Languages – English
|Bosanski jezik |Deutsch |English |Español |Français |Hrvatski |Italiano |македонски јазик |Slovenščina |српски језик
Article
-
Features of International Law: A Critical Account of the Prototype Theory of International Law [Full text]Published in Revus, 43 | 2021
-
Published in Revus, 43 | 2021
-
Published in Revus, 43 | 2021
-
Philosophising on International Law: Jovanović’s Conception of Normativity and Rationality [Full text]Published in Revus, 43 | 2021
-
Tort liability without taking responsibility [Full text]A challenge to David Enoch’s idea of taking tort liabilityPublished in Revus, 41 | 2020
-
Rawls's juridical constructivism revisited [Full text]Priority of law and rights over ideas of the goodPublished in Revus, 43 | 2021
-
The representative continuumPublished in Revus, 41 | 2020
-
Justice-aptness and international law [Full text]Published in Revus, 43 | 2021
-
Constituent power in a “community of equals” [Full text]Published in Revus, 41 | 2020
-
Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom [Full text]Published in Revus, 42 | 2020
-
Published in Revus, 41 | 2020
-
On ‘legal continuity’ in the post-sovereign model of constitution-making: three problems [Full text]Published in Revus, 41 | 2020
-
Post-sovereign constitutional change [Full text]Critiquing and re-imagining the Brexit processPublished in Revus, 41 | 2020
-
Constituent power(s) in a dualistic democracy [Full text]Published in Revus, 41 | 2020
-
Published in Revus, 40 | 2020
-
Published in Revus, 40 | 2020
-
Some reflections on the Inter-American system of human rightsPublished in Revus, 40 | 2020
-
Institutional concepts [Full text]A critical view on the reductionist and interpretative approachesPublished in Revus, 40 | 2020
-
Published in Revus, 40 | 2020
-
On the difference between legislative intent and speaker’s intentionPublished in Revus, 40 | 2020
-
A reply to Bello Hutt, Harel and KlattPublished in Revus, 42 | 2020
-
Justice luck in negligence law [Full text]Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Cost-benefit analysis outside of welfarism [Full text]Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Do societies prioritize harm prevention? [Full text]Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Between absolutism and efficiency [Full text]Reply to Professors Geistfeld, Grady, and PrielPublished in Revus, 39 | 2019
-
Published in Revus, 39 | 2019
-
Property: A conceptual analysis [Full text]Published in Revus, 38 | 2019
-
Published in Revus, 31 | 2017
-
Criminal law and legal dogmatics [Full text]Published in Revus, 31 | 2017
-
On the nature of legal normativity [Full text]Response to commentatorsPublished in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Judicial review and institutional balance [Full text]Comments on Dimitrios KyritsisPublished in Revus, 38 | 2019
-
Political representation as a regulative ideal [Full text]A comment on the democratic objection to constitutional reviewPublished in Revus, 38 | 2019
-
Published in Revus, 36 | 2018
-
Published in Revus, 35 | 2018
-
Two conceptions of norms [Full text]Published in Revus, 35 | 2018
-
Why legislatures owe deference to the courts [Full text]A commentary on Dimitrios Kyritsis’ Where our protection lies: separation of powers and constitutional reviewPublished in Revus, 38 | 2019
-
Understanding normativity [Full text]The impact of culturally-loaded explanatory ambitionsPublished in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Reasonable stability vs. radical indeterminacy [Full text]A disanalogy between domestic rule of law and humanity-based international lawPublished in Revus, 30 | 2016
-
Pre-conventions [Full text]A fragment of the BackgroundPublished in Revus, 30 | 2016
-
Rules and norms [Full text]Two kinds of normative behaviourPublished in Revus, 30 | 2016
-
A new type of convention? [Full text]Some remarks on Bruno Celano’s Pre-conventionsPublished in Revus, 30 | 2016
-
Embodied conventions [Full text]Some comments on their social dimension and intentionalityPublished in Revus, 30 | 2016
-
Published in Revus, 30 | 2016
-
Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Legal normativity as a moral property [Full text]Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Comments on Brian Bix’s ‘Hart, Kelsen and legal normativity’Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Bix on the normativity of law [Full text]Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Legal interpretation without truth [Full text]Published in Revus, 29 | 2016
-
The possibility of naturalistic jurisprudence [Full text]Legal positivism and natural law theory revisitedPublished in Revus, 32 | 2017
-
The compatibilist fallacy [Full text]Published in Revus, 32 | 2017
-
Published in Revus, 32 | 2017
-
Published in Revus, 32 | 2017
-
Naturalism and the legal image of man [Full text]Published in Revus, 32 | 2017
-
The tigerish nature of legal normativity [Full text]Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
A legal orderʼs supreme legislative authorities [Full text]Published in Revus, 29 | 2016
-
A challenge to Bix's interpretation of Kelsen and Hart's views on the normativity of law [Full text]Published in Revus, 37 | 2019
-
Deontic sentences, possible worlds and norms [Full text]Published in Revus, 34 | 2018
-
A dilemma regarding the nature of norms [Full text]Published in Revus, 34 | 2018
-
Legal disagreements [Full text]A pluralist reply to Dworkin’s challengePublished in Revus, 28 | 2016
-
Published in Revus, 28 | 2016
-
Three ideas on Hohfeld examinedPublished in Revus, 35 | 2018
-
The structure of criminal attempts [Full text]An analytic approachPublished in Revus, 34 | 2018
-
Let’s talk about antinomies [Full text]Normative systems reloadedPublished in Revus, 36 | 2018
-
Published in Revus, 27 | 2015
-
A never-ending controversy in Polish legal theory?Published in Revus, 27 | 2015
-
Kelsen, Hart, and legal normativity [Full text]Published in Revus, 34 | 2018
-
Legal philosophy as practical philosophy [Full text]Published in Revus, 34 | 2018
-
Expressing Norms [Full text]On Norm-Formulations and Other Entities in Legal TheoryPublished in Revus, 25 | 2015
-
For a truly realistic theory of law [Full text]Published in Revus, 29 | 2016
-
Published in Revus, 29 | 2016
-
A critical analysisPublished in Revus, 28 | 2016
-
President of the Republic [Full text]Croatian constitution’s mimicry of the French constitutional modelPublished in Revus, 28 | 2016
-
Expectations and attribution of responsibility [Full text]Published in Revus, 26 | 2015
-
A Realistic View on Law and Legal Cognition [Full text]Published in Revus, 27 | 2015
-
Published in Revus, 27 | 2015
-
Conceptual Jurisprudence [Full text]An Introduction to Conceptual Analysis and Methodology in Legal TheoryPublished in Revus, 26 | 2015
-
Analogy and Balancing [Full text]A Reply to David DuartePublished in Revus, 25 | 2015
-
Published in Revus, 25 | 2015
-
Law as Fact [Full text]Published in Revus, 24 | 2014
-
The Logic of Showing Possibility Claims [Full text]A Positive Argument for Inclusive Legal Positivism and Moral Grounds of LawPublished in Revus, 23 | 2014
-
Kelsen on Natural Law Theory [Full text]An Enduring Critical AffairPublished in Revus, 23 | 2014
-
In Defence of the Expressive Conception of Norms [Full text]Published in Revus, 22 | 2014
-
Naturalizing Alf Ross’s Legal Realism [Full text]A Philosophical ReconstructionPublished in Revus, 24 | 2014
-
Constitutional Rights and Proportionality [Full text]Published in Revus, 22 | 2014
-
Published in Revus, 22 | 2014
-
Published in Revus, 21 | 2013
-
Published in Revus, 21 | 2013
-
The Case of the Croatian Capital ZagrebPublished in Revus, 20 | 2013
-
Published in Revus, 1 | 2003
-
Constitutional Law and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: An Attempt at a Synthesis [Full text]Published in Revus, 1 | 2003
-
A Case AnalysisPublished in Revus, 19 | 2013
-
Published in Revus, 19 | 2013
-
Five Models of Legal Science [Full text]Published in Revus, 19 | 2013
-
Published in Revus, 13 | 2010
-
Founding Principles of EU Law [Full text]A Theoretical and Doctrinal SketchPublished in Revus, 12 | 2010
-
Human Rights in the Republic of Macedonia [Full text]Seen Through the Lens of the Constitution and the Practice of DemocracyPublished in Revus, 11 | 2009
-
One Health Only [Full text]Published in Revus, 10 | 2009
-
The Contemporary Debate on Citizenship [Full text]Some Remarks on the Erased of SloveniaPublished in Revus, 9 | 2009
-
Published in Revus, 12 | 2010
-
Celano on normative facts [Full text]Published in Revus, 33 | 2017
-
What laws are experienced as [Full text]A comment on Celano’s pre-conventionsPublished in Revus, 33 | 2017
-
Do jurists need pre-conventions? [Full text]Published in Revus, 33 | 2017
-
Published in Revus, 33 | 2017
Chronicle
-
Causes of Different Outcomes in Slovenia and CroatiaPublished in Revus, 26 | 2015
-
January 2010 – December 2010Published in Revus, 16 | 2011
-
Chronicle for the Year 2008Published in Revus, 9 | 2009
Book review
-
Review of Navarro & Rodríguez, Deontic Logic and Legal Systems (CUP 2014)Published in Revus, 29 | 2016
-
Some Brief Comments About Bartosz Brożek’s Rule-Following (Cracow: Copernicus Press, 2013)Published in Revus, 20 | 2013
-
Law and Defeasibility [Full text]A few comments on The Logic of Legal Requirements (Oxford 2012)Published in Revus, 23 | 2014
-
Book ReviewPublished in Revus, 18 | 2012
-
Substance and Procedure in the Criminal Law [Full text]Published in Revus, 9 | 2009
-
Substance and form in criminal law [Full text]A Reply to a Book Review by Luís Duarte d’AlmeidaPublished in Revus, 11 | 2009
Editorial
-
On tû-tû [Full text]Published in Revus, 27 | 2015
-
A Short Note on Digestive Realism [Full text]Published in Revus, 25 | 2015
Critical note
-
Theory of Legal Interpretation and Contextualism [Full text]Replies to Kristan, Poggi and VignoloPublished in Revus, 18 | 2012
-
Contextualism, But Not Enough [Full text]A Brief Note on Villa’s Theory of Legal InterpretationPublished in Revus, 17 | 2012
-
Published in Revus, 17 | 2012