Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilAppels à contributionAppels clos“Changing the Tune”:Popular Music...

“Changing the Tune”:
Popular Music & Politics in the 21st Century
From the Fall of Communism to the Arab Spring

International Conference – Strasbourg University, France
7-8 June 2013
Changing the Tune - Poster EnglishAfficher l’image
Crédits : ©

The selected conference proceedings were published, under the title Politiques des musiques populaires au xxie siècle [The politics of popular music in the 21st century], Elsa Grassy and Jedediah Sklower, eds. Table of contents and order here.
Les actes choisis du colloque ont été publiés aux Éditions Mélanie Seteun, sous le titre Politiques des musiques populaires au xxie siècle. Consultez la table des matières et commandez l’ouvrage ici.

This CFP has been closed since 31 December 2012.
The programme is now online – consult it here.
Practical information here.


Conference organizers

Keynote speakers

  • Martin Cloonan, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom

  • Dietrich Helms, University of Osnabrück, Germany

Provisional scientific committee

  • Ralph von Appen, University of Giessen, Germany

  • Esteban Buch, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, France

  • Hugh Dauncey, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom

  • André Doehring, University of Giessen, Germany

  • Gérôme Guibert, University of Paris III, Sorbonne Nouvelle, France

  • Patricia Hall, University of Michigan, United States

  • Olivier Julien, University of Paris IV, Sorbonne, France

  • Dave Laing, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • David Looseley, University of Leeds, United Kingdom

  • Rajko Muršič, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

  • Rosa Reitsamer, University of Music and Performing Arts, Vienna, Austria

  • Deena Weinstein, DePaul University, United States

  • Sheila Whiteley, University of Salford, United Kingdom

The Conference

The programme is now online – cf. here.

Popular Music scholars have devoted considerable attention to the relationship between music and power. The symbolic practices through which subcultures state and reinforce identities have been widely documented (mainly in the field of Cultural, Gender and Postcolonial Studies), as has the increasingly political and revolutionary dimensions of popular music. Most studies have focused on the genres and movements that developed with and in the aftermath of the 1960’s counterculture. Yet little has been written about how the politics of popular music has reflected the social, geopolitical and technological changes of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, after the fall of Communism. Still, the music of the Arab Spring or of the Occupy and Indignados movements have been scarcely commented upon while they attest to significant changes in the way music is used by activists and revolutionaries today.

This international conference therefore aims to explore the new political meanings and practices of music and to provide an impetus for their study. Broadly the themes of the conference are divided into five main streams:

1. Music as a Political Weapon

The history of popular music cannot be divorced from that of social, cultural and political movements, and yet the question remains: if music is politically efficient, how can we measure its impact? It is not clear what role music plays in the struggle for political, ideological and social change. While musical practices and the writing of songs can strengthen existing activist groups, can it also truly change minds or upset the established order and destabilize it? If there are such things as soundtracks for rebellions and revolutions, do they merely accompany fights or can they quicken the pace and bring about change themselves?

Of course it would be naïve to think of the political impact of music only in progressive terms; participants are encouraged to pinpoint the ambiguities and contradictions at work in the relationship between music and power. Popular music artists and whole genres can refuse to meddle in politics – and the non-referentiality of music makes it an ill-suited medium for the diffusion of clean-cut messages. It would therefore be ill-advised to consider popular music genres and artists as falling either into the political or apolitical categories. Music can also be violent in less political ways, and even carry nihilistic undertones – it can ignore or even mock its own alleged political power. This should lead us to a re-evaluation of subcultural politics.

2. Political Change, Musical Revolution? The Question of Artistic Legacy

The musical styles that accompany social and political change are part of a musical continuum. This prompts the question of originality and relation to tradition. Has the new historical context shaken up the old codes for protest music? What are the new politically conscious forms and genres of today, and how do they relate to older protest movements? The covering of songs from the Civil Rights era and the Great Depression in the aftermath of Katrina and the participation of singers from the 1960s counterculture in the Occupy Wall Street movement raises the issue of correspondences between groups of artists and activists. We will also look at how contemporary movements connect with one another. Can it be said that protest music is globalized today? How does the music of the Arab Spring compare to the songs of the Occupy Wall Street movement or of the Maple Spring protesters?

3. Music, Identity and Nationalism

Popular music has a hand in the building and solidification of (sub)cultural communities. Songs have expressed the emergence of new group identities in fall of Communism, the breakup of Yugoslavia and during other political schisms in Latin American countries more recently. People sing and play the old regimes away, or they use music to connect with fellow migrants or refugees in an upset political landscape. Songs serve as a bridge between past and present by pairing traditional patterns to new instruments, new technology, and new media – by associating nostalgia with the wish for change. They can also smooth out the transition to a new life and a new identity as individuals and groups assimilate into another culture. Reversely, they can reflect new cultural antagonisms and class conflicts and follow the radicalization of group identities. In the Balkans, Eastern Europe and Russia, nationalist movements have their own anthems, too.

4. Aesthetics, digital practices and political significations

The increased use of computing technology in musical practices as well as the advent of social networks has opened new aesthetic vistas (with the increasing use of sampling, mashups, or shreds), as well as changed the way music is shared, advertised and composed. How do those technical changes affect the political uses of music and its weight? Of course while these changes have led to a wave of increased artistic creativity, they might also obliterate symbolic legacies and political meanings. When do reference and reverence turn into betrayal? New technologies might have opened a new battleground where political awareness competes with cultural emancipation.

5. Marching to a Different Beat? Censorship, Propaganda and Torture

The political weight and the mobilizing capacities of popular music can be gauged by how authorities react to them. Some states consider them a threat to their stability and to an established order in which the voice of the people is seldom heard – and never listened to. In the 21st century, popular music is still censored and repressed all over the world. From the ban of irreverent songs after 9/11 to the violence directed against emos in Iraq and the trial against Pussy Riot more recently, the regimes contested by deviants and/or protesters can take musical criticism and anticonformist artists very seriously.

Political and moral authorities with a sense of how powerful music can be may also use it for their benefit, as propaganda. Soldiers’ moral and psychological states can also be altered by listening to aggressive playlists during military operations. Music is never further away from its role in political struggles than when it is meant to numb the will of individuals, subdue or even torture. This might constitute the most extreme way in which its emancipatory power can be subverted.

Practical information


Content & Format

  • name and short biography;

  • contact information;

  • title, presentation/abstract (800 to 1.000 words): no full papers;

  • bibliographical references;

  • in English, German or French (but the conference will take place in English);

  • word 2004 (.doc or .rtf), Times, 12 pt., 1.5-spaced paragraphs.


  • 20 minutes + 10 of Q&A


  • Publication of selected proceedings is scheduled for late 2014. Participation in the conference does not guarantee selection for the publication.

Practical information

  • The conference will be held at the université de Strasbourg, on June 7th and 8th, 2013;

  • Registration fee: 30 euros (we did our best);

  • Lodging: further information will be given later on for possible inexpensive solutions. We however highly recommend that selected participants look into this issue early on in the process;

  • A dinner will be organized – cost: approximately 20 €.

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search