Armour, J. (2018). Where Bias Lives in the Criminal Law and Its Processes: How Judges and Jurors Socially Construct Black Criminals. American Journal of Criminal Law, 45, 203-252. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ajcl45&div=9&id=&page=
Austin, J. (1995). The province of jurisprudence determined. E. Wilfrid Rumble (Ed). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521447560
Bentham, J. (1781). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hay:hetboo:bentham1781
Berman, D. H., & Hafner, C. D. (1987). Indeterminacy: A Challenge to Logic‐based Models of Legal Reasoning. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 3(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.1987.9966251
Billett, S., Harteis, C., & Gruber, H. (2018). Developing Occupational Expertise through Everyday Work Activities and interactions. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. (2nd ed., pp. 105-126) Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Bix, B. H. (2011). Radbruch's Formula and Conceptual Analysis. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 56(1), 45-57. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ajj56&div=5&id=&page=
Breiman, L., Friedman J., Stone, C. J., & Olshen, R. A. (2017). Classification and regression trees. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315139470
Brennan, William J Jr. (1988). Reason, Passion, and the Progress of the Law. Cardozo Law Review, 10, 3-24. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/cdozo10&div=12&id=&page=
Brożek, B. (2018). Umysł prawniczy [Eng. ‘The Legal Mind’]. Copernicus Center Press. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/60052
Brożek, B. (2019). The Legal Mind: A New Introduction to Legal Epistemology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108695084
Bröhmer, J., & Hill, C. (2010). 60 Years German Basic Law: The German Constitution and its Court. Landmark Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany in the Area of Fundamental Rights. The Malaysian Current Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/7659
Bystranowski, P., Janik, B., Próchnicki, M., & Skórska, P. (2021). Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000438
Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without intuitions. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644865.001.0001
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215-281). Academic Press/Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-10487-4
Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (2014). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Volume 1: Basic processes, (2nd ed., pp. 323-417). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807102
Cole, L. R. (1989). Training the Mentor: Improving the Ability of Legal Experts to Teach Students and New Lawyers. New Mexico Law Review, 19(1), 163-170. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/nmlr19&i=171
Crowe, J. (2018). Not-So-Easy Cases. Statute Law Review, 40(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmy027
Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889-6892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018033108
De Groot, A. (1964). Chess playing programs. Proceedings Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen (Series A), 67, 385-398. https://doi.org/10.1037/e685262012-115
Dickson, J. (2001). Evaluation and legal theory. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472562364
Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 0674867114
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 0674518357
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205282152
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological review, 100(3), 363-406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363
Ericsson, K. A. (2014a). Expertise. Current Biology, 24(11), 508-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.013
Ericsson, K. A. (2014b). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.001
Ericsson, K. A. (2016). Summing up hours of any type of practice versus identifying optimal practice activities: Commentary on Macnamara, Moreau, & Hambrick (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 351-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635600
Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (2018). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Ericsson, K. A. (2018). The Differential Influence of Experience, Practice, and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Individual Performance of Experts. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 745-769). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Farrington-Darby, T., & Wilson, J. R. (2006). The nature of expertise: A review. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.09.001
Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2018). Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives: Historical Foundations and Recurrent Themes. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 59-83). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fuller, L. L. (1958). Positivism and fidelity to law-A reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 630-672. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338226
Gardner, A. von der Lieth. (1984). An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning (Doctoral Dissertation). Stanford University.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999b). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd. & ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 3-34). Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Engel, C. (Eds.) (2006). Heuristics and the Law. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3488.001.0001
Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Heuristics. In G. Gigerenzer & C. Engel (Eds.), Heuristics and the law (pp. 17-44). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3488.001.0001
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R. & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098
Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. Little, Brown & Co.
Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903395748
Gobet, F. (1997). A pattern-recognition theory of search in expert problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 3(4), 291-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467897394301
Gobet, F. (2017). Three views on expertise: Philosophical implications for rationality, knowledge, intuition and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(3), 605-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12253
Gobet, F., & Chassy, P. (2009). Expertise and intuition: A tale of three theories. Minds and Machines, 19(2), 151-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-008-9131-5
Green, L., & Mehr, D. R. (1997). What alters physicians' decisions to admit to the coronary care unit?. Journal of Family Practice, 45(3), 219-226. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-30170-001
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2007). Blinking on the bench: How judges decide cases. Cornell Law Review, 93, 1-43.
Hage, J. C., Leenes, R., & Lodder, A. R. (1993). Hard cases: A procedural approach. Artificial intelligence and law, 2, 113-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871759
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological review, 108(4), 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998-1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Altmann, E. M., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert?. Intelligence 45, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.001
Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. Harvard Law Review, 271(4), 593-629. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338225
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The concept of law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Harteis, C., & Billett, S. (2013). Intuitive expertise: Theories and empirical evidence. Educational Research Review 9, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.001
Hartman, G. R., Mersky, R. M., & Tate, C. L. (2004). Landmark Supreme Court cases: the most influential decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. Facts On File, Inc.
Hodgkinson, G. P., Langan‐Fox, J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2008). Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607x216666
Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. The University of Chicago Press.
Horvath, J., & Wiegmann, A. (2016). Intuitive expertise and intuitions about knowledge. Philosophical Studies, 173(10), 2701-2726. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44122369
Jakubiec, M. (2021). Legal Concepts as Mental Representations. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09853-7
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics. Stanford Law Review, 50(5), 1471-1550. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229304
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449-1475. https://www.doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1986). Rapid decision making on the fireground. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 30(6), 576-580. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F154193128603000616
Klein, G. A. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods (pp. 138-147). Ablex Publishing. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-97634-000
Klein, G., & Kahneman, D. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515-526. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0016755
Klein, G., Shneiderman, B., Hoffman, R. R., & Wears, R. L. (2019). The war on expertise: Five communities that seek to discredit experts. In P. Ward, J.M. Schraagen, J. Gore & E.M. Roth (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of expertise (pp. 1157-1192). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795872.001.0001
Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020762
Lehmann, A. C., Gruber, H., & Kopiez, R. (2018). Expertise in music. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 535-549). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Leiter, B. (1995). Legal Indeterminacy. Legal Theory, 1(4), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352325200000227
Levinson, J. D., Bennett, M. W., & Hioki, K. (2017). Judging Implicit Bias: A National Empirical Study of Judicial Stereotypes. Florida Law Review, 69, 63-114.
Liu, J. Z., & Li, X. (2019). Legal techniques for rationalizing biased judicial decisions: Evidence from experiments with real judges. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 16(3), 630-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12229
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological science, 25(8), 1608-1618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535810
Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Moreau, D. (2016). How important is deliberate practice? Reply to Ericsson (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 355-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635614
Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11281-000
Minei, E., & Bisel, R. (2013). Negotiating the Meaning of Team Expertise: A Firefighter Team’s Epistemic Denial. Small Group Research, 44(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1046496412467830
Modak-Truran, M. (2001). A Pragmatic Justification of the Judicial Hunch. University of Richmond Law Review, 35, 55. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/urich35&div=12&id=&page=
Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
Mosier, K., Fischer, U., Hoffman, R. R., & Klein, G. (2018). Expert professional judgments and" naturalistic decision making". In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 453-475). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511780295
Okoli, J. O., Weller, G., & Watt, J. (2016). Information processing and intuitive decision-making on the fireground: towards a model of expert intuition. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0348-9
Pietrzykowski, T. (2012). Intuicja Prawnicza. W stronę zewnętrznej integracji Teorii Prawa [Eng. ‘Legal Intuition. Towards an External Integration of the Theory of Law’]. Difin.
Pogarsky, G., & Babcock, L. (2001). Damage caps, motivated anchoring, and bargaining impasse. The Journal of Legal Studies, 30(1), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1086/468114
Raz, J. (1985). Authority, law and morality. The Monist, 68(3), 295-324. www.jstor.org/stable/27902922
Richards, D. (2016). When Judges Have a Hunch‐Intuition and Experience in Judicial Decision-Making. Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosphie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 102(2), 245-260. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24756844
Ross, P. E. (2006). The expert mind. Scientific American, 295(2), 64-71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26068925
Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2015). Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection. Cognition, 141, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.015
Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 53(2) 252-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90064-E
Simon, H. A. (1995). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
Simon, H. A., & Barenfeld, M. (1969). Information processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving. Psychological Review, 76, 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028154
Simon, H. A. (1986). Rationality in Psychology and Economics. The Journal of Business, 59(4), S209-S224. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2352757
Simon, H. A. (1990). Bounded Rationality. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman (Eds.), Utility and Probability (pp. 15-18). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_5
Sinclair, M. (2010). Misconceptions about intuition. Psychological Inquiry, 21(4), 378-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.523874
Stanovich, K., & West, R. (2002). Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 421-440). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.026
Stelmach, J. (2017). Legal Instinct. Polish Law Review, 3(1), 153-159. https://polishlawreview.pl/resources/html/article/details?id=157559
Strömwall, L., & Granhag, P. A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160308138
Struchiner, N., Hannikainen, I., & Almeida, G. (2020). An experimental guide to vehicles in the park. Decision Making, 15(3), 312–329.
Susskind, R. E. (1989). Expert systems in law: a jurisprudential inquiry. Oxford University Press.
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
Tobia, K., Buckwalter, W., & Stich, S. (2013). Moral intuitions: Are philosophers experts? Philosophical Psychology, 26(5), 629-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.696327
Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G (2007). Environments that make us smart: Ecological rationality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8721.2007.00497.x
Tushnet, M. V. (Ed.) (2008). I dissent: Great opposing opinions in landmark supreme court cases. Beacon Press. ISBN: 9780807000366
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
Wessel, E., Drevland, G. C. B., Eilertsen, D. E., & Magnussen, S. (2006). Credibility of the Emotional Witness: A Study of Ratings by Court Judges. Law and Human Behavior, 30(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9024-1
Williams, A. M., Ford, P. R., Hodges, N. J., & Ward, P. (2018). Expertise in sport: Specificity, plasticity, and adaptability in high-performance athletes. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 653-673). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Zander, T., Öllinger, M., & Volz, K. G. (2016). Intuition and insight: Two processes that build on each other or fundamentally differ?. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01395
Zoll, F. (2004). Jaka szkoła prawa? Czy amerykańskie metody nauczania prawa mogą być przydatne w Polsce? [Eng. ‘Which School of Law? Can American Methods of Legal Education be Useful in Poland?’]. Dom Wydawniczy ABC.
Zygmunt, T. J. G. (2020). An intuitive approach to hard cases. Utrecht Law Review, 16(1). http://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.505