Abbott, A., 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Agamben, G., 2001. Homo Sacer. Berkeley University Press, Berkeley.
Amadae, S.M.M., 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Arendt, H., 1951. Imperialism: The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt, New York.
Balibar, E., 1998. Introduction. In : C. Schmitt, Le Léviathan dans la doctrine de l’État de Thomas Hobbes. Sens et échec d’un symbole politique. Seuil, Paris.
Baruch, B., 1946. The American Proposal for International Control. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 4, 3–10.
Benjamin, W., 2000. [1921] Critique de la violence. In: Oeuvres 1. Gallimard, Paris, pp. 211–245.
Bernal, J.D., 1949. Ought Science to be Planned? The case for Collective Research. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35, 17–19.
Bernstein, B., 1974. The Quest for Security: American Foreign Policy and International Control of Atomic Energy, 1942‑1946. The Journal of American History 60 (4), 1003–1044.
Bourdieu, P., 2002. Les conditions sociales de la circulation des idées. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 145, 1–9.
Briggs, H., 1947. The Problem of World Government. The American Journal of International Law 41 (1), 108–112.
Brodie, B., 1946. The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order. Harcourt, Brace and Co, New York.
Brodie, B., 1947. The Atomic Dilemma. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 249, 32–47.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthe, Y., 2001. Agir dans un monde incertain : essai sur la démocratie technique. Seuil, Paris.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Legal Subcommittee of the Committee on Atomic Energy, June 1946. Utilization and Control of Atomic Energy: A Draft Convention. CEIP, New York.
Cavers, D., 1950. An Interim Plan for International Control of Atomic Energy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists VI (1), 13–17.
Collier, S., Lakoff, A., Rabinow, P., 2004. Biosecurity: Towards an Anthropology of the Contemporary. Anthropology Today 20 (5), 3–7.
Condon, E., 1946. The Plannification of Science. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 4, 15–17.
Cousin, N., Finletter, T., 1946. A beginning for Sanity: A Review of the Acheson-Lilienthal Proposal. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 4, 3–10.
Daniel, C., Squires, A., 1949. The International Control of Safe Atomic Energy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 12, 111–116.
Dezalay, Y., Garth, B., 2002. La mondialisation des guerres de palais : La reconfiguration du pouvoir d’État en Amérique Latine, entre notables du droit et « Chicago Boys ». Seuil, Paris.
Drori, G., Meyer, J., Ramirez, F., Schofer, E., 2003. Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Finnemore, Martha, 1993. International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The UNESCO and Science Policy. International Organization 47 (4), 565–597.
Foucault, M., 1991. Governmentality. In: Burchell, G., Gordon, C., Miller, P. (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 87–105.
Foucault, M., 2004. Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France 1978‑1979. Gallimard-Seuil, Paris.
Galison, P., Bernstein, B., 1989. In Any Light: Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1942‑1954. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 19, 267–347.
Grodzins, M., Rabinowitch, E., 1963. The Atomic Age: Scientists in National and World Affairs. Basic Books, New York.
Hall, P., 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Heilbron, J.L., Seidel, R., Wheaton, B., 1981. Lawrence and his Laboratory. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory News Magazine 6 (3), 6–106.
Jasper, J., 1990. Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden and France. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Joxe, A., 1990. Le cycle de la dissuasion (1945‑1990). La Découverte, Paris.
Kahn, H., 1961. On Thermonuclear War. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Kaiser, D., 2004. The Scientists as Spies. Paper presented at the conference on Atomic Sciences, Department of History, Princeton University.
Kaplan, F., 1983. The Wizards of Armageddon. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Kevles, D., 1978. The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Knopf, New York.
Knorr, K., 1955. Defense for Atomic War. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists XI (3), 77–82.
Latour, B., 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Lerner, A., 1949. Does Control of Atomic Energy Involve a Controlled Economy? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35, 15–17.
Licklider, R., 1971. The Private Nuclear Strategists. Ohio University Press, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lilienthal, D., 1946. How can Atomic Energy Be Controlled? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 8, 13–15.
Lilienthal, D., 1949. The Fellowship Program. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35 (3), 166–172.
Lilienthal, D., 1963a. Change, Hope and the Bomb. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Lilienthal, D., 1963b. The Journals of David E. Lilienthal. vol. 2. Harper and Row Publishers, New York.
Mallard, G., 2005. Bucolic and Machinic Epistemologies: The Laboratory Lives of Lawrence and Oppenheimer. Paper presented at the Section Session on Sociology of Science. American Sociological Association.
Mallard, G., non publié. L’influence des experts américains sur le fédéralisme européen et la construction d’Euratom. Princeton University.
Marschak, J., 1946. The Economic Aspects of Atomic Power. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 7, 8–10.
May, A., 1998. Dissertation, The Rand Corporation and the Dynamics of American Strategic Thought, 1946‑1962. Emory University.
Meyer, J., Boli, J., Thomas, G., Ramirez, F., 1997. World Society and the Nation State. American Journal of Sociology 103 (1), 144–181.
Newman, J., Miller, R., 1949. The Socialist Island. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35, 13–15.
Niebhur, R., 1949. The Illusion of World Government. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 50 (3), 289–293.
Oppenheimer, R., 1947. Functions of the International Agency in Research and Development. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 16, 173–175.
Oppenheimer, R., 1953. Atomic Weapons and American Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs, 529.
Polanyi, M., 1949. The case for Individualism. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35, 19–21.
Polanyi, M., 1950. Freedom in Science. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists VI (7), 195–200.
Polanyi, M., 1952. Some British Experience. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists VIII (7), 223–233.
Price, M., 1995. Roots of Dissent: The Chicago Met Lab and the Origins of the Frank Report. Isis 86 (2), 222–244.
Rhodes, R., 1986. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. Touchstone, New York.
Rosenberg, D., 1983. The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy 1945‑1960. International Security 7 (4), 3–71.
Schmitt, C., 1988. Political Theology [1928]. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Schmitt, C., 1996. The Concept of the Political [1932]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Schmitt, C., 1993. Le Léviathan dans la doctrine de l’État de Thomas Hobbes : sens et échec d’un symbole politique [1938]. Seuil, Paris.
Shils, E., 1946. Some Political Implications of the State Department Report. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 4, 7–12.
Shils, E., 1949. Blackett’s Apologia for the Soviet Position. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35 (2), 34–35.
Shils, E., 1952. America’s Paper Curtail. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists VIII (7), 210–217.
Shotwell, J., 1946a. Report of the Meeting of the Committee on Atomic Energy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, April 13th1946 Baruch Papers. Mudd Library, Princeton.
Shotwell, J., 1946b. Report of the Meeting of the Committee on Atomic Energy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. May 11th1946. Baruch Papers. Mudd Library, Princeton.
Shotwell, J., 1946c. The Atomic Bomb and International Organization. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 4, 8–10.
Shotwell, J., 1946d. Letter to Dean Acheson, May 8th 1946. Baruch Papers, Box 112. Mudd Library, Princeton University.
Snow, D., Benford, R., 1988. Ideology, Frame resonance and participant mobilization. In: Klandermans, B., Kriesi, H., Tarrow, S. (Eds.), From Culture to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures. University of California Press., Berkeley.
Sokolsky, H., 2001. Best of Intentions: America’s Campaign against Strategic Weapons Proliferation. Praeger, Wesport, Connecticut.
State Department, Board of Consultant, March 16th 1946. A Report on the International Control of Atomic Energy. Washington DC, Department of State.
Szilard, L., 1949. Shall we Yield or Fight? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35 (3), 177–179.
Teller, E., 1946. Commentary on the Acheson-Lilienthal Report. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 10, 3–5.
United Nations, 1947. Commission on Atomic Energy, Working Papers. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 13, 276–277.
Urey, H.C., 1946. Atomic Energy and World Peace. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 9, 2–4.
Urey, H.C., 1947. An Alternative Course for the Control of Atomic Energy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 12, 139–140.
Urey, H.C., 1949. The Paramount Problem of 1949. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 50 (3), 283–288.
Urey, H.C., 1952. Editorial. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists VIII (7), 207–208.
Viner, J., 1946a. Meeting of the Committee on Economics. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Baruch Files, Box 5. Mudd Library, Princeton University.
Viner, J., 1946b. The Implications of Atomic Energy for International Relations. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 90 (1), 56.
Wallace, H., 1946. Letter to the President. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 6, 2–4.
Wigner, E., 1951. The Impact of the Developments in Atomic Energy on the Sciences. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists VII (3), 66–70.
Wohlstetter, A., 1959. The Delicate Balance of Terror. Foreign Affairs 37 (2), 211–234.



