Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilNuméros36Editorial

Editorial

Cet article est une traduction de :
Éditorial [fr]

Texte intégral

1Issue 36 of Revue de la régulation is published at a particular moment in French political history: the far right could come to power in the second round of the general elections scheduled for 7 July 2024. In the context of the current debates, Revue de la régulation reaffirms its attachment to the principle of academic freedom that underpins French public research, its absolute rejection of the idea of national preference, and its attachment to informed scientific debate, particularly on economic policy options to which the members of the editorial board are committed.

2This new issue also comes at a time of upheaval in the world of scientific journals. For example, the effects of the use of artificial intelligence in the production of “fake science”. In May, the Wall Street Journal reported that the publisher Wiley had had to retract more than 11,000 articles published in recent years that had since been found to be fraudulent. In May, the same publisher closed 19 journals in its catalogue (none in economics or management), mainly because they were likely to contain scientifically dubious content. These journals were in the catalogue of the Egyptian publisher Hindawi, which Wiley acquired in 2021. Today, the publisher justifies this decision by saying that it wants to prevent these journals from overlapping with other scientific journals in terms of editorial line...1 This is hard to believe when we know that scientific publishers are doing everything they can to increase the quantity of scientific production in the form of articles in order to increase the revenues linked to the publication of journals.

3Economics, as a scientific discipline, is also affected by this turmoil: on 7 February we learned that the entire board of the Journal of Economic Surveys, published by Wiley, had resigned. In a letter, its members urge publishers and the wider scientific community not to consider journals as repositories for publications, to be wary of the use of artificial intelligence to produce false scientific content, and to discuss the risks associated with submission fees and/or article processing charges (APCs) for an article to be published in Gold Open Access.2

4As members of the editorial board of the Revue de la régulation, we share these fundamental concerns. In our own way, we are trying to defend a model, if not an ethic. As a reminder, the journal (referenced by the DOAJ)3 is published according to the so-called diamond model of open science: the entire content of the Revue is freely accessible online and authors are not charged any fees. This model is based on public support (from the CNRS and the MSH-Paris Nord via its editorial office) and on freemium revenue linked to the download of articles in .pdf format. It also relies on two types of voluntary work: that of all the members of the editorial board and that of our external reviewers. We would like to thank these colleagues for their work, which is essential for a journal: it enables the evaluation and scientific discussion of contributions.

5It goes without saying that we attach great importance to our model, which allows us to maintain a journal that provides structure, not only for Regulation Theory (RT), but more broadly for institutionalist and heterodox analyses in economics. This structuring character is demonstrated by this issue, which is original in the history of the Revue. Although it usually publishes articles in French or English, all the academic articles in this volume happen to be in English, although this is not a deliberate move on our part. It may be exception that confirms the rule, but this originality underlines the internationalization of the Revue.

6The relevance of our editorial line, characterized by openness to different theoretical frameworks for thinking about forms of capitalism, is confirmed by this issue, in particular by the four articles published as varia. The first article in this issue analyses the transition from feudalism to capitalism in France. Drawing on regulationist and Marxist approaches, N. Pinsard argues that absolutism was a specific form of feudalism that allowed capitalism to emerge by initiating the emergence of the proletariat.

7The second article also provides a long-term historical analysis using a regulationist framework. In it, S. Celle shows how the social/solidarity economy in France became a relatively unified meso-economic space in the course of a process initiated after the French Revolution. Three sub-periods are identified: a liberal compromise (1790–1880), followed by a republican compromise (1880–1970), before a period that is described as neoliberal.

8The third article deals with the financialization of the health insurance sector in Brazil over the period 2007–2019. N. Montani-Martins and C. Ocké-Reis show, by analysing the strategies of the main private health insurance companies that are articulated with the public system (the Universal Health System [SUS]), that their actions have characteristics that are not generally expected. The companies studied do not seem to have broken completely with the model of financial intermediaries that primarily provide funding to private medical structures.

9The fourth article in this issue describes the intellectual background of M. Aglietta, one of the founders of RT. The article by Y. Tadjeddine, which combines the history of thought and the sociology of science, identifies a series of key encounters and stages in his intellectual training, culminating in the publication of Régulation et Crise du capitalisme in 1976.

10The Opinions-Debates section includes an interview by M. Carpenter and M. E. Sakinç with another great thinker of radical institutionalist economics, a theorist of the firm and its governance influenced by Marx and Schumpeter: the American W. Lazonick. The dense and fascinating interview dovetails with the one conducted by M. O’Sullivan and published in 2018.4

11This issue also includes two reading notes: the first is on the important book Théorie de la régulation, un nouvel état des savoirs. In his critical analysis, M. Lainé opens up a wide range of possibilities for questioning and discussion, underlining the vitality of RT and encouraging the organization of seminars around the book and its proposals. The second note, by the political scientist A. Guironnet, deals with the book by the geographer Brett Christophers Our Lives in Their Portfolios: Why Asset Managers Own the World. While the book focuses on asset managers, the interdisciplinary approach of this note enhances our analysis of financial intermediaries.

12Finally, three PhD dissertation reviews complete this issue. The presentations of the work of J. Deyris, N. Nenovska and J. Pharo bear witness in their own way to the dynamism, progress and pluralism of doctoral research in monetary economics, ecological economics and the economics of conventions.

13We hope you enjoy reading this issue.

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

« Editorial »Revue de la régulation [En ligne], 36 | 1er semestre|Spring 2024, mis en ligne le 25 juin 2024, consulté le 15 septembre 2024. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/24376

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

Haut de page
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search