Predstavljanje
Revus je prvi časopis za ustavnu teoriju i filozofiju prava u jugoistočnoj Europi. (Do 20. broja njegov je podnaslov bio revija za europsku ustavnost.) S višejezičnošću se nudi i kao jedini regionalni pravni forum. Jedan od njegovih ciljeva izgraditi je most između pravnika iz regije i onih iz drugih pravnih kultura. Strogi postupak odabira i međunarodna indeksiranost sadržaja jamče kakvoću i odjek u Revusu objavljenih rasprava i članaka. (..više..)
Zadnji broj
33 | 2017
Pre-Conventions or Normative Facts (2/2)
-
Discussion with Bruno Celano
Revusov forumUr. Matija ŽgurImmediately after the publication of the Italian original of Bruno Celano’s paper Pre-convenzioni (Ragion pratica 2014/2) we decided to prepare its English translation for publication in Revus. My conversations with Marco Brigaglia regarding this project stimulated the organisation of a broader critical forum dedicated to Celano’s paper. Brigaglia kindly accepted the invitation to contribute a comprehensive introductory study. This underlines the significance of the paper within Celano’s larger opus by showing that it constitutes a crucial (though implicit) turn, which may be represented as the author’s first step towards a “psychological jurisprudence”.
The resulting discussion on pre-conventions is placed in two issues of Revus. Whereas Revus (2016) 30 includes Celano's paper and the contributions of Marco Brigaglia, Federico José Arena, Dale Smith and José Juan Moreso, the present issue features the comments by Luís Duarte d’Almeida, Rodrigo Sánchez Brigido, Pierluigi Chiassoni, Marco Segatti, and Sebastián Figueroa Rubio – together with Celano’s reply to them all.
As the editor of this discussion, I wish to thank Marco Segatti for the English translation, as well as the reviewers and commentators for their participation. Of course, a special thanks goes to Bruno Celano who graciously accepted to confront the challenges presented by the commentators.
-
On pre-conventions as ‘normative facts’ [Cjelovit tekst]
-
Celano on normative facts [Cjelovit tekst]
-
What laws are experienced as [Cjelovit tekst]A comment on Celano’s pre-conventions
-
Do jurists need pre-conventions? [Cjelovit tekst]
-
How can we explain pre-conventions? [Cjelovit tekst]
-
Exploring the Background: puzzles, afterthoughts, and replies [Cjelovit tekst]
-
-
Constitutional Interpretation
-
Evidential Reasoning
-
El control de la valoración de la prueba en segunda instancia [Cjelovit tekst]Inmediación e inferencias probatorias
-
-
Books
-
Izzivi ustavnega prava v 21. stoletju [Cjelovit tekst]Liber Amicorum Ciril Ribičič (Ur. M. Žgur, N. Kogovšek Šalamon in B. Koritnik, Maribor: ILSJN 2017)
-