Baars J. (1991), “The challenge of critical gerontology: the problem of social constitution”, Journal of Aging Studies, 5, 3 p. 219-243, <https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-4065(91)90008-G>.
Bergschöld J. M., Neven L., Peine A. (2019), “DIY gerontechnology: circumventing mismatched technologies and bureaucratic procedure by creating care technologies of one’s own”, Sociology of Health and Illness, 42, 2, p. 232-246, <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13012>.
Bischof A. (2020), „Wir wollten halt etwas mit Robotern in Care machen“. Epistemische Bedingungen der Entwicklung von Robotern für die Pflege in Hergesell J., Maibaum A., Meister M. (eds.), Genese und Folgen der „Pflegerobotik“. Die Konstitution eines interdisziplinären Forschungsfeldes, Bâle, Weihnheim, Beltz Juventa, p. 46-62.
Calasanti T. (2003), Theorising age relations in Biggs S., Lowenstein A., Hendricks J. (eds.), The need for theory: critical approaches to social gerontology, Amityville, New York, Baywood Press, p. 199-218.
D21 Digital Index (2020), Jährliches Lagebild zur Digitalen Gesellschaft, <https://initiatived21.de/app/uploads/2019/01/d21_index2018_2019.pdf>.
Ehlers A., Bauknecht J., Naegele G. (2020), Abschlussbericht zur Vorstudie „Weiterbildung zur Stärkung digitaler Kompetenz älterer Menschen“, Dortmund, Forschungsgesellschaft für Gerontologie e.V./ Institut für Gerontologie an der TU Dortmund.
Endter C. (2016), Skripting age – the negotiation of age and aging in ambient assisted living, in Domínguez-Rué E., Nierling L. (eds.), Ageing and technology, Bielefeld, Transcript, p. 121-140, <https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839429570-006>.
Felt U., Fouché R., Miller C. A., Smith-Doerr L. (2017), The handbook of science and technology studies, Cambridge, London, MIT Press.
Fernández-Ardèvol M., Rosales A., Loos E., Peine A., Beneito-Montagut R., Blanche D., Östlund B. (2019), Methodological strategies to understand smartphone practices for social connectedness in later life, in Zhou J., Salvendy G. (eds.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Social Media, Games and Assistive Environments, Cham, Springer, p. 46-64.
Fischer B., Peine A., Östlund B. (2019), “The importance of user involvement: a systematic review of involving older users in technology design”, Gerontologist, 60, 7, p. 513-523, <https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz163>.
Greenhalgh T., Shaw S., Wherton J., Hughes G., Lynch J., A’Court C., Hinder S., Fahy N., Byrne E., Finlayson A., Sorell T., Procter R., Stones R. (2016), “SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context”, BMJ Open, 6, 2, <https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010208>.
Haraway D. (1985), “Manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980’s”, Socialist Review, 80, p. 65-108.
Höppner G., Urban M. (2018), “Where and how do aging processes take place in everyday life? Answers from a new materialist perspective”, Frontiers in Sociology, 3, <https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00007>.
Jasanoff S. (2004), States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order, London, New York, Routledge.
Joyce K., Loe M. (2010), “A sociological approach to ageing, technology and health”, Sociology of Health and Illness, 32, 2, p. 171-180, <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01219.x>.
Klebbe R., Eicher C. (2020), Wer sind eigentlich diese Nutzer? Zur Rolle älterer und pflegebedürftiger Erwachsener in der Entwicklung robotischer Assis tenzsysteme, in Hergesell J., Maibaum A., Meister M. (eds.), Genese und Folgen der „Pflegerobotik“. Die Konstitution eines interdisziplinären Forschungsfeldes, Bâle, Weihnheim, Beltz Juventa, p. 220-253.
Kolland F., Wanka A., Gallistl V. (2019), Technik und Alter – Digitalisierung und die Ko-Konstitution von Alter(n) und Technologien, in Künemund H., Vogel C., Schroeter K. (eds.), Handbuch Soziologie des Alter(n), Wiesbaden, Springer, p. 1-19.
Lassen A. J., Moreia T. (2020), “New bikes for the old: Materialisations of active ageing”, Science and Technology Studies, 33, 3 p. 39-56, <https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.77239>.
López Gómez D. (2015), “Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, p. 91-101.
Marshall B., Katz S. (2018), “How old am I? Digital culture and quantified ageing”, Digital Culture and Society, 2, 1, p. 145-152.
Mitzner T.L., Savla J., Boot W.R., Sharit J., Charness N., Czaja S., Rogers W.A. (2019), “Technology adoption by older adults: findings from the PRISM trial”, Gerontologist, 59, 1, p. 34-44.
Moreia T. (2016), Science, technology and the ageing society, London, Taylor & Francis.
Neven L. (2010), “‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users”, Sociology of Health and Illness, 32, 2, p. 335–347, <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x>.
Neven L., Peine A. (2017), “From triple win to triple sin: how a problematic future discourse is shaping the way people age with technology”, Societies, 7, 3, 26, <https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7030026>.
Peine A. (2019a), Technology and ageing – theoretical propositions from science and technology studies (STS), in Neves B. (ed.), Ageing and digital technology, Singapour, Springer, p. 51-64.
Peine A. (2019b), “The co-constitution of health systems and innovation: comment on ‘What health system challenges should responsible innovation in health address? Insights from an international scoping review’”, International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 8, 11, p. 665-667. <https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.64>.
Peine A., Neven L. (2019), “From intervention to co-constitution: new directions in theorizing about aging and technology”, Gerontologist, 59, 1, p. 15-21, <https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050>.
Peine A., Faulkner A., Jæger B., Moors E. (2015), “Science, technology and the ‘grand challenge’ of ageing – understanding the socio-material constitution of later life”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, p. 1-9, <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.010> .
Pelizäus-Hoffmeister H., Birken T., Schweiger P., Sontheimer R. (2018), „Technik für ein selbstbestimmtes Leben im Alter. Eine Forschungsstrategie zur kontextintegrierenden und praxiszentrierten Bedarfsanalyse“, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19, p. 1-28.
Rammert W. (2008), Technik und Innovationen. Kerninstitutionen der modernen Wirtschaft, Technical University Technology Studies Working Papers, Berlin, Technische Universität Berlin, Fak. VI Planen, Bauen, Umwelt, Institut für Soziologie Fachgebiet Techniksoziologie, <https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-12355>.
Urban M. (2017), “‘This really takes it out of you!’ Senses and emotions in digital health practices of elderly”, Digital Health, 3, <https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617701778>.
Wanka A., Gallistl V. (2018), “Doing age in a digitized world – a material praxeology of aging with technology”, Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 6, <https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00006>.





