically all other fields of knowledge – the contributions most commonly referred to in our research writing is published by men.
6This article is part of these studies I carried out during the postdoctoral internship, in which I was dedicated to mapping performance theorists through a broad bibliographic survey, but not disregarding the critical analysis of this production that I still consider poorly referred to in scientific writing. Based on a corpus delimited around four Qualis A Brazilian journals, I present and discuss below the results of this unprecedented research on women’s theoretical production on Performance Studies and its consequent reception in academia.
- 4 Elin Diamond teaches in the Department of Gender and Sexuality Studies at the Institute of Scienc (...)
7At least since the 1970s, when it was established as a field of study in academia, performance has been analyzed not only as an artistic form immanent to the theater sphere, but also as a quotidian cultural practice, intertwined in a complex array of power that serves diverse cultural interests and that moves in contested territories, in which the senses are produced, compelled, repelled, (de)legitimized, demarcated or pluralized (Diamond, 1996)4.
8This is how performance, nowadays, seems to us close to a space of negotiation and dispute of identities, in which it is increasingly possible to view cultural practices in their multiple and complex heterogeneities. From this other viewpoint, it is refuted, after all, that old notion of theatricality that was presumed only within the scope of artistic staging, as if the arts could be separated from social constructs or did not constitute only one of the myriad phenomena of imaginative construction and mobilization of experience.
- 5 Dean of Princeton College, the undergraduate school of Princeton University (New Jersey, USA), an (...)
- 6 Original text in English: “[…] performance provides a place where people come together, embodied (...)
- 7 It should be noted, in this case, the interfaces of Performance Studies with the Visual Arts. Jos (...)
9From a similar perspective, Jill Dolan5 (2005) points out that performance occurs in the encounter, in the embodiment, in the presence6. The various stagings that it mobilizes are not restricted, therefore, to the historically legitimized representations that are installed in the spaces of the (auto)so-called “universal art” (Europeanizing, colonializing), but constitute, before that and above all, expressive behaviors of people or groups of people – better said, of any person or group of people – involving a double drive: that of performing and that of letting oneself be affected (by the performative act). Therefore, it is more than imperative that the dimensions of human performativity be approached in a cross-cultural and transdisciplinary manner – given its condition of border practice in the multiple territories of knowledge7, or interfields – keeping in mind that the interactions between bodies (of those who perform and let themselves be touched by performance), space and time that produce the knowledge transmitted, as identity and memory, by/in the performative act.
- 8 Lithuanian theorist and professor of Theatrical Studies at Vytautas Magnus University. She is the (...)
- 9 Original text in English: “[…] the performative turn initiated by modernist impulses of historica (...)
- 10 In short, the “turn” can be described as a paradigmatic transdisciplinary shift in which performa (...)
10Over time, we also came to create new parameters to understand the interaction between textuality and performativity, dismantling the dichotomous logic between “culture as text” and “culture as performance”. Jurgita Staniškytė8 explains that such shifts began to occur still in the context of the “modernist impulses of historical avant-garde performances and performance art practices transferred into postmodern territory via cultural studies and post-structuralist theories” (Staniškytė, 2021, p. 117)9. According to the author, what supported this “performative turn” was, in particular, the (post-structuralist) notion of “performativity”. According to her, the works of Austin, Searle, Derrida and Judith Butler, as well as the resulting reflections on representation, had an unquestionable impact on the new theories of performance. That was also the case with the reasoning developed by Schechner in the transition from the 20th to the 21st century, bringing to the center of the analysis the depuration of performative processes in order to subject them to a “de-representation” and the necessary dismantling of the Eurocentric logic rooted in the text and the theatrical events of hegemonic culture (Staniškytė, 2016)10.
- 11 One of the most highly regarded contemporary theorists in theatre and performing arts studies. Sh (...)
11Erika Fischer-Lichte11 (2009) also employs the expression “performative turn” to refer to this change, more especially from the early 1990s onwards, in the acceptance-validation of the paradigm legitimizing European cultures (which self-identified as superior because of their aptitude to produce artistic textualities and artifacts) and quite demarcating as to non-European ones (to which the former attributed a list of inferiorities due to their ritualistic, naturally performative characteristics).
- 12 Professor of Black Performances in the Department of Drama, Theatre and Dance at the University o (...)
- 13 Elaine Aston is Professor Emeritus at the Institute of Contemporary Arts at Lancaster University (...)
12The potential of performance is evident, in this and in countless other senses, as argued by Lynette Goddard (2007)12, both to reject the simplistic and stereotyped representations imposed on the experiences of historically subalternized populations and to destabilize the idea that micro-resistances do not constitute emancipatory practices with transformative power (Aston; Harris, 2007)13.
- 14 I borrow the notion of crossroads in the terms of Hartmann and Langdon (2020, p. 1-2). According (...)
- 15 Luciana Hartmann is a professor in the Department of Performing Arts of the Universidade de Brasí (...)
13Certainly, although the concept of performance arose at the crossroads14 of studies on ritual, theater and language, as pointed out by Luciana Hartmann and Esther Jean Langdon (2020)15, the notion of performance itself – whether it is under the scrutiny of this or that analytical sensitivity, in this or that (interdisciplinary) field of study – still points to a variety of uses and connotations that challenge the compartmentalization of the multiple domains in which cultural practices are situated.
- 16 Based in New York, she is the author of numerous works on performance, including the books Theate (...)
- 17 Original text in English: “The word ‘performance’, whether it describes a live event or personal (...)
- 18 Original text in English: “We have come so far from distinguishing between art and life, the pers (...)
14In a 2006 essay, Bonnie Marranca16 points out that performance actually permeates, today, all contemporary thought about people and things, no longer mattering so much whether it describes a live event or an orchestrated/scripted acting-out, or whether it refers to history or therapy or the act of mourning, a pilgrimage; whatever they may be, the main issues of our time can be outlined in the terms or viewed through the lens of performance (Marranca, 2006, p. 3).17 The author then presents and discusses the work of a series of performers who, in the early 2000s, began to dilute the boundaries between experience and performative practice; among the numerous allusions to which she resorts, she cites the example of Linda Montano, a North-American artist of the so-called Living Art who witnessed the death of her father, in the interim of the years in which she acted as his caregiver, unveiling the entire ritualistic process involved there (Marranca, 2006, p. 7)18.
- 19 Professor in the Department of Performance Studies at New York University and founding director o (...)
- 20 See footnote 4.
- 21 “Every performance, if it is intelligible as such, embeds features of previous performances: gend (...)
15Authors such as Diana Taylor19 and Elin Diamond20 also shift, in their formulations, the (artistic) theatricalities that once determined and limited the notion of performance to situate them closer to the domain of (everyday) experience, because it is in it, in fact, that the transmission of knowledge is articulated as presence. While Elin Diamond (1996) is dedicated to examining the features that every performance embeds from other performances, including gender conventions, racial histories, and aesthetic, political and sociocultural traditions, each containing “traces” of already disappeared quotidian scenes21, Diana Taylor (2003) considers performances as vital acts of transfer that reflect the cultural and historical specificity existing both in the staging and in the reception – insofar as they act as living streams of memory transmitting a sense of identity; therefore, according to the author, it is about admitting that we learn and transmit knowledge through embodied practices, which is equivalent, in particular, to giving body to our own experiences.
16In this case, in addition to constituting cultural practice, performance also opens up as an epistemic possibility, acting as a “methodological lens that allows researchers to analyze events as performances” (Taylor, 2013, p. 27, our translation). As a choreography of meanings, it provides a means of learning, which varies from community to community, recovering the importance of that necessary-urgent finger in the wound (opened by Eurocentrism): to constantly review our methodologies through the encounter with other persons-interlocutors, makers of other (many) meanings.
17Faced with this urgency, our first role as women researchers may be to admit that knowledge is produced based on and in dialogue with so many other ways of being present in the world. Associated with this, the main challenge is to see that Performance Studies have gradually developed similarly to other fields of human knowledge, in a multifaceted context – of construction and reception of knowledge. And it is impossible to remove from this context the daily weight of the intersectional axes of subalternization of existence, whether it is being observed in any of its productive spheres.
- 22 Sueli Carneiro (2005, p. 33 and 60, our translation) (philosopher, writer, activist of the black- (...)
18There is, in other words, no way to think critically about the construction of knowledge (including theoretical, cultural, artistic knowledge) without considering the intersectional oppressions of gender, race, class, sexuality, locality and mobility, for example, as part of the equation of power that circumscribes us all. When a study – any study, in any area of knowledge, that proposes to be serious and complex, at the very limit of confrontation and restitution of humanities torn by previous practices and studies – neglects this, or allows itself to be inattentive to the intersectional oppressions that make our life move, it is subject to the enormous risk of representing a disresearch, of bringing to the public an intellectual discontribution, continuing to reproduce epistemicides22.
- 23 Professor at the School of Theater, Film and Television at the University of California, Los Ange (...)
- 24 In this regard, I also highlight the author’s explanation of how racist patriarchy operates to co (...)
19In practical and direct terms: in the same context where “the most important male authors” of Performance Studies were (self)defined, there was already a profusion of studies by female culture theorists and critics, many of whom with their long-standing publications in the interdisciplinary field of feminisms, in which the main issues of performance were addressed and elaborated. For example: almost a decade and a half before the publication of Richard Schechner’s Performance Studies: An Introduction, whose first edition is of 2002, Sue-Ellen Case23 (1988) had already released the book Feminism and Theatre, which, despite not presenting specifically already in the title the word “performance”, was introduced with an important consideration about the performances of contemporary women being considered as unprecedented, when, in fact, they echoed those of other performers of yore. The same situation, according to the author, can also be observed when it comes to the voices theorizing on performance, which remained (as many still remain to date) inaudible24.
- 25 North-American theorist and professor of Performance Studies at Stanford University, California. (...)
- 26 (1953-2000) Performance Studies Theorist, feminist and one of the important American voices of Qu (...)
- 27 Professor of Theatre Arts and Performance Studies at Brown University and author of numerous publ (...)
20Similarly, another example that I can easily recall is the book organized by Elin Diamond, Performance and Cultural Politics, of 1996, in which she and other essential women theorists of Performance Studies – such as Peggy Phelan (1988; 1993)25, Lynda Hart (1993)26 and Rebecca Schneider (1997)27 – already asserted the importance of feminist researchers reappropriating performance as episteme, since many of the crucial problematizations in this field of research had also been established by them, and also a long time prior.
- 28 She is also the author of several articles on race, gender, performance and culture.
- 29 Original text in English: “[My] study is inspired by the advances of black feminist theorists who (...)
21In this regard, I also note the work of Daphne A. Brooks, a professor of African American and Theatrical Studies at Yale University, in Connecticut28. Published in the early 2000s, Bodies in Dissent: Spectacular Performances of Race and Freedom, 1850-1910 presents and analyzes the performative practice of countless African American women, still little known, from the mid-nineteenth century to the first decade of the twentieth century. This is a broad, detailed and unprecedented research that also incorporates the contribution of black feminism theorists who “have opened up new ways of considering the representational politics of the black body in the cultural imaginary” (Brooks, 2006, p. 40)29.
22Several other female authors are added to the aforementioned scholars of performance – either as a cultural practice or methodological lens. Their researches, most longstanding, as well as numerous, also move through several fields of knowledge, inspiring interdisciplinary approaches and being established on the threshold of the multiple languages and transiences that embody performance analysis and theories.
23What most of these women thinkers – if not all of them – have in common is the way their writings approach us, women theorists-researchers. Their contributions are, in other words, gazes into the performative acts of contemporary culture that theorize about them without separating them from our life experiences. A first plausible explanation for our perception of proximity comes certainly from a need that is still quite pulsating to happen in knowledge production systems: to decolonize epistemes, creating-spreading others. To speak of decolonizing is, above all, to speak of a procedural movement that goes from defocusing (the gaze) to interrupting (the senses of the world), culminating in the restitution of our humanities. Defocusing, interrupting and restituting are, therefore, at the core of what we understand as a process of decolonization – of the ways in which we see ourselves in the world and perform our visibilities within it.
24Respecting the varied fields of study and their correponding approaches to the notion of decoloniality, a main idea circumscribes it: the problematization of the geopolitics of knowledge and of the epistemic standpoint of enunciation (involving the creation, circulation and reception of cultural practices).
- 30 Professor in the Department of Visual Culture at Goldsmiths (University of London). She has produ (...)
- 31 Original text in English: “What is it that we do when we look away? When we avert our gaze in the (...)
25Irit Rogoff30, one of the most active theorists of Visual Culture today, in discussions about the socialization of the gaze, questions what it would be possible to see, beyond the surface, in the known demarcation of visibilities that constitute the “great narratives”, founded on a cultural order that we have already inherited ready (that is: male, white, wealthy, heteronormative and territorialized). In the important article Looking Away: Participations in Visual Culture, the main answer found by the author for such questioning undoubtedly requires the defocusing of what we see-perceive. Look away, in other words, avert the gaze – delocalize, defocus. The author intends to understand how this defocusing can be – within contemporary culture – not only an act of resistance, but an alternative form of appropriation, to which she also refers as participation. “What is it that we do when we look away [from hegemonic forms]? When we avert our gaze in the very spaces and contexts in which we are meant to focus our attention? [...] Or are we opening up a space of participation whose terms we are to invent?” (Rogoff, 2005, p. 126)31.
- 32 That unfolds, infallibly, into two main meanings: as affection and as relation (that which concer (...)
- 33 Original text in Spanish: “Necesitamos encontrar modos de intervención que apunten a que nuestros (...)
26The reflections of the Spanish philosopher Marina Garcés (2013) help us to understand the importance of rupture as an ally of this movement of deviation described by Irit Rogoff: once defocused, our analytical sensitivity needs to dedicate itself to interrupting oppressive structures, which we will only achieve with what the author proposes as a practice of affection32, that is, that gesture-movement of letting ourselves be affected by the world, disreproducing the hegemonies that do not engage us, that do not touch us, that do not affect us. To discover, in other words, the potency that the – decolonial(izing) – gaze carries, so, then, it is possible to interrupt the meaning of the world, is equivalent to “[...] finding forms of intervention that allow our gaze to divert the focus – which directs and controls it – so it can perceive and question what eludes consensual visibilities” (Garcés, 2013, p. 111, our translation)33. Note that this affectionate engagement with the world is that which will enable us – according to the author – to bite reality, jumping onto it with our own meanings.
27Defocusing the manner of gazing at the complex network of contemporary cultural processes – to thus interrupt the oppressive experiences imposed on historically silenced-invisible populations – is that which will provide the restitution of our humanity, the creation, after all, of our own manner of seeing and showing, of learning and teaching, of building and spreading our own epistemologies.
28In a first movement in this direction, considering cultural practices as everyday performances makes it possible to see them outside of that already dusty ideal of humanity that produces knowledge (which is assimilated, as a rule, as European) and more intimately as composition. The sense of composition, in this case, is essentially two: the relation that performance establishes with the world (in formal and affective terms, in the sphere of life experience) and, at the same time, its capacity – as a methodological lens and analytical sensitivity – to unthink this same world (and here we can imagine the unthinking as a decomposition-done-to-recompose).
29Now, it is possible to decompose-to-recompose: theatricalities, textualities, sonorities and visualities, which integrate – so to speak – the materialities of experience. Such process includes addressing the complexity of the world without reducing it to a hegemonic imaginative repertoire (of fixed ways of gazing) nor to a pasteurized order (which refers to only a few of the various other possible perceptions). To think of experience as composition means, in short, that the multiple and endless performances that we trigger or witness are not limited to the (implicit or explicit) ways of understanding based on decision, judgment and determination parameters that the “modern reason” (that is, the colonial culture-expropriating reason) granted from the 16th century and still grants, in the 21st century.
30This thesis – by Brazilian sociologist Denise Ferreira da Silva, currently a professor at the University of British Columbia in Canada – assumes, as a counterpart to the modern system of categories, the approach to a matter, so to speak, in a raw state when analyzing the performances of culture. The methodological path chosen is, in the field of theory and criticism, what she calls “poethics”, with a view to decomposing-to-recompose the value expropriated from colonized lands, enslaved bodies, silenced cultural practices, within the scope of materialities left outside of what is considered as cultural experiences by Kantian modes of racial and colonial subjugation that operate with full force in our global present (Ferreira da Silva, 2019, p. 46).
31This perspective, according to the author, raises the possibility of a material and decompositive poetics (of interpretation), as a type of re/de/composition that no longer mobilizes the onto-epistemological pillars of modern thought (Ferreira da Silva, 2019, p. 48-49). What this means is that it is impossible (in the sense of being epistemologically impractical, or even ethically unsustainable) that the attribution of value to cultural performances that circulate in contemporary times (“forms of the object of art or nature”, in the Kantian terms recovered by the author) continues to be established under the aegis of a determinability based on this so-called modern reason (that is, again, colonial), as a standpoint from which a certain “subjective universality” is granted so as to achieve the knowledge, appreciation and judgment of these practices. To achieve, in a word, their legitimacy.
32In the end, when she proposes to decompose-to-recompose the view when analyzing the performative acts of contemporary culture, the author is proposing to restitute from the very embodied experience, expressed there in the matter of the staging under analysis, its humanity – that is how these acts transmit memories, trigger political claims and/or manifest the sense of identity of a group, as argued by Diana Taylor (2013).
- 34 I am always tempted in my writings to resume the famous question asked half a decade ago by the A (...)
33An immediate question that derives from the provocation contained in the subtitle above is: why, although “also several”, “also long-standing”, “also precursors”, and “also institutionalized” (as a brief reading, in the previous items of this article, through the theoretical-critical formulations of the authors mentioned here could suggest), why, finally, these female authors and other numerous women theorists who also actively publish still appear little in our reflections and in our texts on performance? This question unfolds in at least two male others: how do our work plans at the university still not embrace women’s production to the same extent as they include that of female authors whose theories are always considered “pioneering”, or “indispensable”, or “the most relevant”? How, after all, can we dialogue more with women’s theoretical production on Performance Studies, incorporating this production into our academic practice and our scientific writing?
34Analyzing locally, as a way to bring closer our context of epistemic production, a brief survey on the diffusion of theoretical knowledge published by women who currently work in the field of Performances in Brazil – or in areas considered as related, such as Anthropology, Cultural Studies, Sociology and Visual Culture – sheds light on a situation that is, at least, intriguing. In examining, for example, the most recent articles published by women in the best evaluated journals in Capes Qualis (A1, A2, A3 and A4), aligned with Performance Studies or in dialogue with them, it is observed that the authors themselves, in their studies and writings, still make few references to themselves, preferring or reinforcing the canon (composed, as a rule, of men, whites, Europeans or Americans), or base their analyses, most often, on the formulations of male researchers, rather than female researchers.
35Of the ten articles published by women in 2022 in the Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Presença (Qualis A1), a journal of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul35, in only three there were more references to female authors in the same text than to male authors36.
36A similar situation is observed in Revista de Antropologia (also Qualis A1), of the Universidade de São Paulo:37 of the five articles published in 2022 by women, only two dialogue more with research by female authors than with research by male authors.
37In turn, in Fênix, Revista de História e Estudos Sociais (Qualis A2), an interdisciplinary journal of the Center for Studies in Social History of Art and Culture of the Universidade Federal de Uberlândia38, of the five texts by female authors collected for analysis that relate to Performance Studies, all from 2022, only one had more references to female authors than to male authors.
- 39 Although edited at the end of 2021, the aforementioned edition was published on the journal's web (...)
38Finally, in the last edition of the journal Repertório (also Qualis A2), of the Graduate Program in Performing Arts of the Universidade Federal da Bahia39, considering the eight most recently published articles written by women, there were only four texts with more references to research by female authors.
- 40 Although still low, half a decade later, in 2022, this percentage is already 11% higher.
39Fortunately, our current context is already better than that observed, for example, half a decade ago (Graphs 1 and 2). Considering the same journals examined, out of a total of 59 articles by female authors assessed in 2017, in only 16 of them there are more references to female authors than to male authors, which corresponds to a disappointing percentage of 27%40, confirming that even female authors who write about performance refer little to themselves, since most still base their reflections on theories of male authors.
Graph 1 – References to female authors in 59 articles selected for analysis, all published by women, in four journals with an A rating in Capes Qualis – year 2017
Source: prepared by the author
Graph 2 – References to females authors in 28 articles selected for analysis, published by women, in four journals with rating A in Capes Qualis – year 2022
Source: prepared by the author
- 41 The data collected are from the last 33 editions of the Brazilian Journal of Presence Studies, th (...)
40It can be considered, in view of these data, that more male authors have published in the main Brazilian journals aligned with the field of Cultural Performances, while fewer women have dedicated themselves to theoretical-critical production. Paradoxically, when we analyze the same four national journals selected here for examination, they show that women published more in the last decade. Between 2012 and 2022, out of a total of 2017 articles, 1054 were written by women (equivalent to 53%)41, attesting that female researchers have been publishing more than male researchers.
- 42 See previous footnote.
Graph 3 – Number of publications by female researchers compared to male researchers in the last decade, in four journals with rating A in Capes Qualis (2012–2022)42
Source: prepared by the author
41Evidently, an intersectional quantitative study would show more appropriate and therefore even more devastating nuances. This means that, in addition to gender, it would also be essential to assess its intersection with other categories of oppression, such as race, class, sexuality, locality, institutional affiliation, among other social markers of difference.
- 43 That is when little, because, at most, they are referred to, without any problematization or mode (...)
42Even so, considering only gender as analytical category of the present study, the structural inequality that still permeates the reception of women’s theoretical-critical formulations is patent. Just as in the field of Anthropology it seems “natural” to accept, without much questioning, the “greatness” or “brilliance” or even the “more abundant production” of authors such as Claude Lévi-Strauss, Malinowski, Clifford Geertz, Marcel Mauss and, in Brazil, Darcy Ribeiro43, in Performance Studies it is also customary to compile an analogous list of “main male authors”, or “pioneering male authors”, and so on.
43Richard Schechner, Milton Singer, Victor Turner, Richard Bauman, John Dawsey, among dozens of others – not that they are not important authors or that their theoretical contributions should not be considered expressive, relevant, indispensable. The point is that, in addition to their capacity and the relevance of their works, what should also interest us is, firstly (immediately), the problematization of the limiting territorialities of such theories – from genderization to racialization, to other forms of hierarchical(izing) debasement.
- 44 The event took place at the University of Wisconsin, in Milwaukee, USA. The title of the article (...)
- 45 Born in Cuba in 1928, she is professor emeritus at Stanford University in California, USA, and on (...)
- 46 Which, apropos, she never gave up when talking about practically everything: from poetry, psychoa (...)
- 47 The reference here, once again, is to the analysis made by Sueli Carneiro (2005) in her doctoral (...)
44In one of her memorable articles, presented in 1975 at the 1st International Symposium on Ethnopoetics44 and published the following year by the journal Alcheringa, the American philosopher and cultural critic Sylvia Wynter45 reinforces the importance of detaching ourselves from the modern-colonial repertoires of knowledge, proposing this through an essential epistemic rebellion46. The author revisits, in this article, the modern colonial course, in which Europe invented, from itself to itself, a concept of otherness to justify the logic of enslaving and dominating peoples and cultures, which basically included: the separation between nature and the notion of human; the association of non-European people to nature, in conjunction with their exclusion from the notion of humanity; and, finally, the creation of a narrative to naturalize such brutality (epistemicidal)47.
45However, if the language legitimized as human was not the language of that invented otherness and whose domination has been authorized since then, neither its narratives (involving everything: life, culture, arts, habits, daily life, history and memory) of knowledge of the world are those that concern this notion of humanity. From this perspective, Sylvia Wynter then concludes that we do not need an ethnopoetics – since, according to her, a poetics of otherness would only reaffirm the segregation between us and others, and this will be a language that will continue to direct our gaze to the experiences of other people as apart. Instead, we need a language that connects us, that does not segregate those who know and those who make (themselves) known. We need, therefore, a poetics (and the author is talking about both a poetics of naming, through language, and a poetics of performing, with the body) that leads us to disregard the ways of imagining the world in order to inscribe in this same world other ways – our own – of learning about it.
- 48 Original text in English: “Autotheory reveals the tenuousness of maintaining illusory separations (...)
46This perspective is currently being revisited by women authors who are dedicated to thinking about epistemological construction as autotheory. According to Lauren Fournier (2021), for example, autotheory is a knowledge that flourishes in unusual spaces of written production, merging scientific research and personal narrative. Autotheory reveals, in this sense, “[...] the tenuousness of maintaining illusory separations between art and life, theory and practice, work and the self, research and motivation, just as feminist artists and scholars have long argued” (Fournier, 2021, p. 12)48.
- 49 I refer here, by analogy, to the “adventure of self-telling” proposed by Margareth Rago (2013).
- 50 Born in Salford, England, to a Pakistani father and English mother, Sara Ahmed migrated with her (...)
47Accordingly, that is how I understand the writing of women theorists of performance as embodied writing, which arises in a space in which research and practice, theoretical formulation and everyday experience meet. This juxtaposition of critical study with self-writing49 is, as Sara Ahmed (2022) recalls50, what enables us, as women theorists, to produce a knowledge base provided by experiences lived in the body. That was how, in fact, as the author says, that she decided, a few years ago, that the theoretical work she would like to develop would be that in contact with the world, a work that would bring her closer than ever to everyday life. After all, if theory itself is usually considered abstract and if, therefore, “to abstract is to drag, separate, make apart, or divert [...], it may be necessary to drag it back, bring theory back to life” (Ahmed, 2022, p. 23, our translation).
48One of the most extraordinary pitfalls of language – in any of its manifestations – is its impossibility of being neutral. Materialized or still dreamed of as an image, word, noise and beyond, language is a living heart inside the chest. It performs (itself in) and pulsates hand in hand with history, choosing one side of the narrative, taking sides. And, then, by opening up claiming presence, it will always be in a position to compromise or disobey, torment or unburden. Political, poetic, theoretical, rhetorical, prosaic, artistic – performative, language builds epistemologies. And epistemologies concern not only the paradigms that validate our knowledge about the world, but also – and perhaps essentially – the very world we create with language. Therefore, more than ever we need to know how to speak the language of the emancipation that we so demand. Speak exactly. Directly. In specific language. Confronting, in the practice-we-want-as-presence, the oppressions that continue to shape people’s lives, our own lives.
49Indeed: not long ago, I defended my doctoral thesis (Piva, 2021), which, aligned with the field of Visual Culture and based on black and decolonial feminist studies, was intended both to listen to the narratives of women from the state where I currently live and to see-recognize their artistic creations as social practices, also makers of meanings. (Beyond, therefore, the canonical configurations of view, which were historically imposed by the pasteurizing-Europeanizing racist cisheteropatriarchy).
- 51 In addition to being a novelist, Dionne Brand is a poet, essayist, university professor, document (...)
50I remember again here that, at that time, among the many readings I did in the zigzag-of-days-running, I sought to read one of the most beautiful books (and the most recent novel) by the Afro-Caribbean-Canadian writer Dionne Brand51. Theory presents a character who believes in the curative power of knowledge; immersed in the writing of her thesis, close to her forty years of age, as I myself was at the time, the protagonist (left, purposely, unnamed by the author and deconfined, therefore, from the gender binarisms that are also part of namings) lives her doctoral process while performing, herself, her thesis (in) the life-life.
- 52 Which, in addition to meaning theory (critical-theoretical construct), properly, also goes back, (...)
51In the meantime of this writing, which has already lasted about fifteen years, the narrator shares, each one having occurred in its respective time, the loving experiences with three female companions-of-life: Selah, Yara and Odalys (who is, by the way, who gives her the nickname of Theory)52. While the novel discusses, before our eyes and through a clearly metalinguistic writing, the academic gesture of referencing the same authors (yes, mostly white men, from the top of some luminous zone of power and prestige), there are also two still-urgencies in the sphere of contemporary production of knowledge: the expansion of space for women in academia, as producers of meanings, and the dismantling of the false dichotomy between theory and practice.
- 53 This is the well-known “principle of parsimony”, or “law of parsimony”, according to which simple (...)
52Mainly from this point of view, Dionne Brand’s theorynovel is very sensitive and reverberating. Starting with the opening note, “Occam’s razor”53, in which the narrator highlights the need to pause to better think about her life-thesis – that is, the whole process of living the experience of the thesis and writing the days in the days. It must be admitted, she says, that the best thing to do is to settle immediately, at least from herself to herself, an account still charged to her so disproportionately, starting with that obligation to attend to her unbearable male fellow researchers, with only half of her intelligence, going further than her in life.
- 54 When I speak of performative writing, I am thinking, especially, of language as a cultural practi (...)
- 55 I refer, undoubtedly, once again, to the formulations of the American theorist Diana Taylor, acco (...)
53In the course of the pages, Theory is woven as performance writing54 in which research and practice, theoretical formulation and everyday experience meet. It is in this crossing of experiences that flourished the author-protagonist’s projects for the creation of a new epistemology (so that women researchers like her make themselves visible in the “world of science”), while we also see the intensification of her daily struggle for the transformation of this same world into a place occupied by other voices and that can be considered from the perspective of other analytical sensibilities; a place, after all, where multiple embodied practices55, which at the same time connect and fragment our experiences, give body to the varied phenomena of imaginative mobilization of experience, including academic performance.
54This writing that creates new (counter-hegemonic) ways of seeing the world is the same that performs an indispensable encounter between aesthetics and politics; which faces and seeks to repel the contradictions of an “academic language” made to segregate, rather than connect; and which struggles to bring the “world outside” closer to our practical experiences.
- 56 “Language: teaching new worlds/new words”.
55I speak here of a writing that, when performing a repertoire that is inobedient and already aloof from that invented precision of “neutrality/impartiality in discourse”, teaches new worlds, as recalled by bell hooks (2013) in one of her essays56 on the importance of other scriptures; worlds, by the way, situated far beyond the colonialism that still operates within the scope of the language-which-is-intended-as-episteme-that-has-universal-knowledge-of-the-world. According to bell hooks, there is no way to theorize without stripping the writing itself of the historically imposed links between language and domination.
- 57 “Theory as a liberating practice”.
56In another essay in the same book57, the author is specifically dedicated to thinking about theory as a liberating practice. She begins the text by saying that she arrived at the theory because she was hurt, desperate, eager to understand what was happening “in the world outside” and within herself, that is, in connection with her own life experiences. As in the case of Dionne Brand, in the novel mentioned here, for bell hooks theory became a place of healing. “A refuge in theorization” is what she confesses to having found, since there, in that space where the hostilities of “unauthorized knowledge” disappeared, she found herself for the first time with the chance to imagine alternative and much closer futures, to understand what was happening before her eyes, to find “a place where life could be different”, and it was precisely in this place of healing that she accessed “this lived experience of critical thinking, reflection and analysis” (hooks, 2013, p. 85, our translation). In a word: theory.
- 58 I refer here to these concepts as they are developed by Diana Taylor (2013) in the book The Archi (...)
57Thinking about theory based on this reasoning, understanding it as an everyday social practice instead of being confined only to the meanders and sensitivities of the archives or those already well-established repertoires58, which hardly consider that experience varies from context to context and from community to community; seeing, after all, theory as one of the various vital acts of transfer that boost knowledge, that is the crucial aspect in any movement of seeing and showing, of learning and teaching, of desiring and articulating, with one’s own hands, the sensibilities with which one takes part of the world in which one lives.
- 59 I considered as visuexperiences the presentifications of our experiences of imagining with images (...)
58As I was saying at the opening of this text, I have recently been dedicated to studying the daily performances that lead us to better know the imaginative experiences of people, a time when I developed a doctoral research that brought me closer to the creations of fifteen women artists from the state of Goiás, ordinary citizens not legitimized by the art system. Not their works, but their visuexperiences were what I considered as presentations of the imagination, and essentially that led to the analogy with the writexperiences of Conceição Evaristo becoming presence in the text of the thesis59.
59It occurred, then, that, even before defending the thesis, I gradually developed the desire to also revisit the ways in which we (women-researchers-theorists) produce – or not, or perhaps still little – our own epistemologies-of-looking into cultural performances in contemporary times.
60It was not a matter of this or that type of essentialist binarism, as I recently heard, during my presentation at a congress in Portugal, a male researcher referring – under the veneer of productive criticism – to the mapping of women intellectuals that I have been carrying out in the areas of knowledge through which I move and from which I write; nor is it a mere search for similarities and dissimilarities between the production of women theorists of performance and the (much better known) male performance theorists. It is – this intellectual exercise of mine – a proposal for delocalization of the gaze, with the consequent (and equally necessary, not to say pressing) studious dedication to the epistemologies produced by women, within the scope of what I have been taking the liberty of coining as theorexperiences.
61I defend as unpostponable this movement in the field of Cultural Performances, since in it we also refer little, much less, or still very unsatisfactorily, to the formulations of female theorists compared to the references we make to the writings of male theorists. That does not happen, as it could be (and has been, incidentally, often) conjectured, because women write less, theorize less or publish less, but rather, properly speaking, because their theoretical writing is still not properly referenced, known or legitimized in comparison with that of the endless “fathers of such and such notion”, male “pioneers in such and such field of study”, “male coiners of this or that concept”.
62As an analytical sensibility, performance inspires us to problematize this coloniality rooted in the epistemes imposed as “universal”. It also inspires us to observe how impracticable it is to talk about the issues that affect and interest us through strange approaches to our experiences, or based on narratives developed by disembodied subjects. As we learn and transmit knowledge through embodied actions (Taylor, 2003), we should also consider the role of the doing body in the construction of knowledge, as well as the spatiality and temporality of the epistemologies we create or use as repertoire in Presence Studies.
63However, “in order to escape of [the] pitfall of the episteme of knowledge”, as argued by Suely Messeder (2020, p. 165), “we must implode the epistemic map, question the privileged spaces, borders, flows and directions that structure it in this way, whose appearance is of a natural law”. And the role that the university must play in this construction is irrefutable.
- 60 Original text in English: “I’m concerned with how ideas extend somewhere outside this marketplace (...)
64In Producing Knowledges That Matter: Practicing Performance Studies Through Theatre Studies, Jill Dolan sheds light precisely on how the university can foster or obstruct certain knowledge. The author elucidates that, as an intellectual, her concern goes far beyond producing “marketable” knowledge nowadays as an academic; according to her, “[…] linking knowledge to bodies and therefore to history and materiality, to specific locations and contexts in which bodies and ideas move” is fundamental (Dolan, 1996, p. 10)60. That is our greatest contribution as women scholars – producing knowledges that matter.
- 61 According to the author, “incarnate writing is the moment of encounter between the subject marked (...)
65To think, in this context, of theoretical production as an epistemological construction consistent with our experiences (as women who still have somewhat secondary roles and an intellectual work that is almost always “non-voluminous” or “unimportant”) is to see the inevitability of the encounter between research and practice, theoretical formulation and everyday experience; the inevitability, after all, of a performative writing that concerns us; or, according to Suely Messeder (2020), of an embodied writing61 that includes not only our corporeity of women researchers, but also the corporeity of the knowledge produced in our research.
66It is, finally, as embodied women theorists, that we come closest to this – feminist – horizon of the production of “blasphemous and decolonial epistemologies” (Messeder, 2020). To the horizon, after all, of our theorexperiences – and it is in it, only in it, that theory begins to be our place of healing.