Reforms and sanitary covid crisis: have spatial inequalities in resuscitation beds increased since 2008?
- Cet article est une traduction de :
- Réformes hospitalières et crise pandémique de la Covid-19 : depuis 2008 les inégalités spatiales d'équipement en lits de réanimation ont-elles augmenté ? [fr]
Entrées d’index
Haut de pageTexte intégral
1Since 2000, bed short-stay hospitalization closures have continued in almost all urban areas, with around sixty of them disappearing altogether. The decrease in the number of short-stay beds is well known. Less well known is the way in which hospital reforms have altered hospital capacities in resuscitation unit.
2This paper analyses the evolution of the geography of the resuscitation bed equipment, particularly at stake during the COVID-19 epidemic in France. Analysis are conducted at the functional urban areas and regional levels, and in two situations: reforms in the last 10 years and 2020 sanitary crisis. Data is provided by the Annual Statistics of Healthcare Institutions, which provides information, relative to resuscitation, intensive care and continuous monitoring beds over the period 2008-2018. Using this database, measures in volume and density of equipment allows us to analyse the evolution of the spatial structure of resuscitation equipment in France. How has the distribution of resuscitation equipment evolved over the last decade? Have resuscitation beds been closed and if so, where?
3Since 2008, numbers in resuscitation beds in metropolitan France remain virtually stable, rising from 4,983 to 4,923 beds. Resuscitation beds are highly polarised throughout the country, involving 150 functional urban areas. Although only 60 beds were closed at national level, this figure conceals opposite local changes. Density of resuscitation beds has decreased over the period: the average level of density in the sample of equipped urban areas decreased from 14.5 to 13.1 beds per 100,000 inhabitants. The bed density indicator reveals that twice as many urban areas are in fact affected by a decrease in the number of resuscitation bed facilities. At the regional level, a linear regression between the initial density of beds in 2008 and the rate of variation in the number of beds over the period (2008-2018) shows inter-regional convergence: regions with the highest resuscitation beds densities in 2008 show most negative variation rates in bed numbers; conversely, regions least equipped in 2008 mostly show positive or slightly negative variation rates.
4In the sanitary crisis situation, the potential of transformation, based on the capacity to convert intensive care and monitoring beds into resuscitation beds, is 240% at national level. This theoretical transformation potential would increase the volume of existing resuscitation beds by a factor of 3.4, i.e. from 4,923 resuscitation beds to 16,751. At local level, this potential varies greatly (standard deviation of 117%), from 33% in Digne-les-Bains, or 55% in Thonon-les-Bains to 706% in Avignon or 683% in Limoges. Large urban areas stand out with average transformation potential. At regional level, the average transformation potential is 284%. Inter-regional differences are smaller than between urban areas: 21 of the 22 regions have a transformation potential between 2.8 and 4.5 times the number of resuscitation beds.
5In conclusion, these results raise the more general question of the ability of hospitals to cope with epidemic crises, which are unfortunately not new. If patient transfers have helped to contain the tension in the resuscitation units of the highly affected regions in the spring of 2020, what is the situation in the autumn of 2020, or winter and spring 2021 in a context where all the regions are affected? It appears that hospital medical staff have learned from the first epidemic wave and are now reorganising when patients’ inflows increase drastically under "Plan Blanc" in order to cope with the increase. This means that medical staff from specialised departments (such as internal medicine for example) are temporarily moved from their current departments to COVID and reanimation departments. Therefore, hospitals which were already under pressure from the productive hospital reforms implemented in the first two decades of the 2000s, have been under threat of collapse since the beginning of the pandemic. However, the tensions brought to light by the pandemic has not led public authorities to question the productivity strategies implemented for more than 20 years under the NPM ideology: closures of MCO hospitals beds has been pursued in 2020.
Table des illustrations
![]() |
|
|---|---|
| URL | http://journals.openedition.org/rfst/docannexe/image/941/img-1.jpg |
| Fichier | image/jpeg, 59k |
Pour citer cet article
Référence électronique
Benoit Conti, Sophie Baudet-Michel et Charlène Le Neindre, « Reforms and sanitary covid crisis: have spatial inequalities in resuscitation beds increased since 2008? », Revue francophone sur la santé et les territoires [En ligne], 3 | 2021, mis en ligne le 12 mars 2021, consulté le 17 octobre 2026. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfst/941 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/rfst.941
Haut de pageDroits d’auteur
Le texte seul est utilisable sous licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés) sont susceptibles d’être soumis à des autorisations d’usage spécifiques.
Haut de page




